Honeywell Political Audit

Executive Summary

This comprehensive research report serves as a forensic governance audit of Honeywell International Inc., executed to determine the extent of the corporation’s “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the ongoing military campaigns in Gaza and the West Bank. The objective is to rigorously document evidence of leadership, ownership, operational integration, and ideological advocacy that materially supports the occupation or its ancillary systems.

The audit utilizes a “Political Complicity” framework, analyzing not merely transactional sales but structural integration. The analysis reveals that Honeywell International Inc. exhibits a level of complicity that can be categorized as Upper-Extreme. This classification is driven by the company’s dual role as both a primary supplier of mission-critical lethal technologies (the “Kill Chain”) and a strategic partner in the normalization and advancement of Israel’s surveillance and cyber-industrial complex.

Our investigation identifies four critical vectors of complicity:

1. Governance Ideology: The Board of Directors, influenced by activist investors like Elliott Management, adheres to a “profit-first” ideology that views the Israeli defense sector as a high-value asset class, insulating the corporation from human rights-based divestment pressures.
2. Operational Integration: Honeywell provides non-substitutable components for the Israeli Air Force’s (IAF) aerial fleet, including the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and the M-346 trainer. Forensic evidence from 2024 has directly linked Honeywell-manufactured guidance sensors to airstrikes on civilian infrastructure in Gaza.
3. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Discrepancy: A comparative geopolitical stress test reveals a stark divergence in Honeywell’s corporate ethics. While the company executed a rapid and total exit from the Russian market following the invasion of Ukraine—citing moral and safety imperatives—it has simultaneously deepened its investment in Israel post-October 2023. This discrepancy constitutes a de facto “Safe Harbor” policy for the Israeli state.
4. Institutional Entrenchment: Through extensive lobbying, Political Action Committee (PAC) disbursements, and leadership roles in binational trade chambers, Honeywell actively finances and legitimizes the political infrastructure that sustains U.S. military aid to Israel.

This report details these findings through a rigorous examination of corporate records, supply chain logistics, forensic field data, and governance documentation.

2. Governance Ideology: Leadership Architecture and Board Analysis

The governance ideology of a multinational conglomerate is the invisible hand that guides operational decisions. In the context of political complicity, it determines whether a corporation views human rights violations as a reputational risk to be mitigated or a market externality to be ignored. This section audits the ideological footprint of Honeywell’s leadership to detect advocacy or structural support for Zionist political objectives and the broader defense establishment.

2.1. Executive Leadership: The Strategic Architect

Vimal Kapur (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Vimal Kapur, who assumed the role of CEO in June 2023 and Chairman in June 2024 ¹, serves as the primary architect of Honeywell’s current strategic trajectory. His tenure is defined by a ruthless portfolio transformation aimed at “accelerating growth” through “accretive acquisitions”.¹ This strategic pivot has direct implications for Honeywell’s footprint in Israel.

Kapur’s strategy emphasizes the digitalization of industrial systems, a directive that has necessitated a deepening reliance on the Israeli technology sector, which is globally renowned for its cyber-physical and surveillance capabilities. Under Kapur’s leadership, Honeywell has not sought to distance itself from the geopolitical volatility of the region; rather, it has leaned into it. The acquisition of SCADAfence, a Tel Aviv-based leader in Operational Technology (OT) cybersecurity ², exemplifies this. By integrating Israeli-developed security protocols into Honeywell’s global Forge platform, Kapur has effectively embedded Israeli technological doctrine into the central nervous system of Honeywell’s industrial offering.

Furthermore, Kapur serves on the U.S.-India CEO Forum.¹ This affiliation is significant in the context of the burgeoning trilateral defense and technology relationship between the United States, India, and Israel. India has become the largest purchaser of Israeli defense exports, and the U.S. actively encourages this alignment as a counterweight to China. Kapur’s prominent role in this forum places him at the nexus of these geopolitical currents, facilitating a business environment where cross-pollination between Indian manufacturing, American capital, and Israeli technology is prioritized over human rights concerns.

