OpenIntel Logo Black

Contents

Airbnb Political Audit

Executive Intelligence Summary

This document constitutes a comprehensive forensic audit of Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ: ABNB) regarding its political and ideological footprint concerning the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and associated systems of surveillance, militarization, and apartheid. This audit is conducted in response to a directive to determine “Political Complicity” based on four Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs): Governance Ideology, Lobbying & Trade, the “Safe Harbor” Test (comparative conflict response), and Internal Policy.

The findings presented herein suggest that Airbnb, Inc. operates as a deeply integrated node within the Israeli tourism and technology ecosystem, sustaining material support for the settlement enterprise in the occupied West Bank despite a brief, aborted attempt to decouple in 2018. The company is currently listed on the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) database of business enterprises involved in activities relating to settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), specifically cited for the provision of services and utilities supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements.1

While the corporate narrative emphasizes “belonging” and “community,” the operational reality reflects a strategic alignment with the Israeli Ministry of Tourism, compliance with anti-boycott legislation driven by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and associated pressure groups, and a demonstrated “Double Standard” in its crisis response mechanisms when comparing the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the Israeli bombardment of Gaza. Furthermore, the governance structure is heavily influenced by Venture Capital (VC) interests with deep historic and financial ties to the Israeli defense and technology sectors, potentially creating fiduciary pressures that override human rights commitments.

This report provides the raw data and analytical synthesis necessary for a subsequent ranking of Airbnb’s complicity. It avoids final scoring but provides exhaustive evidence of leadership affiliations, lobbying expenditures, operational footprints on contested land, and internal disciplinary measures against pro-Palestinian dissent.

1. Governance Ideology and Leadership Architecture

To understand the political trajectory of Airbnb, one must first analyze the ideological and financial commitments of its controlling stakeholders. The Board of Directors and Executive Leadership Team (ELT) are not merely fiduciaries; they represent the geopolitical alignment of the firm.

1.1 The Executive Triumvirate: Ideological Drift and Political Alignment

The control of Airbnb rests with its co-founders—Brian Chesky, Joe Gebbia, and Nathan Blecharczyk—who hold a voting majority under a nominating and voting agreement.2 Their individual political posturing directly impacts corporate neutrality.

1.1.1 Brian Chesky (CEO & Chairman): The Rhetoric of “Belonging” vs. Geopolitical Reality

Brian Chesky has cultivated a public persona centered on the “sharing economy” as a bridge for global peace. However, his direct actions regarding the Israeli-Palestinian file demonstrate a susceptibility to external political pressure that contradicts this vision.

  • Response to October 7 and Gaza: In the immediate aftermath of the October 7, 2023 attacks, Chesky and the executive team issued an unequivocal condemnation of “Hamas’ terrorist attacks,” expressing deep sympathy for Israeli citizens and prioritizing the safety of hosts and guests in the region.3 While this aligns with standard corporate responses to terror events, the subsequent lack of a comparable high-level condemnation of the widespread destruction of civilian housing in Gaza—the very core of Airbnb’s “home” mandate—marks a significant deviation from the company’s previous activism.
  • Philanthropic Asymmetry: Chesky personally announced matching donations up to $10 million for Ukrainian refugee relief 4, leveraging his platform to galvanize global support. No parallel “matching” campaign led by the CEO was identified for the displacement of 1.9 million Palestinians in Gaza during the 2023-2024 bombardment. This asymmetry suggests a governance ideology that views Palestinian displacement as politically radioactive, whereas Ukrainian displacement is viewed as a clear moral imperative.

1.1.2 Joe Gebbia (Co-founder & Director): The Shift to the Right

Joe Gebbia, while having stepped down from the chairmanship of Airbnb.org, remains a powerful director at the parent company. His recent political trajectory indicates an alignment with the American political right, which historically supports unrestricted Israeli settlement expansion.

