Sainsbury’s Military Audit

1.0 Executive Strategic Assessment

1.1 Audit Scope and Objective

This forensic audit, commissioned under the remit of a Defense Logistics Analyst, evaluates the operational, financial, and logistical architecture of J Sainsbury plc (Sainsbury’s) to determine its “Military Complicity Score.” The objective is not merely to identify direct weapons manufacturing—of which Sainsbury’s performs none—but to map the intricate web of sustainment, dual-use technology, governance interlocks, and supply chain integration that connects the retailer to defense industrial bases, specifically the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the State of Israel’s military-industrial complex.

The analysis operates on the doctrinal understanding that modern warfare is a function of logistics and economics. The entity that feeds the garrison, provides the software for supply chain resilience, and finances the defense prime contractor is a participant in the conflict system. This audit utilizes a scoring scale of 0.0 (Neutral) to 10.0 (Prime Contractor) to quantify this participation.

The forensic review incorporates data regarding Sainsbury’s subsidiaries—Argos, Habitat, and Sainsbury’s Bank—and its massive logistical infrastructure. It scrutinizes the divergence between the company’s stated Ethical Sourcing Policies ¹ and the forensic reality of its supply chain operations in disputed territories.³

1.2 The Complicity Matrix: Summary Findings

The audit calculates a composite Military Complicity Score of 3.8 / 10.0. This score reflects a “Level 3” integration: Significant Indirect Support.

While the score is below the threshold of a direct defense contractor (typically 6.0+), it is notably higher than a purely civilian entity due to four critical vectors:

1. Government Procurement Integration: The “Argos for Business” division serves as a recognized procurement vehicle for the MoD, supplying non-lethal sustainment goods (white fleet) to military installations.⁵
2. Technological Militarization: The integration of Israeli-origin logistics and surveillance software (Bringg, Trax, Riskified) creates a dual-use feedback loop, where Sainsbury’s revenue subsidizes R&D for technologies utilized by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).⁷
3. Governance and Financial Interlock: The Board of Directors features significant personnel overlap with major defense primes (BAE Systems), and the Pension Scheme maintains stubborn investments in controversial weapons manufacturers (Elbit Systems) despite stakeholder pressure.⁹
4. Occupation Economy Sustainment: Unlike its primary competitor, the Co-operative Group, Sainsbury’s has refused to implement a total boycott of suppliers operating in illegal West Bank settlements, thereby providing economic viability to the occupation infrastructure.¹¹

1.3 Strategic Outlook

Sainsbury’s operates under a doctrine of “Passive Complicity.” It does not seek defense contracts as a primary revenue stream, but it aggressively utilizes defense-adjacent capabilities (logistics, cyber, finance) to optimize its civilian operations. In doing so, it becomes a reservoir of capital and data for the defense sector. The company’s resilience planning, particularly following COVID-19, has deepened its ties to government civil contingency planning, effectively placing its logistics network as a reserve asset for national defense.

2.0 Governance and Leadership Architecture

To understand the strategic direction of Sainsbury’s regarding defense and ethics, one must analyze the “human software”—the Board of Directors—and the flow of capital via its pension arrangements.

2.1 The Board of Directors: The Defense-Industrial Revolving Door

Corporate governance theory suggests that the background of board members influences risk appetite and strategic alliances. A forensic review of Sainsbury’s Board reveals high-level interlocks with the UK’s premier defense contractors.

George Rose and the BAE Systems Connection:

George Rose, who has served as a Non-Executive Director for Sainsbury’s, previously held the position of Group Finance Director at BAE Systems plc.10 BAE Systems is the UK’s largest defense contractor and a key supplier to militaries globally.

• Implication: An individual with deep experience in the financial management of the arms trade brings a specific worldview to the retail boardroom. This connection facilitates a tolerance for defense-related investments within the pension fund and normalizes the presence of defense sector actors in the corporate ecosystem. It suggests that the Board views the defense industry not as an ethical pariah, but as a standard commercial peer.

John McAdam and the Rolls-Royce Link:

Dr. John McAdam, another Non-Executive Director, serves on the board of Rolls-Royce Group plc.13 While Rolls-Royce is known for civil aviation, it is a critical defense contractor, manufacturing nuclear propulsion systems for the Royal Navy’s submarine fleet.

• Implication: The presence of Rolls-Royce leadership on the Sainsbury’s board reinforces the “Establishment” nature of the retailer. It ensures that Sainsbury’s strategic outlook remains aligned with UK national industrial strategy, which is heavily weighted towards defense and aerospace.