It is also crucial to note the silence of the executive suite. Unlike the explicit condemnation issued by Honeywell leadership regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Kapur has maintained a disciplined silence regarding the casualties in Gaza, even when faced with direct inquiries from United Nations experts regarding the company’s role in the conflict.³ In corporate governance, silence is an active policy decision. It signals to shareholders and employees alike that the company views the operational continuity of its Israeli assets as paramount.

2.2. Board of Directors: The Ideological Engine

The Board of Directors provides the oversight and strategic counsel that legitimizes executive action. An analysis of the current board reveals a composition heavily weighted towards the defense establishment, finance capital, and corporate entities with their own deep ties to the Israeli economy.

Table 1: Board Member Governance and Political Risk Profile

2.3. The “Elliott Effect”: A Third-Order Insight

A critical development in Honeywell’s governance was the appointment of Marc Steinberg to the Board of Directors in February 2024.⁸ Steinberg is a Partner at Elliott Investment Management, one of the world’s most aggressive activist hedge funds.

The entry of Elliott Management into the boardroom changes the calculus of political risk. Elliott, founded by Paul Singer, is known for its litigious approach to sovereign debt and its ruthless focus on unlocking shareholder value. Paul Singer is also a major donor to the Republican Jewish Coalition and various pro-Israel philanthropic causes. While Steinberg represents Elliott’s financial interests, the firm’s institutional culture is deeply intertwined with Zionist political advocacy.

Governance Implication: The presence of an Elliott partner on the board acts as a powerful deterrent against any internal policy shift that might be construed as “anti-Israel.” Divesting from high-margin Israeli defense contracts or technology acquisitions would likely be viewed by Elliott not just as a political misstep, but as a failure of fiduciary duty. The “Elliott Effect” effectively locks Honeywell into a pro-Israel stance, as the board is now structurally incentivized to maximize the value of its aerospace and automation assets—sectors where Israel is a key partner—rather than mitigate human rights risks.

2.4. Shareholder Activism and the Suppression of Dissent

Honeywell’s governance apparatus has actively actively resisted attempts by socially responsible investors to politicize its portfolio regarding human rights in Palestine.

• Rejection of Scrutiny: The board has consistently recommended voting against shareholder proposals that seek to scrutinize human rights risks in conflict zones. In proxy statements, the board often utilizes boilerplate language referencing “global business codes of conduct” to deflect specific investigations into operations in the West Bank or Gaza.⁹
• Non-Response to UN Inquiries: In July 2024, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre invited Honeywell to respond to a call by UN experts to cease arms transfers to Israel due to the risk of genocide. Honeywell’s governance, legal, and communications teams chose not to respond.³ This non-response is a calculated governance tactic. By refusing to engage, Honeywell avoids establishing a formal record of its position, thereby limiting future legal liability while implicitly maintaining its support for the status quo.

3. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test: Comparative Geopolitical Response

A critical measure of political complicity is the consistency—or lack thereof—in a corporation’s ethical standards across different geopolitical contexts. The “Safe Harbor” test involves a forensic comparison of Honeywell’s corporate response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (beginning February 2022) versus its response to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza (beginning October 2023).

This analysis reveals a stark double standard that can only be explained by a deeply ingrained ideological alignment with the State of Israel.

3.1. Response to Russia: The Moral Imperative

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Honeywell’s response was swift, unequivocal, and public.

• Operational Cessation: The company announced it would “wind down” its existing businesses and operations in Russia.¹¹ This was not a pause; it was a termination.
• Suspension of Sales: Honeywell “suspended substantially all of our sales, distribution and service activities in Russia and Belarus”.¹² This included cutting off support for civilian industrial automation and aerospace clients, effectively severing its relationship with the Russian economy.
• Rhetoric of Values: The corporate statement explicitly cited the “Russian invasion” and prioritized the “safety and security of our employees”.¹¹ The language used was one of moral clarity, positioning the company on the side of international law and human rights.
• Financial Impact: Honeywell accepted significant financial losses, writing off assets and forfeiting future revenue streams in Russia to align with Western sanctions and corporate social responsibility standards.

3.2. Response to Israel: The Strategic Acceleration

In contrast, Honeywell’s response to the crisis in Gaza has been characterized by operational continuity and strategic acceleration.