  • Political Affiliations: Intelligence confirms Gebbia has aligned himself with the “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), an initiative associated with US President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance.2 The Trump administration was the architect of the “Deal of the Century,” which legitimized settlement annexation. Gebbia’s alignment with this political bloc suggests a governance influence that would likely oppose any renewed attempts to boycott settlements.
  • Refugee Aid Controversy: Gebbia faced scrutiny for reposting statements on social media critical of refugee aid, including posts from J.D. Vance.2 This necessitated a public distancing by Airbnb.org, which clarified it did not share his views. However, his continued presence on the Airbnb board ensures that this ideological perspective retains a vote in corporate governance.

1.1.3 Dave Stephenson (CFO & Head of Employee Experience)

Stephenson’s role bridges financial oversight and internal culture. His communications regarding the Gaza crisis prioritized partnerships with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).3 The ADL has been widely criticized by human rights organizations for conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism and for urging corporate crackdowns on pro-Palestine speech. By institutionalizing the ADL as a primary partner for “combating hate,” Stephenson embeds a pro-Israel framework into Airbnb’s internal disciplinary and Human Resources (HR) policies.

1.2 Board of Directors: The Venture Capital Nexus

The composition of Airbnb’s Board of Directors reflects the heavy influence of Silicon Valley Venture Capital firms, specifically Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) and Sequoia Capital. These firms are not neutral financial actors; they are deeply enmeshed in the US-Israel technology corridor, often investing in Israeli cybersecurity, surveillance, and defense-adjacent startups.

Director Affiliation Relevance to Israel/Zionism
Jeffrey Jordan General Partner, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) High. Represents a firm with deep investment ties to the Israeli tech sector. Intelligence reports link AIPAC lobbying efforts to the environments in which these firms operate, though direct personal leadership in AIPAC is not confirmed in the snippets. Jordan has served on the board since 2011.5
Alfred Lin Partner, Sequoia Capital High. Sequoia Capital is a foundational investor in the Israeli ecosystem. While snippet 6 references an “Alfred Lin” in the context of Jewish National Fund (JNF) donations, snippet 7 clarifies his brother Edwin made a gift in their mother’s name. However, the institutional alignment of Sequoia with the “Startup Nation” narrative creates strong fiduciary pressure to maintain open markets in Israel.
Angela Ahrendts Former SVP Apple, CEO Burberry Medium. Member of the British American Business Advisory Board.8 While no direct Zionist advocacy is listed, her voting record in investment funds (Boston Trust Walden) has supported management against shareholder proposals regarding human rights in some contexts.9
James Manyika SVP, Google-Alphabet Medium/Complex. An academic and tech executive. Snippets reference academic papers on “rebuilding the security sector in the Gaza Strip” 10 and “Zionist vision” 11 in the context of research institutes he is affiliated with (e.g., McKinsey Global Institute). This suggests an intellectual engagement with the security architecture of the region, though not necessarily an advocacy role.
Kenneth Chenault Chairman, General Catalyst Low/Medium. Focused on US-based civil rights philanthropies (Anti-Racism Fund).12 General Catalyst has global investments, but Chenault’s specific footprint appears centered on domestic racial justice rather than foreign policy.

Analytical Insight: The board lacks any representation from human rights or international law backgrounds that could counterbalance the heavy commercial and technological bias toward Israel. The dominance of a16z and Sequoia Capital means the board is structurally incentivized to view Israel as a “tech hub” and “market” rather than an occupying power. This explains the board’s swift capitulation to investor pressure during the 2018/2019 settlement policy reversal.

2. The “Brand Israel” Integration Strategy

Beyond passive investment, Airbnb has actively participated in “Brand Israel” initiatives. These state-sponsored or state-aligned campaigns are designed to normalize Israel’s image as a liberal, technological beacon, effectively “whitewashing” the occupation through tourism and culture.

2.1 Strategic Partnerships with the Ministry of Tourism

The relationship between Airbnb and the Israeli government is not adversarial; it is collaborative, characterized by high-level negotiations and Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs).

