HPE has issued no publicly identifiable corporate statement specifically addressing the October 2023 Hamas attack, the subsequent Israeli military campaign in Gaza, or the broader Israel-Palestine conflict as of April 2026. CEO Antonio Neri published no op-ed, open letter, or social-media post addressing Palestinian civilian casualties, the Gaza conflict, or related humanitarian concerns in any identifiable public record 22. HPE’s publicly available communications on the conflict are confined to general ESG and human rights disclosures, none of which reference the conflict by name 151613.
HPE’s silence on Gaza is rendered more legible by its documented responses to other geopolitical crises:
HPE’s Living Progress Reports for 2023 and 2024 contain sections on human rights, supply chain ethics, and conflict-sensitive business. Neither report references the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Israeli settlements, or the post-October 2023 conflict by name 1516.
HPE’s Human Rights Policy Statement articulates general commitments to internationally recognised human rights standards but contains no conflict-specific provisions, no reference to the UN Guiding Principles’ heightened-risk framework for conflict-affected areas, and no mention of Israeli-occupied territories 13.
HPE’s Israel operations are presented in standard commercial terms across all identified corporate materials. The Israel country page describes HPE as offering compute, storage, networking, and services to enterprise and government clients 24. No identified annual report, investor presentation, or earnings call transcript frames Israel operations in geopolitical, security-partnership, or occupation-economy terms. Israel is not broken out as a named geographic segment in HPE’s SEC filings; it is subsumed within the broader EMEA segment 9.
The ICJ Advisory Opinion on the legal consequences of Israeli occupation was issued 19 July 2024. The ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defence Minister Gallant on 21 November 2024. No evidence has been identified of HPE reviewing, amending, or publicly addressing its Israel operations in response to either development. HPE’s FY2024 10-K risk factor disclosures include standard geopolitical risk language but do not specifically reference the ICJ Advisory Opinion, ICC proceedings, or occupation-related legal risk 9.
The February 2023 iteration of the UN OHCHR database (HRC res. 31/36), the most recently publicly released version as of the research cutoff, lists 112 business enterprises. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is not listed as a standalone entry in the February 2023 database 1.
HP Inc. — the consumer and printing company separated from HPE in November 2015 — has been listed in prior iterations of the database in connection with providing hardware and biometric population-registry technology to Israeli authorities operating in the West Bank 15. The corporate separation of Hewlett-Packard Company into HPE and HP Inc. (effective 1 November 2015) is foundational context: contracts and activities documented prior to the split are attributed to the undivided HP entity, and post-split attribution between HPE and HP Inc. requires contract-level review 17.
[pre-2020]The following activities are documented for the undivided Hewlett-Packard Company. Their post-2015 assignment to HPE or HP Inc. is not confirmed in publicly available records reviewed:
The Special Rapporteur’s Anatomy of a Genocide report (A/HRC/55/73, March 2024) provides substantive context for assessing the legal and human-rights environment within which enterprise technology vendors operating in or for Israeli military and occupation infrastructure are situated 2.
HPE operates a direct sales and services presence in Israel through its local country organisation, providing enterprise compute, storage (HPE Primera, Nimble, Alletra), networking (Aruba), and GreenLake cloud services to Israeli enterprise and public-sector clients 2427. HPE maintains an authorised partner and reseller network in Israel, including major Israeli IT distributors and integrators (e.g., Bynet, Malam-Team), which serve both commercial and government end-users. The use of these channels to supply Israeli government ministries, defence-adjacent agencies, or settlement municipal authorities cannot be ruled out from publicly available channel documentation, but no specific contract to a settlement entity has been identified in publicly available records.
Aruba Networks (HPE subsidiary, acquired 2015 and retained post-split): Who Profits has noted Aruba networking equipment in deployments within Israeli institutional contexts 17. Specific settlement-territory deployments have not been confirmed in primary procurement records reviewed.
HPE’s GreenLake platform (hybrid cloud-as-a-service) is marketed in Israel; no public record has been identified linking GreenLake specifically to Israeli government military or settlement-related contracts 24.
AFSC’s Investigate platform lists Hewlett Packard Enterprise and flags it on the basis of: (a) corporate lineage from undivided HP’s documented activities; (b) ongoing enterprise IT sales to Israeli government clients through the Israeli country organisation; and (c) Aruba Networks’ networking equipment presence in Israeli institutional contexts. The AFSC listing does not allege a specific post-2015 settlement or military contract by name 620.
