Birds Eye Political Audit

Overview

This dossier constitutes a comprehensive, forensic audit of the governance structures, political affiliations, trade relationships, and crisis response mechanisms of Birds Eye Limited and its parent company, Nomad Foods Limited. The audit was commissioned to determine the extent of the entity’s “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

The investigation utilizes a multi-layered intelligence approach, screening the ideological commitments of the Board of Directors, the philanthropic flows of key equity holders, the strategic integration of the company into bilateral trade lobbies, and the consistency of its ethical frameworks when applied to disparate geopolitical conflicts (the “Safe Harbor” test).

Key Findings

The audit concludes that Birds Eye and Nomad Foods exhibit a High Level of Political Complicity with the Zionist state apparatus and the settlement enterprise in the West Bank. This complicity is structurally embedded through the “Founder Preferred Share” mechanism, which ensures that the corporate profits generated by European consumers directly capitalize the private philanthropic vehicles of the company’s founders, Sir Martin E. Franklin and Noam Gottesman.

Primary Risk Indicators:

1. Direct Financing of Occupation Infrastructure: Co-Chairman Sir Martin E. Franklin is a documented donor to the Central Fund of Israel (CFI), a U.S.-based clearinghouse that provides significant funding to illegal West Bank settlements and extremist yeshivas. This creates a direct financial pipeline from Birds Eye revenue to the settlement movement.¹
2. Military Philanthropy: The corporate leadership maintains a sustained, high-value financial relationship with the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces (FIDF). Sir Martin Franklin has served on the National Board of the FIDF, and his charitable foundation has transferred hundreds of thousands of dollars to support the welfare of Israeli combatants.³
3. Governance Ideology: The Board of Directors includes individuals with deep ties to the Israeli financial and political establishment. Director Amit Pilowsky, founder of Key1 Capital, serves as a strategic bridge to the Israeli high-tech sector, facilitating the integration of Israeli agricultural technologies into Nomad Foods’ supply chain.⁵
4. Strategic “Tech-Washing”: Nomad Foods has prioritized R&D partnerships with Israeli food-tech firms (e.g., BlueTree Technologies, collaborations with Agronomics Limited), effectively normalizing trade relations and integrating the Israeli economy into its long-term growth strategy.⁶
5. Asymmetric Crisis Response: The company engaged in rapid operational and humanitarian adjustments following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Conversely, it has maintained total corporate silence regarding the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza (2023-2024), failing to address the weaponization of food despite being a leading food manufacturer. This discrepancy indicates a politicized application of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).⁷

Audit Verdict

The analysis indicates that Nomad Foods is not a neutral commercial actor. Through the specific design of its ownership structure and the active political philanthropy of its principals, the company functions as a significant economic node in the support network for the State of Israel and its military operations.

1. Corporate Genealogy and Control Structures

To understand the political footprint of Birds Eye, it is imperative to first deconstruct the ownership architecture of its parent company, Nomad Foods. Unlike traditional public companies where ownership is diffuse, Nomad Foods was structured to retain centralized control in the hands of its founders, thereby linking the corporate identity inextricably to their personal ideologies.

1.1 The Genesis of Nomad Foods

Nomad Foods was established in 2014 by Noam Gottesman and Sir Martin E. Franklin as a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), originally named “Nomad Holdings”.⁹ The entity was created with the specific intent of acquiring Iglo Group (which owned the Birds Eye brand in the UK and Europe) from private equity firm Permira.⁹

This acquisition structure is critical to the political risk assessment because it established the “Founder Preferred Shares” mechanism. As detailed in the company’s annual reports, these shares are designed to “incentivize the Founders to achieve Nomad’s objectives” and are structured to “align the interests of the Founders with those of the holders of ordinary shares on a long term basis”.¹² In practice, this mechanism ensures that Gottesman and Franklin retain outsized influence over the strategic direction of the company. Consequently, the political activities of these two individuals cannot be separated from the corporation; they are its architects and primary beneficiaries.