  • The Taxation & Regulation Negotiations: Following the rapid expansion of Airbnb in Israel, the company engaged in direct negotiations with the Israeli Tax Authority and the Ministry of Tourism to regularize the market. Tourism Minister Yariv Levin publicly stated that he viewed Airbnb as “essential to the development of incoming tourism”.13 These negotiations were not merely administrative; they legitimized Airbnb’s operation across the “entire country,” often a euphemism in Israeli administrative law that includes the West Bank (Judea and Samaria).
  • Marketing Agreements: Reports indicate Airbnb has signed marketing agreements to showcase tourism experiences.14 While similar agreements exist with India 15 and Abu Dhabi 16, the agreement with Israel is distinct due to the contested nature of the territory. By promoting listings in “Israel” without distinguishing the OPT, Airbnb effectively adopts the Israeli government’s annexationist mapping.
  • The Abu Dhabi Precedent: The MoU signed with Abu Dhabi’s Department of Culture and Tourism (DCT) requires Airbnb to share transaction data.16 This raises concerns about similar data-sharing arrangements with Israeli security services under the guise of “tourism regulation,” potentially exposing Palestinian users or activists to surveillance.

2.2 Normalization through Tech Tourism: The DLD Festival

Airbnb has sponsored and participated in the DLD Tel Aviv Innovation Festival, a premier event in the “Startup Nation” calendar.

  • “Entrepreneur Hosts Entrepreneur” (EHE): Airbnb launched this specific initiative to encourage Israeli startup leaders to host international guests for the festival.17
  • Ideological Function: Molly Turner, Airbnb’s Global Head of Civic Partnerships, stated the goal was to create “deep and long-lasting connections”.17 This program explicitly serves the “Brand Israel” objective of bypassing the political conflict by focusing on technology and entrepreneurship. By embedding international tech workers in Israeli homes, Airbnb facilitates a form of soft diplomacy that humanizes the host population while rendering the nearby occupation invisible.

2.3 “Pinkwashing” and Pride Sponsorship

Airbnb has heavily utilized Tel Aviv Pride as a marketing vehicle.

  • Sponsorship: The company has produced films and campaigns such as “Host with Pride” centered on Tel Aviv.18
  • The “Pinkwashing” Critique: Civil society groups argue that promoting Tel Aviv as a gay-friendly oasis is a deliberate state strategy (“Pinkwashing”) to distract from the lack of rights afforded to Palestinians mere miles away. By sponsoring these events, Airbnb aligns its brand with the liberal face of the Israeli state while simultaneously profiting from settlements where such rights are irrelevant to the displaced Palestinian population.19

3. Operational Complicity: The Settlement Economy

The most material form of complicity identified is Airbnb’s direct commercial operation within illegal Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

3.1 Forensic Accounting of Settlement Listings

Investigation confirms that Airbnb continues to list properties in settlements, which are recognized as war crimes under the Fourth Geneva Convention.

  • Volume and Location: Analysis identified approximately 200 to 300 properties listed in West Bank settlements.21
  • Specific Settlements: Listings have been verified in:
    • Tekoa: A settlement where listings market “views of the Judean mountains” while omitting the context of land seizure from the neighboring Palestinian village of Tuqu’.23
    • Kfar Adumim: A settlement located in the strategic E1 corridor, vital for the contiguous Palestinian state, where Airbnb listings support the permanence of the settlement infrastructure.25
    • Ariel: A major settlement bloc deep within the West Bank.
  • Misrepresentation: A significant proportion (approx. 40%) of settlement listings identify their location as “Israel” rather than “Palestinian Territories”.23 This misleads consumers and contributes to the “de facto annexation” of the land by erasing the Green Line in the digital cartography used by millions of travelers.

3.2 The “Proceeds of Crime” and Money Laundering Allegations

The continued listing of these properties has exposed Airbnb to criminal complaints regarding money laundering.

