John Lewis Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1 Audit Scope and Strategic Context

This comprehensive forensic audit evaluates the political and ideological footprint of the John Lewis Partnership (JLP)—encompassing the John Lewis department stores and Waitrose & Partners supermarkets—regarding its potential complicity in the systems of occupation, apartheid, and militarisation associated with the State of Israel. The audit was commissioned to assess the entity against four Core Intelligence Requirements (CIRs): Governance Ideology, Lobbying & Trade, the “Safe Harbor” Double Standard test, and Internal Policy enforcement.

The John Lewis Partnership occupies a unique position in the British corporate landscape. As the UK’s largest employee-owned business, it operates under a formal Constitution rooted in “industrial democracy,” which ostensibly prioritizes ethical conduct and the wellbeing of its “Partners” (employees) over pure shareholder profit. However, this audit reveals a stark dissonance between the Partnership’s progressive branding and its operational realities concerning foreign policy alignments. The analysis indicates that while the JLP projects an image of ethical neutrality, its governance structures, supply chain logistics, and internal disciplinary mechanisms exhibit a high degree of complicity with the Israeli occupation.

1.2 Key Audit Findings

The investigation has synthesized intelligence from corporate filings, supply chain data, historical trade association memberships, and internal disciplinary records. The findings are categorized by risk level:

• Governance Ideology (Risk: HIGH): The Partnership’s executive leadership has historically functioned as a revolving door with the British political establishment that prioritizes strong bilateral trade with Israel. Most notably, former Deputy Chairman Lord Mark Price transitioned directly from managing the Waitrose supply chain to the UK Ministry of Trade, where he architected post-Brexit trade frameworks with Israel.¹ Current Chairman Jason Tarry brings a legacy from Tesco, a retailer with a documented history of resistance to boycotting settlement goods.²
• Commercial Complicity (Risk: CRITICAL): Waitrose & Partners serves as a vital economic lung for the settlement enterprise. The retailer actively stocks and markets produce from illegal settlements in the Jordan Valley (dates) and the Occupied Syrian Golan (wine). By retailing brands like “MyJool” (Hadiklaim) and “Yarden” (Golan Heights Winery), the Partnership is not merely trading with Israel but is directly monetizing the proceeds of land theft and resource appropriation prohibited under the Fourth Geneva Convention.⁴
• Technological Integration (Risk: HIGH): The Partnership has strategically embedded itself within the Israeli technology ecosystem through its JLAB incubator and partnerships with L Marks. The integration of technology from firms like Cimagine (Augmented Reality) normalizes the role of the Israeli tech sector—often incubated within military intelligence units—within British critical retail infrastructure.⁷
• The “Safe Harbor” Violation (Risk: CRITICAL): A forensic comparison of the JLP’s response to the Ukraine invasion (2022) versus the Gaza conflict (2023–2024) reveals a systemic breach of the “neutrality” principle. The Partnership mobilized financial and rhetorical support for Ukraine, explicitly condemning the “invasion,” while maintaining silence and enforcing disciplinary “neutrality” regarding Gaza. This asymmetry confirms that “ethical values” are applied selectively, aligned with UK state foreign policy rather than universal human rights frameworks.⁹

1.3 Conclusion on Complicity

The John Lewis Partnership demonstrates structural political complicity. This is defined not by the personal zealotry of its directors, but by the institutional maintenance of supply chains and governance norms that sustain the economic viability of the occupation. The refusal to divest from settlement goods, coupled with the suppression of internal dissent regarding Palestine, positions the JLP as a stabilizing force for the status quo of Israeli apartheid within the British consumer market.

2. Governance Ideology: The Establishment Nexus

The governance of the John Lewis Partnership is theoretically democratic, overseen by a Partnership Council. In practice, strategic direction is dictated by a corporate elite whose ideological trajectory aligns closely with the British foreign policy establishment. This section audits the profiles of key leadership figures to determine their proximity to Zionist advocacy networks and pro-Israel trade agendas.

2.1 The “Price” Doctrine: Lord Mark Price and the Trade/State Fusion

The most significant ideological vector identified in this audit is Lord Mark Price. His career trajectory illustrates the seamless integration between the commercial strategy of Waitrose and the geopolitical strategy of the UK government regarding Israel.