1.2 Distinction from Conagra Brands

It is a common analytical error to conflate the UK/European operations of Birds Eye with the US operations. The Birds Eye brand in the United States is owned by Conagra Brands, a separate entity.¹⁴ This audit focuses exclusively on Nomad Foods, which controls Birds Eye in the UK, Ireland, and Europe. While Conagra has its own political footprint, the governance ideology of Nomad Foods is distinct and, as the evidence suggests, far more deeply integrated into Zionist advocacy networks.

1.3 Key Governance Principals

The Board of Directors of Nomad Foods comprises individuals whose backgrounds suggest a strong predisposition toward pro-Israel advocacy and integration with the Israeli economy.

This board composition is not merely “business-friendly” toward Israel; it is structurally rooted in the Israeli-American financial nexus. The presence of Amit Pilowsky, specifically, signals a strategic orientation toward Tel Aviv as a source of innovation and capital partnership.⁵

2. Governance Ideology: The Zionist Philanthropic Complex

The first core intelligence requirement of this audit was to screen the Board, CEO, and Owners for membership in Zionist advocacy groups. The investigation reveals that the leadership of Nomad Foods is deeply embedded in the philanthropic infrastructure that supports the Israeli military (IDF) and the settlement enterprise.

2.1 Sir Martin E. Franklin: The Military-Settlement Nexus

Sir Martin Franklin represents the highest risk factor in this audit. His philanthropic vehicle, the Julie and Martin Franklin Charitable Foundation, serves as a primary conduit for channeling wealth derived from his corporate ventures (including Nomad Foods) into Israeli state and para-state organizations.

2.1.1 Financing the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces (FIDF)

The audit confirms that Sir Martin Franklin has served as a National Board Member of the FIDF.³ The FIDF is the sole organization authorized to collect charitable donations on behalf of the soldiers of the Israel Defense Forces across the United States. Its mission is to provide for the “wellbeing” of soldiers, which includes recreational facilities, educational programs, and financial support for lone soldiers.

• Historical Funding: Between 2002 and 2013, the Franklin Foundation donated $544,200 to the FIDF.³
• Recent Funding: In 2023, amidst escalating tensions in the region, the foundation donated a further $150,000 to the FIDF.¹

Implication: By serving on the board and providing sustained financial support, the Co-Chairman of Nomad Foods is directly invested in the operational morale of a military force currently engaged in combat operations in Gaza—operations that have drawn condemnation from international human rights bodies and are the subject of genocide proceedings at the ICJ. This creates a direct link between the sale of Birds Eye fish fingers in the UK and the welfare of IDF combat units.

2.1.2 Financing the Central Fund of Israel (CFI)

Perhaps the most egregious finding regarding political complicity is the Franklin Foundation’s financial support for the Central Fund of Israel (CFI).

• The Mechanism: The CFI is a U.S.-based 501(c)(3) organization that acts as a “clearinghouse” for donations to Israeli charities. It has been the subject of intense scrutiny and criticism for funneling millions of dollars to organizations that support illegal settlements in the West Bank.²
• The Controversy: Investigations by The New York Times and The Intercept have revealed that CFI funds have flowed to extremist groups such as Honenu (which provides legal aid to settlers accused of violence against Palestinians) and the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva (known for its radical anti-Palestinian teachings and connection to “price tag” attacks).¹⁷ The CFI also funds the Israel Land Fund, which actively works to evict Palestinian families from their homes in East Jerusalem.²
• The Donation: In 2023, the Julie and Martin Franklin Charitable Foundation donated $40,000 to the Central Fund of Israel.¹
• Analysis: This donation is not accidental. The reputation of the CFI as a primary funding vehicle for the settlement movement is well-established in philanthropic circles. By choosing to route funds through the CFI, the leadership of Nomad Foods is effectively engaging in the capitalization of the occupation. This violates the “Do No Harm” principles of standard Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and exposes the company to severe reputational risk should these links be widely publicized.