  • Legal Theory: The Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and partner organizations have filed complaints in the UK and Ireland arguing that because settlements are war crimes (based on the Rome Statute), revenue generated from them constitutes “proceeds of crime”.22
  • The Mechanism: When Airbnb takes a commission from a booking in a settlement built on stolen private Palestinian land, it is arguably laundering the proceeds of that theft.
  • The “Donation” Defense: In 2019, Airbnb stated it would donate profits (not revenue) from these listings to humanitarian aid organizations.27 However, critics note that this does not mitigate the complicity; the activity itself—driving tourism traffic and economic sustenance to the settlements—continues. Furthermore, transparency regarding which organizations receive these funds and the exact amounts remains opaque.28

3.3 United Nations “Blacklist”

In February 2020, the UN OHCHR released a database of business enterprises involved in certain activities relating to settlements. Airbnb was included as one of 112 companies.1

  • Specific Citation: The company was cited for “The provision of services and utilities supporting the maintenance and existence of settlements, including transport.”
  • Implication: This listing serves as an international authoritative acknowledgement of Airbnb’s complicity in human rights violations, distinct from mere political opinion.

4. The 2018-2019 Policy Reversal: A Case Study in Political Capitulation

The timeline of Airbnb’s attempt to delist settlement properties provides the clearest evidence of its vulnerability to pro-Israel political pressure and its prioritization of US market access over international law compliance.

4.1 November 2018: The Ban

On November 19, 2018, Airbnb announced it would remove approximately 200 listings in Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.

  • Rationale: The company applied a decision-making framework concluding that the settlements were “at the core of the dispute between Israelis and Palestinians” and that companies “should not profit on lands where people have been displaced”.29
  • Significance: This was the first time a major US corporation acknowledged the illegality of the settlements and acted to align its business operations with international law.

4.2 The Counter-Offensive

The reaction from the Israeli government and pro-Israel advocacy groups was immediate, coordinated, and punitive.

  • Government Retaliation:
    • Tourism Minister Yariv Levin: Threatened to impose a “special and high tax” on Airbnb’s activities in Israel and encouraged hosts to sue the company.31
    • Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan: Called on US states with anti-BDS laws to blacklist Airbnb, explicitly framing the corporate decision as a boycott of Israel.33
    • Entry Bans: Erdan threatened to ban Amnesty International researchers from Israel for their role in pressuring Airbnb.33
  • Legal Warfare (Lawfare):
    • US Lawsuits: A class-action lawsuit (Silber et al. v. Airbnb) was filed in Delaware by dual US-Israeli citizens who owned properties in the settlements, alleging religious discrimination under the Fair Housing Act.35
    • Israeli Lawsuits: Multiple suits were filed in Israeli courts claiming discrimination based on place of residence.36
  • State-Level Blacklisting: Complying with Erdan’s call, states like Texas (Comptroller) and Florida moved to place Airbnb on their lists of “Scrutinized Companies” that boycott Israel. The University of Texas at Austin prohibited employees from using Airbnb for official travel.37 This threatened Airbnb’s access to state pension fund investment and government contracts.

4.3 April 2019: The Reversal

Under this multifaceted pressure, Airbnb settled the Silber lawsuit and reversed its policy on April 9, 2019.

  • The Settlement Terms: Airbnb agreed to “continue to allow listings throughout all of the West Bank”.27
  • The “Profit” Compromise: The company stated it would “take no profits from this activity in the region” and donate them to non-profits.27
  • Analysis: This reversal demonstrated that for Airbnb, the commercial risk of losing US state contracts and facing prolonged litigation outweighed the reputational risk of facilitating war crimes. The company effectively admitted that it could not sustain a policy based on international law when faced with the domestic US legal architecture designed to protect Israeli settlements (Anti-BDS laws).

5. Lobbying, Legislation, and the Anti-Boycott Complex

Airbnb’s political activity in Washington D.C. and state capitals has been heavily shaped by the need to navigate the anti-BDS legislative landscape.

