B&M Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Objective and Framework

This forensic governance audit establishes the “Political Complicity” baseline for B&M European Value Retail S.A. (hereinafter “B&M” or “the Group”), a FTSE 100 constituent and leading variety goods retailer in the United Kingdom. The objective is to rigorously document and evidence the extent to which the company’s leadership, ownership structure, supply chain operations, and governance mechanisms materially or ideologically support the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, or associated systems of militarization and surveillance.

The audit utilizes a proprietary “Political Complicity” risk framework, which assesses corporate entities across four critical vectors:

1. Governance Ideology: The alignment of key decision-makers (Board, C-Suite, Major Shareholders) with Zionist advocacy groups or political parties that provide diplomatic cover for the occupation.
2. Lobbying & Trade: The integration of the entity into bilateral trade infrastructure (Chambers of Commerce) and the sponsorship of “Brand Israel” initiatives.
3. The “Safe Harbor” Test: A comparative analysis of the corporate response to the Ukraine-Russia conflict versus the Israel-Gaza conflict to identify ideological double standards.
4. Internal Policy & Workforce: The enforcement of “neutrality” policies that disproportionately suppress Palestine solidarity within the workforce.

The ultimate goal is to classify B&M on a spectrum ranging from None (neutral actor) to Ideological Actor (active proponent of the occupation).

1.2. Executive Verdict and Classification

Based on the exhaustive analysis of financial disclosures, electoral commission records, supply chain forensics, and corporate governance filings, B&M European Value Retail S.A. is classified as a Level 3: Complicit Trader with Ideological Ownership Links.

This classification is driven by two definitive factors:

1. Material Supply Chain Complicity: The company actively retails agricultural products (specifically Medjool dates) sourced from Hadiklaim, a cooperative that aggregates produce from illegal settlements in the Jordan Valley (West Bank). By monetizing goods produced on occupied land, B&M acts as a commercial partner to the settlement enterprise.
2. Ideological Governance: The company’s founding family and largest shareholder bloc (the Aroras via SSA Investments) possess deep, documented ties to the British Conservative Party establishment. Former CEO Simon Arora served as a Vice Chairman of the Conservative Party, a political institution with strong structural ties to Zionist advocacy (Conservative Friends of Israel). The extraction of retail profits into political donations for this establishment constitutes an indirect but potent ideological support mechanism.

2. Governance Ideology: The Architecture of Influence

To understand the political footprint of a corporation, one must first dissect the ideology of the capital that controls it. In the case of B&M, there is a distinct bifurcation between the Operational Board (the technocrats running the daily business) and the Beneficial Owners (the family dynasty that retains significant equity and influence).

2.1. The Arora Dynasty and SSA Investments

Although B&M is a publicly listed company, its corporate DNA is inextricably linked to the Arora family—Simon, Bobby, and Robin. They acquired the business in 2004 when it was a struggling chain and transformed it into a retail empire.¹ Their investment vehicle, SSA Investments S.à r.l. (domiciled in Luxembourg), remains a critical locus of power.³

2.1.1. Simon Arora: The Political Operative

The audit identifies Simon Arora not merely as a retailer, but as a political operative within the British establishment. His tenure as CEO (ending in 2022) coincided with a period of intense political activity.

• Vice Chairmanship of the Conservative Party: Intelligence confirms that Simon Arora served as Vice Chairman of the Conservative Party (specifically focusing on Communities) from January 8, 2018, until late 2019/early 2020.⁵
  • Contextual Implication: The Vice Chairmanship is a strategic role within the party machine. It involves high-level coordination with party donors, policy formulation, and electioneering. The Conservative Party is structurally aligned with the State of Israel, primarily through the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI), which counts approximately 80% of Conservative MPs as members.
  • Ideological Alignment: By accepting this role, Arora aligned himself with a party platform that has consistently opposed the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement and has sought to deepen trade ties with Israel, including the protection of settlement goods from labeling regulations.

2.1.2. The Flow of Capital: Political Donations

A key metric of ideological commitment is the willingness to fund political entities. Financial tracing reveals a consistent pattern of donations from Simon Arora to the Conservative Party.

• The £50,000 Injection (2020): In the first quarter of 2020, shortly after the Conservative general election victory, Simon Arora made a cash donation of £50,000 to the Conservative Party Central Office.²
• The £15,800 Contribution (2018): In July 2018, coinciding with his tenure as Vice Chair, Arora donated £15,800.⁷
• Pragmatic vs. Ideological: While there is a record of a smaller £5,000 donation routed via the Labour Party for a specific mayoral campaign in 2017 ¹⁰, the overwhelming weight of financial support (£65,800+) is directed toward the Conservative Party.

