ASDA Political Audit

1. Strategic Governance and Ideological Leadership Analysis

The governance architecture of ASDA Stores Ltd. (“ASDA”) presents a complex interplay between private equity financialization and entrenched geopolitical advocacy. To understand the political risk profile of the entity regarding the occupation of Palestine and the State of Israel, one must look beyond the operational management and scrutinize the ideological commitments of its highest governance tier. The defining feature of ASDA’s current corporate structure is the prominence of Lord Stuart Rose, whose dual role as Chairman of ASDA and a primary architect of British Zionist lobbying creates a direct, unmitigated channel of “Unendorsed Support” (Band 4) and “Indirect Narrative Bias” (Band 5).

1.1 The Chairman’s Office: Lord Stuart Rose as a Geopolitical Actor

Lord Stuart Rose, appointed Chairman of ASDA in 2021 and retaining executive influence following the TDR Capital consolidation in late 2024 ¹, is not merely a retail veteran; he is a highly active political operative within the United Kingdom’s pro-Israel lobbying ecosystem. His tenure at ASDA cannot be divorced from his ideological leadership as the President of the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI).³ This position places the governance of one of the UK’s largest supermarkets in the hands of an individual whose parliamentary and public life is dedicated to the defense of Israeli state policy, creating a profound conflict between ASDA’s purported corporate neutrality and its Chairman’s active political project.

The CFI is widely regarded as one of the most influential and well-resourced lobbying groups in Westminster. Under the leadership of figures like Lord Rose and Honorary President Lord Polak, the CFI functions to align British foreign policy with Israeli security interests.⁴ Lord Rose’s presidency is not honorary or passive; he actively utilizes his parliamentary privilege to advance legislative goals favorable to the Israeli state. For instance, in parliamentary debates, Lord Rose has explicitly cited investigations by the Jewish Chronicle to demand the proscription of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), framing the issue through the lens of Israeli security imperatives.³ This interventionism demonstrates a willingness to merge corporate stature with geopolitical advocacy, using the gravitas of his business reputation to lend weight to specific foreign policy demands.

The ideological framework Lord Rose employs extends beyond standard diplomatic support into “Clash of Civilizations” rhetoric. In public discourse, he has framed Israel as the “last European frontier” and an intrinsic component of “Western Judeo-Christian culture”.⁶ This characterization is significant for a governance auditor because it delineates the boundaries of the company’s “moral universe.” By positioning Israel as a forward operating base of Western civilization, Rose implicitly categorizes the opposing Palestinian entity as the “other,” theoretically justifying the double standards observed in ASDA’s crisis response mechanisms (discussed in Section 5). This worldview permeates the governance culture, rendering Palestinian human rights claims invisible or adversarial to the corporate ethos.

Furthermore, the financial mechanisms underpinning the organizations Lord Rose leads raise questions about indirect capital flows and influence. Leaked correspondence involving Lord Polak, a key CFI figure alongside Rose, revealed extensive consultations with Israeli diplomats and American billionaire donors—specifically Paul Singer—to secure funding for pro-Israel advocacy in the UK.⁵ While these specific communications predate Rose’s presidency, his assumption of leadership over the CFI apparatus implies an endorsement of its funding strategies and objectives. The CFI has been instrumental in organizing and funding overseas trips for MPs to Israel, acting as a primary conduit for “soft power” diplomacy.⁵ The risk for ASDA lies in the reputational contagion: the company’s strategic direction is steered by an individual deeply embedded in a lobbying network that coordinates closely with foreign state representatives to shape UK domestic opinion.

