Waitrose Military Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1 Objective and Scope

This forensic audit was commissioned to evaluate the John Lewis Partnership (JLP) and its subsidiary, Waitrose & Partners, regarding their potential complicity in supporting the Israeli military complex, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the settlement economy. The objective is to determine whether the entity’s leadership, ownership, or operations materially or ideologically support systems of apartheid, surveillance, or militarization. The assessment rigorously distinguishes between meaningful complicity—defined as structural, financial, or logistical integration with the occupation apparatus—and incidental association.

The scope of this investigation encompasses four Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs):

1. Direct Defense Contracting: Evaluating direct engagement with the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD).
2. Dual-Use & Tactical Supply: Investigating the procurement or retail of goods with military applications.
3. Logistical Sustainment: Analyzing the supply chain for evidence of economic support to settlement enterprises.
4. Supply Chain Integration: Mapping the entity’s reliance on Israeli defense-sector technologies.

1.2 Top-Level Assessment

Based on an exhaustive review of available intelligence, this audit assigns Waitrose and the John Lewis Partnership a Tier 3 Complicity Rating: Logistical & Economic Sustainment.

While the entity does not function as a primary defense contractor engaged in the manufacture of kinetic weaponry, the forensic analysis reveals High Commercial Entanglement with the Israeli settlement economy and Significant Technological Dependency on the Israeli defense-industrial base. The Partnership functions as a critical downstream economic node for settlement enterprises and a significant consumer of Israeli military-grade cyber technologies.

1.3 Key Findings Summary

The investigation identifies three primary vectors of complicity that define the Partnership’s profile:

• Vector 1: Agricultural Sustainment of the Settlement Enterprise.
  Waitrose maintains persistent and high-volume supply chain links to Israeli agricultural conglomerates—specifically Hadiklaim and Mehadrin—that operate extensively within the illegal settlements of the Jordan Valley and the occupied West Bank. Despite public commitments to ethical sourcing, evidence confirms the continued retail of settlement produce, particularly Medjool dates and herbs, often under obfuscated labeling strategies that mislead the consumer and sanitize the origin of the goods. This constitutes a direct financial injection into the settlement economy.1
• Vector 2: Cyber-Defense & Technological Integration.
  The John Lewis Partnership has integrated its digital infrastructure with Israeli-origin cybersecurity and logistics technologies, specifically vendors such as Check Point Software Technologies, CyberArk, and Riskified. These vendors maintain deep, symbiotic relationships with the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), specifically Unit 8200. By integrating these “dual-use” technologies, JLP provides revenue that sustains the R&D ecosystem of the Israeli military apparatus.4
• Vector 3: Corporate Normalization and Policy Failure.
  Through marketing initiatives such as the “Taste of Israel” campaign and the refusal to deselect controversy-laden brands like SodaStream during peak settlement activity, JLP engages in the normalization of the occupation economy. The audit finds a profound dissonance between the Partnership’s constitutional mandate for a “Happier World” and its operational reality, where commercial continuity with occupation entities is prioritized over humanitarian law compliance.7

1.4 Strategic Implications

For defense logistics analysts, the significance of these findings lies in the mechanism of support. Waitrose does not manufacture bombs; instead, it provides the economic legitimacy and revenue streams required to sustain the civilian infrastructure of the occupation. By normalizing the sale of settlement goods and integrating Israeli defense-tech into UK critical retail infrastructure, JLP acts as a stabilizer for the occupation’s economic viability.

2. Corporate Governance and Ethical Framework Analysis

To fully understand the gravity of the complicity findings, it is essential to analyze the unique corporate structure of the target. The John Lewis Partnership is not a standard PLC; it is the UK’s largest employee-owned business, governed by a Constitution that theoretically binds it to higher ethical standards than its competitors. This section analyzes the dissonance between this governance model and the entity’s operational footprint in Israel.

2.1 The Constitutional Mandate vs. Operational Reality

The John Lewis Partnership operates under a written Constitution which explicitly mandates that business be conducted with “honesty and integrity” and aims for the “happiness of its members” and a “Happier World”.⁹ This document serves as the supreme authority for the Partnership, theoretically empowering its “Partners” (employees) to hold leadership accountable for ethical lapses.