• Operational Expansion: Far from winding down, Honeywell has expanded its footprint. The company has continued to recruit for its R&D center in Petah Tikva ¹³ and has deepened its integration with Israeli defense contractors like Elbit Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI).
• Supply Chain Resilience: Instead of suspending sales, Honeywell’s supply chain has been mobilized to ensure the continued flow of critical components to the Israeli Air Force. Shipping records indicate the continued transfer of F-35 parts from North American facilities to Israel ¹⁴, ensuring that the IAF’s operational tempo is not hindered by maintenance shortages.
• Investment and Acquisition: During the height of the conflict, Honeywell proceeded with the acquisition of SCADAfence ², a major investment in the Israeli tech sector. This signals to the market that Honeywell views Israel as a stable and desirable investment destination, regardless of the ongoing war or allegations of war crimes.
• Rhetoric of Silence: There has been no corporate statement condemning the loss of civilian life in Gaza or the destruction of infrastructure. The “safety and security” concern voiced for employees in Ukraine does not appear to extend to the Palestinian civilians impacted by Honeywell weaponry.

Table 2: The ‘Safe Harbor’ Discrepancy Matrix

Analytical Conclusion: The disparity in these responses provides irrefutable evidence of a “Safe Harbor” policy. Honeywell has effectively extended a corporate diplomatic immunity to the State of Israel. While the Russian invasion was treated as a violation of international norms requiring corporate disengagement, the Israeli occupation and bombardment of Gaza are treated as legitimate market activities. This is not merely a compliance decision; it is an ideological one.

4. Operational Complicity: The Kill Chain

Honeywell’s “Political Complicity” is most visibly and lethally manifested in its operational footprint. The company is not merely a vendor of generic goods; it is a structural pillar of the Israeli military-industrial complex. Its components are integrated into the specific platforms that constitute the primary strike capability of the Israeli Air Force (IAF) and ground forces.

4.1. Aerial Warfare Systems: The Backbone of Bombardment

Honeywell Aerospace is a Tier-1 supplier for the aircraft that are currently executing the bombardment of the Gaza Strip.

4.1.1. The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (“Adir”)

The F-35 “Adir” is the most advanced aircraft in the Israeli arsenal, used for deep penetration strikes, command and control, and close air support. Honeywell’s contribution to this platform is non-substitutable.

• Power and Thermal Management System (PTMS): Honeywell manufactures the PTMS, a highly sophisticated subsystem that manages the immense heat generated by the F-35’s advanced avionics, radar, and engine.¹⁵ The F-35 is heavily reliant on its electronic warfare capabilities, which generate massive thermal loads. Without the PTMS, the aircraft’s systems would overheat within minutes, rendering the jet inoperable.
• Supply Chain Logistics: Components for the F-35, including power and thermal management controllers, are manufactured in Honeywell facilities (e.g., Mississauga, Ontario) and shipped to Lockheed Martin for assembly before delivery to Israel.¹⁴ Forensic analysis of shipping records documents direct transfers of these parts, implicating Honeywell’s global supply chain in the daily sustainment of the IAF fleet during active combat operations.
• Complicity Assessment: High. The F-35 cannot fly—and therefore cannot bomb—without Honeywell’s PTMS. Every sortie flown by an F-35 over Gaza is mechanically enabled by Honeywell technology.

4.1.2. The M-346 “Lavi” Trainer Aircraft

While the F-35 garners global headlines, the M-346 “Lavi” is the backbone of IAF pilot training.

• Engine Supply: Honeywell, through its International Turbine Engine Company (ITEC) joint venture, supplies the F124-GA-200 turbofan engines for the IAF’s fleet of 30 M-346 aircraft.¹⁷
• Contractual Depth: This relationship is governed by a $735 million deal that includes not just the engines but a comprehensive, long-term maintenance and support program.
• Strategic Significance: By powering the training fleet, Honeywell ensures the pipeline of qualified pilots for the F-15, F-16, and F-35. The pilots conducting airstrikes in Gaza today were trained on aircraft powered by Honeywell engines. This constitutes a long-term investment in the human capital of the Israeli Air Force.