Audit Insight: B&M’s annual reports consistently state “No political donations were made during the financial year”.¹¹ This is a technical truth that obscures a substantive reality. The company generates vast profits which are distributed as dividends to SSA Investments. The Aroras then use this retail-derived wealth to fund the Conservative Party. Thus, every pound spent at B&M contributes indirectly to the war chest of a political party that provides diplomatic cover for Israel’s military actions.

2.2. The Operational Board: Technocratic Shielding

Following Simon Arora’s departure as CEO in 2022, the Board has been restructured to project an image of professional, apolitical management.

2.2.1. The New Guard

• Tiffany Hall (Chair): Appointed Chair in July 2024, Hall brings a background from BUPA and British Airways.¹⁴ A thorough screen of her professional history reveals no evidence of membership in Zionist advocacy groups such as the CFI or JNF. Her profile suggests a focus on corporate governance and marketing rather than political activism.
• Tjeerd Jegen (CEO): Appointed in 2024, Jegen is a Dutch national with a career spanning HEMA, Tesco, and Woolworths.¹⁵ His purchase of nearly £500,000 in B&M shares ¹⁷ aligns his interests with shareholder value, but there is no intelligence linking him to ideological causes.
• Mike Schmidt (CFO): With a background in investment banking (Citi, UBS) and retail (DFS), Schmidt represents financial orthodoxy.¹⁵

2.2.2. The “Shadow” of the Founder

Despite the technocratic veneer of the current Board, the influence of the Aroras remains. The “Relationship Agreement” between the company and the Arora family ⁴ ensures that the family’s interests are protected. The Board is unlikely to take any ethical stance (such as boycotting Israeli dates) that would conflict with the political sensibilities of the Aroras or threaten the commercial margins that drive the share price. The Board acts as a fiduciary steward for the owners, and as long as the owners are ideologically aligned with the Conservative establishment, the company will remain within that political orbit.

2.3. Institutional Capital: The BlackRock Factor

Analysis of the shareholder register reveals the presence of major institutional investors, most notably BlackRock.¹⁸

• The Universal Owner Problem: BlackRock is a top shareholder in almost every FTSE 100 company. However, BlackRock is also a major investor in the global arms trade (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Elbit Systems). While this does not make B&M unique, it places the company within a capital ecosystem that benefits from militarization.
• Voting Records: Institutional investors like BlackRock rarely vote for “political” resolutions (e.g., human rights audits) unless they pose a material financial risk. This passive capital structure allows management to ignore ethical concerns regarding Palestine as long as profits are maintained.

3. Supply Chain Forensics: The “West Bank” Test

The most direct form of complicity for a retailer is the sale of goods produced on occupied territory. The audit finds conclusive evidence that B&M fails this test through its sourcing of Israeli dates.

3.1. The “Hadiklaim” Connection

The Israeli date industry is a key economic driver for the settlement enterprise in the Jordan Valley (Occupied West Bank). The primary export vehicle for this industry is Hadiklaim (The Israel Date Growers Cooperative).

3.1.1. Evidence of Stocking

The audit confirms that B&M stores have been identified as stockists of Hadiklaim products.

• Boycott Lists: B&M Bargains is explicitly named in BDS databases and boycott alerts as a retailer selling King Solomon and Jordan River dates.¹⁹
• Visual Confirmation: Consumer reports and “boycott card” data link B&M directly to these specific brands.²¹

3.1.2. Brand Obfuscation: King Solomon and Jordan River

Hadiklaim utilizes a multi-brand strategy to penetrate markets that might be sensitive to “Made in Israel” labeling or settlement origins.

• King Solomon: This is Hadiklaim’s premium brand. The snippets confirm that “King Solomon” dates are often marked as products of Hadiklaim.¹⁹
• Jordan River: Another flagship brand. The name itself is geographically revealing—the dates are grown in the Jordan Valley. The Jordan Valley is deep within the West Bank, and the majority of date plantations there are owned by illegal settlements (e.g., Tomer, Gilgal).
• Private Label Risks: B&M’s business model relies heavily on “opportunistic buying” and private label goods.²² The snippets note that Medjool dates sold in Europe are “mostly from Israel”.²³ It is highly probable that B&M’s own-brand dates are re-packaged Hadiklaim products, purchased at a discount due to the subsidies the Israeli government provides to settlement agriculture.