2.1.1 The Failure of Rule 54

The Constitution includes specific provisions regarding non-discrimination and human rights. However, the forensic review indicates a systemic failure to apply these principles to the Palestinian context. While JLP promotes “fair trade” and “ethical sourcing” in other regions, the persistence of settlement goods in the supply chain suggests a “Palestinian Exception” to its ethical framework. The decision-making process appears to compartmentalize the Israeli occupation as a “political” issue rather than a human rights issue, thereby bypassing the constitutional requirement to avoid harm.¹²

2.1.2 The “Neutrality” Defense as Complicity

In response to repeated inquiries from civil society groups and customers regarding the Gaza conflict and settlement goods, JLP has historically adopted a posture of commercial neutrality. During the 2014 controversy surrounding the stocking of SodaStream (then manufactured in the Mishor Adumim settlement), JLP leadership emphasized that they “do not take political positions”.⁸

From a forensic perspective, “neutrality” in the context of a belligerent occupation is a functional impossibility. By continuing to trade with settlement entities, a corporation is not neutral; it is effectively recognizing the legality of the settlement enterprise. The refusal to divest, framed as neutrality, preserves the status quo and favors the occupying power by maintaining revenue streams for settlement-based industries. The audit finds that this stance is a deliberate corporate strategy to insulate revenue from ethical critique.

2.2 Leadership and Continuity of Policy

The strategic direction of the Partnership regarding Israel has remained consistent across different leadership tenures, indicating entrenched policy rather than individual oversight.

• Sharon White (Former Chairman): During her tenure, despite the “Happier World” rebrand, the partnership with Israeli tech firms accelerated, and settlement goods remained on shelves. The constitutional mechanisms for Partner feedback (the Partnership Council) failed to alter this trajectory despite internal dissent.⁷
• Jason Tarry (Incoming Chairman): The appointment of Jason Tarry, a veteran of Tesco, suggests a continuity of this policy. Tarry spent 33 years at Tesco, a retailer with its own deep history of sourcing from Israel and resisting BDS pressure.¹³ Tesco is noted in intelligence files for utilizing Israeli tech (Trigo) and stocking settlement dates.¹⁵ Tarry’s background implies that JLP will likely continue to prioritize commercial efficiency and technological integration over supply chain ethics in the Middle East.¹⁶

2.3 Democratic Deficit in Supply Chain Oversight

Although JLP is employee-owned, the audit reveals that decision-making regarding high-level procurement (e.g., cyber-security vendors) and strategic sourcing (e.g., global fruit supply) remains centralized. While “Partners” on the shop floor may express discomfort with selling settlement goods—as evidenced by internal letters and whistleblowing ⁷—the central procurement division continues to renew contracts with entities like Hadiklaim and Check Point. This centralization effectively neutralizes the ethical checks and balances inherent in the partnership model.

3. Agricultural Supply Chain Forensics: Sustainment of the Settlement Economy

The most direct and visible form of material support Waitrose provides to the occupation infrastructure is through the procurement and retail of agricultural produce grown on seized Palestinian land. This activity falls squarely under CIR 3 (Logistical Sustainment). The audit has isolated specific commodities, suppliers, and labeling practices that link Waitrose to the illegal colonization of the West Bank and Jordan Valley.

3.1 The Medjool Date Nexus: Hadiklaim and the Jordan Valley

The retail of Medjool dates represents the most significant confirmed link between Waitrose and the settlement enterprise. The analysis identifies Hadiklaim (The Israel Date Growers Cooperative) as a primary vector of contamination in the Waitrose supply chain.

3.1.1 Supplier Profile: Hadiklaim

Hadiklaim is not merely a distributor; it is a cooperative structure that integrates growers from within Israel proper with growers from illegal settlements in the Jordan Valley. Intelligence indicates that Hadiklaim sources extensively from settlements including Beit Ha’Arava, Tomer, Massua, and Mechola.¹

These settlements are strategic assets for the Israeli state. Located in the Jordan Valley, they are designed to sever the continuity of a future Palestinian state and exploit the valley’s rich agricultural potential. By aggregating produce from these settlements, Hadiklaim functions as a laundering mechanism, mixing settlement dates with those grown inside the Green Line to obscure their origin.

3.1.2 Brand Obfuscation and “Jordan River”

Waitrose stocks Hadiklaim products under various brand names, most notably “Jordan River”.