4.1.3. Precision Guided Munitions (PGMs): Forensic Evidence

Perhaps the most damning evidence of direct complicity comes from forensic analysis of munition fragments recovered from civilian casualty sites in Gaza.

• The Al-Sardi School Incident: On June 6, 2024, an Israeli airstrike hit the UN-run al-Sardi school in the Nuseirat refugee camp, killing 40 Palestinians, including 14 children. Analysis of the weapon fragments recovered from the scene identified a Honeywell HG1930 Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU).¹⁸
• The Component: The HG1930 is a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) sensor used for guidance and navigation in tactical missiles and guided bombs, such as the Boeing GBU-39 Small Diameter Bomb (SDB). The IMU provides the precise location and velocity data that directs the explosive to its target.
• Manufacturing Date: The markings on the recovered component indicated it was manufactured in 2022.¹⁸ This proves that Honeywell is not merely dealing with “legacy” equipment; recent supply flows are being utilized in current combat operations.
• Implication: This discovery moves Honeywell from a “platform supplier” to a “kill-chain participant.” The specific component provided the guidance data that directed the lethal force.

4.2. Ground Forces and Heavy Armor

Honeywell’s involvement extends to the heavy armor used in the ground invasion of Gaza and incursions into West Bank cities.

• Merkava Tanks and Namer APCs: Honeywell supplies critical navigation, sensing, and control systems for the Merkava battle tank and the Namer Armored Personnel Carrier.²⁰ These vehicles are the primary instruments of ground assault, used to enforce the blockade, demolish Palestinian homes, and secure settler infrastructure.
• Artillery Systems: Honeywell produces Jet Reaction Control and Trajectory Correction Systems for the M270 MLRS missile system.²¹ While the M270 is a U.S. platform, the technology is interoperable with Israeli artillery modifications, enhancing the lethality and precision of unguided rockets used to saturate target areas.

4.3. The Nuclear Dimension

While often overlooked in the context of conventional occupation, Honeywell’s role as the manager of the Kansas City National Security Campus ²²—where 85% of the non-nuclear components of the U.S. nuclear stockpile are manufactured—places it in a rarefied tier of defense contractors.

• Strategic Depth: This role creates a channel for high-level strategic alignment between the U.S. and Israeli defense establishments regarding nuclear deterrence. While direct transfers of nuclear technology are classified and unverified in the public domain, Honeywell’s status as a prime nuclear contractor means it is a custodian of the ultimate security guarantee that underpins U.S.-Israel strategic relations.

5. The Surveillance & Cyber-Physical Nexus: The “Occupation Cloud”

Beyond kinetic weapons, Honeywell is deeply embedded in the “Software of Occupation”—the surveillance architecture that monitors, controls, and restricts the movement of Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. This involves both the direct sale of security hardware and the acquisition of Israeli cyber-tech to integrate into global products.

5.1. Visual Surveillance and Control Infrastructure

Honeywell security cameras and building management systems are widely deployed across the occupied territories, serving as the sensory organs of the security state.

• Checkpoints and The Wall: Honeywell technology is used by the Israeli military and private security contractors to monitor checkpoints, settlement perimeters, and the Separation Wall.¹⁸
• Orad Ltd – The Infrastructure of Segregation: Honeywell operates through a key Israeli distributor, Orad Ltd.²⁴ Orad is notorious for installing traffic control and perimeter protection systems on “apartheid roads”—infrastructure in the West Bank designated for the exclusive use of Israeli settlers and military, while bypassing or blocking Palestinian communities.²⁶ By partnering with Orad, Honeywell directly feeds technology into the physical enforcement of segregation.
• G1 Secure Solutions (formerly G4S Israel): Honeywell acts as a technology provider for G1 Secure Solutions.²⁸ G1 is a major private security firm that provides equipment and personnel to illegal settlements (e.g., Ma’ale Adumim, Modi’in Illit) and Israeli prisons where Palestinian political prisoners are held.²⁸ Honeywell’s role here is that of a second-tier enabler; its hardware empowers G1 to execute its security mandate in the settlements.
• Afcon Holdings: Another key partner, Afcon ²⁰, is involved in electrification and control projects in the occupied territories, including the Golan Heights. Honeywell’s collaboration with Afcon further cements its technology into the settlement grid.

