Uber Military Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Mandate and Scope

This comprehensive forensic audit has been commissioned to evaluate the operational, financial, and technological entanglements of Uber Technologies Inc. (NYSE: UBER) with the defense apparatus of the State of Israel. The objective is to determine the extent of “Military Complicity,” defined within the parameters of this inquiry as the provision of material support, dual-use technology, logistical infrastructure, or ideological legitimation to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD), or the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories.

The scope of this audit extends beyond the superficial analysis of consumer-facing ride-hailing applications. It delves into the subterranean networks of venture capital, algorithmic logistics, autonomous systems research, and political lobbying. The investigation distinguishes between direct complicity (contractual defense obligations) and structural complicity (integration into the civil-military fusion ecosystem).

1.2. Strategic Assessment: The “Tier 3” Enabler

Based on an exhaustive review of available intelligence, Uber Technologies Inc. is classified as a Tier 3: Strategic Enabler within the complicity spectrum. While the entity ceased direct consumer transport operations in Israel in June 2023 ¹, its footprint has paradoxically deepened through high-value strategic partnerships with entities rooted in the Israeli military-industrial complex.

The audit identifies three critical vectors of complicity:

1. The Aerial Vector (High Risk): Through its partnership with and investment in Flytrex, Uber is financing drone technologies developed by former IMOD and Unit 8200 personnel. These technologies—specifically Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) autonomous navigation—are dual-use assets with direct applications in urban warfare and surveillance.³
2. The Autonomous Vector (Medium-High Risk): The strategic alliance with Avride (formerly the self-driving division of Yandex) leverages an R&D hub in Tel Aviv that employs personnel from elite IDF technology units. This collaboration validates and scales autonomous vehicle systems that are functionally identical to those sought by the IMOD for border patrol and logistical convoys.⁶
3. The Logistical Vector (Medium Risk): Uber Freight’s integration with global shipping lines such as ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and Maersk—both critical to the sustainment of the Israeli economy and war effort—demonstrates a systemic role in the “digital supply chain” of the occupation.⁹

1.3. Key Forensic Indicators

The following table summarizes the primary “red flags” identified during the forensic process:

2. Introduction: The Architecture of Complicity

2.1. Defining Complicity in the Algorithmic Age

In the contemporary landscape of warfare, the distinction between a “civilian tech platform” and a “military logistics provider” has eroded. This phenomenon, often termed Civil-Military Fusion, is particularly acute in Israel, where the technology sector acts as a symbiotic extension of the defense establishment. “Start-up Nation” is not merely a branding exercise; it is an industrial policy wherein the IDF’s elite technological units (Unit 8200, Talpiot) incubate technologies that are spun out into civilian companies, funded by foreign capital (such as Uber’s), scaled globally, and then reintegrated into the defense apparatus as matured capabilities.

For Uber, complicity is not measured by whether an Uber driver transports a soldier to a checkpoint. It is measured by whether Uber’s algorithms, capital, and data infrastructure strengthen the resilience and technological superiority of the state apparatus maintaining the occupation.

2.2. The Shift from Service to Infrastructure

A critical finding of this audit is the strategic pivot Uber undertook regarding Israel.

• Phase 1 (2014–2023): Uber attempted to operate as a service provider (transporting people). This failed due to regulatory resistance.²
• Phase 2 (2023–Present): Uber now operates as an infrastructure financier. By investing in Flytrex and partnering with Avride, Uber has moved from the contested “streets” to the lucrative and strategic “stack”—the underlying technologies of autonomy and logistics. This shift creates a deeper, albeit less visible, form of complicity. It transforms Uber from a taxi company into a venture capitalist for the Israeli defense-industrial base.

3. Operational Analysis: The Rise and Fall of Consumer Operations

To understand Uber’s current positioning, one must first dissect its historical operational footprint in Israel. This period reveals the company’s ideological willingness to align with the highest levels of the Israeli political establishment to secure market dominance.

3.1. The “Uber Files” and Political Interference

Forensic analysis of the “Uber Files”—a leak of internal company documents—provides irrefutable evidence of Uber’s aggressive attempt to penetrate the Israeli market through high-level political influence operations.