2.1.3 The Jewish National Fund (JNF)

The Franklin Foundation also lists donations to the Jewish National Fund (JNF) totaling $100,000.⁴ The JNF is a quasi-governmental organization in Israel that controls approximately 13% of the land. It prohibits the sale or lease of this land to non-Jews, effectively enforcing a system of housing discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel. Furthermore, the JNF has been heavily involved in the afforestation of Bedouin villages in the Negev (Naqab), a practice criticized as a form of ethnic displacement.¹⁹

2.2 Noam Gottesman: The Cultural and Structural Zionist

While Sir Martin Franklin’s support is militaristic and settlement-focused, Co-Chairman Noam Gottesman’s influence is structural and cultural.

• Background: Gottesman was born in Israel to a prominent family; his father, Dov Gottesman, was the president of the Israel Museum.²⁰
• Business Network: Gottesman’s career, from Goldman Sachs to GLG Partners and finally Nomad Foods, has been characterized by close cooperation with Israeli capital. His investment vehicle, TOMS Capital, operates within the same high-net-worth Zionist philanthropic circles as Franklin.
• Ideological Posture: While less publicly vocal about specific settlements, the “Founder Preferred” structure means that Gottesman’s wealth—and his ability to support institutions like the Israel Museum (which is built on Palestinian land in Sheikh Jarrah/West Jerusalem borders)—is derived from the commercial success of Nomad Foods.¹²

2.3 Amit Pilowsky: The Strategic Link

The appointment of Amit Pilowsky to the Board of Directors in 2022 serves a specific strategic function.⁵ Pilowsky is the founder of Key1 Capital, a fund focused on “Israeli and Israeli-related growth technology companies”.⁵

• Strategic Intent: Pilowsky’s presence on the board indicates a deliberate corporate strategy to integrate Israeli technology into Nomad Foods’ operations. This is not passive investment; it is an active pursuit of “innovation” that relies on the Israeli military-industrial-academic complex (often referred to as the “Start-up Nation” ecosystem).
• Political Signal: By elevating an Israeli tech investor to the board of a European frozen food giant, Nomad Foods signals to the market that it views Israel not as a political liability, but as a core technological partner.

3. Lobbying and Trade: The “Brand Israel” Nexus

The second core intelligence requirement necessitates an audit of Nomad Foods’ integration into trade lobbies and “Brand Israel” initiatives. The investigation confirms that the company utilizes its corporate influence to normalize and strengthen UK-Israel trade relations.

3.1 The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (BICC)

Nomad Foods and its subsidiaries maintain connections to the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (BICC). The BICC is a primary lobbying vehicle dedicated to promoting trade between the UK and Israel, often working to counter the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.²¹

• Objective: The BICC’s mission is to “find partners in research & development, investment, joint venture, distribution”.²¹
• Participation: Corporate filings and biographies indicate that key Nomad personnel and associated entities operate within the BICC network. By participating in this chamber, Birds Eye lends its brand credibility to the Israeli economy. In the context of political risk, this membership is an active political statement: it asserts that the company views the Israeli market as a legitimate and desirable partner, irrespective of the occupation or international law violations.

3.2 “Tech-Washing” and The Open Innovation Portal

A critical finding of this audit is Nomad Foods’ use of “Open Innovation” to deepen its reliance on the Israeli tech sector. This strategy, often termed “Tech-Washing,” involves partnering with Israeli startups to present a progressive, futuristic corporate image while financially supporting the state’s economy.

3.2.1 The Open Innovation Portal

Nomad Foods launched an Open Innovation Portal to “accelerate food tech collaborations”.²² While ostensibly global, the portal’s activities and the board’s composition (specifically Pilowsky) direct significant attention toward Tel Aviv.

• BlueTree Technologies: Nomad Foods has partnered with BlueTree Technologies, an Israeli startup based in the north of Israel (Kiryat Shmona/Tel Aviv).⁶ BlueTree specializes in sugar reduction technology.
• Implication: By investing in and partnering with BlueTree, Nomad Foods is directly engaging with the Israeli economy. The success of this partnership would mean that Birds Eye products in UK supermarkets would contain intellectual property (IP) and ingredients processed using Israeli technology, creating a permanent royalty stream flowing from the UK consumer to the Israeli tech sector.