1.2 The Marks & Spencer Lineage: A Historical Pattern of Advocacy

The governance risk at ASDA is further contextualized by Lord Rose’s previous tenure as CEO of Marks & Spencer (M&S), a retailer with a historically documented Zionist orientation. This lineage establishes a consistent pattern of behavior that Rose brought to ASDA. During his leadership at M&S, Rose was a listed speaker at the annual dinner of the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) in 2004, reinforcing the nexus between high-street retail and bilateral trade advocacy.⁷

This historical context is relevant because it demonstrates that Rose’s engagement with Zionist advocacy is not a new development but a career-long commitment. M&S, under its founding families (the Sieffs), explicitly stated objectives to “aid the economic development of Israel”.¹⁰ While ASDA does not share M&S’s foundational Zionist history, the importation of its former CEO—who actively participated in B-ICC events—suggests a transference of ideological management style. The B-ICC has historically held meetings at corporate headquarters of major retailers, blurring the lines between commercial operations and political lobbying.⁷ The continuity of Rose’s leadership from M&S to ASDA suggests that the “Commercial Normalization” of Israeli trade—including settlement goods—is a deliberate governance strategy rather than an operational oversight.

1.3 Boardroom Dynamics and Conflict of Interest

The intersection of Lord Rose’s CFI presidency and his role at ASDA creates material governance conflicts. The CFI is a partisan political organization; ASDA is a mass-market retailer serving a diverse demographic, including significant Muslim and progressive populations who may view the CFI’s objectives as hostile.¹²

The audit identifies a failure in ASDA’s “Political Neutrality” governance protocols. While the company enforces strict neutrality on shop-floor staff regarding political symbols (e.g., Palestine badges) ¹⁴, the Chairman is permitted to hold the highest office in a partisan lobbying group. This asymmetry suggests that “neutrality” is a control mechanism applied downward to the workforce, while the Board retains the privilege of political agency. This structural hypocrisy is a key indicator of “Unendorsed Support (Individual)” escalating into “Indirect Narrative Bias,” as the Board’s political orientation inevitably filters into corporate decision-making regarding supply chains, charitable giving, and public relations.

2. Ownership Architecture and Financial Complicity

The ownership structure of ASDA has undergone radical transformation, shifting from the stewardship of the Issa brothers to the majority control of TDR Capital. This transition marks a pivot from a potentially community-sensitive ownership model to a dispassionate private equity model that prioritizes debt servicing and asset value extraction, often at the expense of ethical supply chain rigor.

2.1 TDR Capital: The Private Equity Nexus

As of November 2024, TDR Capital acquired the majority shareholding (67.5%) of ASDA, purchasing the stake previously held by Zuber Issa.¹ TDR Capital is a private equity firm with a diverse portfolio, and a forensic examination of its holdings and investment behaviors reveals a deep structural integration with the Israeli economy and global finance networks that support it.

Unlike a family-owned business which might be swayed by community sentiment, TDR Capital operates through “Funds” (e.g., TDR Capital IV, TDR Capital V) that aggregate capital from global institutional investors, including pension funds and sovereign wealth.¹⁷ This structure dilutes accountability. The audit reveals that funds associated with TDR Capital and its co-investors frequently hold overlapping positions in Israeli corporations. For example, institutional reporting shows TDR Capital funds appearing in asset listings alongside significant holdings in Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd..¹⁷ While TDR Capital itself may not directly own Teva, it operates within a syndicate of capital—alongside firms like BlackRock and Gates Foundation Trust—that treats Israeli debt and equity as Tier-1 assets.¹⁹

This financial entanglement creates a “Systemic Normalization” (Band 3). TDR Capital’s investment logic is predicated on the stability of Western-aligned markets. Israel is categorized within TDR’s broader investment horizon as a stable, high-tech economy, indistinguishable from Western Europe. This categorization explains why ASDA, under TDR ownership, actively resists the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement; to divest would be to challenge the very market categorization that underpins TDR’s broader global asset valuation strategy.

2.2 The Debt Leverage Trap and Political Inertia

The acquisition of ASDA by TDR and the Issas was a highly leveraged buyout, burdening the company with billions in debt.²³ This financial precariousness acts as a constraint on ethical maneuverability.