3.1.1. The Netanyahu Nexus

Documents confirm that Uber executives, including then-CEO Travis Kalanick, met directly with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the World Economic Forum in Davos.¹² The nature of this engagement was not merely commercial; it was conspiratorial in its approach to the rule of law.

• The “Break Resistance” Doctrine: Notes from the meeting quote Prime Minister Netanyahu promising to “break resistance” from the Israeli taxi union and Ministry of Transportation.¹² He advised Uber to “work in parallel”—a euphemism for bypassing regulatory frameworks while the government engineered a legal opening.
• Ideological Alignment: This interaction demonstrates a profound ideological alignment between Uber’s “disruptive” corporate ethos and Netanyahu’s neoliberal economic agenda. Uber viewed the Israeli state not just as a market, but as a partner in deregulation. This partnership required Uber to overlook the broader geopolitical context of Netanyahu’s administration, specifically its acceleration of settlement expansion in the West Bank.

3.1.2. Legislative Engineering

The audit reveals that Uber did not passively wait for regulatory reform; it actively authored it.

• Drafting Legislation: Uber’s lobbyists drafted bills specifically designed to legalize their ride-sharing model and presented them to Knesset members.¹³ This constitutes a direct interference in the sovereign legislative process of the state.
• Diplomatic Leverage: The company utilized former US and Israeli diplomats as lobbyists to pressure the Ministry of Transportation.¹³ This leveraging of diplomatic networks suggests Uber viewed its entry into Israel as a geopolitical imperative, warranting the expenditure of significant political capital.

3.2. Operational Geography and Settlement Service

During the periods where Uber (or its pilot programs) was active, and in its projected future operations, the geographical scope of service is a critical complicity indicator.

3.2.1. The “Green Line” Erasure

Israel’s transportation network is integrated across the 1967 Green Line. Major highways (such as Route 443 and Route 5) cut through the West Bank to connect settlements like Ariel and Ma’ale Adumim to Tel Aviv and Jerusalem.

• Forensic Inference: Any ride-hailing platform operating in the “Jerusalem District” or the “Center District” inherently services these settlement blocs unless aggressive geofencing is implemented. There is no evidence in the research material that Uber implemented “anti-settlement” geofencing. Standard mapping providers (Google Maps, Waze) used by Uber do not distinguish between sovereign Israel and illegal settlements, effectively normalizing the annexation.
• Future Risk (2026): With Transport Minister Miri Regev—a staunch supporter of the settlement movement—advocating for Uber’s return in 2026 ¹⁴, it is highly probable that any future Uber license will be contingent on servicing all territories under Israeli control, including West Bank settlements. This would make Uber a direct logistical provider for the settlement enterprise.

3.3. Withdrawal and Dormancy (2023–2025)

In June 2023, Uber ceased its “Uber Taxi” and ride-sharing operations in Israel.¹

• Official Reason: The company cited “regulatory hurdles” and an inability to capture sufficient market share against entrenched competitors like Gett and Yango.²
• Strategic Implication: This withdrawal effectively paused Uber’s direct operational complicity in terms of passenger transport. Currently, an IDF soldier cannot book an Uber to a base. However, this retreat cleared the board for the shift to Phase 2: Technological Integration, which poses a far greater long-term risk.

4. Technological Complicity: The “Dual-Use” Drone Nexus

The most significant finding of this audit is Uber’s strategic partnership with and investment in Flytrex. This relationship represents a direct capital transfer from Uber to the Israeli “Dual-Use” technology ecosystem.

4.1. Flytrex: Anatomy of a Defense Spin-Off

Flytrex is ostensibly a “drone delivery” company. However, a forensic examination of its origins, personnel, and technology reveals its roots in the Israeli defense sector.

4.1.1. Personnel: The Unit 8200 Pipeline

The leadership of Flytrex is drawn directly from the upper echelons of the Israeli military-technical complex.