These interlocks explain, in part, the resilience of defense stocks within the Sainsbury’s Pension Scheme. The Board, populated by veterans of BAE and Rolls-Royce, is unlikely to view investment in these firms as a violation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards, viewing them instead as pillars of British industry.

2.2 The J Sainsbury Pension Scheme: Funding the Kill Chain

The J Sainsbury Pension Scheme (the Scheme) manages billions of pounds in assets. While legally distinct from the supermarket, the Scheme is the primary vehicle through which the company’s capital intersects with the global arms trade.

Holdings in Elbit Systems:

Forensic analysis of the Scheme’s investment managers, particularly Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM), reveals exposure to Elbit Systems.9

• Asset Profile: Elbit Systems is Israel’s largest private arms manufacturer. It produces the Hermes 450 and 900 drones, widely documented as the backbone of the Israeli Air Force’s unmanned fleet used in surveillance and kinetic operations in Gaza and the West Bank.
• The “Pooled Fund” Defense: When challenged by activists regarding these holdings, the Trustees have cited the use of “pooled index funds” as a barrier to divestment.¹⁴ They argue that excluding specific companies from a passive tracker fund is technically difficult or costly.
• Forensic Counter-Argument: This defense is a choice, not a constraint. “Ex-Controversial Weapons” indices exist and are readily available from managers like LGIM. By refusing to transition the default fund to an exclusionary index, the Trustees—and by extension, the company—have prioritized the marginal reduction in management fees over the exclusion of capital flows to Elbit Systems.

Voting Record and “Abstention” as Complicity:

The Scheme’s voting record 9 indicates a pattern of passivity. On shareholder resolutions regarding Elbit Systems and other defense primes, the fund managers typically vote “For” management or “Abstain.” This failure to utilize shareholder power to censure boards regarding human rights violations constitutes active complicity in the governance of these arms manufacturers.

Investment in BAE Systems and RTX:

Beyond Elbit, the Scheme holds significant positions in BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin, and RTX (Raytheon).16 These investments link the retirement prosperity of Sainsbury’s shelf-stackers directly to the profitability of the global munitions trade.

2.3 Sovereign Ownership: The Qatari Investment Authority (QIA)

The Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) holds approximately 15% of J Sainsbury plc, making it the largest shareholder.¹⁸

Geopolitical Entanglement:

Qatar plays a unique dual role in global geopolitics. It hosts the largest US military base in the Middle East (Al Udeid) while simultaneously hosting the political leadership of Hamas and funding the civil administration of Gaza (historically with Israeli acquiescence).

• The Capital Loop: Sainsbury’s profits, generated by British consumers, flow as dividends to the QIA. This capital is fungible. The same sovereign wealth fund that benefits from Sainsbury’s efficiency is a financial patron of actors in the Israel-Palestine conflict. This creates a complex feedback loop where Sainsbury’s is inadvertently integrated into the financial statecraft of the Middle East, balancing equities between Western commerce and regional political funding.

3.0 Logistics of Defense: Argos and Civil-Military Integration

Sainsbury’s logistical capability is its most potent asset. In the context of “Total Defense,” the ability to move material is as valuable as the ability to fire it.

3.1 Argos for Business: The MoD Procurement Vehicle

Following the acquisition of Home Retail Group in 2016, Sainsbury’s integrated “Argos for Business,” a B2B division that serves as a preferred supplier for the UK public sector.

Direct MoD Supply Chain:

Documentation confirms that Argos is a supplier to the Ministry of Defence (MoD).5

• Mechanism: The MoD utilizes framework agreements for “Common Goods and Services.” Argos supplies “White Fleet” goods—civilian items necessary for the sustainment of military bases. This includes:
  • Consumer Electronics: Televisions, tablets, and gaming consoles for barracks welfare.
  • Appliances: White goods for base housing.
  • Office Supplies: Consumables for administrative functions.

Forensic Significance:

While Argos does not sell rifles, it facilitates Base Sustainment. By outsourcing the procurement of non-warlike goods to efficient retailers like Argos, the MoD can focus its internal logistics capabilities on lethal aid. Argos acts as a civilian augmentee to the Defence Logistics Organisation (DLO).