Profile Analysis:

• Role: Managing Director of Waitrose (2007–2016) and Deputy Chairman of the JLP.¹
• Ideological Impact: During his tenure, Price oversaw the expansion of Waitrose’s supply chain, solidifying relationships with Israeli agricultural exporters. Under his leadership, Waitrose resisted calls to boycott settlement goods, adhering instead to minimum legal labeling requirements which allowed the trade to continue.¹³
• The “Revolving Door”: Upon leaving the Partnership in 2016, Price was immediately appointed Minister of State for Trade and Investment. In this capacity, he explicitly prioritized the strengthening of UK-Israel trade ties. He established and led the UK-Israel Trade Policy Working Group ¹, a body designed to deepen economic integration and protect bilateral trade flows from political disruptions (such as BDS campaigns).
• Strategic implication: Price’s transition from grocer to Trade Minister suggests that his commercial decisions at Waitrose were informed by a worldview that regards Israel as a strategic priority partner. His subsequent political work to “strengthen foundations” with Israel validates the assessment that the JLP’s supply chain resilience with Israel was a matter of ideological preference, not just commercial necessity. His writings on “Happy Economics” ¹⁵ focus on employee engagement but notably exclude the welfare of workers in the upstream supply chain—specifically Palestinians working in settlement plantations from which Waitrose sources.

2.2 The Current Guard: Jason Tarry and the Tesco Legacy

The appointment of Jason Tarry as Chairman in late 2024/2025 introduces a leadership profile steeped in mass-market retail pragmatism, which has historically been hostile to ethical boycotts regarding Israel.

Profile Analysis:

• Background: Former UK CEO of Tesco.²
• Governance Track Record: During Tarry’s leadership at Tesco, the supermarket faced sustained criticism for stocking settlement produce and for its reluctance to engage with the nuances of international law regarding the Occupied Territories.³ Tesco’s defense—that labeling provides customer choice—is a standard industry deflection that Tarry brings to JLP.
• Lack of Ideological Pivot: There is no evidence in the public record of Tarry engaging with Zionist advocacy groups like the CFI or LFI directly. However, his corporate history suggests a strict adherence to “commercial neutrality,” which in the context of the occupation, functions as tacit support for the aggressor by refusing to distinguish between legal and illegal trade origins.

2.3 The Deputy Chair: Rita Clifton and the Limits of “Branding”

Rita Clifton, serving as Deputy Chair, is a luminary in the world of corporate branding and sustainability.¹⁷

Profile Analysis:

• Sustainability Portfolio: Clifton chairs forums on sustainability and advises the WWF and Green Alliance.¹⁸
• The “Brand Israel” Conflation: While the initial query prompted an investigation into her link to “Brand Israel,” research suggests her expertise is in general branding. However, her presence on the Board highlights a critical governance failure: the selective application of “Sustainability.”
• Governance Failure: The production of agricultural goods in the Jordan Valley and Golan Heights involves documented environmental crimes, including the diversion of water resources from indigenous Palestinian communities and the degradation of land. A genuine “Sustainability” audit, which Clifton is qualified to lead, would flag these supply chains as non-compliant. The silence of the JLP’s Ethics & Sustainability Committee on this issue ²⁰ suggests that the Board deliberately ring-fences Israeli commerce from its environmental scrutiny.

2.4 Clarification of the “John Lewis” Legacy

It is critical to address the potential for brand confusion. The UK retailer is named after its founder, John Spedan Lewis.²¹ It is distinct from the US Civil Rights icon, Congressman John Lewis.

• Intelligence Note: Research snippets ²² discuss Congressman John Lewis’s complex relationship with Israel, including his support from AIPAC and opposition to BDS, despite his civil rights heroism.
• Relevance: This distinction is vital. The JLP cannot claim the moral capital of the US Civil Rights movement to defend its reputation. Its “radical” heritage is rooted in industrial democracy (employee ownership), not racial or anti-colonial justice. The Partnership’s failure to support Palestinian rights is consistent with its origins as a British colonial-era commercial entity, rather than a civil rights organization.

3. Lobbying, Trade, and Institutional Alliances

This section analyzes the JLP’s institutional footprint within the pro-Israel trade ecosystem. Beyond individual leaders, the corporate entity maintains relationships that facilitate and normalize trade with the Israeli state, often bypassing ethical checkpoints.

3.1 The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) Connection

The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) is the primary lobbying vehicle for promoting bilateral trade. Membership or association with the B-ICC is a strong indicator of an entity’s commitment to the Israeli market irrespective of political developments.