Al-Haq’s Business and Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (2024 edition) documents the broader framework of corporate accountability obligations for enterprises operating in the OPT, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the heightened due-diligence obligations incumbent on vendors supplying Israeli state and security-sector clients 20. Amnesty International’s apartheid report (2022) and Human Rights Watch’s A Threshold Crossed (2021) establish the structural human rights context within which HPE’s Israel operations must be assessed 34.
The BDS Movement’s “Boycott HP” campaign is longstanding — publicly documented from at least 2010 — and explicitly covers both HP Inc. and HPE as successor entities sharing the HP brand and corporate lineage 7. The campaign cites: biometric ID systems in the West Bank, IT infrastructure for Israeli military and prison services, and Aruba networking equipment 721. The BDS campaign has not, in publicly available materials reviewed, operationally distinguished between HPE and HP Inc. post-2015, treating both as a unified “HP” target.
Who Profits Research Center maintains active research profiles on HP (historical) and Aruba Networks (HPE subsidiary), documenting the occupation-economy nexus 517.
War on Want and Stop the Wall have included HP in joint reports on corporate complicity, citing the pre-split record and ongoing brand continuity 25. Electronic Intifada has published multiple articles (2012–2024) documenting HP’s role in Israeli biometric and military systems; post-2015 articles generally address the HP brand without cleanly separating HPE from HP Inc. 16.
HPE has not issued a public statement specifically addressing the BDS campaign against it. HPE’s general human rights and supplier policies do not reference the BDS campaign or Israel-specific concerns 13.
No public reports, legal filings, or news articles have been identified documenting HPE HR enforcement actions against employees for pro-Palestinian speech, display of symbols, or union activity related to the Israel-Palestine conflict as of April 2026. HPE does not have a recognised sector-wide union in the United States for its corporate workforce; it operates under standard at-will employment with a global code of conduct.
Tech Workers Coalition and similar bodies issued sector-wide open letters in November 2023 calling on tech workers to pressure employers on Gaza; HPE is not identified as a named employer-respondent in those communications 26.
No public evidence identified of HPE-specific employee discipline, HR policy enforcement, or internal communications leaked to press regarding Palestine-related employee speech or organising.
HPE is an enterprise infrastructure and services company, not a consumer platform, social media operator, or content host. It does not operate a public-facing content platform subject to content-moderation or algorithmic-curation scrutiny. No public evidence identified of regulatory inquiries, academic studies, or independent reports regarding HPE content moderation, algorithmic suppression, or editorial stances related to the conflict. This category is not materially applicable to HPE’s business model.
HPE is a member of the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), the industry body formerly known as the Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition (EICC), which sets supply-chain labour and environmental standards for electronics sector companies 15. HPE’s hardware is manufactured by contract manufacturers (Foxconn, Flex, and others) under this framework. No public evidence identified of regulatory actions or public reports relating to HPE product labelling, sourcing of components from Israeli settlements, or categorisation of settlement-origin goods in HPE’s supply chain.
HPE is a member of the Global Network Initiative (GNI), which sets responsible principles for ICT companies regarding freedom of expression and privacy 14. GNI membership creates a framework obligation for HPE to conduct due diligence on government requests for data and to assess whether its products and services may enable surveillance or censorship. No identified GNI audit or assessment has been published specifically addressing HPE’s Israel operations, government-client engagements, or supply of networking and computing infrastructure to Israeli security-sector end-users.
HPE markets to defence and government sectors globally under its HPE Pointnext services and HPE GreenLake Government cloud brands. HPE holds US federal civilian and defence contracts visible in public procurement databases. HPE’s defence-sector marketing does not specifically invoke Israeli military heritage. Israel is not named in any identified HPE government-sector marketing material as a reference-case or flagship security-sector deployment.
HPE participates in Israeli tech-sector events, including Cybertech Tel Aviv [^30]. Cybertech is co-organised in partnership with the Israeli Ministry of Economy and the Israel Export and International Cooperation Institute, giving it a Brand Israel and national-promotion dimension. Specific HPE sponsorship tiers, financial commitments, and years of participation require verification against Cybertech event archives and HPE press releases; precise sponsorship levels are not confirmed in primary documents reviewed.