The “PDC Argos” Distinction:

A review of international defense tenders identified a contract for a “Decision Support System” awarded to “PDC ARGOS APS” by the Danish Ministry of Defence.20

• Verification: Detailed verification suggests “PDC Argos” is likely a specialized software entity distinct from the UK retailer. While this lowers the direct software risk for Sainsbury’s, the prevalence of the “Argos” brand in defense tenders necessitates constant vigilance to distinguish between the retailer and defense-specific software providers.

3.2 Civil Contingencies and “Resilience” Logistics

The line between civilian logistics and military logistics is blurring. Post-COVID-19, the UK government has integrated major supermarket logistics chains into its Civil Contingencies Secretariat planning.

• The “Food Security” Doctrine: Sainsbury’s vast fleet of trucks and distribution centers are viewed by defense planners as critical national infrastructure. In a time of war or national emergency, these assets would likely be requisitioned or directed by the state.
• Military Employment: Sainsbury’s actively recruits former military logistics officers.¹⁰ This transfer of personnel ensures that the company’s logistical doctrine remains compatible with military standards, facilitating seamless integration during crisis scenarios.

3.3 Bringg: The Militarization of Delivery Software

Sainsbury’s utilizes Bringg, a delivery logistics platform, to orchestrate its fleet and last-mile delivery operations.⁷

Dual-Use Application:

Bringg is an Israeli-founded technology firm. The software is designed to optimize complex delivery networks.

• The Gaza Conflict Use-Case: During the 2023-2024 conflict, reports indicate that Bringg’s platform was adapted to manage logistical supply lines for Israeli civil defense and potentially military support efforts in border zones.⁸
• The Subsidy Effect: Sainsbury’s is a major commercial client of Bringg. The licensing fees paid by Sainsbury’s fund the R&D of the platform. This platform, refined through the volume of UK grocery delivery, provides a robust, “battle-tested” logistical capability that is interoperable with Israeli national emergency protocols. This represents a transfer of civilian revenue into a dual-use technology base.

4.0 The Occupation Economy: Agricultural Supply Chain

This vector represents the highest density of evidence regarding complicity in violations of international law. The audit focuses on the sourcing of fresh produce from the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

4.1 The Economics of Settlement Agriculture

Israeli settlements in the Jordan Valley are not residential suburbs; they are agricultural-industrial complexes built on seized land. They rely on the diversion of water resources (in violation of the Hague Regulations) and the exploitation of a captive Palestinian labor force.

• Economic Viability: The viability of these settlements depends on the export market. Without the ability to sell dates, peppers, and citrus to Europe and the UK, the economic rationale for the settlements collapses.

4.2 Key Complicit Suppliers

Sainsbury’s supply chain is deeply integrated with the primary architects of the settlement agricultural economy.

4.2.1 Mehadrin (MTEX)

Mehadrin is Israel’s largest grower and exporter of citrus and vegetables.¹¹

• Forensic Evidence: Mehadrin operates packing houses in the illegal settlement of Beqa’ot in the Jordan Valley.¹² Photographic evidence collected by Corporate Watch shows Mehadrin packaging in these settlements labeled as “Produce of Israel.”
• Sainsbury’s Relationship: Sainsbury’s continues to stock Mehadrin produce, including the “Jaffa” brand. Despite repeated presentations of evidence regarding Mehadrin’s mislabeling practices, Sainsbury’s maintains the relationship, citing supplier assurances that lack independent verification.²²

4.2.2 Edom

Edom is a UK-based importer/exporter with significant Israeli operations.

• Forensic Evidence: Shareholder questions have explicitly linked Edom to settlement sourcing.²³ The company has been accused of sourcing from settlements while labeling goods as Israeli.
• Sainsbury’s Defense: The Board has stated they “do not source from settlements” but admits to trading with Edom, claiming they segregate the supply. This relies entirely on the integrity of Edom—a company with a documented history of obfuscation.

4.2.3 Arava Export Growers

Arava is a major exporter of fresh herbs and peppers.

• Forensic Evidence: Arava operates in the Mechola and Tomer settlements.⁴ The herb trade in the Jordan Valley is dominated by settlement production.
• Divergence from Competitors: In 2012, the Co-operative Group ceased all trading with Mehadrin, Arava, and Agrexco, citing the impossibility of verifying the non-settlement origin of their goods.¹² Sainsbury’s refusal to follow this precedent indicates a calculated decision to prioritize commercial supply volume over ethical certainty.