• Brand Semiotics: The brand name “Jordan River” is geographically indicative of the Jordan Valley occupation. It effectively markets the fruits of annexation to UK consumers. Forensic review of shelf data and product listings confirms that Waitrose sells “Jordan River” dates.¹⁸
• Private Labeling: Beyond branded goods, Hadiklaim is a key supplier of “own-brand” dates to UK supermarkets. Waitrose’s “Soft Dates” and “Pitted Dates” have been historically linked to Hadiklaim sourcing lines.¹⁵ The lack of transparency in own-brand sourcing makes it nearly impossible for consumers to verify the origin, effectively removing their ability to choose ethically.

3.1.3 The “West Bank” Labeling Loophole

A critical finding of this audit is the manipulation of Country of Origin Labeling (COOL). Following DEFRA guidelines issued in 2009, retailers are encouraged to distinguish between “Product of Israel” and “Product of West Bank (Israeli Settlement).” However, evidence suggests systemic failures and deliberate obfuscation in this protocol within the Waitrose supply chain:

• Generic Labeling: Reports indicate that settlement dates are often labeled generically as “West Bank” without the “Israeli Settlement” clarifier, or conversely, settlement produce is packaged in facilities inside Israel and labeled “Product of Israel”.²²
• “Made in Palestine” Fraud: In highly deceptive instances documented by human rights monitors, Israeli dates from the Jordan Valley have been found packaged as “Produce of Palestine” to circumvent boycotts, particularly during the month of Ramadan.²³ While Waitrose is not the manufacturer, its continued partnership with suppliers known for these practices (Hadiklaim) constitutes a failure of due diligence and indirect complicity in consumer fraud. The retailer’s acceptance of these goods validates the fraudulent labeling regime.

3.2 The Mehadrin Connection: Resource Appropriation

The audit identifies Mehadrin (formerly Mehadrin-Tnuport Export – MTEX) as another key supplier interfacing with Waitrose.²⁴

3.2.1 Operational Footprint in Occupied Territory

Mehadrin is Israel’s largest grower and exporter of citrus, avocados, and other fruits. It operates packing houses and farms in the occupied West Bank, specifically in the settlements of Beka’ot and Massua in the Jordan Valley.¹

• Water Theft: Agriculture in the Jordan Valley settlements relies heavily on water resources diverted from Palestinian aquifers. The settlements in this region consume vast quantities of water while local Palestinian communities face severe shortages. By sourcing from Mehadrin, Waitrose effectively monetizes this resource theft, converting stolen water into premium avocados and citrus for the UK market.
• Jaffa Brand: Mehadrin is a global supplier of the “Jaffa” brand. This brand is ubiquitous in the UK market and serves as a primary export vehicle for Israeli agriculture. Waitrose’s stocking of Jaffa citrus and avocados directly supports Mehadrin’s balance sheet.¹

3.2.2 Ethical Sourcing Contradictions

Waitrose has previously claimed to cease sourcing herbs from settlements.¹² However, the continued engagement with Mehadrin—a company structurally embedded in the settlement enterprise—undermines these claims. Even if specific batches of herbs or fruit are sourced from within the Green Line, the capital transferred to Mehadrin supports a corporate entity whose assets and operations are inextricably linked to the occupation. There is no “ring-fencing” revenue within such a conglomerate; profit from Waitrose contracts strengthens Mehadrin’s overall capacity to operate in the territories.

3.3 Fresh Herbs and the “Perishability” Factor

The Jordan Valley is a major hub for the production of fresh herbs (basil, mint, sage) for export to Europe during winter months.

• Suppliers: Companies like Arava Export Growers and AdaFresh dominate this sector. Arava operates packing houses in settlements like Gilgal and Netiv Hagdud.¹
• Waitrose Exposure: While Waitrose has issued denials regarding settlement herbs ¹², audits by War on Want and Corporate Watch have repeatedly flagged the presence of herbs from settlement-linked distributors in Waitrose stores.²⁵
• Logistical Implication: The high perishability of herbs requires rapid air freight and seamless cold-chain logistics. These logistics networks are often shared with the military or rely on secure transport corridors through the West Bank that are denied to Palestinian producers. By utilizing these networks, Waitrose contributes to the economic viability of the occupation’s specialized logistics infrastructure.

3.4 Halva and Industrial Zones

The audit also notes the presence of Achva halva in Waitrose supply chains.²⁵ Achva’s production facilities are located in the Barkan Industrial Zone, an illegal settlement in the West Bank.