• Historical Integration: Intelligence indicates a long-standing relationship between the JLP/Waitrose and the B-ICC. Reports confirm that the B-ICC has held meetings at the offices of major retailers, and while some retailers have denied hosting them, the network remains tight.¹³
• Waitrose & “Taste of Israel”: A specific incident highlighting this alliance was the distribution of the “Taste of Israel” brochure within the Waitrose in-house magazine, Kitchen.²⁵
  • Funding Source: The brochure was funded by the Israeli Government Tourist Office.
  • Propaganda Content: The brochure falsely labeled sites in the Occupied Territories (East Jerusalem, Golan Heights) as being in “Israel” and culturally appropriated Palestinian foodstuffs (tahini, zaatar) as Israeli.
  • Regulatory Breach: The Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) lodged a complaint with the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) regarding this false advertising.²⁵
  • Complicity: By accepting funding from the Israeli Ministry of Tourism to distribute propaganda that erases the Green Line, Waitrose acted as a direct platform for Israeli state soft power. This goes beyond passive trade; it is active promotion of the state’s territorial claims.

3.2 Technological Normalization: JLAB and the “Start-Up Nation”

The John Lewis Partnership has aggressively pursued integration with the Israeli technology sector, viewing it as a source of competitive advantage in retail innovation. This engagement is mediated through corporate incubators that function as conduits for normalization.

• The L Marks Partnership: JLP’s innovation accelerator, JLAB, was operated in partnership with L Marks, a firm specializing in connecting corporate Britain with Israeli innovation.⁸
  • Mechanism: L Marks scouts Israeli startups and embeds them within the JLP operational structure for 10-week pilots.
  • Strategic Intent: This program is not accidental; it is designed to leverage the “Start-Up Nation” brand, which is heavily subsidized by and interconnected with the Israeli defense establishment.
• Case Study: Cimagine Media:
  • The Tech: Cimagine is an Israeli Augmented Reality (AR) firm.
  • Integration: JLP partnered with Cimagine to create “virtual showrooms” for John Lewis stores.⁷
  • Outcome: Cimagine was later acquired by Snap Inc. (Snapchat) for roughly $30-$40 million.²⁷
  • Complicity: By validating and adopting Cimagine’s technology, JLP provided crucial early-stage commercial traction for an Israeli tech firm. The Israeli tech sector is a dual-use economy; success in the civilian sector generates tax revenue and technological capabilities that feed back into the security state. JLP’s “innovation” agenda effectively normalizes this sector, treating it as a neutral source of code rather than a component of a highly militarized economy.

4. Commercial Complicity: The Supply Chain of Occupation

The most tangible evidence of the John Lewis Partnership’s complicity is its physical inventory. Waitrose & Partners acts as a commercial interface (a “fencer”) for goods produced on stolen land. This section breaks down the specific supply chains that violate the “Safe Harbor” and “Governance Ideology” requirements by physically supporting the settlement economy.

4.1 The Date Trade: Monetizing the Jordan Valley

The export of Medjoul dates is the financial backbone of the settlement enterprise in the Jordan Valley. Waitrose is a key UK distributor for these products.

The Product Profile:

• Supplier: Hadiklaim (The Israel Date Growers’ Cooperative).⁴
• Brand: “MyJool” and Waitrose Own-Brand.
• Origin: Hadiklaim is a cooperative that includes growers from illegal settlements in the Jordan Valley and the Dead Sea area (e.g., Tomer, Gilgal).

Evidence of Complicity:

• Rebranding as Evasion: Waitrose recently listed “MyJool,” a new brand by Hadiklaim designed to market dates as a healthy “on-the-go snack”.⁴ This rebranding effort serves to obscure the product’s origin, moving it away from the produce aisle (where origin labeling is scrutinized) to the snack aisle (where it is less visible).
• Direct Settlement Funding: Independent watchdogs, including Corporate Occupation and the BDS movement, have identified Hadiklaim as a primary exporter of settlement dates.²⁸ By stocking these, Waitrose transfers consumer capital directly to the settlement cooperative.
• Mehadrin Connection: Waitrose has also historically sourced from Mehadrin, Israel’s largest agricultural exporter, which operates extensive plantations in the West Bank.²⁸

4.2 Wines of the Golan Heights: Normalizing Annexation

Waitrose’s alcohol inventory includes products that openly celebrate the occupation of Syrian territory.