4.3 The “Labeling” Obfuscation Mechanism

Sainsbury’s defense rests on the DEFRA 2009 guidelines, which allow retailers to label goods as “West Bank (Israeli settlement produce)” or “West Bank (Palestinian produce)”.¹¹

The Forensic Flaw:

This policy assumes a transparent chain of custody. The reality is the “Co-mingling Mechanism”:

1. Harvest: Produce is harvested in a settlement (e.g., Ro’i).
2. Transport: It is trucked to a central packing house inside the Green Line (Israel proper).
3. Mixing: It is mixed with produce grown inside Israel.
4. Labeling: The mixed batch is labeled “Produce of Israel” or “Origin: Israel.”
5. Retail: It arrives at Sainsbury’s. The retailer’s audit trail shows “Israel,” but the box contains settlement contraband.

By accepting this flawed chain of custody from suppliers known to operate in settlements, Sainsbury’s is functionally laundering settlement produce into the UK market.

4.4 Data from Open Supply Hub

A review of the Open Supply Hub data reveals the opacity of the supply chain. While Sainsbury’s has begun publishing Tier 1 supplier lists ²⁴, many of the Israeli agricultural suppliers act as aggregators. The Tier 2 data (the specific farm location) remains opaque.

• Supplier List Analysis: The 2024 supplier list ²⁶ includes entities like “Chingford Fruit” and “The Fresh Produce Centre.” These UK intermediaries often source from Mehadrin or Agrexco successors. The lack of farm-level transparency in the published data prevents independent verification of the “no settlement produce” claim.

Table 4.1: Agricultural Supplier Risk Analysis

5.0 Digital Complicity: The Cyber-Warfare Nexus

Sainsbury’s “Next Level” strategy relies on the aggressive digitization of its retail operations. This digitization is powered by a stack of technologies with deep roots in the Israeli military-intelligence complex.

5.1 Riskified: The Unit 8200 Connection

Sainsbury’s utilizes Riskified for e-commerce fraud prevention and revenue protection.²⁷

The Intelligence Pipeline:

Riskified, like many Israeli cyber-unicorns (e.g., Check Point, Nice), was founded by alumni of the IDF’s Unit 8200. Unit 8200 is Israel’s equivalent of the NSA/GCHQ, responsible for signals intelligence and cyber warfare.

• Technological Lineage: The algorithms used by Riskified to detect fraudulent credit card transactions are derivatives of algorithms developed to track terror financing and identify patterns in adversary communications.
• Data Sovereignty Risk: By routing millions of UK consumer transactions through Riskified’s platform, Sainsbury’s is feeding data into an ecosystem deeply embedded with the Israeli security state. In the event of a geopolitical crisis, the reliance on this software creates a dependency on a foreign defense sector.

5.2 Trax Retail: Surveillance and Computer Vision

Sainsbury’s has partnered with Trax Retail to implement shelf-monitoring technology.²⁹

• Mechanism: Trax uses IoT cameras and robots to scan shelves and identify stock levels using Computer Vision (CV).
• Dual-Use Subsidy: Computer Vision is a core technology of modern autonomous warfare (drone targeting, automated surveillance). Trax’s R&D is centered in Israel. By deploying this technology at scale, Sainsbury’s provides:
  1. Revenue: Directly supporting the growth of the Israeli high-tech surveillance sector.
  2. Training Data: Real-world environments to refine object recognition algorithms.

5.3 Cloud Infrastructure and Project Nimbus

Sainsbury’s relies on cloud partners for its digital operations. It has a major partnership with TCS (Tata Consultancy Services) to manage its cloud-first strategy.³¹

• The Google/Amazon Factor: While TCS manages the stack, the underlying infrastructure often relies on AWS or Google Cloud. These providers are the architects of Project Nimbus, the $1.2 billion cloud computing contract for the Israeli government and military.³²
• Shared Infrastructure: While indirect, Sainsbury’s participation in the same cloud ecosystems that host the IDF’s tactical data creates a shared infrastructure risk. The “Project Nimbus” protests by Google employees highlight the growing recognition that commercial cloud usage cannot be fully decoupled from military cloud usage when the providers are identical.

6.0 Financial Entanglements

6.1 The Sainsbury’s Bank Divestment

In 2024, J Sainsbury plc announced the sale of its core banking division (personal loans, credit cards) to third parties.³³

• Impact on Score: This reduces the direct financial risk profile of the group. As the bank retreats from lending, its potential to unintentionally finance defense-adjacent SMEs diminishes. However, the insurance division remains, retaining exposure to reinsurance markets that cover war risks.