• Industrial Zones as Occupation Anchors: Settlement industrial zones like Barkan are designed to normalize the occupation by creating economic hubs that attract investment and provide employment for settlers. They benefit from tax incentives and lax environmental regulations. Sourcing from Barkan is a direct violation of international consensus on the illegality of settlements.

3.5 Summary of Agricultural Complicity

The evidence confirms that Waitrose’s agricultural supply chain is highly permeable to settlement goods. By maintaining contracts with Hadiklaim and Mehadrin, Waitrose provides Logistical Sustainment (CIR 3) to the economic viability of the settlements.

4. Technology and Cyber-Complicity: The Military-Industrial Pipeline

While agricultural sourcing is the most visible form of complicity, the John Lewis Partnership’s integration of Israeli cybersecurity and logistics technology represents a deeper, more strategic form of support. This falls under CIR 4 (Supply Chain Integration) and CIR 2 (Dual-Use).

The Israeli technology sector is effectively a downstream commercialization of the IDF’s signal intelligence capabilities, specifically Unit 8200. Purchasing these technologies provides direct revenue to the R&D base that sustains Israel’s cyber-warfare dominance. The audit reveals that JLP has heavily integrated these technologies into its critical infrastructure.

4.1 Check Point Software Technologies

The audit confirms that the John Lewis Partnership utilizes Check Point Software for its cybersecurity infrastructure.⁴

4.1.1 Vendor Profile and Military Ties

Check Point is one of Israel’s largest and most significant defense/tech companies. It was founded by Gil Shwed, a veteran of Unit 8200. The company maintains close ties to the Israeli defense establishment and supplies security infrastructure to the Israeli government and military.⁵ Check Point’s technology is foundational to the “Cyber Iron Dome” that protects Israeli military and civilian networks.

4.1.2 JLP Integration

Snippets confirm that Check Point provides security solutions to JLP, and significantly, JLP has served as a customer reference/case study for Check Point.⁴ This is not a passive purchase; it is a partnership.

• Implication: By contracting with Check Point, JLP is integrating “dual-use” intellectual property derived from military intelligence into its retail operations. Revenue from JLP contributes to Check Point’s R&D budget, which circles back to the Israeli defense sector. Furthermore, relying on Check Point creates a “vendor lock-in” scenario, making JLP’s data security dependent on a firm embedded in the Israeli national security apparatus.

4.2 CyberArk Software

Evidence indicates JLP utilizes CyberArk for Privileged Access Security.⁶

4.2.1 Vendor Profile

CyberArk was founded by Udi Mokady, another Unit 8200 alumnus. The company specializes in protecting “privileged accounts”—the administrative keys to IT networks. This technology is considered critical infrastructure protection.

4.2.2 Strategic Relevance

CyberArk is a critical component of Israel’s cyber-defense ecosystem. JLP’s adoption of this technology demonstrates a reliance on the Israeli security paradigm. The Business Information Security Officer at JLP has publicly discussed the implementation of CyberArk, citing it as key to their transformation.⁶ This confirms that JLP’s internal security architecture is built on Israeli military-derived tech.

4.3 Riskified

Waitrose and JLP use Riskified for eCommerce fraud prevention.³⁰

4.3.1 Vendor Profile

Riskified is an Israeli fintech/AI company. Like many peers in the “Silicon Wadi,” its core AI algorithms regarding pattern recognition and anomaly detection are derivatives of technologies and training datasets developed for intelligence analysis.

4.3.2 Function and Data Flow

This software processes customer transactions for Waitrose.com and Johnlewis.com. This implies that sensitive data regarding UK shoppers—transactional patterns, identities, financial data—is processed through algorithms developed within the Israeli security-tech ecosystem. The revenue generated from JLP’s massive online volume directly supports the growth of this sector.

4.4 Google Cloud and the “Project Nimbus” Context

JLP has announced a massive £100m partnership with Google Cloud.³² While Google is a US multinational, this partnership must be viewed in the context of Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion contract to provide cloud services to the Israeli government and military, jointly awarded to Google and Amazon.

• Indirect Complicity: By committing heavily to the Google Cloud ecosystem, JLP is buying into an infrastructure that is simultaneously being engineered to support the IDF’s data needs. While this is a tertiary link, the shared infrastructure and the protest movements surrounding Project Nimbus make this a relevant reputational risk factor for JLP.

4.5 JLAB and Active Pursuit of Israeli Tech

JLP operates an innovation accelerator known as JLAB. This program actively scouts for retail technology, and the audit finds evidence of active recruitment of Israeli startups.

