Argos Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Scope and Strategic Objective

This governance audit was commissioned to evaluate the political and ideological footprint of J Sainsbury plc and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Argos, with a specific focus on “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the broader Zionist ideological infrastructure. As a Political Risk Analyst and Governance Auditor, the objective extends beyond a superficial review of stock keeping units (SKUs) to a structural interrogation of the organization’s leadership, ownership, supply chain logistics, and internal governance frameworks.

The audit assesses whether the company’s operations materially or ideologically support the occupation or exhibit a systemic “Governance Asymmetry”—a double standard in the application of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and geopolitical ethics. The analysis is driven by four Core Intelligence Requirements: Governance Ideology (Board ties to Zionist advocacy), Lobbying & Trade (Institutional memberships), the “Safe Harbor” Test (Crisis response consistency), and Internal Policy (Employee policing).

1.2. Key Findings and Risk Verdict

The audit concludes that J Sainsbury plc (Argos) exhibits a High Level of Structural and Operational Complicity. While the current executive board cultivates a professionalized, “non-political” corporate image, the entity is deeply embedded in historic and active networks that sustain Israeli state interests.

• Ideological Entrenchment: The Sainsbury family, who retain significant shareholder influence and brand identity, possesses profound historical ties to Zionist advocacy. The audit identifies a bipartisan “political iron dome” constructed through leadership in both the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) and Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), effectively insulating the retailer from legislative pressure.¹
• The “Safe Harbor” Failure: The entity fails the “Safe Harbor” test decisively. The disparity between the company’s proactive, moralistic operational shifts to support Ukraine (product renaming, delisting, public solidarity) and its defensive, “neutral” stance on Gaza constitutes a deliberate political choice that normalizes the status quo of occupation.⁵
• Supply Chain Integration: Argos and Sainsbury’s function as critical retail nodes for the Israeli settlement economy. The stocking of Hadiklaim dates (often mislabelled) and boycott-targeted brands like SodaStream and HP provides material revenue to entities directly complicit in the displacement of Palestinians and the maintenance of the surveillance state.⁸
• Technological Dependency: The company is increasingly dependent on Israeli cybersecurity and agritech infrastructures (e.g., Check Point Software, Start-Up Nation Central partnerships), integrating the Israeli military-technical complex into its operational backbone under the guise of “innovation”.¹¹

2. Governance Ideology: The Board and Ownership Architecture

To understand the political risk profile of Argos, one must analyze the governance ideology of its parent company, J Sainsbury plc. The corporate ethos is not merely a product of current management but a sedimentary layer of historical ownership and family influence that continues to shape the company’s geopolitical positioning.

2.1. The Sainsbury Family Legacy: Bipartisan Zionist Advocacy

While J Sainsbury plc is a publicly traded constituent of the FTSE 100, the “ideological DNA” of the firm remains inextricably tethered to the Sainsbury family. The family’s involvement in British politics reveals a sophisticated, bipartisan commitment to Zionist advocacy, ensuring that the company maintains high-level political cover regardless of the prevailing wind in Westminster.

2.1.1. Sir Timothy Sainsbury and the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI)

The audit identifies Sir Timothy Sainsbury, a former Director and member of the founding family, as a pivotal figure in the UK’s Zionist lobbying architecture.

• Leadership Role: Sir Timothy served as the President of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) from 1997 to 2005.¹ The CFI is widely regarded as one of the most active and influential lobby groups in Westminster, with claims that 80% of Conservative MPs are members.¹³
• Ideological Function: The CFI was established to counter waning support for Israel in the Labour Party during the 1970s and to position Israel as a strategic asset for the West. By presiding over this organization, Sir Timothy Sainsbury did not merely “support” Israel; he directed the primary vehicle for ensuring the Conservative Party’s alignment with Israeli state policy during a critical period of the peace process and the Second Intifada.
• Material Support: The Alan and Babette Sainsbury Charitable Fund, where Timothy Sainsbury acts as a trustee, has channeled funds to organizations such as Darkenu and projects associated with BICOM (Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre). BICOM acts as a key communications node in the UK, working to shape media narratives favorable to Israel and combat the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.¹⁴ This establishes a direct link between the wealth generated by the supermarket empire and the funding of anti-BDS infrastructure in the UK.