3.2.2 BlueNalu and Cellular Agriculture

Nomad Foods has announced a major collaboration with BlueNalu to develop cell-cultured seafood.²³ While BlueNalu is US-based, this partnership is deeply intertwined with the Israeli food-tech ecosystem, which is a global leader in cellular agriculture (cultivated meat).

• Agronomics Limited: Nomad Foods’ innovation strategy overlaps with Agronomics Limited, a venture firm chaired by Jim Mellon that is heavily invested in the Israeli cellular agriculture sector (e.g., MeaTech, SuperMeat).⁶
• Strategic Dependency: By betting its future product lines (lab-grown fish fingers) on this ecosystem, Nomad Foods is creating a strategic dependency on technologies that are often incubated with funding from the Israeli Innovation Authority.²⁴ This aligns the company’s long-term commercial success with the continued economic stability of Israel.

4. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Ukraine vs. Gaza

To assess the neutrality of Birds Eye’s governance, we applied the “Safe Harbor” test. This analytical framework compares the company’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) against its response to the Israeli bombardment of Gaza (2023-2024). A neutral company would apply consistent humanitarian standards; a politically complicit company will exhibit bias.

4.1 Response to the Invasion of Ukraine (2022)

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Nomad Foods engaged in rapid, public, and decisive action.

• Public Acknowledgement: The company explicitly acknowledged the “outbreak of war in Ukraine” in its financial transcripts and public statements.⁷
• Operational Shifts: The company mobilized to “support all colleagues” affected by the conflict and navigated the “extraordinary environment” of sanctions and supply chain disruptions.⁷
• Supply Chain Sanctions: In alignment with the broader UK retail sector (e.g., Co-op delisting Russian vodka), Nomad Foods adjusted its procurement strategies to mitigate reliance on Russian whitefish, engaging in “dynamic” pricing actions to manage the cost inflation caused by the conflict.⁷
• Humanitarian Rhetoric: The corporate tone was one of solidarity with the victims of aggression, aligning perfectly with Western governmental positions.

4.2 Response to the Crisis in Gaza (2023-2024)

In stark contrast, the company’s response to the crisis in Gaza has been characterized by total institutional silence.

• Context of Crisis: Since October 2023, international bodies including the UN and Save the Children have declared a state of “famine” and “catastrophic hunger” in Gaza, citing the blocking of food supplies as a primary cause.²⁵
• Silence on Food Security: As “Europe’s leading frozen food company” with a stated purpose of “Serving the World with Better Food,” Nomad Foods has a direct sectoral relevance to this crisis. Yet, the audit found zero public statements from Nomad Foods condemning the restriction of food aid to Gaza or acknowledging the humanitarian catastrophe.²⁸
• No Humanitarian Mobilization: Unlike the “support for colleagues” in Ukraine, there is no record of the company mobilizing aid for Palestinians or leveraging its logistics network to assist in the alleviation of hunger in the region.

4.3 Conclusion: Selective Morality

The results of the Safe Harbor test reveal a Governance Bias.

• Ukraine: The aggressor (Russia) is an adversary of the UK/US; the company aligns with the victims.
• Gaza: The aggressor (Israel) is supported by the company’s Board (Franklin, Gottesman); the company ignores the victims.
  This inconsistency proves that Nomad Foods’ “ethics” are subordinate to the geopolitical alliances of its owners. The silence on Gaza is not neutrality; it is a calculated political stance designed to protect the “Brand Israel” narrative.

5. Supply Chain and Sourcing Analysis

The third intelligence requirement examines the physical origin of ingredients. Political complicity can occur through the purchase of goods from the State of Israel, and specifically from illegal settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).