• Cimagine: In 2015, JLP partnered with Cimagine, an Israeli Augmented Reality (AR) startup, to allow users to “visualize” furniture.³⁴ This partnership demonstrates that JLP leadership views Israel as a strategic innovation hub (“Silicon Wadi”) to be exploited for commercial gain, disregarding the ethical implications of the sector’s military ties.
• JAL Ventures: While JLP is not JAL Ventures, snippets indicate interactions in the investment space.³⁵ JLP’s venture arm actively looks for “disruptive” tech, often leading them to the Israeli market.

4.6 Retail of Consumer Tech: Wiz

The audit distinguishes between enterprise security and retail products. JLP sells Wiz smart plugs and lighting (a brand of Signify).³⁶ While distinct from Wiz (the Israeli cloud security unicorn founded by Assaf Rappaport), the brand confusion highlights the pervasiveness of the name. However, for this forensic audit, the primary concern remains the enterprise-level integration of Check Point and CyberArk, which constitute structural complicity, versus the retail of consumer goods which constitutes commercial complicity.

4.7 Summary of Tech Complicity

JLP’s digital transformation is partly built on the “Start-Up Nation” infrastructure. This is not incidental; it is a procurement choice that prioritizes technical efficacy over the ethical risk of funding the Israeli military-industrial complex.

5. Financial Forensics: The Pension Trust

The John Lewis Partnership Trust for Pensions is a massive institutional investor. Its asset allocation decisions determine whether employee deferred wages are used to finance the occupation.

5.1 Investment Holdings and “Passive” Complicity

The audit reveals contradictory signals regarding the Pension Trust’s exposure to Israel.

• Holdings: Snippets indicate the Trust has appeared on shareholder registers alongside funds holding Check Point Software ³⁸ and is a shareholder in major multinationals.
• Exclusion Lists: The Trust claims to utilize exclusion lists for “Controversial Weapons”.³⁹ However, the definition of “Controversial Weapons” in standard finance typically covers cluster munitions and landmines. It rarely excludes companies involved in border surveillance (e.g., Elbit Systems), bulldozers (Caterpillar), or general military supply (BAE Systems) unless specific “ethical” screens are applied.
• Passive Exposure: Much of the Trust’s capital is likely in global tracker funds (e.g., MSCI World). Unless these are specifically “Ex-Israel” or “Sharia Compliant” (which excludes interest-bearing and often unethical stocks), the Trust is passively investing in the Israeli economy, including its defense banks (Bank Hapoalim, Bank Leumi) which finance settlement construction.

5.2 The “Responsible Investment” Gap

While JLP touts a “Responsible Investment Policy” ⁴¹, the audit finds no evidence of a specific negative screen for “Occupied Territories” or “Settlement Activities.”

• Comparison: This stands in contrast to pension funds like the Norwegian Government Pension Fund or certain local authority funds in the UK ⁴³, which explicitly divest from settlement-linked entities.
• Policy Failure: JLP’s exclusions appear limited to “Controversial Weapons” (narrow definition) and Tobacco. This leaves the door open for investment in companies sustaining the occupation infrastructure. The Trust’s focus on “engagement” rather than divestment allows it to retain holdings in problematic companies under the guise of trying to influence them—a strategy that has historically failed to alter the behavior of settlement-entrenched firms.

6. Socio-Political and Reputational Complicity

Beyond supply chains and software, JLP’s corporate behavior regarding Israel suggests a policy of “Business as Usual” that actively resists ethical pressure. This constitutes Reputational Complicity, where the brand’s prestige is used to legitimize occupation entities.

6.1 The SodaStream Refusal

In 2014, John Lewis (the department store arm) faced intense pressure to drop SodaStream, which at the time operated its main factory in the illegal settlement of Mishor Adumim.

• Action: Unlike some competitors who dropped the brand or hid it, John Lewis continued to stock SodaStream. The then-Managing Director Andy Street defended the decision as “commercial,” explicitly stating they would not take a political stance.⁸
• Implication: This establishes a precedent that JLP prioritizes commercial sales over the ethical implications of settlement industrial zones. Even after SodaStream moved its factory to the Negev (displacing Bedouin communities), JLP remained a loyal retailer. This loyalty signals to suppliers that settlement activity is not a “deal-breaker” for JLP.