5.1 Lobbying Disclosures

Federal lobbying reports indicate Airbnb has engaged on issues related to the “Israel Anti-Boycott Act” (S. 720 / H.R. 1697) and the “Combating BDS Act”.38

  • Objective: While the specific content of their lobbying (for or against) is often shielded, the context of the 2018 reversal suggests the lobbying was defensive—aimed at preventing the company from being categorized as a boycotter under these broadly defined acts.
  • Recent Activity (2023-2024): More recent filings list lobbying on “H.R. 8818: American Privacy Rights Act” and “S. 2498: Hotel Fees Transparency Act”.40 While these appear unrelated, the continued engagement with legislators who are staunch supporters of anti-BDS laws (often the same sponsors) creates a transactional relationship where Airbnb must maintain “good standing” on the Israel file to secure favorable regulation on privacy and taxes.

5.2 Trade Chamber Memberships

Airbnb is a member of key bilateral trade organizations that function as lobbying arms for Israeli economic integration.

  • Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce (IBCC): Airbnb is identified as a member.41 The IBCC works to promote bilateral trade and investment, effectively normalizing business ties with Israel regardless of the occupation.
  • US-Israel Business Council: Through its US Chamber of Commerce affiliation and presence on the UN database, Airbnb is part of the cohort defended by the US-Israel Business Council against “discriminatory” labeling.42

6. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Comparative Crisis Response

A critical measure of political complicity is the consistency of ethical standards. A comparative audit of Airbnb’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the Israeli bombardment of Gaza (2023-2024) reveals a profound “Double Standard.”

6.1 The Ukraine Mobilization (Total Economic War)

In response to Russia’s aggression, Airbnb activated a “total mobilization” model:

  • Operational Cessation: Airbnb suspended all operations in Russia and Belarus. It blocked host calendars from accepting new bookings and restricted users in those countries from making reservations.43 This was a proactive sanction exceeding government requirements in some aspects.
  • Economic Resistance: The company facilitated a “grassroots movement” where global users booked 61,000 nights in Ukraine (value ~$2 million) with no intention of staying, solely to transfer cash to Ukrainian hosts. Airbnb waived all guest and host fees to maximize this aid.43
  • CEO Activism: Brian Chesky actively promoted these measures on social media and added a Ukrainian flag to his profile, signaling clear ideological alignment with the Ukrainian state.

6.2 The Gaza Neutrality (Status Quo Maintenance)

In response to the Gaza crisis, Airbnb adopted a “neutrality” model that effectively maintained the status quo of the occupation:

  • Business as Usual: Airbnb did not suspend listings in Israel or the illegal West Bank settlements. Operations continued without interruption.
  • Financial Policy: The company activated its “Extenuating Circumstances” policy, allowing penalty-free cancellations.3 It did not waive fees for bookings to facilitate aid, nor did it encourage a “booking for donation” movement for Palestinian families, despite the immense humanitarian need.
  • Rhetoric: Internal communications described the situation as “complex” and condemned “Hamas’ terrorist attacks”.3 There was no condemnation of state violence or the settlement expansion that preceded the war.

6.3 Statistical Disparity

Metric Ukraine Response Gaza/Palestine Response
Operational Status Total Suspension in aggressor territory. Active operations in occupying state & settlements.
Fees Waived for all bookings. Standard fees applied (cancellation penalties waived).
Housing Aid Commitment to house 100,000 refugees. General “refugee fund” support; no specific target for Gazans publicized.
Ideology “Stand with Ukraine.” “Complex situation”; Partnership with ADL.

Insight: This disparity confirms that Airbnb’s “Safe Harbor” is selectively applied. The company is willing to weaponize its platform against geopolitical adversaries of the US (Russia), but retreats to “complexity” and “neutrality” when the aggressor is a US ally (Israel), even when the victim population (Palestinians) faces comparable or greater displacement.