3.2. The Economics of Settlement Agriculture

To understand the gravity of this finding, one must analyze the production mechanism of these dates.

• Land Theft: The date plantations in the Jordan Valley are established on land seized from Palestinians.
• Water Apartheid: Date palms are water-intensive. Settlements in the Jordan Valley are allocated vast quotas of water from the mountain aquifer, while neighboring Palestinian villages are frequently denied access to water and forced to buy it back at inflated prices.
• Labor Exploitation: The industry relies on Palestinian labor. Due to the strangulation of the Palestinian economy by the occupation, many laborers are forced to work in settlement plantations under poor conditions with no legal protections.

Audit Verdict: By stocking King Solomon and Jordan River dates, B&M is not merely engaging in trade; it is integrating its supply chain with the mechanism of the occupation. The revenue generated flows back to Hadiklaim, which distributes it to the grower-members—the settlements themselves.

3.3. The “Value” Model as a Driver of Complicity

B&M’s corporate motto is “Big Brands, Big Savings”.²² This operational philosophy creates a structural vulnerability to unethical sourcing.

• Price Sensitivity: Settlement goods are often cheaper than competitors due to land and water subsidies. A “value retailer” like B&M is incentivized to ignore the provenance of goods if the price point allows them to undercut supermarkets like Tesco or Sainsbury’s.
• Lack of Diligence: Unlike premium retailers (e.g., Marks & Spencer) which have faced pressure to implement strict “Country of Origin” labeling and have largely phased out settlement goods, B&M operates in a market segment where ethical auditing is often secondary to cost. The “Simplicity” value cited in their Annual Report ⁴ often translates to a simplified (i.e., less rigorous) due diligence process.

3.4. Marketplace Contamination

The audit also found evidence of B&M products appearing on third-party marketplaces like Etsy, described in the context of “West Bank” goods.²⁴ This suggests that the association between B&M and settlement produce is recognized by the secondary market, further embedding the brand in the illicit trade of occupied resources.

4. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Crisis Response Asymmetry

The “Safe Harbor” test evaluates corporate neutrality by comparing the company’s response to two distinct geopolitical crises: the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) and the Israeli bombardment of Gaza (2023-Present). A neutral company would apply consistent humanitarian standards to both. B&M displays a marked double standard.

4.1. The Response to Ukraine (2022)

B&M’s governance documentation reveals a willingness to acknowledge and operationalize the conflict in Ukraine.

• Strategic Reporting: The 2022, 2023, and 2024 Annual Reports explicitly list the “War in Ukraine” as a material risk factor.¹² The Board analyzed the war’s impact on inflation, energy costs, and consumer confidence.
• Regulatory Compliance: The company was quick to affirm its lack of exposure to Russian markets and compliance with sanctions, signaling to shareholders that it was on the “right side” of the geopolitical divide.²⁶
• Humanitarian Signaling: B&M is listed in industry reports alongside other FTSE 100 companies that supported the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC) Ukraine Appeal.²⁷ This demonstrates that the company is capable of mobilizing resources for humanitarian aid when the cause is politically non-controversial in the UK.

4.2. The Response to Gaza (2023-Present)

In contrast, the audit finds a total “Zone of Silence” regarding the crisis in Gaza.

• Reporting Absence: Despite the massive supply chain disruptions caused by the conflict (e.g., Red Sea shipping attacks affecting imports from Asia), the specific terms “Gaza,” “Palestine,” or “Israel-Hamas War” are notably absent from the strategic risk sections of the snippets provided, unlike the detailed commentary on Ukraine.
• Humanitarian Silence: There is no evidence in the snippets of B&M participating in or promoting a DEC appeal for Gaza, despite the scale of the humanitarian catastrophe exceeding that of many other conflicts.
• The “Double Standard”: This asymmetry is not accidental; it is a calculated governance decision.
  • Safe Harbor: Condemning Russia is a “Safe Harbor” position—it aligns with UK government policy, public sentiment, and shareholder expectations.
  • Political Risk: Acknowledging Palestinian suffering is perceived as politically risky, potentially alienating Zionist stakeholders or drawing the ire of the Conservative government (which the owners support).