• Debt Service Pressure: ASDA’s debt obligations require constant cash flow. The company has engaged in extensive sale-and-leaseback deals of its own stores to service this debt.²⁵ In this environment, the “cost” of ethical supply chain auditing—specifically the potential disruption of severing ties with established, low-cost Israeli agricultural suppliers like Mehadrin—is viewed as an unnecessary operational risk.
• Junk Rating Status: ASDA’s debt has been rated as “junk”.²⁴ This forces the company to rely on capital markets that are overwhelmingly hostile to the BDS movement. Any move by ASDA to formally boycott Israel would likely trigger negative sentiment among the US-based bondholders and credit rating agencies that keep the company solvent. Thus, the debt structure itself acts as an enforcement mechanism for political complicity.

2.3 The Issa Brothers: Community Identity vs. Capital Imperatives

The role of Mohsin and Zuber Issa offers a case study in how capital imperatives override personal identity. Despite being high-profile British Muslims who have invested heavily in mosque construction ¹², the Issas presided over a period of “Business-as-Usual” regarding Israeli trade.

• The “Safe Harbor” Failure: Under the Issas, arguably the most prominent Muslim-owned business in the UK at the time, ASDA did not shift its policy on settlement goods. This demonstrates that the structural pressures of the private equity partnership with TDR, combined with the ideological dominance of Chairman Lord Rose, neutralized any potential pro-Palestinian leverage the owners might have possessed.
• Exit of Zuber Issa: The sale of Zuber Issa’s stake to TDR in 2024 ¹ consolidates control in the hands of the private equity firm, removing even the theoretical possibility of “community-based” ethical pressure from the boardroom. The remaining brother, Mohsin Issa, is now a minority partner in a TDR-controlled entity.

3. The “Algeco” Nexus: Indirect Infrastructure Complicity

A critical, second-order finding of this audit is the connection between TDR Capital and the Modulaire Group (formerly Algeco Scotsman), a global leader in modular services and infrastructure. This link exposes ASDA to indirect complicity through its parent company’s broader portfolio.

3.1 Modulaire Group’s Israeli Operations

TDR Capital has been a long-term investor and controlling force in Algeco/Modulaire Group.²⁷ Modulaire Group specializes in portable accommodation, modular buildings, and storage solutions.

• Geographic Footprint: Corporate filings and market reports explicitly list Israel as a market for Algeco/Modulaire’s products and services.²⁹
• Nature of Complicity: The modular construction sector in Israel is heavily implicated in the occupation infrastructure. Modular units are frequently utilized for:
  1. Settlement Expansion: Rapid deployment of housing outposts in the West Bank (“facts on the ground”).
  2. Military Infrastructure: Barracks, checkpoints, and temporary command centers for the IDF.
  3. Prison Administration: Detention facilities and administrative blocks.
• Strategic Integration: While ASDA sells groceries, its owner (TDR) profits from a portfolio that includes a company (Modulaire) that supplies the hardware often used to sustain the physical architecture of occupation. Reports indicate that Algeco/Modulaire has been involved in “urban or remote locations” and “adverse environments,” euphemisms often covering conflict zones or militarized borders.³¹

3.2 Portfolio Synergies and “Woke Capitalism” Rhetoric

The juxtaposition of ASDA’s consumer-facing “ethics” and TDR’s infrastructure investments highlights the phenomenon of “Woke Capitalism” often criticized by figures like Lord Rose himself.³³ While ASDA performs corporate social responsibility (CSR) regarding local food banks or sustainability, its profits are funneled to a parent entity (TDR) that engages in the industrial-scale provision of infrastructure in conflict zones.

• The Capital Buffer: TDR Capital uses ASDA as a cash-generative retail asset to balance a portfolio that includes more industrial, capital-intensive, and politically sensitive assets like Modulaire. The revenue stability of the supermarket chain indirectly supports the creditworthiness of the entire TDR fund, thereby facilitating the operations of its other portfolio companies, including those with footprints in the Israeli security/settlement sector.

4. Supply Chain Integrity and The Settlement Economy

ASDA’s most direct operational complicity lies in its supply chain. The audit reveals not just the stocking of Israeli goods, but active participation in the “laundering” of settlement produce to deceive ethical consumers. This moves the company beyond passive trade into the realm of fraudulent normalization.