7. Internal Governance and Human Capital Control

Airbnb’s internal culture regarding Palestine has been marked by censorship, disciplinary action, and the suppression of dissent, creating a hostile environment for employees expressing solidarity with Palestinian rights.

7.1 Disciplinary Actions and The “Civility” Trap

Reports document the termination of employees for pro-Palestinian speech.

  • The Alexandria Dunn Case: An employee was fired after posting “Free Palestine” on internal or social channels. The dismissal was justified under “civility” or “hate speech” codes.44
  • Pattern of Retaliation: Legal advocacy groups (Palestine Legal) and news reports indicate a broader pattern where offers are rescinded or employees forced to resign for past social media activity critical of Israel.45
  • The ADL Factor: By partnering with the ADL to define “hate speech” 3, Airbnb effectively incorporates a definition of antisemitism that often flags anti-Zionism or criticism of Israel as a fireable offense.

7.2 Internal Censorship and “Project Lighthouse” Bias

  • Slack Leaks: Leaked internal messages from Airbnb’s “Jewish@” and “Arabs@” Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) reveal deep tensions. Management has been accused of moderating or deleting posts that contextualize the violence in Gaza as a result of occupation, while allowing posts supporting Israeli military actions to remain as expressions of “safety” or “grief”.3
  • Project Lighthouse Critique: Airbnb’s “Project Lighthouse” uses data to uncover racial discrimination against Black guests in the US.46 Employees and activists have demanded the company apply similar methodology to Palestinian guests, who frequently face discrimination and cancellation from Israeli hosts. The company has refused to extend this transparency tool to the Israel/Palestine market, protecting the discriminatory practices of its host base in the region.47

7.3 Whistleblower Allegations

A whistleblower complaint alleged that Airbnb “weakened its policies against extremists and hate groups” and dissolved the team responsible for removing them.48 In the context of the West Bank, where violent settler groups (e.g., “Hilltop Youth”) often use platforms to organize or fundraise, the degradation of these safety teams increases the risk that Airbnb is facilitating the logistics of violent extremism.

8. Legal and Reputational Risk Horizons

Airbnb faces significant and escalating legal risks due to its continued operations in the settlements.

8.1 The Money Laundering Lawsuits (GLAN)

The Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and Sadaka have filed criminal complaints in the UK and Ireland targeting Airbnb’s subsidiaries.22

  • The Argument: Because settlements are war crimes, revenue generated from them is “criminal property.” Therefore, Airbnb’s processing of payments for these rentals constitutes money laundering under the UK Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) and Irish money laundering legislation.
  • Status: As of 2024, complaints have been filed with the Garda National Economic Crime Bureau (GNECB). While the GNECB initially declined to investigate, judicial review proceedings are underway.22 This represents a novel and dangerous legal liability that extends to individual executives.

8.2 Future Liabilities

  • ICJ Ruling (July 2024): The International Court of Justice ruling that Israel’s occupation is illegal and that states must prevent trade/investment support 22 heightens the risk for Airbnb. Continued operation may be interpreted as “aiding and abetting” under universal jurisdiction principles.
  • Data Privacy (GDPR): The potential sharing of user data with Israeli authorities under tourism MoUs 16 exposes the company to GDPR violations in Europe, particularly regarding the sensitive data of Palestinian users.

 