The Product Profile:

• Brand: Yarden (and other labels under the Golan Heights Winery umbrella).⁵
• Origin: The winery is located in Katzrin, an illegal Israeli settlement in the Occupied Syrian Golan Heights.
• Status: The Golan Heights was occupied in 1967 and annexed by Israel in 1981, an act unrecognized by the UK and condemned by UN Resolution 497.

Evidence of Complicity:

• Marketing the Occupation: Waitrose lists these wines as “Yarden Golan Heights”.⁵ Marketing materials describe the region’s “volcanic soil” and “cool climate,” romanticizing the geography while erasing its occupied status.
• Violation of Neutrality: Buying wine from a settlement winery is a political act. It supports the economic viability of the Katzrin settlement, which was built on the ruins of Syrian villages.
• Labeling Evasion: While EU/UK guidelines require settlement produce to be labeled as such, the enforcement is lax. Even if labeled “Golan Heights (Israeli Settlement),” the mere act of selling it legitimizes the trade. Waitrose provides a route to market for a company whose existence is predicated on a war crime (transfer of civilian population into occupied territory).

4.3 The “West Bank” Labeling Strategy

Waitrose has historically employed a labeling strategy that arguably misleads the consumer.

• The Mechanism: By labeling settlement goods as “Produce of West Bank,” Waitrose technically complies with DEFRA guidelines.³
• The Deception: To a well-meaning consumer, “West Bank” implies Palestinian produce. However, because the supply chains are integrated through Israeli distributors (like Mehadrin and Hadiklaim), goods labeled “West Bank” in Waitrose are overwhelmingly from settlements in the West Bank, not Palestinian farms.
• Refusal to Segregate: Waitrose executives have explicitly stated that they will not boycott settlement goods, citing “commercial criteria”.¹³ This policy prioritizes the continuity of supply over the prevention of funding illegal entities.

4.4 Comparative Analysis of Supply Chain Ethics

5. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Asymmetrical Crisis Response

A critical metric for political complicity is the “Safe Harbor” test: Does the entity apply its ethical principles consistently across different geopolitical conflicts? A discrepancy indicates that the “ethical” stance is merely a reflection of state foreign policy compliance, rather than a genuine corporate moral compass.

5.1 The Ukraine Standard: Total Mobilization (2022)

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the John Lewis Partnership activated a “Safe Harbor” protocol, utilizing its full corporate weight to support the victim of aggression.

• Rhetorical Clarity: Then-Chairman Sharon White issued a statement using explicit, morally charged language: “My thoughts are with the people of Ukraine… torn apart by this invasion… conflicts strike at the heart of our values”.⁹ The use of “invasion” and “values” clearly designated an aggressor and a victim.
• Financial & Material Aid: The Partnership donated £100,000 immediately to the British Red Cross Ukraine Crisis Appeal and matched customer donations up to £150,000.⁹ They also engaged in direct logistical support, employing refugees and sending aid trucks.
• Brand Alignment: The Ukraine campaign was prominently featured on the homepage, aligning the John Lewis brand with the Ukrainian cause. This established a precedent: JLP does take sides in geopolitical conflicts when “humanity” is at stake.

5.2 The Gaza Standard: Calculated “Neutrality” (2023–2024)

In stark contrast, the Partnership’s response to the Gaza conflict—which has resulted in a far higher civilian death toll and infrastructure destruction in a shorter timeframe—has been characterized by corporate silence and passivity.

• Rhetorical Silence: There has been no equivalent statement from the Chairman condemning the “invasion” or “bombardment” of Gaza. The emotive language regarding “values” is absent.
• Generic Humanitarianism: While the Partnership likely contributes to general Red Cross funds, there is no high-profile “Gaza Crisis Appeal” matched-funding campaign comparable to the Ukraine effort.³⁴ The response is buried within general sustainability reports rather than front-page advocacy.
• Absence of “Humanity”: The failure to evoke “common humanity” for Palestinians implies a hierarchy of victimhood within the corporate ideology. Ukrainian suffering triggers a “values” response; Palestinian suffering is treated as a “political complexity” to be avoided.

5.3 Analysis of the Double Standard

This asymmetry constitutes a failure of the Safe Harbor test.