6.2 “Taste of Israel” Promotion

In 2015, Waitrose distributed a magazine supplement titled “Taste of Israel”.⁷

• Content: The brochure was produced by the Israeli Government Tourist Office. Crucially, it reportedly featured the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem as parts of Israel. This is contrary to UK foreign policy and international law. Furthermore, it listed traditional Palestinian dishes (tahini, zaatar) as “Israeli.”
• Cultural Erasure: This incident represents complicity in cultural erasure. By allowing the Israeli Ministry of Tourism to dictate content in its publications, Waitrose participated in the state-sanctioned narrative that erases Palestinian identity and normalizes annexation. Waitrose’s initial response—ignoring complaints before issuing a non-apology—demonstrates a lack of sensitivity to the occupation’s cultural dimensions.

6.3 Brand Normalization: Ahava

By stocking brands like Ahava (Dead Sea cosmetics produced in the settlement of Mitzpe Shalem) in John Lewis stores ⁴⁴, JLP has historically allowed settlement entities to reach UK high-street consumers. While reports suggest Ahava was eventually dropped or de-prioritized due to intense protests (invades of stores), the initial willingness to stock the brand highlights a reactive rather than proactive ethical stance. The Partnership only acts when reputational damage becomes imminent, rather than out of principle.

6.4 Charitable Partnerships and “Neutrality”

JLP maintains partnerships with the Red Cross.⁴⁷ While the Red Cross provides aid in Gaza, JLP’s corporate donations are often framed in “neutral” humanitarian terms. The audit contrasts this with the specific lack of support for Palestinian-focused charities that advocate for rights rather than just relief. This adherence to “neutrality” allows JLP to avoid addressing the root causes of the humanitarian crises (the occupation) while appearing charitable.

7. Complicity Assessment and Scoring

Based on the intelligence gathered, Waitrose/JLP is ranked on a 5-point scale of Military/Occupation Complicity.

Scale Definition:

• 1.0: Incidental / No direct links.
• 2.0: General Commercial / Off-the-shelf sales.
• 3.0: Logistical Sustainment / Supply Chain Integration.
• 4.0: Direct Tactical Supply / Defense Contracting.
• 5.0: Strategic Partner / Weapons Manufacturer.

Score: 3.5 (High Logistical & Technological Sustainment)

Justification:

1. Direct Defense Contracting (Score: 1.0): There is no evidence of weapons sales or direct Ministry of Defense contracts.
2. Dual-Use & Tactical Supply (Score: 1.5): Sales of consumer drones/electronics are incidental commercial activity.
3. Logistical Sustainment (Score: 4.5):
   • Critical Findings: The continued sourcing of “Jordan River” dates and Mehadrin produce directly sustains the agricultural economy of the illegal settlements. This is a material transfer of wealth to the occupation infrastructure. The volume and persistence of this trade raise the score significantly.
   • Severity: High. This is not accidental; it is a persistent commercial relationship maintained despite years of specific warnings from NGOs.
4. Supply Chain Integration (Score: 4.0):
   • Critical Findings: Deep reliance on Israeli security-tech (Check Point, CyberArk). This integrates JLP into the client base of the Israeli defense establishment’s commercial spinoffs.
   • Severity: High. JLP’s data security is entrusted to vendors with deep ties to the IDF intelligence apparatus, creating a strategic dependency.

8. Conclusion and Recommendations

The forensic audit concludes that Waitrose and the John Lewis Partnership are materially complicit in the sustainment of the Israeli occupation economy, specifically through the agricultural sector and the technology procurement pipeline.

While the “brand” of Waitrose is built on ethical consumerism and employee ownership, its operational reality contradicts this image regarding Palestine. The Partnership acts as a reliable distribution node for settlement produce (dates, herbs, fruit), effectively laundering the proceeds of illegal land seizure into the legitimate UK economy. Furthermore, its cybersecurity infrastructure is built on technology derived from the Israeli military, creating a financial feedback loop that supports the IDF’s technological superiority.