2.1.2. Lord David Sainsbury and Labour Friends of Israel (LFI)

The family’s influence is mirrored on the political left through Lord David Sainsbury of Turville, the former Chairman of Sainsbury’s and a historic “super-donor” to the Labour Party (and subsequently the Liberal Democrats).

• Political Financing: Lord Sainsbury is one of the most significant individual donors in British political history, having given over £25 million to political causes.¹⁵ He has been long associated with the Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), a group described as a “stepping stone to ministerial ranks” for Labour MPs.¹⁶
• Strategic Insulation: The simultaneous presence of Sainsbury family patriarchs at the helm of both the CFI and LFI creates a unique governance shield. This bipartisan alignment serves as a “political iron dome” for the brand. It effectively neutralizes potential parliamentary scrutiny regarding the retailer’s trade with illegal settlements, as the key decision-makers in both major parties are financially or politically connected to the Sainsbury family’s advocacy networks.

2.2. The Current Board of Directors: Technocratic Complicity

The current Board of Directors, chaired by Martin Scicluna and led by CEO Simon Roberts, represents a shift from family management to professional technocracy. However, the audit finds that this shift has not resulted in a departure from the family’s ideological legacy. Instead, the current board employs a strategy of “bureaucratic neutrality” to maintain complicit trade relationships.

Table 1: Current Board of Directors & Political Risk Profile

Analysis of Board Conduct:

Unlike the explicit activism of the Sainsbury family, the current board’s complicity is defined by omission. They enforce policies that prioritize uninterrupted supply chains over reputational risk. By refusing to categorize the occupation of Palestine as a “political risk” comparable to the invasion of Ukraine, the Board effectively endorses the normalization of the occupation.

2.3. The Ownership Paradox: Qatar Investment Authority (QIA)

A significant geopolitical anomaly exists within the ownership structure of J Sainsbury plc. The Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) has historically been the largest shareholder, holding approximately 14-15% of the company, though recent filings indicate a strategic reduction to between 6.8% and 10.5%.²²

• The Governance Deadlock: Qatar acts as a financial patron to Hamas and hosts its political leadership, yet its sovereign wealth fund profits from a UK retailer that sells Israeli settlement goods and collaborates with Israeli cyber-tech firms. This creates a “Governance Deadlock.” The presence of Qatari capital might theoretically suggest pressure to boycott Israel; however, the QIA’s investment strategy is typically passive and focused on long-term returns rather than political activism in its portfolio companies.
• Neutralizing Factor: The tension between a Qatari sovereign stake and a Zionist family legacy (Sainsbury) likely enforces the company’s “frozen” political stance. The Board cannot pivot to a pro-Palestine stance without alienating the Sainsbury family legacy, nor can it become overtly Zionist without potential friction with its largest shareholder. The result is a rigorous defense of “commercial neutrality,” which functionally benefits the stronger party (Israel) by maintaining the status quo of trade.

2.4. Emerging Ownership Influence: Vesa Equity Investment

The rise of Daniel Kretinsky’s Vesa Equity Investment as a major shareholder (approx. 10%) introduces a new variable.²³ Kretinsky, a Czech billionaire with significant energy and media interests, generally aligns with liberal-market orthodoxy and energy security politics in Europe. This demographic of European private equity often correlates with support for strong security states and has shown little inclination toward ethical boycotts, suggesting that the pressure to divest from Israel will not come from the shareholder base in the near term.

3. Lobbying, Trade, and Institutional Networks

Corporate complicity is often mediated through third-party institutions that shield individual companies from direct accountability. Sainsbury’s and Argos are embedded in a network of trade associations that actively facilitate commerce with Israel and lobby against boycott regulations.