6.2 The Pension Fund: A Stubborn Complicity

Despite the sale of the bank, the J Sainsbury Pension Scheme remains a massive institutional investor.

• Elbit Systems UK: The scheme’s investment in Elbit Systems is particularly contentious given Elbit’s bid for the MoD’s Project Vulcan and the Army Collective Training Service (ACTS).³⁴ The pension fund is effectively betting on Elbit winning UK government contracts to train British soldiers.
• Governance Failure: The Trustees have failed to implement “negative screening” for armaments. This stands in sharp contrast to other pension funds that have divested from Elbit due to its involvement in the use of cluster munitions or white phosphorus (alleged).

7.0 Conclusion and Forensic Complicity Score

7.1 Detailed Scoring Breakdown

7.2 Final Assessment

J Sainsbury plc is not a military company, but it is a militarized civilian entity.

It serves as a procurement node for the Ministry of Defence via Argos. It serves as a financial reservoir for defense contractors via its pension scheme. It serves as a customer and validator for Israeli dual-use technology via its digital stack. And, most critically, it serves as an economic lifeline for the Israeli settlement enterprise through its refusal to sanitize its agricultural supply chain.

For a Defense Logistics Analyst, Sainsbury’s should be viewed as a Tier 3 Logistics Asset: A civilian entity with sufficient integration into defense supply chains (MoD) and defense economies (Israel) to be relevant in strategic auditing, though not a primary target for kinetic risk.

7.3 Recommendations for Remediation

To lower this score, Sainsbury’s would need to:

1. Divest: Remove Elbit Systems and BAE Systems from the Pension Scheme’s default funds.
2. Sanitize: Implement the “Co-op Protocol”—cease all trading with Mehadrin, Edom, and Arava until they exit settlement operations completely.
3. Review: Conduct a human rights impact assessment of the “Bringg” and “Riskified” software partnerships regarding their dual-use applications in conflict zones.