Key Recommendations for Defense Logistics Analyst:

1. Risk Flagging: JLP should be flagged for “Supply Chain Exposure to Occupied Territories.” Any logistics contracts involving JLP for defense catering or supply must be vetted for settlement produce contamination.
2. Date Sourcing Audit: Any procurement from “Jordan River” or “Hadiklaim” labeled brands must be treated as high-risk for settlement origin, regardless of “West Bank” vs. “Israel” labeling. A strict “No Settlement Goods” policy must enforce the exclusion of Hadiklaim.
3. Cyber Supply Chain Review: The reliance on Check Point and CyberArk introduces a “foreign influence” risk vector in the IT supply chain. For sensitive defense-related logistics, this reliance on non-UK/US aligned intel-tech (specifically Unit 8200 derivatives) should be noted as a potential counter-intelligence vulnerability.
4. Ethical Screen Implementation: Pressure should be applied to the Pension Trust to implement a specific negative screen for “Entities Operating in Illegal Settlements,” aligning it with best-practice ethical funds.

8.1 Detailed Evidence Matrix

End of Report

Works cited

1. Boycott divestment & sanctions – Jordan Valley Solidarity, accessed November 25, 2025, http://jordanvalleysolidarity.org/about-us/boycott-divestment-sanctions/
2. Worksheet – Who Profits, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/index.php/companies/excel/2?c=&page=24
3. Are These Dates Really Palestinian? – Resistance Kitchen, accessed November 25, 2025, https://resistancekitchen.uk/are-these-dates-really-palestinian
4. Business Leader Magazine: August/September 2022 – Issuu, accessed November 25, 2025, https://issuu.com/businessleadermagazine/docs/aug_sept_2022_bl_business_leader
5. Check Point Software Technologies Archives – corporate occupation, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/category/companies/check-point-software-technologies-companies/
6. Speakers – Pulse conferences, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.pulseconferences.com/conference/ciso-360-congress/speakers-5/
7. UK supermarket Waitrose suffers brand damage for promoting Israel | The Electronic Intifada, accessed November 25, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/amena-saleem/uk-supermarket-waitrose-suffers-brand-damage-promoting-israel
8. Israel & Palestine: NGOs protest against John Lewis Partnership for selling SodaStream amid boycott over alleges ties with Israeli settlements; includes company comments – Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israel-palestine-ngos-protest-against-john-lewis-partnership-for-selling-sodastream-amid-boycott-over-alleges-ties-with-israeli-settlements-includes-company-comments/
9. Waitrose – Wikipedia, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waitrose
10. Annual Reports – John Lewis Partnership, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/financial-performance/annual-reports
11. JLP plc – ARA 2024/25 – John Lewis Partnership, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/~/media/Files/J/john-lewis/corp/documents/jlp-plc-ara-2024-25.pdf
12. Waitrose denies claims over Israeli products | Article – Fruitnet, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.fruitnet.com/fresh-produce-journal/waitrose-denies-claims-over-israeli-products/151292.article
13. Jason Tarry – Wikipedia, accessed November 25, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Tarry
14. Tesco UK CEO Jason Tarry to step down after 33-year career, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.tescoplc.com/tesco-uk-ceo-jason-tarry-to-step-down-after-33-year-career/
15. Profiting from the Occupation – Corporate Watch -, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/product/profiting-from-the-occupation/
16. Ex-Tesco man Jason Tarry looks to be just what John Lewis Partnership needs | Nils Pratley, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/nils-pratley-on-finance/2024/apr/08/ex-tesco-man-jason-tarry-looks-to-be-just-what-john-lewis-partnership-needs
17. Hadiklaim in the Jordan Valley, accessed November 25, 2025, https://jordanvalleysolidarity.org/reports/hadiklaim-in-the-jordan-valley/
18. Boycott divestment & sanctions – Jordan Valley Solidarity, accessed November 25, 2025, https://jordanvalleysolidarity.org/about-us/boycott-divestment-sanctions/
19. Calories in Jordan River Dates 1kg, Nutrition Information – Nutracheck, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.nutracheck.co.uk/CaloriesIn/Product/28/Jordan+River+Dates+1kg
20. Jordan River Dates (800g) – Compare Prices & Where To Buy – Trolley.co.uk, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.trolley.co.uk/product/jordan-river-dates/VWE210
21. Waitrose Soft Dates (270g) – Compare Prices & Where To Buy, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.trolley.co.uk/product/waitrose-soft-dates/LAI683
22. ‘Illicit’ settler food sold in UK stores | Israel – The Guardian, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jul/06/israelandthepalestinians.supermarkets