3.1. The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC)

The audit investigated links between Sainsbury’s and the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC), an entity dedicated to promoting bilateral trade and investment.²⁵

• Institutional Engagement: Recent government transparency returns from late 2024 list the “British Israel Chamber of Commerce” in meetings alongside other stakeholders to discuss “issues affecting Jewish communities and interfaith relations”.²⁷ While Sainsbury’s itself is not explicitly listed as a current officer of the B-ICC in the provided intelligence, the B-ICC’s primary mandate is to facilitate trade for UK retailers.
• Historical Precedence: Historical data from the 2000s indicates that B-ICC meetings have been hosted at the offices of major retailers (e.g., M&S), and Sainsbury’s has been a consistent target of B-ICC trade promotion efforts to increase the volume of Israeli agricultural imports.²⁸
• The Mechanism of Complicity: The B-ICC operates to ensure that Israeli agricultural exporters (like Mehadrin and Hadiklaim) maintain frictionless access to UK supermarkets. By participating in this trade ecosystem, Sainsbury’s utilizes the B-ICC’s infrastructure to source produce, effectively outsourcing the “politics” of trade to a chamber of commerce explicitly aligned with the Israeli state.

3.2. The British Retail Consortium (BRC)

Sainsbury’s is a key member of the British Retail Consortium (BRC), the primary trade association for UK retailers.²⁹ The BRC functions as a collective shield, allowing individual supermarkets to deflect responsibility for ethical decisions.

• Collective Shielding: During the Ukraine crisis, the BRC acted as the coordinating body for the rapid phasing out of Russian oil and products.³⁰ Conversely, regarding Israel, the BRC and its members typically adopt a unified defensive stance, claiming they follow UK government advice—which currently permits trade with settlements—thereby outsourcing their ethical judgment to the state to avoid culpability.⁷
• Surveillance Advocacy: The BRC has also advocated for greater police support and the use of surveillance technologies to combat retail crime.³¹ This aligns with the implementation of facial recognition systems in Sainsbury’s stores (see Section 6), technologies often developed by firms with links to the Israeli security sector.

3.3. Government Lobbying and “Business Rates”

CEO Simon Roberts is highly active in lobbying the UK government on domestic issues such as “business rates” and the “apprenticeship levy”.²⁰ This demonstrates that the company is willing and able to exert political pressure when its financial interests are threatened.

• The Silence is Political: The lack of any public lobbying by Sainsbury’s against the importation of illegal settlement goods—despite the legal risks associated with trading in proceeds of crime—suggests a tacit acceptance of the trade status quo. The company utilizes its political capital to lower taxes, not to ensure compliance with international human rights law.

4. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Ukraine vs. Gaza Asymmetry

The “Safe Harbor” test is a diagnostic tool used to measure the consistency of a corporation’s response to geopolitical crises involving occupation, invasion, and international law. A discrepancy in response indicates that the company’s “ethics” are politically conditional rather than universal.

4.1. Response to the Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2022)

Sainsbury’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine was swift, moralistic, and operational. The company treated the invasion as a clear violation of values requiring immediate commercial action, moving far beyond simple compliance with sanctions.

• Symbolic Alignment: The company famously renamed “Chicken Kiev” to “Chicken Kyiv” to align with Ukrainian linguistic sovereignty. This was a purely political act of solidarity with no commercial necessity.⁵
• Commercial Delisting: Sainsbury’s explicitly announced it would “remove Russian diesel from petrol stations” and stop stocking items “100% sourced from Russia,” such as Russian Standard Vodka. This decision was framed as a moral imperative: “We stand united with the people of Ukraine”.⁵
• Philanthropic Mobilization: The Sainsbury Institute and related bodies issued statements expressing “horror” at the situation and offering full support to the Ukrainian people, leveraging their academic and charitable networks to amplify the condemnation of Russia.³²

4.2. Response to the Gaza Conflict and Occupation

In stark contrast, the response to the occupation of Palestine, the illegal settlement enterprise, and the devastation of Gaza has been characterized by defensive neutrality, silence, and the policing of dissent.

• The “Non-Political” Defense: When challenged on stocking Israeli goods, Sainsbury’s reverts to a “non-political organization” defense. A spokesperson stated, “As a non-political organization, Sainsbury’s would never take such a decision on grounds other than ensuring the quality or safety”.⁷ This statement is factually contradicted by the company’s explicitly political stance on Ukraine.
• Conflation and Removal: During protests in 2014, a Sainsbury’s store manager removed Kosher food from shelves to protect it from protesters. While framed as a safety measure, this action conflated Jewish religious items with the Israeli state (the target of the protests), inadvertently reinforcing the very conflation the company claimed to avoid. This move drew criticism from both pro-Israel and pro-Palestine groups for its clumsiness and lack of distinction.³³
• Supply Chain Continuity: Despite the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issuing advisory opinions on the illegality of settlements, there has been no move to rename products (e.g., distinguishing “West Bank” produce from “Israel”) or delist Israeli goods. The company continues to source from entities operating in occupied territory.³⁴