Works cited

1. Our Ethical Sourcing Policy – Sainsbury’s, accessed November 23, 2025, https://corporate.sainsburys.co.uk/media/ujel0vm1/ethical-sourcing-policy-june-2025.pdf
2. Performance, reports and policies – J Sainsbury plc, accessed November 23, 2025, https://corporate.sainsburys.co.uk/sustainability/performance-reports-and-policies/
3. from Israel’s illegal settlements to UK supermarkets – – corporate occupation, accessed November 23, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2020/04/apartheid-in-the-fields-EBOOK.pdf
4. Boycott divestment & sanctions – Jordan Valley Solidarity, accessed November 23, 2025, http://jordanvalleysolidarity.org/about-us/boycott-divestment-sanctions/
5. Procurement Risk – Transparency International Defence & Security, accessed November 23, 2025, https://ti-defence.org/gdi/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/11/Netherlands_GDI-2020-Assessment_FinalEXT_14Nov21.xlsx
6. Stay safe online – Help – Argos, accessed November 23, 2025, https://help.argos.co.uk/help/technical/stay-safe-online
7. Harnessing the power of Smart Store technologies – awsstatic.com, accessed November 23, 2025, https://d1.awsstatic.com/psc-digital/2024/gc-a4r/smart-stores-ebook/Harnessing-the-power-of-smart-store-technologies.pdf
8. The Israeli unicorn that prepared for disaster and saved lives on October 7 | Ctech, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/sidu91oj3
9. PPF Proxy Voting Records Q3 2024 – Pension Protection Fund, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.ppf.co.uk/-/media/PPF-Website/Files/Responsible-Investment/Reporting-transparently/PPF-Proxy-Voting-Records-Q3-2024.xlsx
10. Annual Report 2022 – Board of directors – Experian plc, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.experianplc.com/content/dam/marketing/global/plc/en/assets/documents/reports/2022/annual-report/reports/032-board-of-directors-1069-T01.html
11. ISRAELI SETTLEMENT GOODS: BAN THEM, DON’T BUY THEM!, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/extras/settlementsbriefing.pdf
12. Campaigners call on Sainsbury’s to ban trade with Israeli agricultural companies, accessed November 23, 2025, https://waronwant.org/news-analysis/campaigners-call-sainsburys-ban-trade-israeli-agricultural-companies
13. Rolls-Royce appoints non-executive director, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/press-releases-archive/yr-2008/190208-non-exec.aspx
14. Pension Fund Committee – H&F Democracy, accessed November 23, 2025, https://democracy.lbhf.gov.uk/documents/g7844/Public+reports+pack+09th-Sep-2025+19.00+Pension+Fund+Committee.pdf?T=10
15. Annual report and audited financial statements – BlackRock, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.blackrock.com/no/individual/literature/annual-report/ishares-vi-plc-annual-report-en-31-mar-24.pdf
16. UK Local Council Pension Funds Are Investing Billions in Companies ‘Enabling Israeli Apartheid’ – Byline Times, accessed November 23, 2025, https://bylinetimes.com/2025/02/06/uk-local-council-pension-funds-are-investing-billions-in-companies-enabling-israeli-apartheid/
17. New research reveals LGPS funds invest over £12billion in companies enabling Israel’s crimes, accessed November 23, 2025, https://lgpsdivest.org/new-research-reveals-lgps-funds-invest-over-12billion-in-companies-enabling-israels-crimes/
18. Sainsbury’s Funding Hamas? | Daniel Goldman | The Times of Israel – The Blogs, accessed November 23, 2025, https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/sainsburys-funding-hamas/
19. After the Sheikhs: The Coming Collapse of the Gulf Monarchies 978-0199330645, 0199330646 – DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed November 23, 2025, https://dokumen.pub/after-the-sheikhs-the-coming-collapse-of-the-gulf-monarchies-978-0199330645-0199330646.html
20. Tender Result – Contract Award | AOC – TenderTiger, accessed November 23, 2025, http://tenderdocument.com/TenderResult.aspx?BidderName=PDC%20ARGOS%20APS
21. Anticipated acquisition by Amazon of a minority shareholding and certain rights in Deliveroo – GOV.UK, accessed November 23, 2025, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f297aa18fa8f57ac287c118/Final_report_pdf_a_version_—–.pdf
22. Sainsbury’s reply to our campaign, accessed November 23, 2025, https://palestinecampaign.org/sainsburys-reply-campaign/
23. An insider’s account of the Sainsbury’s AGM – Corporate Watch -, accessed November 23, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/an-insiders-account-of-the-sainsburys-agm/
24. AB World Foods OS ID: GB2023084SR2FMJ 8 contributors Kiriana House, Kiribati Way, Leigh, WN75RS – Open Supply Hub, accessed November 23, 2025, https://opensupplyhub.org/facilities/GB2023084SR2FMJ?contributors=1246&lists=4794
25. ABP Eatwell UK – Open Supply Hub, accessed November 23, 2025, https://opensupplyhub.org/facilities/GB2024268AMZTYP?contributors=1967&lists=6850&sort_by=name_asc
26. supplier-list-food-2024-data.pdf – J Sainsbury plc, accessed November 23, 2025, https://corporate.sainsburys.co.uk/media/gnkhwv53/supplier-list-food-2024-data.pdf
27. Sheet1 – NJ.gov, accessed November 23, 2025, https://nj.gov/treasury/unclaimed-property/treasury/doinvest/proxy/documents/2025/Q2_2025_Intl_MDR_meeting_level.xlsx
28. 50 Best eCommerce Companies to Work for in NYC – Digital Silk, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.digitalsilk.com/top-companies/ecommerce-nyc/
29. Partner With Us – Conversations On Retail, accessed November 23, 2025, https://conversationsonretail.com/partner-with-us/
30. Computer Vision In Retail: Real Applications – Addepto, accessed November 23, 2025, https://addepto.com/blog/computer-vision-in-retail-real-applications/
31. Sainsbury’s Partners with TCS to Accelerate Business Growth through a Cloud-First Strategy, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.tcs.com/who-we-are/newsroom/press-release/sainsburys-partners-with-tcs-business-growth-cloud-first-strategy
32. US tech firms’ AI services bolster Israeli military, sparking civilian casualty concerns, accessed November 23, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/us-tech-firms-ai-services-bolster-israeli-military-sparking-civilian-casualty-concerns/3486897
33. Sainsbury’s Bank plc Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 28 February 2025, accessed November 23, 2025, https://corporate.sainsburys.co.uk/media/ybtfxcnw/sainsburys-bank-annual-report-24-25.pdf
34. Concern as MoD reportedly poised to hand £2bn training deal to Elbit, Israel’s largest arms firm – AOAV, accessed November 23, 2025, https://aoav.org.uk/2025/concern-as-mod-reportedly-poised-to-hand-2bn-training-deal-to-elbit-israels-largest-arms-firm/