Works cited

  1. Database of Business Enterprises Pursuant to Human Rights Council Resolutions 31/36 and 53/25 | OHCHR, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.ohchr.org/en/business/bhr-database
  2. Joe Gebbia exits Airbnb.org board amid refugee aid controversy – ShortTermRentalz, accessed January 12, 2026, https://shorttermrentalz.com/news/joe-gebbia-exits-airbnb-org-board-amid-refugee-aid-controversy/
  3. A message to Airbnb employees about the crisis in Israel and Gaza, accessed January 12, 2026, https://news.airbnb.com/a-message-to-airbnb-employees-about-the-crisis-in-israel-and-gaza/
  4. Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky Announces Major Donation to Help Ukraine – YouTube, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDLlnztmavg
  5. Jeffrey (Jeff) Jordan – Investor Relations | Airbnb | Governance – Board of Directors – Person Details, accessed January 12, 2026, https://investors.airbnb.com/governance/board-of-directors/bod-person-details/default.aspx?ItemId=751c3f6f-f248-4df5-a2b8-78c50c56e72c
  6. Jewish Herald-Voice (Houston, Tex.), Vol. 76, No. 50, Ed. 1, accessed January 12, 2026, https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth1616179/m1/33/
  7. Paying It Back by Paying It Forward | Your Giving Matters – Harvard Alumni Association, accessed January 12, 2026, https://alumni.harvard.edu/donors/stories/lin
  8. Nordic Business Forum 2025, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.nbforum.com/nbf2025/
  9. Manage – Boston Trust Walden, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.bostontrustwalden.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/WIEFX-N-PX_6.30.21.pdf
  10. Realizing Youth Potential in the Mediterranean: Unlocking Opportunities, Overcoming Challenges, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iairs_2.pdf
  11. A Multidisciplinary Journal on National Security – INSS, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Adkan23.4Eng_e-3.pdf
  12. Turning a Moment into a Movement: Interview with Anti-Racism Fund Co-Founders Kenneth and Kevin Chenault – Alumni, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.alumni.hbs.edu/careers/blog/post/turning-a-moment-into-a-movement-interview-with-anti-racism-fund-co-founders-kenneth-and-kevin-chenault
  13. Israel Wants to Be First Country to Collect Tax Via Airbnb, accessed January 12, 2026, https://barlaw.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/BNA-112-Israel-Airbnb-PRINT.pdf
  14. Airbnb to promote MTDC’s new tourism experiences worldwide – The Hindu, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/mumbai/airbnb-to-promote-mtdcs-new-tourism-experiences-worldwide/article19033973.ece
  15. Airbnb signs an MoU with the MOT to showcase India’s heritage stays and promote cultural tourism, accessed January 12, 2026, https://bottindia.com/airbnb-signs-an-mou-with-the-ministry-of-tourism-to-showcase-indias-heritage-stays-and-promote-cultural-tourism/
  16. Open Letter to Airbnb Regarding Users Data in Abu Dhabi – SMEX, accessed January 12, 2026, https://smex.org/open-letter-to-airbnb-regarding-users-data-in-abu-dhabi/
  17. Airbnb launches new platform aimed at DLD Festival goers – Ynetnews, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.ynetnews.com/business/article/4696366
  18. Love is Welcome Here: Our #HostWithPride Film | Airbnb – YouTube, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OL2P2u45SCA
  19. The Gay friendly Home in TEL-AVIV – Airbnb, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/5972751
  20. Campaign branding Tel Aviv gay destination underway – Ynetnews, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3922524,00.html
  21. Airbnb share listing: company is ‘deeply compromised’ by Israeli settlement properties, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/airbnb-share-listing-company-deeply-compromised-israeli-settlement-properties
  22. Multi-jurisdiction legal actions target Airbnb listings in illegal Israeli Settlements – GLAN, accessed January 12, 2026, https://glanlaw.org/cases/multi-jurisdiction-legal-actions-target-airbnb-listings-in-illegal-israeli-settlements/
  23. Seized, settled, let: how Airbnb and Booking.com help Israelis make money from stolen Palestinian land | West Bank | The Guardian, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/feb/27/seized-settled-let-how-airbnb-and-bookingcom-help-israelis-make-money-from-stolen-palestinian-land
  24. Israel/OPT: Airbnb and Booking.com helping illegal settlers to make money from stolen Palestinian land – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israelopt-airbnb-and-bookingcom-helping-israelis-to-make-money-from-stolen-palestinian-land/