HPE has a partnership with the Technion — Israel Institute of Technology (Haifa), documented through joint research programs and HPE’s academic partnership framework 2427. The Technion receives significant Israeli government and defence ministry funding and maintains formal collaboration with IDF elite technology units through the Talpiot program. The specific scope, financial terms, and research topics of HPE’s Technion relationship — and whether any deliverables have dual-use or defence applications — are not confirmed in primary documents reviewed. This constitutes an evidence gap requiring primary-document review of Technion annual reports and HPE grant disclosures.
HPE participates in Start-Up Nation Central ecosystem activities in Israel, an Israeli government-linked initiative to market Israeli technology internationally 27. Participation has been at conference and ecosystem level; no formal partnership agreement has been identified in publicly available records.
The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation — associated with HP’s co-founders — are entirely separate legal entities from HPE. They hold HPE equity as passive investors only and have no operational or governance relationship with HPE following the 2015 corporate separation. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation’s documented grant-making focuses on education, environment, performing arts, and international affairs (including Middle East peacebuilding); no identified grants to Israeli settlement, military-welfare, or IDF-linked organisations have been found. These foundations are treated as separate entities for purposes of this audit.
No public evidence identified of HPE accepting Israeli state honours, hosting Israeli government officials in formal non-commercial capacities beyond standard diplomatic or trade engagement, or formally sponsoring Israeli government cultural-diplomacy programs.
HPE maintains an active federal lobbying program in the United States. LDA disclosures for 2022–2024 show HPE lobbying on: federal IT procurement (FedRAMP, cloud security), semiconductor policy (CHIPS Act), export controls (BIS/EAR), and trade policy 12.
No lobbying disclosures identified that specifically reference Israel-Palestine policy, anti-BDS legislation, or settlement-related trade matters as HPE lobbying topics in LDA filings reviewed 12.
HPE has lobbied on export control matters (EAR/ITAR), which carry Israel-adjacency given dual-use technology exports and HPE’s enterprise IT products sold into Israeli government and security-sector contexts. However, no specific Israel-related export control lobbying position has been identified in public LDA records 12.
Anti-BDS legislation: HPE has not been identified as a signatory to corporate anti-BDS statements or as a lobbyist for state-level anti-BDS legislation in LDA or state lobbying disclosures reviewed. No public evidence identified.
HPE is registered on the EU Transparency Register through its Brussels office, lobbying on Digital Single Market, cybersecurity, and AI regulation topics 18. No Israel-specific EU lobbying identified. UK FCDO and Companies House lobbying registers were not live-searched in this research session; specific Israel-related lobbying by HPE’s London office cannot be confirmed or excluded — this constitutes an evidence gap.
HPE PAC (FEC Committee ID C00628677) makes contributions across both parties, consistent with a large-cap US technology company’s standard bipartisan giving pattern 1110. No PAC disbursements to AIPAC, NORPAC, or other explicitly pro-Israel political committees have been identified in FEC records reviewed 11. Standard HPE PAC recipients include congressional committee chairs with jurisdiction over technology and defence appropriations.
No public evidence identified of HPE corporate donations to FIDF (Friends of the Israel Defense Forces), JNF/KKL, Israeli reservist funds, or settlement organisations. No public evidence identified of HPE corporate sponsorship of AIPAC conferences, CFI events, or US-Israel Science and Technology Foundation activities beyond standard bilateral tech-council participation.
No public evidence identified of HPE directing cloud credits, logistics, infrastructure, or free services to Israeli military or state-aligned NGOs during or after October 2023.
By contrast, HPE did extend cloud and infrastructure support to Ukrainian government entities following the February 2022 invasion, noted in corporate communications and Living Progress disclosures 15. No equivalent program for Palestinian humanitarian organisations, Gaza civil-society response, or UNRWA operations has been identified.
HPE was incorporated in Delaware on 1 November 2015 as a spinoff from Hewlett-Packard Company. Its stated corporate purpose is commercial: providing enterprise IT products, solutions, and services globally 9. HPE’s corporate charter contains no golden shares, state-held ownership interests, or explicit geopolitical mandates. It is a publicly traded corporation (NYSE: HPE) with broadly distributed institutional shareholdership.
Major institutional shareholders per the FY2024 proxy include: Vanguard Group (~10%), BlackRock (~7%), State Street (~5%), and other large passive index managers 8. No identified controlling individual shareholder holds ≥10%. No identified founding document, charter provision, or board resolution links HPE’s corporate mission to Israeli state infrastructure or geopolitical objectives.