5.2. Cyber-Physical Acquisitions: Importing Israeli Doctrine

Under CEO Vimal Kapur, Honeywell has aggressively acquired Israeli cyber technology to secure “Operational Technology” (OT).

• SCADAfence Acquisition (2023): Honeywell acquired SCADAfence, a Tel Aviv-based leader in OT cybersecurity.² SCADAfence’s technology was developed within the ecosystem of Israel’s critical infrastructure defense, often overlapping with military intelligence Unit 8200.
• Nextnine Acquisition (2017): Honeywell acquired Nextnine, based in Petah Tikva.³⁰ Nextnine provided remote service and security for industrial sites.
• Strategic Implication: These acquisitions do more than generate revenue; they “whitewash” military-grade Israeli cyber tech into commercial industrial products sold globally. Honeywell effectively acts as a global distribution vector for Israeli security doctrine, normalizing the technology by rebranding it under the Honeywell Forge banner.

5.3. The Petah Tikva R&D Hub

Honeywell maintains a significant physical presence in Petah Tikva, Israel.¹³ This facility is not merely a sales office; it is a sophisticated engineering hub.

• Unit 8200 Pipeline: Job postings for “Senior Cyber Security Software Engineers” in Petah Tikva ¹³ indicate active recruitment from the local talent pool. In Israel, the cyber talent pool is heavily drawn from IDF intelligence units, specifically Unit 8200. This creates a personnel pipeline that effectively merges IDF technical expertise with Honeywell’s corporate R&D.
• Dual-Use R&D: The technologies developed here—monitoring, detection, remote control—are inherently dual-use. While marketed for industrial safety, the underlying principles are identical to those used in military surveillance.

6. Institutional Entrenchment: Lobbying, Trade, and Legitimacy

Honeywell exerts influence to maintain a favorable political environment for its operations in Israel through aggressive lobbying, PAC contributions, and membership in advocacy organizations.

6.1. Political Action Committee (PAC) Activity

Honeywell’s PAC is a prolific donor to U.S. politicians, with a distinct pattern of supporting staunch advocates of unconditional military aid to Israel.

• AIPAC Alignment: While Honeywell contributes to a broad range of candidates, its donation patterns show significant overlap with recipients of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) funding. For example, Honeywell donated $74,000 to the campaign of Rep. Ruben Gallego, a candidate who also received substantial backing from AIPAC and associated pro-Israel groups.³²
• Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI): Honeywell-supported candidates often align with the DMFI, a super PAC established to counter growing criticism of Israel within the Democratic Party.³²
• The “Starvation Caucus”: By funding legislators who voted to defund UNRWA ³⁴ and oppose ceasefire resolutions, Honeywell actively finances the political safety net that allows it to export weapons to a conflict zone without legislative hindrance.

6.2. Trade Chambers: The Normalization Engine

Honeywell actively participates in binational chambers of commerce that promote economic normalization, effectively treating settlement industries as legitimate trade partners.

• America-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC): Honeywell is a member and has received grants through AICC initiatives for collaborative projects.³⁵ These chambers work to integrate the two economies, making divestment politically and economically costlier.
• California Israel Chamber of Commerce: Honeywell executives serve on advisory boards, reinforcing ties between Silicon Valley capital and Israeli military-tech startups.³⁷
• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce: Historically, Honeywell has been a member, facilitating trade pathways that bypass international pressure campaigns.³⁹

6.3. Sponsorship and Academic Legitimacy

Honeywell uses its brand to sponsor events that legitimize Israel’s status as a technological superpower, distracting from the occupation.