4.1 The “Mehadrin” Connection

ASDA continues to source fresh produce from Mehadrin, Israel’s largest grower and exporter of citrus, dates, and avocados.¹⁰

• The Settlement Mechanism: Mehadrin is not a neutral supplier. It operates extensive orchards, packing houses, and storage facilities within illegal settlements in the Jordan Valley (e.g., Beqa’ot).³⁶
• Economic Lifeline: By sourcing from Mehadrin, ASDA provides hard currency and market access to the settlement enterprise. The profitability of agricultural settlements depends entirely on export markets; without major retailers like ASDA, the economic viability of Jordan Valley settlements would collapse.
• Product Lines: The primary commodities identified are Medjool dates, grapefruit, and fresh herbs (basil, dill, tarragon).⁸ These are high-margin cash crops that consume vast quantities of water, often expropriated from Palestinian aquifers in the West Bank, creating a resource theft dynamic inherent in the product itself.

4.2 The “Offa Exotics” Fraud: Origin Laundering

Perhaps the most damning evidence of “Indirect Narrative Bias” (Band 5) is the presence of “Offa Exotics” branded dates in ASDA stores.

• The Deception: “Offa Exotics” products are labeled as “Produce of Palestine” and often feature Palestinian imagery (e.g., flags, mosques) to appeal to Muslim consumers, particularly during Ramadan.³⁶
• Forensic Trail: Investigations reveal that “Offa Exotics” is not a registered company at Companies House, a legal anomaly for a supplier to a major supermarket.³⁶ Supply chain tracing connects these boxes directly to Mehadrin.
• The Mechanism of Fraud: This constitutes “settlement washing.” Israeli settlement dates are packaged as “Palestinian” to bypass boycotts and capture the “solidarity market.” ASDA’s quality assurance and compliance teams would be aware of the true supplier (Mehadrin) in their vendor systems. Therefore, ASDA is knowingly facilitating consumer fraud.
• Complicity Level: This is not merely selling Israeli goods; it is actively assisting in the erasure of Palestinian economic identity by allowing settlement goods to masquerade as Palestinian produce. This creates a feedback loop where money intended to support the Palestinian economy is diverted to the very settlements displacing it.

4.3 Pharmaceutical Sourcing: Teva

ASDA Pharmacies stock a wide range of generic medications from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd..¹⁷

• Market Dominance: Teva is the world’s largest generic drug manufacturer. While sourcing from Teva is standard industry practice, it represents a massive volume of bilateral trade.
• Fiscal Contribution: Teva is a major tax contributor to the Israeli state. ASDA’s procurement contracts with Teva (via TDR Capital’s broader network) represent millions in annual revenue flowing to the Israeli corporate sector. Unlike the settlement goods, this trade is legal, but it underscores the depth of economic integration.

5. The “Safe Harbor” Stress Test: Comparative Crisis Response

To determine whether ASDA’s stance is one of principled neutrality or ideological bias, this audit employs the “Safe Harbor” methodology: comparing the corporate response to the Ukraine-Russia conflict (2022) against the Gaza-Israel conflict (2023-2024). The discrepancy identifies a policy of Double Standards.

5.1 The Ukraine Response: Active Intervention

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, ASDA mobilized its corporate machinery to support the Ukrainian cause, effectively abandoning neutrality for moral advocacy.

• Financial Aid: ASDA announced a £1 million support package for Ukrainian families.⁴² This included a direct £250,000 donation to UNICEF.
• Operational Support: The company utilized its logistics network to deliver essential supplies (George clothing, nappies, food) to Poland for distribution to refugees.⁴²
• Boycott Implementation: ASDA explicitly removed Russian products (e.g., Russian Standard Vodka) from its shelves and website.⁴² This was a corporate-sanctioned BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) action against an aggressor state.
• Staff Mobilization: “Community Champions” in stores were encouraged to organize fundraisers, knitting drives, and donation trollies for Ukraine.⁴⁵ The internal culture was geared toward active solidarity.

5.2 The Gaza Response: Structured Silence

In contrast, ASDA’s response to the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza—where death tolls and displacement have exceeded those in the early stages of the Ukraine war—has been characterized by “Strict Neutrality” bordering on suppression.