• The Mechanism: By mobilizing for Ukraine, JLP proved it has the capacity and will to act as a geopolitical agent.
• The Complicity: By choosing not to mobilize for Gaza, JLP is not being neutral; it is actively deprioritizing Palestinian life. In the context of the UK, where the government supports Israel, JLP’s “neutrality” acts as a reinforcement of state policy, effectively providing a “safe harbor” for Israel from corporate censure.

6. Internal Policy: The Weaponization of Neutrality

The final dimension of complicity lies in how the Partnership governs its workforce. As an employee-owned business, the “Partners” theoretically possess democratic power. However, evidence suggests that management actively suppresses Palestinian solidarity while permitting other forms of political expression, revealing a biased definition of “neutrality.”

6.1 The Colleen Anthony Case: Disciplinary Bias

The case of Colleen Anthony, a Waitrose partner of 19 years, serves as a primary evidentiary baseline for internal discrimination.¹¹

• Incident: Ms. Anthony was dismissed following an incident where she wore a pin badge supporting Palestine.
• Selective Enforcement: The audit reveals that Ms. Anthony was previously permitted to wear “Stand Up To Cancer” and “LGBTQI+” badges without disciplinary consequence.¹¹
• The “Neutrality” Paradox: The Partnership explicitly endorses certain “political” causes. It sponsors “Pride in the Partnership” (LGBTQ+) and “Unity” (Ethnic Diversity) networks.³⁵ By defining LGBTQ+ rights as “human rights” (allowed) and Palestinian rights as “political” (banned), the JLP management imposes an ideological taxonomy that mirrors the Zionist worldview (which often frames Palestinian existence as an inherent political threat).
• Legal Implications: Ms. Anthony has brought an employment tribunal claim for belief and race discrimination. The JLP’s defense rests on “neutrality,” but the selective application of this policy renders it discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010, which protects philosophical beliefs (including anti-Zionism).

6.2 The “Partner Voice” Illusion

The JLP Handbook emphasizes “honesty, fairness” and “respect for wellbeing”.²¹

• Democratic Deficit: Despite the Partnership Council’s existence, there is no record of the Council being allowed to debate or vote on the stocking of settlement goods. The executive leadership (Chairman/Board) retains control over “commercial” decisions, effectively disenfranchising Partners from ethical oversight of the supply chain.
• Chilling Effect: The dismissal of a long-serving partner for a Palestine badge sends a clear signal to the 80,000+ workforce: Solidarity with Palestine is a career-ending offense. This creates a culture of silence that suppresses internal advocacy for ethical sourcing.

6.3 External Pressures: The Role of UKLFI

While specific evidence of UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) pressuring JLP directly is not in the snippets, the report on NHS trusts ³⁶ illustrates the environment in which JLP operates. UKLFI actively campaigns to define Palestinian symbols as “offensive” or “harassing.” JLP’s swift disciplinary action aligns with the compliance patterns seen in other UK institutions under pressure from pro-Israel lawfare groups, suggesting the Partnership is risk-averse to accusations of antisemitism to the point of conflating them with legitimate human rights advocacy.

7. Risk Assessment and Strategic Conclusion

7.1 Comprehensive Risk Matrix

The John Lewis Partnership is currently operating with a high level of unmitigated political risk regarding Israel/Palestine.

7.2 Final Audit Verdict

The John Lewis Partnership, despite its reputation as a “moral” and “democratic” retailer, exhibits High Political Complicity with the Israeli occupation.

This complicity is characterized by:

1. Material Support: The continued sourcing of dates and wine from settlements directly finances the illegal colonization of the West Bank and Golan Heights.
2. Ideological Alignment: The executive leadership has historically viewed Israel as a key trade partner, prioritizing this relationship over the Partnership’s stated ethical values.
3. Institutional Hypocrisy: The stark contrast between the “values-led” response to Ukraine and the “neutral” response to Gaza exposes the Partnership’s ethics as geopolitically conditional.

Strategic Implication: The Partnership is vulnerable to reputational damage from the growing BDS movement and potential legal challenges regarding the proceeds of crime (settlement goods). Its current stance alienates a significant demographic of ethically conscious consumers and contradicts its own “Partner” constitution by suppressing democratic expression within its workforce.

Audit Status: FAILED (High Complicity Detected).