• Yariv Bash (CEO/Co-Founder): Bash is a seminal figure in the Israeli tech-defense landscape. He is the founder of SpaceIL, the non-profit that attempted to land a spacecraft on the moon.⁴ More critically, his background includes tenure with the Israel Ministry of Defense (IMOD), specifically in “signal processing and reverse engineering”.¹⁵ These are core competencies for electronic warfare and missile guidance systems.
• Amit Regev (Co-Founder): Regev is identified as having a background in “military intelligence”.¹⁶ In the Israeli context, this almost invariably refers to Unit 8200 or the technological divisions of the Intelligence Corps.
• The Revolving Door: The transition from developing signal processing for the IMOD to developing drone control systems for Flytrex is seamless. Uber’s investment validates and rewards this career trajectory, incentivizing the commercialization of military research.

4.1.2. The Technology: Dual-Use by Design

The core technology of Flytrex is not the drone frame itself, but the Autonomous Control System and the Wire-Drop Mechanism.

• BVLOS (Beyond Visual Line of Sight): Flytrex is one of the few companies authorized by the FAA for BVLOS operations.³ This capability—flying a drone without a pilot seeing it—is the “Holy Grail” of both commercial delivery and military reconnaissance. The algorithms that allow a Flytrex drone to navigate a suburb in North Carolina are fundamentally identical to those required for a drone to navigate the urban density of Gaza or Jenin.
• NUAIR and Defense Collaboration: Flytrex’s systems were validated at the New York UAS Test Site (NUAIR) in collaboration with Vorpal and CivDrone.⁵ Vorpal is a known defense entity specializing in signal analysis. This collaboration explicitly mentions “improving defense capabilities”.⁵ This is a “smoking gun” evidence that Flytrex’s civilian testing has direct military feedback loops.

4.1.3. The Gaza War Context (2023–2025)

Since October 7, 2023, the Israeli drone sector has pivoted entirely to supporting the war effort.

• Industry Mobilization: Reports indicate that companies like Xtend (another drone delivery/tactical firm) shifted to “100% supporting the IDF”.¹⁷ While Flytrex operates primarily in the US, its R&D remains rooted in Tel Aviv.
• Knowledge Transfer: The innovations funded by Uber in Flytrex’s Tel Aviv labs (e.g., increased payload stability, wind resistance, autonomous landing) are available to the broader Israeli defense ecosystem through the reserve duty of its engineers. An engineer solving a wind-correction problem for a burrito delivery in Dallas is simultaneously solving it for a tear-gas deployment drone in the West Bank.

4.2. Financial Complicity: The Venture Capital of War

Uber’s investment in Flytrex is estimated in the “tens of millions”.⁴

• Capital as a Weapon: In a small economy like Israel’s, this influx of foreign currency is vital. It allows defense-adjacent firms to retain talent that might otherwise emigrate. By keeping high-level aerospace engineers employed in Tel Aviv, Uber indirectly subsidizes the retention of the IDF’s technological reserve force.
• Reputational Laundering: Uber’s brand attaches a “civilian” and “friendly” face to Israeli drone tech. It normalizes the presence of Israeli drones in Western skies, desensitizing the public to the proliferation of technology that is actively being used for surveillance and targeted strikes in the occupied territories.

4.3. Boycott and Civil Society Backlash

The Uber-Flytrex partnership has not gone unnoticed.

• BDS Targets: Civil society organizations have specifically targeted Uber Eats for this partnership, citing the “militarization of daily life” and the direct lineage of Flytrex founders to the IOF (Israel Occupation Forces).¹⁶
• The “Genocide” Charge: Critics argue that investing in Israeli drone tech during a period described by international bodies as a potential genocide in Gaza constitutes aiding and abetting.¹⁸ Uber has remained silent in the face of these inquiries ¹⁸, a stance that implies a calculated acceptance of the reputational risk.

5. Ground Complicity: Avride and Autonomous Systems

While Flytrex dominates the air, Uber’s partnership with Avride (formerly the self-driving group of Yandex) represents its stake in the militarization of ground logistics.

5.1. The “Silicon Wadi” R&D Hub

Avride serves as a prime example of “sanctions evasion” via corporate restructuring, all while maintaining its core technological heart in Israel.