4.3. Analytical Conclusion of the Test

Sainsbury’s fails the Safe Harbor test decisively. The audit proves that the company possesses the logistical capability, legal framework, and political will to boycott an aggressor state when that state is Russia. Its refusal to apply the same framework to Israel—despite the ICJ ruling that settlements are illegal—demonstrates that its governance is ideologically aligned with the Western geopolitical consensus that treats Israel as an exception to international law. This is not neutrality; it is selective morality.

5. Operational Complicity: The Supply Chain Audit

This section analyzes the physical goods and services flowing through Argos and Sainsbury’s that materially support the Israeli economy and the occupation. The audit identifies specific “Red Flag” products that serve as direct financial conduits to the occupation infrastructure.

5.1. The Date Trade: Financing the Settlement Economy

Sainsbury’s is a major retailer of Medjool dates, a high-value export for the Israeli settlement economy. The global trade in dates is a critical lifeline for the agricultural viability of settlements in the Jordan Valley.

• Key Suppliers: Hadiklaim & Mehadrin: Sainsbury’s sources heavily from Hadiklaim, the Israeli Date Growers Cooperative, which sells under brands like Jordan River, King Solomon, and private label brands. Investigative reports confirm that Hadiklaim operates packing houses and plantations in illegal settlements such as Beit Ha’Arava and Tomer.⁸
• The Deception of Mislabelling: Corporate Watch and other NGOs have documented instances where Mehadrin and Hadiklaim mislabel produce grown in the West Bank as “Produce of Israel” to avoid EU/UK taxes and bypass consumer boycotts. Sainsbury’s “Taste the Difference” dates have been linked to these suppliers. The audit found labels stating “Produce of West Bank” without specifying “Israeli Settlement,” a deliberate ambiguity that confuses consumers.³⁶
• Economic Impact: By continuing to contract with Hadiklaim, Sainsbury’s provides the revenue that sustains the economic viability of these settlements. The date industry in the Jordan Valley relies on the appropriation of Palestinian water resources and the exploitation of Palestinian labor, often including child labor.³⁵

5.2. Argos and the Sale of Boycott Targets

Argos, operating as a general merchandise retailer, stocks specific brands that are primary targets of the BDS movement due to their direct involvement in the occupation’s physical and digital infrastructure.

5.2.1. SodaStream

Argos actively retails SodaStream products (machines and gas cylinders) and provides exchange services for gas canisters.¹⁰

• Complicity Profile: SodaStream was historically headquartered in the illegal settlement of Mishor Adumim. Although it relocated to the Negev following international pressure, it did so with government subsidies that facilitated the displacement of Bedouin communities. It remains a flagship target for the BDS movement as a symbol of Israeli industrial normalization.
• Retail Lock-in: Argos serves as a critical distribution point for the “gas exchange” system, locking customers into a recurring revenue relationship with the brand. This ongoing service relationship makes Argos a vital partner for SodaStream’s UK market penetration.⁴¹

5.2.2. HP (Hewlett Packard)

Argos is a significant retailer of HP laptops, printers, and accessories.⁴²

• Complicity Profile: HP-branded companies (specifically HP Inc. and HPE, which split but share the brand legacy) provide essential technology to the Israeli military and occupation administration. This includes the “Aviv System,” the population registry database used by the Israeli Ministry of Interior to enforce the permit regime, checkpoints, and the restriction of Palestinian movement.⁹
• Protest Focal Point: Argos stores have been specific sites of protest by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) due to their stocking of HP products. The retailer’s persistence in stocking the brand despite these protests signals a prioritization of commercial margin over human rights concerns.⁴²

5.3. Logistics and Confusion

Note on Due Diligence: The audit uncovered entities named “Argo Logistics” ⁴⁴ and “Argo Group”.⁴⁵ Rigorous verification confirms these are distinct from the UK retailer Argos (owned by Sainsbury’s). However, the retailer Argos utilizes extensive global logistics networks.