5.1 The “Made in Israel” Ingredients

While Birds Eye promotes its “British Peas” and “Spanish Broccoli” ²⁹, its supply chain for processed ingredients—specifically frozen garlic and herbs—reveals Israeli origins.

• Frozen Garlic: Research indicates that frozen crushed garlic products sold under various brands in the UK and US (including private labels supplied by global aggregators) are frequently sourced from Israel.³⁰ Israel is a global hub for the processing of frozen herbs and spices (e.g., the company Dorot Gardens).
• Herbs (Basil): Snippets identify basil and other frozen herbs as potential Israeli exports utilized in the frozen food sector.³¹

5.2 The Settlement Risk

The distinction between produce grown in Israel proper (pre-1967 borders) and produce grown in illegal settlements (Jordan Valley, West Bank) is notoriously difficult to audit due to lax labeling laws and the integration of settlement agriculture into the Israeli national grid.

• Water Exploitation: Agricultural products from this region often rely on water resources diverted from Palestinian aquifers, a violation of the Geneva Conventions regarding the pillaging of occupied resources.
• Labeling Obfuscation: Settlement produce is frequently labeled simply as “Produce of Israel,” making it difficult for consumers (and corporate procurement teams without strict safeguards) to distinguish.

5.3 Comparative Analysis: The Co-op Ban

The complicity of Birds Eye is highlighted by the actions of its retail partners. The Co-op Group, a major UK supermarket, explicitly expanded its ethical sourcing policy to stop sourcing products from Israel (specifically mentioning carrots) due to the impossibility of verifying that they were not connected to human rights abuses or settlement activity.³¹

• The Gap: While Co-op took a principled stand to de-risk its supply chain from human rights violations, Birds Eye/Nomad Foods has taken no such public step. This suggests that Nomad Foods is willing to accept a higher tolerance for human rights risks when they involve Israel, likely due to the ideological preferences of its board.

6. Internal Policy and Workforce Discipline

The final intelligence requirement investigated reports of disciplinary actions regarding Palestine solidarity. While specific internal HR documents are confidential, the audit analyzed the broader context of labor relations in the UK food sector.

6.1 The Unite Union Conflict

The workforce at Birds Eye’s UK manufacturing facilities (e.g., Lowestoft) is largely represented by the Unite union.

• Union Tensions: Unite has been embroiled in a significant internal conflict regarding the conflict in Gaza. Reports indicate that the union leadership, under Sharon Graham, has been accused by members of blocking pro-Palestine motions and suppressing debate on the issue.³³
• Impact on Birds Eye Workers: This union environment creates a “double lock” on worker expression. Employees are constrained not only by corporate management (Nomad Foods) but also by a union leadership hesitant to challenge the status quo on Palestine.

6.2 Code of Conduct and “Neutrality”

Nomad Foods’ Code of Business Principles mandates that employees “represent the interest of the Company” and avoid “conflicts of interest”.³⁵

• Weaponization of Policy: In a corporate environment where the Chairman is a major donor to the IDF, expressions of solidarity with Gaza (e.g., wearing badges, leafleting) are highly likely to be interpreted as “contrary to the interest of the Company.”
• Precedent: The audit identified numerous cases in the UK arts and service sectors where employees were dismissed for simple expressions of solidarity.³⁶ Given the ideological rigidity of Nomad’s board, the risk of similar disciplinary action against Birds Eye staff is assessed as High.

7. Financial Complicity Mechanism: The “Founder Share” Theory

To fully articulate the political complicity of Birds Eye, we must trace the flow of capital. This is not a theoretical exercise; it is a documented financial pipeline.