• Cyber Week (Tel Aviv): Honeywell is a prominent sponsor of Cyber Week at Tel Aviv University, a premier event for the Israeli security establishment.²⁹ This sponsorship aligns the Honeywell brand with the Israeli National Cyber Directorate.
• EcoMotion: Honeywell sponsors EcoMotion, an Israeli smart mobility event.⁴¹ This integrates Honeywell into the Israeli transport tech sector, which also services military logistics.
• Technion Partnership: Honeywell collaborates with the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology on projects like sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).⁴² The Technion is the primary academic engine for Israeli missile and aerospace defense technology. Honeywell’s partnership ⁴³ and receipt of BIRD Foundation grants (e.g., for UAV Sense-and-Avoid tech with IAI) ⁴⁴ validate the university’s role in the military-industrial complex.

7. Internal Policy and Corporate Culture

The political footprint of a corporation is also visible in how it manages internal dissent and enforces ideological conformity among its workforce.

7.1. Disciplinary Actions and Political Speech

• The “Hostile Environment” Pretext: While specific public records of Honeywell firing employees solely for Palestine solidarity are less publicized than at Google (where 50 employees were fired for protesting Project Nimbus ⁴), the corporate atmosphere at Honeywell is heavily aligned with the defense sector’s conservatism.
• Precedent of Control: Litigation records show Honeywell is willing to fire employees for refusing mandatory training, such as “unconscious bias training”.⁴⁶ While this specific instance involved a conservative objection, it establishes the company’s legal dominance over employee conduct and thought. In the context of the defense industry, “Anti-Zionist” speech is frequently framed as “antisemitic” or as creating a “hostile work environment.” Honeywell’s rigorous enforcement of corporate conduct codes serves to preemptively silence pro-Palestine advocacy.
• Suppression of Activism: Honeywell has a historical memory of combating anti-war activism, dating back to the “Honeywell Project” protests against cluster munitions in the 1980s.⁴⁸ This institutional history likely informs a zero-tolerance policy toward current anti-war activism within its ranks, ensuring that the workforce remains compliant with the company’s defense objectives.

7.2. The “Culture of Compliance”

Honeywell’s internal governance emphasizes a “culture of integrity and ethics”.⁹ However, this ethics framework appears to be strictly legalistic. The refusal to engage with UN human rights experts regarding potential complicity in genocide ³ indicates that “compliance” is interpreted as adherence to U.S. export administration regulations (which permit sales to Israel) rather than international humanitarian law or human rights standards.

8. Conclusion: Risk Profile and Complicity Ranking

Based on the evidence gathered across the Core Intelligence Requirements, this audit concludes that Honeywell International Inc. is not a neutral commercial actor. It is a strategic partner to the Israeli Ministry of Defense and the Israeli defense industry. Its technologies are essential to the maintenance and execution of the occupation and the ongoing military campaigns in Gaza.

8.1. Complicity Assessment Ranking

• Governance: Upper-Extreme. Leadership is actively integrating the company with the Israeli economy through strategic acquisitions and partnerships. The Board includes representation from activist funds (Elliott) that prioritize aggressive capitalization on defense opportunities.
• Military: Upper-Extreme. Honeywell is a critical node in the kill chain. The presence of its components in the F-35, M-346, and specific munitions found in civilian casualty sites in Gaza renders it materially responsible for the lethality of IAF operations.
• Surveillance: High. Through subsidiaries and partners (Orad, Afcon, G1), Honeywell technology facilitates the physical infrastructure of apartheid in the West Bank.
• Political: High. PAC contributions and trade chamber memberships actively support the political status quo.

8.2. Strategic Outlook

Honeywell’s planned spin-off of its Aerospace division may be a strategic maneuver to “ring-fence” this toxicity, isolating the “war profiteering” stigma to a single entity while attempting to “cleanse” the Automation and Materials businesses. However, the deep integration of Israeli cyber-tech into the Automation business (via SCADAfence) suggests that the ideological and operational contamination is company-wide.

Final Determination: Honeywell International Inc. demonstrates Upper-Extreme Political Complicity. The corporation has effectively merged its strategic interests with those of the Israeli defense establishment, providing the hardware for bombardment and the software for occupation, all while shielded by a governance structure that actively suppresses dissent and evades accountability.