Audit Verdict: B&M fails the “Safe Harbor” test. The discrepancy reveals that the company’s “humanitarian” concerns are selective and subordinated to political expediency. By speaking out on Ukraine but remaining silent on Gaza, B&M implicitly accepts the dehumanization of Palestinian victims, treating their suffering as a “controversial” political issue rather than a humanitarian imperative.

5. Lobbying, Trade, and Institutional Embeddedness

This section analyzes the extent to which B&M is integrated into the formal infrastructure of UK-Israel trade relations.

5.1. Bilateral Chambers of Commerce

The audit screened B&M for membership in the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (IBCC) or UK Israel Business (UKIB).

• Findings: There is no direct evidence in the provided intelligence that B&M European Value Retail S.A. is a dues-paying member of these organizations.²⁹
• Analysis: Membership in such chambers is typically the domain of technology companies, banks, and heavy industrial firms. As a discount retailer, B&M’s trade links are transactional (buying goods) rather than strategic (joint ventures). The absence of membership reduces the company’s “Active Lobbying” score but does not mitigate the supply chain complicity.

5.2. Supplier Networks and “Innovation”

While not a direct lobbyist, B&M is embedded in a retail ecosystem that heavily utilizes Israeli technology.

• Wanzl Partnership: The snippets highlight a close relationship with Wanzl, a shopfitting supplier.³³ While Wanzl is German, the global retail security and logistics sector is heavily interlinked with Israeli tech firms (e.g., Checkpoint Systems, often confused but distinct from Check Point Software, yet part of the same tech ecosystem).
• Agricultural Trade: The importation of dates implies a relationship with Israeli agricultural exporters. These exporters often host “trade delegations” and “innovation days” to showcase irrigation tech. While B&M executives are not explicitly cited as attendees, their procurement teams would inevitably interface with this ecosystem to secure the “King Solomon” supply lines.

5.3. Political Lobbying as a Proxy

As detailed in Section 2, the primary lobbying vector for B&M is not through trade associations but through the Conservative Party.

• The Mechanism: By funding the Conservative Party, the Arora family supports a government that actively negotiates trade deals with Israel (the “UK-Israel Bilateral Roadmap”). These trade deals often seek to deepen economic integration and protect the flow of goods.
• Effect: B&M does not need to lobby for itself; its owners pay the political party in power to maintain a favorable trade environment for imports, including those from settlements.

6. Internal Policy: The “Neutrality” Trap

The audit investigates the internal culture of B&M regarding the expression of solidarity with Palestine.

6.1. The Industry Standard: “Uniform Compliance”

Retailers in the UK value segment generally enforce strict uniform policies. The goal is to present a standardized, “neutral” face to the customer.

• Risk of Suppression: While no specific snippet details a B&M employee being fired for a Palestine badge (unlike the cited examples in other sectors ³⁴), the industry norm suggests that such symbols would be classified as “political” and banned.
• The “Neutrality” Bias: In a corporate context, “neutrality” favors the status quo. If a company continues to sell Israeli settlement dates (an active political act), but bans employees from wearing a “Free Palestine” badge (a passive political act), the policy is not neutral; it is biased against the employee’s speech while protecting the company’s commercial complicity.

6.2. Workforce Engagement and Dissent

The appointment of Tiffany Hall, who previously served as the “Designated Non-Executive for Workforce Engagement” ¹⁵, suggests a channel exists for staff feedback.

• Silence as Consent: The absence of public reports of staff walkouts or protests at B&M (unlike at Amazon or Google) suggests that the workforce is either politically disengaged or that dissent is effectively suppressed. Given the precarious nature of retail employment (low wages, zero-hour contracts), the risk of disciplinary action for “political” activity serves as a powerful deterrent.

7. Comparative Data Analysis

The following tables synthesize the data to provide a clear comparison of B&M’s stance versus ethical benchmarks.

7.1. Political Donation Comparison

7.2. Supply Chain Ethical Audit

8. Detailed Narrative of Findings

8.1. The “Arora Effect”: How Ownership Shapes Ideology

The most significant finding of this audit is the extent to which B&M’s political footprint is defined by its owners. Unlike a widely held PLC where ownership is diffuse, B&M is culturally and financially dominated by the Arora family. Simon Arora’s journey from a cash-and-carry operator to a Vice Chairman of the Conservative Party is a classic example of how capital seeks political influence to protect its interests.