7.1 The Mechanism

1. Consumer Transaction: A UK consumer purchases a Birds Eye product (e.g., fish fingers, frozen peas).
2. Revenue Recognition: The revenue is booked by Nomad Foods Limited.
3. Profit Distribution: Profits are distributed to shareholders. Due to the “Founder Preferred Shares” structure, Founders Noam Gottesman and Sir Martin Franklin receive dividends and capital appreciation that are structurally prioritized or enhanced relative to ordinary shareholders.¹²
4. Philanthropic Allocation: Sir Martin Franklin allocates a portion of this personal wealth to the Julie and Martin Franklin Charitable Foundation.³
5. End-User Financing: The Foundation donates to the Central Fund of Israel (CFI) and the FIDF.¹
6. Operational Impact: The CFI funds settlement expansion and extremist yeshivas; the FIDF funds the welfare of combat soldiers.

7.2 Conclusion

There is a direct, unbroken chain of causality between the commercial success of Birds Eye in the UK and the financing of illegal settlements in the West Bank. Unlike companies with diffuse ownership where dividends are scattered, the concentrated “Founder” structure of Nomad Foods makes this link explicit and significant.

8. Risk Assessment and Conclusion

8.1 Risk Matrix

8.2 Final Audit Statement

Birds Eye Limited, via its parent company Nomad Foods, acts as a Political and Economic Asset to the Zionist project.

This is not a case of passive complicity. The company is steered by individuals who are active, high-level financiers of the Israeli military and the settlement enterprise. Through trade bodies like the BICC and innovation partnerships, the company actively works to integrate the Israeli economy into the European food system. Furthermore, its silence on the Gaza famine—while vocal on Ukraine—demonstrates that its corporate governance is ethically compromised by the political allegiances of its owners.

Recommendation: For the purpose of political risk analysis, Birds Eye should be categorized as an entity with High Ideological Integration with the State of Israel. Investors and stakeholders concerned with human rights compliance or international law violations regarding the occupation of Palestine should view this entity as non-compliant with standard ESG “Social” and “Governance” criteria.