HPE announced an agreement to acquire Juniper Networks on 9 January 2024 in a transaction valued at approximately $14 billion 23. The acquisition — pending regulatory approval during the review period — would significantly expand HPE’s networking portfolio (Aruba + Juniper AI-driven networking). The acquisition does not alter HPE’s corporate domicile, ownership structure, or governance as it relates to Israeli operations, but it materially expands the networking infrastructure capabilities HPE brings to all markets, including Israel.
HPE subscribes to multiple international ESG and responsible-business frameworks relevant to this audit:
None of these frameworks, as applied by HPE, have produced publicly documented outputs specifically addressing HPE’s Israel operations, government-client engagements, or the occupation-economy context.
Antonio Neri has served as HPE President and CEO since February 2018. He is Italian-born and US-based 8. No public evidence identified of personal donations by Antonio Neri to FIDF, JNF, Israeli military-welfare funds, or settlement organisations in IRS 990 filings, FEC records, or press reports reviewed. No public evidence identified of Antonio Neri making personal public statements, op-eds, or social-media posts specifically addressing the Israel-Palestine conflict, Gaza operations, or Palestinian civilian harm 22.
No public evidence identified of Antonio Neri holding board seats or advisory roles in AIPAC, CFI, ADL, FIDF, or equivalent organisations. Neri’s known external affiliations include: Business Roundtable (technology policy committee), World Economic Forum (participant), and Stanford University advisory engagement. None of these affiliations carry an identified Israel-specific advocacy mandate 8.
HPE’s board as of the FY2024 proxy includes independent directors across technology, finance, and operational backgrounds 8. No public evidence identified of any HPE board member holding personal roles in FIDF, JNF, AIPAC, settlement organisations, or Israeli defence companies. No public evidence identified of HPE board members making public statements on the Israel-Palestine conflict in their personal capacity that are intertwined with the HPE corporate brand.
HPE executives do not maintain high-profile family foundations with disclosed Israel-related grant-making in any IRS 990 or Charity Commission filing identified in the research corpus. A full ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer / IRS TEOS search for foundations linked to current HPE board members has not been conducted and constitutes an evidence gap — it should be completed before this section is finalised in a scored deliverable.
The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and David and Lucile Packard Foundation are legally and operationally separate from HPE (see Brand Heritage section above) and are excluded from executive footprint analysis.
Following the ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 and ICC arrest warrants of 21 November 2024, no evidence has been identified of HPE’s CEO, board, or executive leadership acknowledging either legal development in public communications, SEC filings, investor calls, or corporate policy updates 9. HPE’s FY2024 proxy statement (filed with the SEC) contains no reference to the ICJ AO, ICC proceedings, or any enhanced human-rights due-diligence obligations arising from those developments 8.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/regular-sessions/session31/database-hrc3136 ↩↩
https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/ahrc5573-anatomy-genocide ↩
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/5141/2022/en/ ↩
https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution ↩
https://investigate.afsc.org/company/hewlett-packard-enterprise ↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001645590&type=DEF+14A&dateb=&owner=include&count=10 ↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001645590&type=10-K&dateb=&owner=include&count=10 ↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/hewlett-packard-enterprise/summary?id=D000067274 ↩
https://lda.senate.gov/filings/public/filing/search/?registrant=hewlett+packard+enterprise ↩↩↩
https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getpdf.aspx/a00110841enw.pdf ↩↩↩↩
https://globalnetworkinitiative.org/member/hewlett-packard-enterprise/ ↩↩
https://www.responsiblebusiness.org/membership/members/ ↩↩↩↩↩↩
https://whoprofits.org/company/hewlett-packard-aruba-networks/ ↩↩↩
https://lobbyfacts.eu/representative/hewlett-packard-enterprise/ ↩
https://www.oecdwatch.org/complaints/ ↩
https://bdsmovement.net/hewlett-packard ↩
https://www.hpe.com/us/en/living-progress.html ↩
https://www.waronwant.org/resources/corporate-complicity-israeli-violations ↩
https://techworkerscoalition.org/ ↩
https://en.globes.co.il/en/hewlett-packard [^15b]: https://h20195.www2.hpe.com/v2/getpdf.aspx/a00128816enw.pdf ↩↩↩
https://investigate.afsc.org/methodology ↩