  25. Chapter 4: Online Tourism Companies Doing Business in the Settlements, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2019/01/chapter-4-online-tourism-companies-doing-business-in-the-settlements/
  26. Airbnb faces multi-Jurisdictional legal actions over alleged profiting from rentals in illegal Israeli settlements, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/airbnb-faces-multi-jurisdictional-legal-actions-over-alleged-profiting-from-rentals-in-illegal-israeli-settlements/
  27. Update on Listings in Disputed Regions – Airbnb Newsroom, accessed January 12, 2026, https://news.airbnb.com/update-listings-disputed-regions/
  28. 140+ Palestinian groups call for boycott of Airbnb dirty money – Jewish Voice for Peace, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/2019/11/19/no-airbnb-dirty-money/
  29. Listings in Disputed Regions – Airbnb Newsroom, accessed January 12, 2026, https://news.airbnb.com/listings-in-disputed-regions/
  30. Airbnb to take rentals in Israeli West Bank settlements off website – The Guardian, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/nov/19/airbnb-removes-rentals-in-israeli-west-bank-settlements
  31. Israel steps up boycott fight after Airbnb settlement ban – Arab News PK, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.arabnews.pk/node/1408471/middle-east
  32. Israel may look to punish Airbnb with special tax after settlement ban, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-may-look-to-punish-airbnb-with-special-tax-after-settlement-ban/
  33. Minister threatens to ban Amnesty over settlement tourism report | The Times of Israel, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/minister-threatens-to-ban-amnesty-over-settlement-tourism-report/
  34. Airbnb’s Listings in Disputed Territories: A Tortured Compromise – Just Security, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.justsecurity.org/65114/airbnbs-listings-in-disputed-territories-a-tortured-compromise/
  35. Silber, et al. v. Airbnb Historic Case – Center for Constitutional Rights, accessed January 12, 2026, https://ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/our-cases/silber-et-al-v-airbnb
  36. Israel/Palestine: Airbnb overturns decision to remove listings in West Bank following lawsuits, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israelpalestine-airbnb-overturns-decision-to-remove-listings-in-west-bank-following-lawsuits/
  37. Airbnb lawsuit exposes attacks on free speech and Palestinian human rights, accessed January 12, 2026, https://palestinelegal.org/news/2019/4/3/airbnb-lawsuit-exposes-attacks-on-free-speech-and-palestinian-human-rights
  38. Israel and the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) Movement – EveryCRSReport.com, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44281.html
  39. WIELDING ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW TO SUPPRESS THE MOVEMENT FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS, accessed January 12, 2026, https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/1360-1381_Online-1.pdf
  40. LD-2 Disclosure Form, accessed January 12, 2026, https://lda.senate.gov/filings/public/filing/cb4e70f3-001e-4dbe-b330-e322521b4149/print/
  41. Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/stores/israel-britain-chamber-of-commerce/
  42. U.S.-Israel Business Council | U.S. Chamber of Commerce, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.uschamber.com/program/international-affairs/middle-east-central-asia-and-turkey-affairs/us-israel-business-council
  43. Airbnb’s actions in response to the Ukraine crisis, accessed January 12, 2026, https://news.airbnb.com/airbnbs-actions-in-response-to-the-ukraine-crisis/
  44. Woman Fired After Voicing Support For Palestine – YouTube, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTL7ZXl4xWY
  45. How should HR handle employee social media posts on the Israel-Hamas war? – HR Dive, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.hrdive.com/news/fired-over-palestine-israel-social-media-posts/701844/
  46. A six-year update on Airbnb’s work to fight discrimination, accessed January 12, 2026, https://news.airbnb.com/sixyearadupdate/
  47. How we’re using data to make travel more open for all – Airbnb Newsroom, accessed January 12, 2026, https://news.airbnb.com/2024-project-lighthouse-update/
  48. Whistleblower says Airbnb weakened its policies on extremists and hate groups – YouTube, accessed January 12, 2026, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhUebwUnjGI

 

Related News & Articles