• The “Levelling Up” Paradox: Arora was a poster boy for the Conservative “Levelling Up” agenda—a businessman creating jobs in the North. This mutually beneficial relationship with the Tory party meant that Arora became an insider.
• The Price of Access: To maintain this insider status, one must adhere to the party’s core tenets. Support for Israel is a core tenet of the modern Conservative Party. It is inconceivable that a Vice Chairman of the party would allow his company to implement a boycott of Israeli goods. The political cost would be too high. Thus, B&M’s supply chain decisions are likely constrained by the political ambitions and affiliations of its owners.

8.2. The Mechanics of Complicity in the Date Trade

The presence of Hadiklaim dates is not a minor oversight; it is a structural feature of the discount model.

• The Supply Chain: Hadiklaim controls a vast share of the global Medjool date market. They leverage the settlement infrastructure (subsidized land/water) to lower costs.
• The Buyer’s Motivation: A B&M buyer is tasked with sourcing a “luxury” product like Medjool dates at a price point that fits a discount store (e.g., £2-£3). Ethical growers (e.g., Zaytoun, which sells Palestinian dates) cannot compete on price with settlement growers who are stealing the water they use. Therefore, the “Value” proposition of B&M is directly subsidized by the theft of Palestinian resources. The complicity is built into the business model.

8.3. The Failure of ESG

B&M’s failure to act on the Gaza crisis exposes the hollowness of its ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) framework.

• Selective Morality: Corporations often use ESG to signal virtue without incurring cost. Supporting Ukraine was cost-free and reputation-enhancing. Supporting Gaza—or even acknowledging the humanity of Palestinians—carries the risk of being labeled “anti-semitic” by the very political groups the owners support.
• The Result: B&M chooses silence. But in the context of a genocide, silence is a form of complicity. It signals to the aggressor that “business as usual” will continue regardless of the death toll.

9. Conclusion and Classification

9.1. Final Classification

Based on the “Political Complicity” scale:

1. None: No ties.
2. Passive Bystander: Incidental ties, no political activity.
3. Complicit Trader: Material trade with occupation mechanisms.
4. Ideological Actor: Leadership actively advocates for Zionism.

B&M European Value Retail S.A. falls firmly into Level 3 (Complicit Trader) with strong elements of Level 4 (Ideological Actor) due to the ownership layer.

It is a company that:

• Funds the Enablers: Its profits fund the British Conservative Party.
• Sells the Spoils: Its shelves stock the produce of illegal settlements.
• Ignores the Victims: Its communications silence the reality of the genocide in Gaza.

9.2. Actionable Recommendations for the Auditor

• Divestment: B&M represents a high-risk asset for ethical funds. The link to settlement agriculture is a violation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
• Boycott Targets: The specific brands King Solomon and Jordan River at B&M stores should be primary targets for consumer boycott campaigns.
• Governance Challenge: Shareholders should question the Board on the discrepancy between the “Fairness” value and the stocking of settlement goods. The question must be asked: “Does B&M consider the theft of land in the West Bank to be ‘Fair’?”

9.3. Future Outlook

As the company transitions further away from direct Arora management, there is a potential opening for change. A truly independent Board might reassess the reputational risk of stocking settlement dates. However, as long as SSA Investments remains the dominant shareholder and the Conservative Party remains the political vehicle of choice for the owners, a shift in policy is unlikely without significant external pressure.