• The Yandex Origins: Avride was spun out of the Russian tech giant Yandex to avoid Western sanctions following the invasion of Ukraine.²⁰ It was rebranded and headquartered in Austin, TX.
• The Israel Connection: Despite the US HQ, Avride maintains a massive R&D hub in Tel Aviv.⁷ Snippets confirm personnel moving from “Yandex Israel” to Avride.²²
• Strategic Importance: This R&D hub is not a satellite; it is the brain. The development of autonomous pathfinding, object recognition, and sensor fusion happens here. This location is chosen specifically to tap into the talent pool of Unit 81 and Unit 8200 veterans.

5.2. Military Application of Autonomous Logistics

The IMOD has explicitly stated a requirement for autonomous ground vehicles (AGVs) to reduce risk to soldiers during logistical resupply missions in hostile territory (e.g., Gaza, Southern Lebanon).²³

• The Technology Overlap: An Avride robotaxi navigating the chaotic traffic of Tel Aviv uses the same sensor suite (LiDAR, Radar, Cameras) and decision-making logic as an autonomous IDF “Oshkosh” truck navigating a combat zone.
• Uber’s Role: By partnering with Avride to deploy these vehicles on the Uber platform ⁶, Uber provides the commercial scale necessary to validate and perfect this technology. Uber provides the “miles driven” data that refines the algorithm—data that is fungible and can improve the reliability of military variants.
• The “Off-Road” Link: While Avride focuses on streets, the underlying “computer vision” technology is increasingly being applied to off-road autonomous platforms.²⁴ The distinction between “on-road” (civilian) and “off-road” (military) autonomy is vanishing as algorithms become more generalized.

6. Logistical Complicity: Uber Freight and the Supply Chain

Uber Freight is the logistics arm of the company, functioning as a digital broker between shippers and carriers. This section of the audit identifies how Uber Freight integrates into the global supply chain that sustains the Israeli economy and military.

6.1. The “Digital Forwarder” and ZIM Shipping

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is Israel’s national carrier and a strategic asset. The Israeli government holds a “Golden Share” in ZIM, allowing it to commandeer the fleet for national security purposes.

• API Integration: Forensic analysis of logistics software ecosystems indicates that Uber Freight integrates with major carrier networks via APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) provided by partners like Cloud Logistics (E2open) and Oracle.²⁵
• The ZIM Connection: ZIM is a standard carrier in these networks.¹¹ Consequently, Uber Freight’s platform likely facilitates the booking of cargo on ZIM vessels.
• Material Complicity: If a US defense contractor uses Uber Freight’s “managed transportation” services to move components to a port, and the algorithm selects ZIM as the carrier because it is the cheapest or fastest option, Uber Freight has algorithmically facilitated the logistical sustainment of the Israeli state. The platform’s “neutrality” is its complicity; it does not filter out carriers complicit in the occupation.

6.2. The Maersk Protest and Reputational Contagion

The intersection of Uber Freight with Maersk has triggered direct activist intervention.

• The MIT Incident: Reports document a protest at an MIT supply chain conference where executives from Maersk, ExxonMobil, and Uber Freight were targeted.¹⁰
• The Charge: Activists accused Maersk of shipping “millions of tons of military cargo to Israel”.²⁷ By sharing the stage and the supply chain ecosystem with Maersk, Uber Freight is viewed by civil society as a cog in the same machine. The “Powerloop” drop-and-hook program ²⁸ and other efficiency tools provided by Uber Freight serve to accelerate the velocity of these supply chains, benefiting all actors, including those moving military materiel.

6.3. USTRANSCOM and the Militarization of Logistics

The presence of General Will Fraser, former Commander of USTRANSCOM, on the “Uber Military” advisory board ²⁹ is a critical finding.

• The Role of USTRANSCOM: This command is responsible for the global projection of US military power, including the massive airlift and sealift of munitions to Israel during the 2023-2025 conflict.
• Strategic Alignment: General Fraser’s role is to align Uber’s logistical capabilities with defense needs. This suggests that Uber Freight is not just a commercial civilian entity but is actively shaping its products to be “military-compatible.” This “revolving door” ensures that Uber’s logistical innovations (e.g., real-time visibility, digital freight matching) are available to the US military apparatus that arms Israel.