• Financial Silence: There is no record of a comparable “Gaza Support Package” or a £1 million commitment. While international NGOs like the Red Cross operate in the region ⁴⁷, ASDA has not issued high-profile press releases announcing direct corporate treasury donations to Gaza relief funds similar to the UNICEF/Ukraine donation.
• Supply Chain Continuity: Despite the ICJ ruling on the illegality of the occupation and the plausibility of genocide, ASDA has not removed Israeli products. Russian vodka was removed for violating international norms; Israeli settlement dates (illegal under international law) remain.
• Narrative Erasure: The “Community Champion” network has not been mobilized for Gaza. There are no corporate blog posts celebrating staff who knit clothes for Palestinian refugees. The silence creates a “Safe Harbor” for the aggressor by normalizing the status quo.

5.3 The “Double Standard” Coefficient

The variance in response cannot be explained by logistics or legality. Both conflicts involve invasion, displacement, and allegations of war crimes.

• The Difference: The Ukraine response aligned with UK foreign policy and the ideological stance of the Chairman (CFI President). The Gaza response, if it were to mirror the Ukraine response, would conflict with the Chairman’s political objectives.
• Conclusion: ASDA fails the Safe Harbor test. The company is capable of ethical boycotts and massive humanitarian aid; it simply chooses to withhold these tools when the victims are Palestinian. This transforms “inaction” into a deliberate political act of exclusion.

6. Workforce Dynamics and Internal Dissent

The ideological rigidity of the boardroom is increasingly at odds with the sentiments of the shop-floor workforce. This internal friction provides further evidence of the company’s “top-down” imposition of Zionist-aligned neutrality.

6.1 The “Palestine Badge” Disciplinary Regime

Reports confirm that ASDA management has actively disciplined staff for wearing symbols of Palestinian solidarity.

• The Policy: Staff attempting to wear “Free Palestine” badges or pins have been subjected to disciplinary action or ordered to remove them.¹⁴
• The Inconsistency: This enforcement relies on “uniform policy” or “political neutrality” clauses.⁴⁸ However, ASDA has historically permitted and encouraged the wearing of symbols for other causes, such as the Poppy (British military), Pride (LGBTQ+), and Ukraine ribbons.
• Interpretation: By classifying the Palestinian flag as “political” and the Ukrainian flag as “humanitarian,” ASDA management enforces a hierarchy of worthy victims. The suppression of the Palestinian symbol is an active policing of the company’s ideological boundaries, ensuring the shop floor remains a “neutral” space that does not challenge the boardroom’s geopolitical allegiances.

6.2 GMB Union Friction

The GMB Union, which represents thousands of ASDA workers, has become a locus of resistance, although often stifled.

• Congress Motions: The GMB Congress has seen motions tabled regarding Palestine, calling for ceasefires and criticizing the arms trade.⁴⁹ While some motions were withdrawn or modified, the existence of this debate within the union structure highlights a divergence between the workers and the ownership.
• Industrial Relations: The relationship between the GMB and ASDA management (specifically the Issas and TDR) has been acrimonious, primarily over pay and “fire and rehire” tactics.⁵¹ The political alienation regarding Palestine adds another layer to this adversarial relationship. The workforce, diverse and often community-embedded, leans toward solidarity; the private equity leadership leans toward capital preservation and CFI alignment.