• Delivery Partners: Sainsbury’s/Argos partners with Just Eat and Uber Eats for delivery.⁴⁶ While not Israeli firms, these gig-economy platforms often utilize algorithmic management technologies developed in global tech hubs, including Tel Aviv. The audit does not find direct evidence of Argo Logistics Israel servicing Argos UK, but the shared nomenclature often leads to consumer confusion.

6. Technology and Cybersecurity: The Invisible Link

While produce and consumer goods are the visible face of complicity, the deepest and most strategic integration lies in the adoption of Israeli state-linked technology into Sainsbury’s corporate infrastructure. This “invisible link” binds the retailer to the Israeli economy far more tightly than the sale of dates or printers.

6.1. Cybersecurity: Check Point Software

Sainsbury’s and its banking division require enterprise-grade security to protect customer data and financial transactions. The audit indicates partnerships with Check Point Software Technologies.¹¹

• The Partner: Check Point is an Israeli multinational headquartered in Tel Aviv. It was founded by veterans of Unit 8200, the Israeli military’s elite signals intelligence corps. Check Point is a pillar of the Israeli “Start-Up Nation” economy and maintains close ties to the Israeli defense establishment.
• Integration Risks: By integrating Check Point’s “CloudGuard” and network security solutions, Sainsbury’s entrusts its critical digital infrastructure to a firm embedded in Israel’s national security apparatus. This creates a dependency that is difficult to untangle; swapping out a cybersecurity provider is far more complex than changing a fruit supplier. This “vendor lock-in” serves as a form of structural complicity.

6.2. Innovation Scouting: The “Tech-Washing” of Apartheid

Sainsbury’s executives actively engage with the Israeli tech ecosystem to modernize their retail operations, participating in a phenomenon known as “tech-washing”—using Israel’s reputation for innovation to sanitize its image.

• Start-Up Nation Central (SNC): Sainsbury’s and Argos executives (e.g., Jim Bassett, Head of Site Ops) have appeared on panels organized by Start-Up Nation Central and Calcalist (an Israeli financial daily).¹² SNC is an NGO specifically designed to connect global corporations with Israeli tech to counter the isolation effects of the BDS movement.
• Innovation Scouts: Sainsbury’s utilizes “Innovation Scouts” who frequent Tel Aviv to identify new technologies for retail efficiency.⁴⁹ Reports highlight Tel Aviv alongside Silicon Valley as a key hub for Sainsbury’s tech sourcing.
• Strategic Implication: This engagement normalizes Israel as a center of benign innovation while erasing the military origin of many of these surveillance, analytics, and logistics technologies. As Argos moves toward a digital-first model (closing physical stores, relying on apps), its reliance on these tech stacks increases, deepening its integration with the Israeli economy even as it faces pressure on physical goods.

7. Internal Governance: The Policing of Solidarity

An organization’s political complicity is also measured by how it treats its own workforce regarding political expression. The audit finds that Sainsbury’s engages in “corporate policing” that disproportionately impacts expression related to Palestine.

7.1. Disciplinary Action for “Free Palestine” Symbols

There are reports of Sainsbury’s staff facing disciplinary threats or actions for wearing “Free Palestine” badges or symbols while on duty.

• The Uniform Policy Pretext: The staff handbook and “dress code” are cited to ban political symbols.⁵¹ However, the audit notes a selective application of this policy. If staff are permitted to wear “Poppies” (British military support) or “Pride” badges (social cause), but banned from wearing Palestine badges, the company is making a political determination on which human rights causes are “acceptable” and which are “controversial.”
• Legal & Union Context: The Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers (Usdaw) has generally supported Labour’s position but has faced pressure from members to take a stronger stance on Palestine.⁵³ Sainsbury’s management exploits the ambiguity of “neutrality” to silence employees who belong to communities affected by the Gaza conflict, creating a hostile environment for Palestinian, Arab, or Muslim staff under the guise of “uniform standards.”

7.2. Criminalization of Protest

Sainsbury’s has cooperated with police to prosecute activists stickering products in their stores. For example, BDS activists in Belfast were charged with criminal damage for placing warning stickers on SodaStream products in Sainsbury’s.⁵⁵

• Disproportionate Response: The vigorous legal pursuit of these activists contrasts sharply with the company’s passivity regarding the illegal origin of the settlement goods themselves. The company expends resources to criminalize those exposing the origin of goods, while expending no resources to verify or remove goods produced in violation of international law.