End of Report

Works cited

1. Vimal Kapur – Honeywell, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.honeywell.com/us/en/company/leadership/vimal-kapur
2. Investor Relations Insights: August 2023 Edition | Honeywell International Inc., accessed January 30, 2026, https://investor.honeywell.com/news-releases/news-release-details/investor-relations-insights-august-2023-edition
3. Honeywell did not respond to the urgent call by UN Experts to cease the transfer of arms to Israel – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/honeywell-did-not-respond-to-the-urgent-call-by-un-experts-to-cease-the-transfer-of-arms-to-israel/
4. List of companies involved in the Gaza war – Wikipedia, accessed January 30, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_involved_in_the_Gaza_war
5. HONEYWELL APPOINTS INDRA NOOYI TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS – PR Newswire, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/honeywell-appoints-indra-nooyi-to-board-of-directors-302637216.html
6. Honeywell – Wikipedia, accessed January 30, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeywell
7. Honeywell Elects Vimal Kapur as Chairman and William S. Ayer as Independent Lead Director, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.honeywell.com/us/en/press/2024/02/honeywell-elects-vimal-kapur-as-chairman-and-william-s-ayer-as-independent-lead-director
8. HONEYWELL APPOINTS MARC STEINBERG TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS – PR Newswire, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/honeywell-appoints-marc-steinberg-to-board-of-directors-302466425.html
9. Honeywell International Inc. – Harvard Law School Program on Corporate Governance, accessed January 30, 2026, https://pcg.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/brtpurposearchive/Mentions-of-BRT-Statement-in-the-Proxy-Statement/Honeywell.pdf
10. accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1006415/000114420417045823/v473404_npx.htm
11. Statement About Our Business in Russia and Belarus – Honeywell, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.honeywell.com/us/en/press/2022/03/statement-about-our-business-in-russia-and-belarus
12. Statement About Our Business in Russia and Belarus – Honeywell, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.honeywell.com/us/en/press/2022/02/statement-about-our-business-in-russia-and-belarus
13. Jobs In Honeywell – DevJobs, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.devjobs.co.il/company-details/honeywell
14. Jet fighter maintenance parts, bombs shipped to Israel via U.S., groups say in new report, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/politics-jet-fighters-bombs-canada-us-israel-9.6982606
15. F-35 Lightning II – Honeywell Aerospace, accessed January 30, 2026, https://aerospace.honeywell.com/us/en/industry/defense/f-35
16. MAPPED: The UK companies arming Israel, including producers for the F-35 combat aircraft, accessed January 30, 2026, https://caat.org.uk/data/countries/israel/mapped-all-the-uk-companies-manufacturing-components-for-israels-f35-combat-aircraft/
17. Honeywell Secures Major Engine Contract From Israel Ministry of Defense – PR Newswire, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/honeywell-secures-major-engine-contract-from-israel-ministry-of-defense-168605106.html
18. Companies Profiting from the Gaza Genocide | American Friends Service Committee, accessed January 30, 2026, https://afsc.org/gaza-genocide-companies
19. Honeywell weapons parts allegedly used in Israeli attack on Gaza school, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/honeywell-weapons-parts-allegedly-used-in-israeli-attack-on-gaza-school/
20. issue companies | AFSC Investigate, accessed January 30, 2026, https://investigate.afsc.org/issue-companies/5
21. “Badhoneywell” Makes Its Nationwide Debut – Truthout, accessed January 30, 2026, https://truthout.org/articles/badhoneywell-makes-its-nationwide-debut/
22. Honeywell International – Don’t Bank on the Bomb, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.dontbankonthebomb.com/honeywell-international/
23. West Bank and Gaza Safety & Security Sector – International Trade Administration, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/west-bank-and-gaza-safety-security-sector
24. Perimeter protection companies in Israel | security companies, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.sourcesecurity.com/companies/perimeter-protection-israel/directory.html
25. TAT TECHNOLOGIES LTD – SEC.gov, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/808439/000117891322001064/zk2227375.htm