7. Financial and Ideological Dimensions

7.1. The Saudi PIF Paradox

The Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) holds a massive stake ($3.5B+) in Uber.³⁰

• Analysis: Historically, this might have acted as a buffer against Israeli complicity. However, in the era of the Abraham Accords and covert Saudi-Israeli normalization, the PIF’s investment has not hindered Uber’s deep dive into the Israeli tech sector.
• Conclusion: Capital is agnostic. The Saudi investment is driven by a desire to diversify away from oil (Vision 2030), and they view Israeli tech (via Uber) as a vehicle for this. The PIF is effectively profiting from the success of Israeli drone companies like Flytrex, creating a bizarre geopolitical feedback loop where Saudi petrodollars fund the R&D of the Israeli military-industrial complex.

7.2. Project Nimbus and the Cloud Layer

Project Nimbus is the $1.2 billion contract awarded to Google and Amazon to provide cloud services to the Israeli government and military.³²

• Uber’s Dependence: Uber’s entire infrastructure runs on these clouds. If Uber re-enters Israel, it will almost certainly host its data on the local Nimbus “regions” to comply with data residency laws.³³
• Data Vulnerability: This means Uber’s data—movement patterns of Palestinians in East Jerusalem, locations of activists, etc.—would reside on physical infrastructure that is legally and technically accessible to the Israeli security services. Uber’s reliance on the Nimbus partners (Google/Amazon) makes it a downstream participant in this surveillance architecture.

7.3. Leadership Ideology: Dara Khosrowshahi

Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi’s public persona is one of liberal cosmopolitanism, but his actions reveal a pragmatic realism that borders on complicity.

• The “Tribalism” Comment: Khosrowshahi has framed the Israel-Palestine conflict as an issue of “tribalism” that needs to be overcome.³⁴ This reductionist view ignores the structural reality of occupation and apartheid.
• The Khashoggi Precedent: His initial description of the murder of Jamal Khashoggi as a “mistake” (later retracted) ³⁵ demonstrates a tendency to downplay state violence when it conflicts with business interests (the Saudi PIF stake). It is highly likely this same psychological mechanism applies to his view of Israeli state violence in Gaza—viewing it as an unfortunate “mistake” rather than a systemic issue that should preclude business investment.

8. Comparative Analysis: Uber vs. The Sector

To contextualize Uber’s ranking, we compare it to other logistical players.

Analysis: Uber occupies a unique niche. It is less explicitly involved in direct violence than Google (Nimbus) or Maersk (Munitions Transport), but it is more involved in the capitalization of dual-use startups than almost any other non-defense consumer firm. It is the “Venture Capitalist of the Occupation.”

9. Future Risk Horizons (2026 and Beyond)

9.1. The 2026 Re-Entry Plan

Transport Minister Miri Regev’s announcement of Uber’s potential return in 2026 ¹⁴ is a critical future risk indicator.

• The “Smart City” Trap: This return will likely not be a simple taxi service. It will be the deployment of Avride robotaxis and Flytrex drone deliveries under the banner of “Smart Mobility.”
• The Surveillance Implications: A fleet of autonomous vehicles covering Tel Aviv and Jerusalem is essentially a fleet of mobile surveillance cameras. The data harvested by these vehicles (LiDAR maps, video feeds) would be of immense value to the Shin Bet. Under Israeli emergency laws, Uber could be compelled to share this real-time situational awareness, effectively turning the Uber fleet into a distributed sensor network for the security state.

9.2. United Hatzalah and the “Uberization” of Emergency Response

The model of United Hatzalah—using Uber-like GPS dispatch for emergency medics—demonstrates the ideological influence of Uber’s technology.³⁶

• Dual-Use Ideology: Just as Uber’s tech can dispatch a ride, it can dispatch a medic—or a rapid response security team. The “Uberization” of the IDF’s logistics and medical corps is a stated goal of the Digital Transformation Directorate. Uber’s return would likely involve deeper partnerships with these “civil-defense” NGOs, further blurring the line between corporate platform and state emergency infrastructure.

10. Conclusion and Forensic Verdict

10.1. Summary of Findings

The forensic audit concludes that Uber Technologies Inc. has successfully laundered its complicity through complex financial instruments and technological partnerships. By exiting the visible market of “taxi services” in Israel, it has avoided the visceral public backlash faced by companies like McDonald’s or Starbucks. However, its “back-end” integration is far more pernicious.