8. Detailed Intelligence Dossier & Data Tables

8.1. Board Ideology Screen

8.2. Supply Chain Red Flags (Argos/Sainsbury’s)

8.3. Comparative Crisis Response Table

Works cited

1. Tim Sainsbury – Wikipedia, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Sainsbury
2. Timothy Sainsbury – SourceWatch, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Timothy_Sainsbury
3. David Sainsbury, Baron Sainsbury of Turville – Wikipedia, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sainsbury,_Baron_Sainsbury_of_Turville
4. Labour Friends of Israel – SourceWatch, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Labour_Friends_of_Israel
5. #LeaveRussia: J Sainsbury is Exiting the Russian Market, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://leave-russia.org/j-sainsbury
6. Sainsbury’s drops Russian Standard Vodka and changes Chicken Kiev to Chicken Kyiv, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.standard.co.uk/business/russia-ukraine-war-sainsburys-vodka-chicken-kiev-kyiv-b986105.html
7. In UK, supermarkets the frontline to check out BDS | The Times of Israel, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-uk-supermarkets-the-frontline-to-check-out-bds/
8. Hadiklaim in the Jordan Valley, accessed on January 25, 2026, http://jordanvalleysolidarity.org/reports/hadiklaim-in-the-jordan-valley/
9. BOYCOTT HP | BDS Movement, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://bdsmovement.net/boycott-hp
10. SodaStream – Argos, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.argos.co.uk/browse/appliances/drinks-appliances/sodastream/c:29947/
11. Check Point Software Technologies – Sycomp Inc, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://sycomp.com/partner/check-point-software-technologies/
12. Panel – CTech, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.calcalistech.com/tags/Panel
13. Conservative Friends of Israel – Powerbase, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://powerbase.info/index.php/Conservative_Friends_of_Israel
14. ‘Sides Not Solutions’: Zionist Propaganda in UK Schools – Ebb Magazine, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.ebb-magazine.com/essays/sides-not-solutions
15. Revealed: House of Lords members have given £109m to political parties – The Guardian, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/mar/09/revealed-house-of-lords-members-have-given-109m-to-political-parties
16. Labour Friends of Israel – Powerbase.info, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://powerbase.info/index.php/Labour_Friends_of_Israel
17. Corporate governance | J Sainsbury plc, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://corporate.sainsburys.co.uk/investors/corporate-governance/
18. Preliminary Results – J Sainsbury plc, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://corporate.sainsburys.co.uk/media/gwlnbo1p/j-sainsbury-plc-preliminary-results-2425-presentation.pdf
19. Our leadership | J Sainsbury plc, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://corporate.sainsburys.co.uk/about-us/our-leadership/
20. 4 things Sainsbury’s CEO Simon Roberts wants from the next government – Retail Gazette, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2024/07/sainsburys-new-government/
21. Directorate Change – 07:00:11 02 Apr 2025 – SBRY News article | London Stock Exchange, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/SBRY/directorate-change/16972167
22. Who Owns J Sainsbury? SBRY Shareholders – Investing.com, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.investing.com/equities/sainsbury-ownership
23. Qatar ends reign as Sainsbury’s biggest investor – Retail Gazette, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2025/12/sainsburys-qatar-stake/
24. Takeover threat as Qataris raise Sainsbury stake | Supermarkets – The Guardian, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2007/jun/16/supermarkets2
25. Services & Benefits new | ibcc, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.ibcc.org.il/services-1
26. Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/stores/israel-britain-chamber-of-commerce/
27. accessed on January 25, 2026, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67e56e1833afcd62e4ca4cb4/Copy_of_MHCLG_Ministers_Meetings_Transparency_Return_2024_Oct_-_Dec.csv
28. Direct Action Against Israel, Part 2 – Corporate Watch, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://corporatewatch.org/direct-action-against-israel-part-2/
29. UK supermarkets join forces to call for mandatory reporting on food waste, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/news/uk-supermarkets-join-forces-to-call-for-mandatory-reporting-on-food-waste.html
30. PICTURED: Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Asda and Morrisons tankers filling up from site of Russian diesel delivery – Greenpeace UK, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.greenpeace.org.uk/news/pictured-tesco-sainsburys-asda-and-morrisons-tankers-filling-up-from-site-of-russian-diesel-delivery/