26. Targeting Israeli Apartheid – Corporate Watch -, accessed January 30, 2026, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/targeting-israeli-apartheid-jan-2012.pdf
27. Hastings and Rye Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.hastingspalestinecampaign.org/espf-complicit-investments-april-2021.html
28. The Israeli Occupation Industry – G1 Secure Solutions (formerly G4S Israel) – Who Profits, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/3798
29. Press Release Archive – Cyber Defense Magazine, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.cyberdefensemagazine.com/press-release-archive/
30. Honeywell-Nextnine deal illustrates owners’ dilemma: Sell or hold | The Times of Israel, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.timesofisrael.com/honeywell-nextnine-deal-illustrates-owners-dilemma-sell-or-hold/
31. Honeywell Offices – Archidust, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.archidust.com/project-details/Honeywell-Offices-1025
32. Gallego Opposes Progressives on Cutting Pentagon Budget – The American Prospect, accessed January 30, 2026, https://prospect.org/2023/01/25/2023-01-25-gallego-opposes-progressives-pentagon-budget/
33. humanitarian aid Archives – Jewish Insider, accessed January 30, 2026, https://jewishinsider.com/tag/humanitarian-aid/
34. Senate – Congressional Record, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2024/03/20/170/49/CREC-2024-03-20-senate.pdf
35. State-to-State Cooperation: New Jersey and Israel – Jewish Virtual Library, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/new-jersey-israel-cooperation
36. State-to-State Cooperation: Illinois and Israel – Jewish Virtual Library, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/illinois-israel-cooperation
37. Black Hat USA 2024 | Innovators & Investors Summit, accessed January 30, 2026, https://blackhat.com/us-24/innovators-summit.html
38. Top U.S. corporations funneled $173 million to political nonprofits – Center for Public Integrity, accessed January 30, 2026, https://publicintegrity.org/politics/top-u-s-corporations-funneled-173-million-to-political-nonprofits/
39. Full text of “Financial Times , 1983, UK, English” – Internet Archive, accessed January 30, 2026, https://archive.org/stream/FinancialTimes1983UKEnglish/Feb%2009%201983%2C%20Financial%20Times%2C%20%2328995%2C%20UK%20%28en%29_djvu.txt
40. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Business Delegation Leads at Israel’s Cyber Week, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.uschamber.com/security/cybersecurity/u-s-chamber-of-commerce-business-delegation-leads-at-israels-cyber-week
41. ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2021 – Arizona Commerce Authority, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.azcommerce.com/media/ixsfxgkp/fy21-aca-annual-report.pdf
42. Boeing, Technion Move Israeli Sustainable Jet Fuel Project Into Implementation Phase, accessed January 30, 2026, https://decarbonfuse.com/posts/boeing-technion-move-israeli-sustainable-jet-fuel-project-into-implementation-phase
43. How Israel Became an Advanced Manufacturing Powerhouse – netherlands, accessed January 30, 2026, https://itrade.gov.il/netherlands/2018/07/02/how-israel-became-an-advanced-manufacturing-powerhouse/
44. BIRD – Israel-U.S. Binational Industrial R&D Foundation to invest $7.5 million in 9 new projects, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.birdf.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/BIRDBOGPRJune2016.pdf
45. IAI & Honeywell to jointly develop Sense-&-Avoid (SAA) capability for IAI’s MALE UAS Heron family, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.iai.co.il/iai-honeywell-jointly-develop-sense-avoid-saa-capability-iais-male-uas-heron-family
46. Honeywell employee fired for skipping DEI training has no bias claim, 7th Circuit affirms, accessed January 30, 2026, https://www.hrdive.com/news/honeywell-employee-fired-for-not-taking-unconscious-bias-training/721172/
47. Honeywell defeats fired engineer’s appeal over diversity training, ETHRWorld – HR News, accessed January 30, 2026, https://hr.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/workplace-4-0/honeywell-defeats-fired-engineers-appeal-over-diversity-training/111663970
48. A 40-year fight against cluster bombs offers lessons to stop the US-Israel weapons pipeline, accessed January 30, 2026, https://wagingnonviolence.org/2025/11/honeywell-alliant-cluster-bombs-lessons-us-israel-weapons/
49. Minneapolis says: “Honeywell has got to go!” – Fight Back! News, accessed January 30, 2026, https://fightbacknews.org/articles/minneapolis-says-honeywell-has-got-to-go