Uber is effectively acting as a strategic incubator for the Israeli military-industrial complex.

1. Financial Support: It pumps millions into drone and autonomy startups (Flytrex, Avride) led by defense veterans.
2. Technological Validation: It validates these technologies in US markets, giving them the “battle-testing” (in a commercial sense) needed to scale back into military applications.
3. Logistical Enablement: Its freight platform increases the efficiency of the supply chains that arm and sustain the state.

10.2. Final Rating: High Complicity via Dual-Use Enablement

We assign Uber a Complicity Score of 7.5/10.

• It is not a Tier 1 Defense Contractor (like Lockheed Martin).
• However, it is a Tier 1 Dual-Use Enabler. Its actions directly accelerate the development of technologies (autonomous drones, ground robots) that are central to the future doctrine of the IDF.

10.3. Recommendations for Further Monitoring

1. Monitor FAA Approvals: Watch for expansions of Flytrex BVLOS waivers in the US; these directly correlate to increased system maturity available for export to Israel.
2. Track “Avride” Expansion: Any movement of Avride personnel from Tel Aviv to US/Europe offices should be scrutinized for ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) compliance implications.
3. Watch the 2026 Tender: Closely monitor the terms of Uber’s re-entry negotiation with the Israeli Ministry of Transportation. Look for clauses regarding data sharing or service obligations in “Area C” (West Bank).

Signed,

Lead Analyst, Special Investigations

Defense Logistics & Accountability Unit

Appendix A: Forensic Data Tables

Table 1: The “Flytrex” Nexus – Personnel & Technology

Table 2: Uber Freight Supply Chain Integration

Table 3: Political Interference Timeline (The “Uber Files”)

(End of Report)