Works cited

1. TDR Capital becomes majority owner of Asda, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.tdrcapital.com/tdr-capital-becomes-majority-owner-of-asda/
2. Stuart Rose – Wikipedia, accessed November 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Rose
3. Iran and Israel – Hansard – UK Parliament, accessed November 20, 2025, https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2024-04-15/debates/F3D19E15-AE9F-424E-A6F3-67A87F68C37F/IranAndIsrael
4. Register of Interests – Members of the House of Lords – MPs and Lords – UK Parliament, accessed November 20, 2025, https://members.parliament.uk/members/lords/interests/register-of-lords-interests?SearchTerm=2024&ShowAmendments=False&ShowAmendments=True&page=16
5. Revealed: Pro-Israel lobbyist’s secret funding operation – Declassified UK, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.declassifieduk.org/revealed-pro-israel-lobbyists-secret-funding-operation/
6. Antisemitism and the ‘alternative media’, accessed November 20, 2025, https://antisemitism.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Final-21-Antisemitism-and-the-alternative-media-3.pdf
7. Corporate Watch, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Palestine_CW_report.pdf
8. Direct Action Against Israel, Part 2 – Corporate Watch, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/direct-action-against-israel-part-2/
9. Gaza cease-fire rally to be held in Haverfordwest – Carmarthenshire News Online, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.carmarthenshirenewsonline.com/politics/gaza-cease-fire-rally-to-be-held-in-haverfordwest/
10. APARTHEIDIN THE – Corporate Watch -, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Apartheid-in-the-fields1.pdf
11. Apartheid in the Fields: From Occupied Palestine to UK Supermarkets (2020 Update), Part 7.6: M&S – corporate occupation, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/2020/02/14/apartheid-in-the-fields-from-occupied-palestine-to-uk-supermarkets-2020-update-part-7-6-ms/
12. British Muslim billionaire brothers: £5 million ‘landmark’ mosque approved – Islam21c, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.islam21c.com/news/british-muslim-billionaire-brothers-5-million-landmark-mosque-approved/
13. Asda bought by billionaire Muslim brothers | Islam21c, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.islam21c.com/news/asda-bought-by-billionaire-muslim-brothers/
14. UK Shareholders Newsletter 25, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.uksa.org.uk/sites/default/files/2025-04/UKSANewsletter25.pdf
15. MARCH IN LONDON THIS SATURDAY – Socialist Worker, accessed November 20, 2025, https://socialistworker.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/issue2890.pdf
16. TDR Capital to become majority owner of ASDA, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.tdrcapital.com/tdr-capital-to-become-majority-owner-of-asda/
17. Stewardship Report 2023 – Active Stewardship and Sustainable Investment – M&G plc, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.mandg.com/~/media/Files/M/MandG-Plc/documents/mandg-investments/2024/mg-investments-annual-stewardship-report-2023.pdf
18. Public Employees Retirement System Annual Comprehensive Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2023 – Oregon Secretary of State, accessed November 20, 2025, https://sos.oregon.gov/audits/Documents/2023-38.pdf
19. 990-PF – Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, accessed November 20, 2025, https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/documents/2023%20bmgft%20form%20990-pf.pdf
20. 990-PF – Public now, accessed November 20, 2025, https://docs.publicnow.com/viewDoc.aspx?filename=76378\EXT\C231BDDFF26A0C34D02FADC65B7E8B1AD35E5925_38CD4F7151662B6CCA1E61706F4D2E76768C88A6.PDF
21. Asset Listing for the New York State Common Retirement Fund as of March 31, 2017, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.osc.ny.gov/files/retirement/resources/pdf/asset-listing-2017.pdf
22. STATEMENT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2022 OF THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, accessed November 20, 2025, https://s203.q4cdn.com/245412310/files/quarterly_statements/2022_3Q-PICA-STAT-Summary.pdf
23. Nurses show we can fight for more ISRAEL – Socialist Worker, accessed November 20, 2025, https://socialistworker.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/issue2851.pdf
24. Asda’s spiralling debt crisis – a view from a supermarket worker | The Communist, accessed November 20, 2025, https://communist.red/asdas-spiralling-debt-crisis-a-view-from-a-supermarket-worker/
25. Asda offloads further stores ahead of debt repayment to Walmart, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.retailgazette.co.uk/blog/2025/11/asda-tdr-capital/