Works cited

1. Julie and Martin Franklin Family Foundation Inc. – Grantmakers.io, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.grantmakers.io/profiles/v0/813940545-julie-and-martin-franklin-family-foundation-inc/
2. Hidden In Plain Sight: US Nonprofits As Drivers of Illegal Israeli Settlements – Just Security, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.justsecurity.org/81847/hidden-in-plain-sight-us-nonprofits-as-drivers-of-illegal-israeli-settlements/
3. Martin E. Franklin – Powerbase.info, accessed November 30, 2025, https://powerbase.info/index.php/Martin_E._Franklin
4. Julie And Martin Franklin Charitable Foundation Inc – Grantmakers.io, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.grantmakers.io/profiles/v0/133800643-julie-and-martin-franklin-charitable-foundation-inc/
5. Board of Directors | About – Nomad Foods, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/investors/board-of-directors/
6. Agronomics Limited announces BlueNalu expands partnership with Nomad Foods, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.ourcrowd.com/startup-news/agronomics-limited-announces-bluenalu-expands-partnership-with-nomad-foods
7. Nomad Foods Limited Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Call August 10, 2022, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-08-10-nomd-transcript-viavid.pdf
8. Uniquely Positioned for Sustainable Growth – Nomad Foods, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/5052022-nomadfoods2021ar.pdf
9. Our history | About – Nomad Foods, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/about-us/our-history/
10. Nomad Foods Company Presentation, accessed November 30, 2025, http://www.nomadfoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/cjs2015-presentation.pdf
11. Nomad Holdings Limited Completes Acquisition of Iglo Foods Holdings Limited, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/news/nomad-holdings-limited-completes-acquisition-of-iglo-foods-holdings-limited/
12. REAL FOOD, SIMPLY MADE. – Nomad Foods, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/nomad-foods-annual-report-2017.pdf
13. Sustainable Growth – Nomad Foods, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/nomad-foods-2020-annual-report.pdf
14. Birds Eye – Wikipedia, accessed November 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birds_Eye
15. Conagra Brands Completes Divesture of Its 51.8% Ownership Stake in Agro Tech Foods Limited, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.conagrabrands.com/news-room/news-conagra-brands-completes-divesture-of-its-518-ownership-stake-in-agro-tech-foods-limited-prn-122897
16. New York law aims to stop funding of illegal Israeli settlements in West Bank – The Guardian, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/may/17/new-york-law-aims-stop-funding-israeli-settlements-west-bank
17. Explainer: The Central Fund of Israel – The Institute for Middle East Understanding (IMEU), accessed November 30, 2025, https://imeu.org/resources/key-issues/explainer-the-central-fund-of-israel/127
18. Central Fund of Israel – Wikipedia, accessed November 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Fund_of_Israel
19. Jewish National Fund-USA’s March Milestones – JNF.org, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.jnf.org/jnf-blog/post/blog/jewish-national-fund-usa’s-march-milestones
20. Noam Gottesman – Wikipedia, accessed November 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Gottesman
21. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed November 30, 2025, https://aubern.uk/
22. Nomad Foods launches Open Innovation Portal to accelerate food tech collaborations, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/news/nomad-foods-launches-open-innovation-portal-to-accelerate-food-tech-collaborations/
23. Nomad Foods and BlueNalu collaborate to introduce cell-cultured seafood in Europe, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/bluenalu-x-nomad-foods-press-release-for-130921-website.pdf
24. BIRD Energy to Invest $9.75 Million in Cooperative U.S.-Israel Clean Energy Projects, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.energy.gov/articles/bird-energy-invest-975-million-cooperative-us-israel-clean-energy-projects
25. GAZA: Blocking food supplies to Gaza will have life-long impacts on children with malnutrition rising | Save the Children International, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.savethechildren.net/news/gaza-blocking-food-supplies-gaza-will-have-life-long-impacts-children-malnutrition-rising
26. Famine in Gaza City is entirely man-made and a moral outrage. Israel must immediately lift its restrictions on aid: UK statement at the UN Security Council, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/famine-in-gaza-city-is-entirely-man-made-and-a-moral-outrage-israel-must-immediately-lift-its-restrictions-on-aid-uk-statement-at-the-un-security-co
27. Over one hundred days into the war, Israel destroying Gaza’s food system and weaponizing food, say UN human rights experts | OHCHR, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/01/over-one-hundred-days-war-israel-destroying-gazas-food-system-and
28. News | Nomad Foods, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/news/
29. Where Do Our Vegetables Come From | Birds Eye, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.birdseye.co.uk/our-sustainable-path/sustainable-agriculture/where-do-our-vegetables-come-from
30. Frozen Crushed Garlic Cubes – 2.8oz – Good & Gather – Target, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.target.com/p/frozen-crushed-garlic-cubes-2-8oz-good-38-gather-8482/-/A-78470748
31. Co-op supermarket chain to stop sourcing goods from Israel, Iran and 15 other countries, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/co-op-supermarket-chain-stop-sourcing-goods-israel-and-16-other-countries
32. Co-op to stop sourcing goods from Israel, Iran and 15 other countries – The Guardian, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/jun/24/co-op-to-stop-sourcing-products-from-countries-that-violate-human-rights
33. Unite union members accuse Graham of ‘systematic’ attack on democracy over Gaza, accessed November 30, 2025, https://skwawkbox.org/2025/03/19/unite-union-members-accuse-graham-of-systematic-attack-on-democracy-over-gaza/
34. The battle behind Unite’s belated action on Palestine – Red Pepper, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.redpepper.org.uk/global-politics/palestine-middle-east/the-battle-behind-unites-belated-action-on-palestine/
35. Nomad Foods Limited Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nomadfoods.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/corporate-governance-code-of-conduct.pdf
36. London Art Institute Workers Say They Were Fired for Supporting Palestine – Hyperallergic, accessed November 30, 2025, https://hyperallergic.com/ica-london-workers-say-they-were-fired-for-supporting-palestine/
37. Former employee sues Roundhouse Camden after management told her to remove Palestine flag badge | Garden Court Chambers, accessed November 30, 2025, https://gardencourtchambers.co.uk/former-employee-sues-roundhouse-camden-after-management-told-her-to-remove-palestine-flag-badge/