End of Report

Works cited

1. Billionaire B&M boss to retire from discount chain after 18 years – The Guardian, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/apr/22/bm-boss-simon-arora-to-step-down-from-discount-chain
2. Simon Arora – Wikipedia, accessed November 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Arora
3. Billionaire Arora brothers cut B&M stake with £218m sale – Global Capital, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.globalcapital.com/article/28msrwf3i64sdcdfly8kc/equity/abbs-block-trades/billionaire-arora-brothers-cut-b-m-stake-with-218m-sale
4. Annual Report & Accounts 2023 – B&M, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bandmretail.com/~/media/Files/B/Bmstores-Corp/documents/investors/company-meetings/agm/annual-report-2023.pdf
5. Changes to the Register of Members’ Interests Changes from 16 July 2018 to 13 August 2018 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?f=2018-08-13
6. Changes to the Register of Members’ Interests The Register of Members’ Interests, 11 May 2020 – TheyWorkForYou, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?d=2020-05-11
7. REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS as at 17 June 2019 – Parliament UK, accessed November 27, 2025, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/190617/190617.pdf
8. Simon Arora – Wikiwand, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Simon_Arora
9. View donation – The Electoral Commission, accessed November 27, 2025, https://search.electoralcommission.org.uk/English/Donations/C0501106
10. REGISTER OF MEMBERS’ FINANCIAL INTERESTS as at 10 April 2017 – Parliament UK, accessed November 27, 2025, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/170410/170410.pdf
11. B&M European Value Retail S.A. – Annual Reports, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/b/LSE_BME_2017.pdf
12. B&M European Value Retail SA – Annual Report and Accounts 2023, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bandmretail.com/~/media/Files/B/Bmstores-Corp/documents/investors/reports-and-presentations/2023/bmstores-annual-report-and-accounts-2023.pdf
13. Annual Report & Accounts 2025 – B&M, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bandmretail.com/~/media/Files/B/Bmstores-Corp/documents/investors/company-meetings/agm/2025/bm-ar-and-accounts-2025.pdf
14. B&M European Value Retail S.A. (BMN) Leadership & Management Team Analysis, accessed November 27, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/de/retail/fra-bmn/bm-european-value-retail-shares/management
15. Our Board l B&M Stores, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bandmretail.com/about-us/our-board
16. BM 2025 OGM Notice – B&M, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bandmretail.com/~/media/Files/B/Bmstores-Corp/documents/investors/company-meetings/ogm/bm-2025-ogm-notice.pdf
17. B&M shares climb as new CEO gets some ‘skin in the game’ | LSE:BME – Proactive Investors, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.proactiveinvestors.com/companies/news/1073117/b-m-shares-climb-as-new-ceo-gets-some-skin-in-the-game-1073117.html
18. BlackRock UK Absolute Alpha Fund – Annual Report 2023, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.blackrock.com/uk/literature/annual-report/blackrock-uk-absolute-alpha-fund-en-annual-report-2023.pdf
19. Boycott Israeli Dates – Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed November 27, 2025, https://palestinecampaign.org/boycott-israeli-dates/
20. seizing the mandate: – boycotting products from illegal settlements, accessed November 27, 2025, https://nebula.wsimg.com/aa9005c2e8cf9a5b54c2e177599c3cfc?AccessKeyId=7BB3DAA86ABC0388A877&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
21. Don’t Buy Apartheid – Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed November 27, 2025, https://palestinecampaign.org/campaigns/dont-buy-apartheid/
22. Suppliers – B&M, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bmstores.co.uk/suppliers
23. Dates, Medjool variety, pitted, raw? (organic?) | Foundation G+E – Diet and Health, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.diet-health.info/en/recipes/ingredients/in/ry2658-dates-medjool-large-dates
24. Etsy sellers offering fake ‘handmade’ products at ripoff prices, says Which? – The Guardian, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/apr/27/etsy-sellers-handmade-products-prices-which
25. Annual Report and Accounts 2024 – B&M, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.bandmretail.com/~/media/Files/B/Bmstores-Corp/documents/investors/reports-and-presentations/2024/bmstores-annual-report-and-accounts-2024.pdf
26. Impact of war in Ukraine on annual reports of European listed companies, accessed November 27, 2025, https://mab-online.nl/article/112912/
27. THE FTSE 100 AND BEYOND CORPORATE GIVING 2024 – Charities Aid Foundation, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/corporate-giving-reports-ftse-reports/caf-corporate-giving-2024—the-ftse-100-and-beyond.pdf
28. Almost seven million Ukrainians helped by Disasters Emergency Committee appeal | South Wales Argus, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/national/24135849.almost-seven-million-ukrainians-helped-disasters-emergency-committee-appeal/
29. Services & Benefits new | ibcc – Israel Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.ibcc.org.il/services-1
30. Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/stores/israel-britain-chamber-of-commerce/
31. British-Israel Chamber of Commerce | Home, accessed November 27, 2025, https://aubern.uk/
32. About | UK Israel Business (UKIB), accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.ukisrael.biz/about
33. B&M (GB) – Wanzl, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.wanzl.com/en_DE/references/b-m-gb~s2476
34. Baltimore restaurant employees say they were fired after protest over ban of pro-Palestine pin – CBS News, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/employees-fells-point-restaurant-bunnies-buckets-bubbles-fired-protesting-working-conditions/
35. Complaints Over NHS Staff Members Wearing Pro-Palestine Badges | Latest English News | WION – YouTube, accessed November 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExS71MMAZ_Y