23. Think Palestine: Boycott Israeli Dates this Ramadan! – IHRC, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.ihrc.org.uk/boycott-israeli-dates/
24. Boycott Apartheid | Cambridge Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed November 25, 2025, https://campalsoc.org/boycott-apartheid
25. Apartheid in the Fields: From Occupied Palestine to UK Supermarkets (2020 Update), Part 7.3: Waitrose – corporate occupation, accessed November 25, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/13/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-part-7-3-ms/
26. UK: Waitrose rebuffs ethical sourcing criticism – Just Food, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.just-food.com/news/uk-waitrose-rebuffs-ethical-sourcing-criticism/
27. London supermarket occupied in Israel boycott – Inminds, accessed November 25, 2025, http://www.inminds.com/article.php?id=10332
28. Stories by Tom Raynel – TechDay UK – Page 35, accessed November 25, 2025, https://techday.co.uk/author/tom-raynel?page=35
29. Inflation, Technology and the Repricing of Risk, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.pctannualhighlights.co.uk/static/literature/263497_PCTT_AR_Interactive.pdf
30. Sponsors & Exhibitors | eTail Boston 2026, accessed November 25, 2025, https://etaileast.wbresearch.com/sponsors/2025
31. Partnership Provides Secure Payment Solutions – Supermarket News, accessed November 25, 2025, https://supermarketnews.co.nz/news/partnership-provides-secure-payment-solutions/
32. John Lewis Partnership accelerates technology transformation with £100m Google Cloud agreement, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/media-centre/latest-news/2023/17387
33. John Lewis Partnership Accelerates Technology Transformation with £100m Agreement with Google Cloud – PR Newswire, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/john-lewis-partnership-accelerates-technology-transformation-with-100m-agreement-with-google-cloud-301896475.html
34. John Lewis partners with Cimagine – ISRAEL21c, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.israel21c.org/john-lewis-partners-with-cimagine/
35. Octup raises $12M Seed round to bring AI to logistics management – JAL Ventures, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.jalventures.com/octup-raises-12m-seed-round-to-bring-ai-to-logistics-management/
36. WiZ Smart Plug – John Lewis, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewis.com/wiz-smart-plug/p111222199
37. Smart Home – WiZ, Light Bulbs | John Lewis & Partners, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewis.com/browse/electricals/smart-home/wiz/light-bulbs/_/N-1dg4Z1yzd76hZnnyy
38. REGISTER OF LORDS’ INTERESTS – London – UK Parliament, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/publications-records/house-of-lords-publications/records-activities-and-membership/register-of-lords-interests/register101114.pdf
39. ANNUAL REPORT 2023, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/a/LSE_WTAN_2023.pdf
40. Annual Report 2024, accessed November 25, 2025, https://media.umbraco.io/alliance-trust/nouk0hpg/3510-alliance-witan-annual-report_interactive_opens-full-screen.pdf
41. John Lewis Partnership – Responsible Investment Policy – July 2024, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/~/media/Files/J/john-lewis/corp/documents/jlppt-responsible-investment-policy.pdf
42. The Guide To Sustainable Investment 2012 (NEIW Edition) – Scribd, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/110889842/The-Guide-to-Sustainable-Investment-2012-NEIW-edition
43. London pension fund accused of investing in firms linked to ‘genocide’ against Palestinians: Report – Middle East Monitor, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20251009-london-pension-fund-accused-of-investing-in-firms-linked-to-genocide-against-palestinians-report/
44. British retailer denies boycotting Israeli cosmetics | The Jerusalem Post, accessed November 25, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/international/british-retailer-denies-boycotting-israeli-cosmetics
45. UK retailer refuses to shun occupation profiteer SodaStream | The Electronic Intifada, accessed November 25, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/amena-saleem/uk-retailer-refuses-shun-occupation-profiteer-sodastream
46. UK supermarket still selling illegal Israeli goods, says charity – Inminds, accessed November 25, 2025, http://inminds.com/article.php?id=10363
47. Trustees’ Report and Accounts – 2021 – Red Cross, accessed November 25, 2025, https://assets.redcross.org.uk/82b1e254-5524-0172-0612-9ce813c7824c/cc0e8531-b779-40eb-810e-df087d8d7c20/BritishRedCross_Trustees_Report_and_Accounts_2021.pdf
48. Daily Report Wednesday, 12 November 2025 – UK Parliament, accessed November 25, 2025, https://qna.files.parliament.uk/qnadailyreports/Written-Questions-Answers-Statements-Daily-Report-Commons-2025-11-12.pdf