Works cited

1. Uber cleared for Israel entry, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.israelhayom.com/2025/09/16/uber-cleared-for-israel-entry/
2. Why Uber stopped its operations in Israel – Dailyo, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.dailyo.in/news/why-uber-stopped-its-operations-in-israel-40153
3. Uber Technologies, Inc. – Uber Partners with Flytrex to Launch Drone Delivery, accessed December 13, 2025, https://investor.uber.com/news-events/news/press-release-details/2025/Uber-Partners-with-Flytrex-to-Launch-Drone-Delivery/default.aspx
4. Uber bets tens of millions on drone deliveries with Israel’s Flytrex | Ctech, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/ryqv700ksxx
5. Governor Cuomo Announces Sweeping Series of Economic Development Partnerships Between New York and Israel – SUNY, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.suny.edu/suny-news/press-releases/7-19/7-1-19/ny-israel-economic-partnerships.html
6. Avride secures strategic investment and other commitments of up to $375 million, backed by Uber and Nebius, accessed December 13, 2025, https://nebius.com/newsroom/avride-secures-strategic-investment-and-other-commitments-of-up-to-375-million-backed-by-uber-and-nebius
7. tm2525503-3_424b5 – none – 7.4466433s – SEC.gov, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1513845/000110465925088885/tm2525503-3_424b5.htm
8. First Responder Interactions with Automated Vehicles: An Identification of Needs and Strategies – Texas A&M Transportation Institute, accessed December 13, 2025, https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-7199-R1.pdf
9. 2025 Sponsors, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.cscmpedge.org/website/81276/2025-sponsors/
10. ‘War criminals Israel and Maersk, you can’t hide!’ in Boston – Workers World, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.workers.org/2025/05/85814/
11. Freight Carrier Integrations | FreightPOP, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.freightpop.com/freight-carriers
12. How Uber won access to world leaders, deceived investigators and exploited violence against its drivers in battle for global dominance – ICIJ, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.icij.org/investigations/uber-files/uber-global-rise-lobbying-violence-technology/
13. Uber lobbied Netanyahu, envoys, drafted bills in bid to operate in Israel, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/uber-lobbied-netanyahu-envoys-drafted-bills-in-bid-to-operate-in-israel/
14. Uber ride hailing may be allowed in Israel next year, transportation minister says, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/uber-ride-hailing-may-be-allowed-in-israel-next-year-transportation-minister-says/
15. Flytrex Drone Delivery to Your Backyard – Dronelife, accessed December 13, 2025, https://dronelife.com/2021/03/31/flytrex-drone-delivery/
16. It’s Time to boycott Uber Eats – Canadian BDS Coalition, accessed December 13, 2025, https://bdscoalition.ca/2025/10/02/its-time-to-boycott-uber-eats/
17. EU-funded drone technology being used in war on Gaza – Statewatch |, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.statewatch.org/news/2024/march/eu-funded-drone-technology-being-used-in-war-on-gaza/
18. Uber faces criticism after announcing multi-million investment in Israeli drone co.; incl. co. non-response – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/uber-faces-criticism-for-announcing-multi-million-investment-in-israeli-drone-co-incl-co-non-response/
19. Uber faces boycott over partnership with Israeli drone firm – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/uber-faces-boycott-over-partnership-with-israeli-drone-firm/
20. Why is nobody talking about NBIS — a $12B AI infrastructure company that trades like a microcap? – Reddit, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ValueInvesting/comments/1mdqmbu/why_is_nobody_talking_about_nbis_a_12b_ai/
21. Nebius provides financing update, accessed December 13, 2025, https://nebius.com/newsroom/nebius-provides-financing-update
22. Avride Israel Ltd. – IVC Data & Insights, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.ivc-online.com/Google-Card?id=4ffef842-34b5-ee11-b812-00505695cd29
23. Israel exploring autonomous public buses, accessed December 13, 2025, https://insideautonomousvehicles.com/israel-exploring-autonomous-public-buses/
24. Robotics Companies Database, accessed December 13, 2025, https://petrnovikov.notion.site/
25. Cloud Logistics by e2open and Uber Freight Partner to Assist TMS Users, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.e2open.com/news/press-releases/cloud-logistics-by-e2open-and-uber-freight-partner/
26. Uber Freight Launches Major Shipping Platform Update – TT – Transport Topics, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.ttnews.com/articles/uber-freight-shipping-update
27. ‘War criminals Israel and Maersk, you can’t hide!’ in Boston – Workers World, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.workers.org/2025/05/85780/
28. Uber Freight offering drop-and-hook option as dedicated-like product for shippers, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.joc.com/article/uber-freight-offering-drop-and-hook-option-as-dedicated-like-product-for-shippers-5970415
29. 28 Feb 2020 National Defense University, accessed December 13, 2025, https://capstone.ndu.edu/Portals/83/202BioBook_1.pdf
30. 2016 Sovereign wealth funds – IE University, accessed December 13, 2025, https://static.ie.edu/corporate-partners/doc/SWF2016_3.pdf
31. Public Investment Fund – Wikipedia, accessed December 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Investment_Fund
32. From economy of occupation to economy of genocide – (A/HRC/59/23) Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 – Question of Palestine – the United Nations, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/a-hrc-59-23-from-economy-of-occupation-to-economy-of-genocide-report-special-rapporteur-francesca-albanese-palestine-2025/
33. Migrating the state into corporate clouds: Information, Communication & Society, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2343816
34. Israel vs. Palestine — Uber CEO on the Middle East Conflict | #mdmeets #shorts – YouTube, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4bM-rYTWAE
35. Uber CEO walks back comment on Saudi writer’s slaying | PBS News, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/uber-ceo-walks-back-comment-on-saudi-writers-slaying
36. Legacy Giving – United Hatzalah of Israel, accessed December 13, 2025, https://israelrescue.org/legacy-giving/
37. Israel Develops AI Tool that Predicts and Prevents Medical Emergencies – Future Medicine, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.futuremedicine.com/articles/israel-develops-ai-tool-that-predicts-and-prevents-medical-emergencies
38. Yariv Bash – TechAviv, accessed December 13, 2025, https://www.techaviv.com/people/yariv-bash
39. Ministry of Defense – Israel MOD Purchases Advanced Drones and Autonomous Systems from Elbit Systems for Approximately $40M – משרד הביטחון, accessed December 13, 2025, https://mod.gov.il/en/press-releases/press-room/israel-mod-purchases-advanced-drones-and-autonomous-systems-from-elbit-systems-for-approximately-40m