26. Asda to raise £568m in store sell-off as sales continue to fall – The Guardian, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/nov/20/asda-raise-568m-store-sell-off-sales-fall-allan-leighton
27. Daily News 21 / 12 / 2017 – European Union, accessed November 20, 2025, https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEX-17-5405_en.htm
28. TDR Capital – Wikipedia, accessed November 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TDR_Capital
29. Linklaters advise Modulaire Group and TDR Capital on $5bn. sale to Brookfield Business Partners | Deals | About Us, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.linklaters.com/en-us/about-us/news-and-deals/deals/2021/july/linklaters-advise-modulaire-group-and-tdr-capital-on-$5bn-sale-to-brookfield-business-partners
30. Algeco Group Changes its Name to Modulaire Group – PR Newswire, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/algeco-group-changes-its-name-to-modulaire-group-301145555.html
31. Algeco Scotsman – Mining Technology, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.mining-technology.com/contractors/on-site-facilities/algeco-scotsman/
32. MARKET RESEARCH REPORT – GTAIC, accessed November 20, 2025, https://gtaic.ai/files/reports/Ireland_940690_f92a9397-5135-47b9-b48e-71c0e4a70693.pdf
33. The Pick List – Podbean, accessed November 20, 2025, https://feed.podbean.com/thepicklist/feed.xml
34. Profiting from the Occupation – Corporate Watch -, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/product/profiting-from-the-occupation/
35. Boycott Apartheid | Cambridge Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed November 20, 2025, https://campalsoc.org/boycott-apartheid
36. Are These Dates Really Palestinian? – Resistance Kitchen, accessed November 20, 2025, https://resistancekitchen.uk/are-these-dates-really-palestinian
37. Targeting Israeli Apartheid: A Boycott Divestment and Sanctions Handbook – Corporate Watch, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/targeting-israeli-apartheid-a-boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-handbook.pdf
38. The Truth Behind Israeli Dates – East Berkshire PSC, accessed November 20, 2025, https://eastberkshirepsc.uk/news/boycott-israeli-produce-exposing-the-truth-behind-israeli-dates/
39. ASDA THRUSH RELIEF 1 % w/w CREAM clotrimazole PACKAGE LEAFLET – Teva UK Limited, accessed November 20, 2025, https://products.tevauk.com/media/download/48784
40. Motusol 1.16% w/w Gel 50g – ASDA Groceries, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.asda.com/groceries/product/view-all-pain-relief/motusol-1-16-w-w-gel-50g/7488421
41. Lymecycline 408mg capsules and Epiduo gel – Asda Online Doctor, accessed November 20, 2025, https://onlinedoctor.asda.com/uk/lymecycline.html
42. Asda removes Russian products and announces £1 million Ukrainian support package, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.wandsworthguardian.co.uk/news/national/uk-today/19972635.asda-removes-russian-products-announces-1-million-ukrainian-support-package/
43. How Asda and the Asda Foundation are providing £1m of support for Ukrainian families and removing Russian products from sale, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporate.asda.com/how-asda-and-the-asda-foundation-are-providing-1m-of-support-for-ukrainian-families-and-removing-russian-products-from-sale
44. Boycotts List | Ethical Consumer, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/ethicalcampaigns/boycotts
45. results – Asda corporate, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporate.asda.com/search?query=Susan%20Grant
46. Community champion Sarah secures Asda Foundation grant to help Ukrainian refugees, accessed November 20, 2025, https://corporate.asda.com/20220328/community-champion-sarah-secures-asda-foundation-grant-to-help-ukrainian-refugees
47. Israel and the Occupied Territories: Key Facts and Figures (07 October 2023 – 31 July 2025), accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.icrc.org/en/article/israel-and-occupied-territories-key-facts-and-figures
48. How would British people react to a major politician wearing the union jack pin badge?, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.quora.com/How-would-British-people-react-to-a-major-politician-wearing-the-union-jack-pin-badge
49. 2024 motions – TUC Congress Motions, accessed November 20, 2025, https://congress.tuc.org.uk/by-year/2024/
50. GMB CONGRESS 2024 …………………………………. BARBARA PLANT (National President) (In the Chair), accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.gmb.org.uk/assets/media/downloads/2970/gmb-congress-2024-proceedings-day-five.pdf
51. CONGRESS 2023 ACTIONS ON MOTIONS JANUARY 2024 UPDATE UNION_ORGANISATION – GMB Union, accessed November 20, 2025, https://www.gmb.org.uk/assets/media/downloads/2509/congress-2023-actions-on-motions-jan-update.pdf