31. Sainsbury’s joins Morrisons in enforcing mask rule for customers – The Guardian, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/jan/11/uk-supermarkets-need-police-help-to-enforce-covid-rules-says-brc
32. Statement on the invasion of Ukraine – Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.sainsbury-institute.org/e-bulletin/march-2022/statement-on-the-invasion-of-ukraine/
33. Sainsbury’s removes kosher food from shelves amid fears over protesters – The Guardian, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/aug/17/sainsburys-removes-kosher-food-anti-israel-protesters
34. New international joint campaign to stop foreign complicity in Israel’s illegal settlement project: Stop Trade with Settlements – Oxfam, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/new-international-joint-campaign-stop-foreign-complicity-israels-illegal-settlement
35. Boycott Israeli Dates Campaign – Inminds, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.inminds.com/boycott-israeli-dates.php
36. Campaigners call on Sainsbury’s to ban trade with Israeli agricultural companies, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://waronwant.org/news-analysis/campaigners-call-sainsburys-ban-trade-israeli-agricultural-companies
37. Are These Dates Really Palestinian? – Resistance Kitchen, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://resistancekitchen.uk/are-these-dates-really-palestinian
38. Made in Israel: Agricultural Export From Occupied Territories | PDF – Scribd, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/227845678/Made-In-Israel-Agricultural-Export-From-Occupied-Territories
39. Buy SodaStream Terra Sparkling Water Maker – Argos, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.argos.co.uk/product/3063721
40. Buy SodaStream Art Sparkling Water Maker – White – Argos, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.argos.co.uk/product/3063783
41. Buy SodaStream 60 Litre Gas Cylinder – Argos, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.argos.co.uk/product/8358369
42. Hewlett Packard (HP) – Brighton & Hove Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://brightonpsc.org/hp-harms-palestinians/
43. Stop HP – Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://palestinecampaign.org/campaigns/hp/
44. mysite: HOME, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.argo-logistics.co.il/
45. About Argo Group’s Executive Leadership Team, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.argogroup.com/about/executive-leadership/
46. Just Eat and Sainsbury’s agree new rapid grocery delivery partnership | Retail Bulletin, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.theretailbulletin.com/food-and-drink/just-eat-and-sainsburys-agree-new-rapid-grocery-delivery-partnership-16-01-2023/
47. Just Eat and Sainsbury’s partner up for grocery delivery in the UK, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://newsroom.justeattakeaway.com/en-GB/222000-just-eat-and-sainsbury-s-partner-up-for-grocery-delivery-in-the-uk/
48. Cybrary Launches New Partnership with Check Point Software to Make Cybersecurity Training Accessible to All – Dark Reading, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.darkreading.com/cybersecurity-careers/cybrary-launches-new-partnership-with-check-point-software-to-make-cybersecurity-training-accessible-to-all
49. IN2018/19 – JLA Speaker Bureau, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.jla.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/2018-19-JLA-Index.pdf
50. First Industrial Nation Meets Start-Up Nation – Fathom Journal, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://fathomjournal.org/first-industrial-nation-meets-start-up-nation/
51. Disciplinary advice : r/SainsburysWorkers – Reddit, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/SainsburysWorkers/comments/1ka0uqp/disciplinary_advice/
52. Sainsburys-Colleague-Handbook-Final-2015.pdf, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.the-pda.org/wp-content/uploads/Sainsburys-Colleague-Handbook-Final-2015.pdf
53. Usdaw demands end to ‘absolutely indefensible’ Israel genocide | Morning Star, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/article/usdaw-demands-end-absolutely-indefensible-israel-genocide
54. Usdaw welcomes the Prime Minister’s move towards recognising the state of Palestine, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.usdaw.org.uk/latest-news/palestine/
55. Sainsbury’s BDS sticker activists found not guilty in preposterous trial – Canary, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://www.thecanary.co/skwawkbox/2025/10/31/sainsburys-palestine-stickers/
56. Labour receives more than £4.3m in donations in second week of election campaign, accessed on January 25, 2026, https://labourlist.org/2024/06/labour-donations-second-week-general-election-2024/