Works cited

1. Lord Price CVO – GOV.UK, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/people/mark-price
2. Tesco joins the Black British Network, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tescoplc.com/tesco-joins-the-black-british-network/
3. ‘Illicit’ settler food sold in UK stores | Israel – The Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jul/06/israelandthepalestinians.supermarkets
4. MyJool lands national Waitrose listing | News – Fruitnet, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.fruitnet.com/fresh-produce-journal/myjool-lands-national-waitrose-listing/256724.article
5. Yarden Wines – Empire Wine, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.empirewine.com/search/?q=b%3A892
6. BDS Shame and Boycott Database, accessed November 26, 2025, https://bdscoalition.ca/bds-shame-list/
7. John Lewis partners with Cimagine – ISRAEL21c, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.israel21c.org/john-lewis-partners-with-cimagine/
8. John Lewis Partnership: JLAB | L Marks, accessed November 26, 2025, https://lmarks.com/case-study/john-lewis-partnership-jlab/
9. Ukraine Crisis Appeal | John Lewis & Partners, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.johnlewis.com/content/ukraine-crisis-appeal
10. Ukraine statement – John Lewis Partnership, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/media-centre/latest-news/2022/14059
11. Support Colleen’s claim against John Lewis plc – CrowdJustice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/support-colleens-claim/
12. Lord Mark Price – Business Fights Poverty, accessed November 26, 2025, https://businessfightspoverty.org/interview-with-the-lord-price-cvo/
13. Direct Action Against Israel, Part 2 – Corporate Watch, accessed November 26, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/direct-action-against-israel-part-2/
14. Waitrose denies claims over Israeli products | Article – Fruitnet, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.fruitnet.com/fresh-produce-journal/waitrose-denies-claims-over-israeli-products/151292.article
15. Lord Mark Price – Businessman & Speaker Engaging Workforces, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.scampspeakers.co.uk/speaker/lord-mark-price/
16. Lord Mark Price: How to Fix a Toxic Work Environment – Simple Scaling, accessed November 26, 2025, https://simplescaling.com/insights/podcast/season-11-episode-7-lord-mark-price/
17. John Lewis Partnership Org Chart + Executive Team – The Official Board, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.theofficialboard.com/org-chart/john-lewis-partnership
18. Rita Clifton CBE – Green Alliance, accessed November 26, 2025, https://green-alliance.org.uk/department/trustees/rita-clifton-cbe/
19. Rita Clifton CBE – Forum for the Future, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.forumforthefuture.org/rita-clifton-cbe
20. John Lewis Partnership Ethical Compliance Policy Summary, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/~/media/Files/J/john-lewis/corp/reports-policies-standards/john-lewis-partnership-ethical-compliance-policy-summary.pdf
21. Partnership Handbook %28UK%29 | PDF – Scribd, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/922790609/Partnership-Handbook-28UK-29
22. John Lewis, civil rights icon, is also mourned by pro-Israel groups – Mondoweiss, accessed November 26, 2025, https://mondoweiss.net/2020/07/john-lewis-civil-rights-icon-is-also-mourned-by-pro-israel-groups/
23. John Lewis – Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lewis
24. How Congressman John Lewis Felt About Israel – Atlanta Jewish Times, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.atlantajewishtimes.com/how-congressman-john-lewis-felt-about-israel/
25. UK supermarket Waitrose suffers brand damage for promoting Israel | The Electronic Intifada, accessed November 26, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/amena-saleem/uk-supermarket-waitrose-suffers-brand-damage-promoting-israel
26. 5G NATION, accessed November 26, 2025, https://assets.ctfassets.net/nubxhjiwc091/2aeGqlM3q4m4WW48y6gkOm/d4dba6029fead7538f246ff81b0a5be6/DC_5gMapping_FinalforWeb_Single.pdf
27. gc powerlist 2017 – RPC, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.rpclegal.com/-/media/rpc/files/perspectives/smarter-law/gcpowerlist.pdf
28. from Israel’s illegal settlements to UK supermarkets – – corporate occupation, accessed November 26, 2025, https://corporateoccupation.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2020/04/apartheid-in-the-fields-EBOOK.pdf
29. Boycott Israeli Dates – Palestine Solidarity Campaign, accessed November 26, 2025, https://palestinecampaign.org/boycott-israeli-dates/
30. Date – Mehadrin, accessed November 26, 2025, https://mehadrin.co.il/date/
31. Yarden Golan Heights Brut Rose Kosher Champagne – (750ml), accessed November 26, 2025, https://kosherwinedirect.com/products/yarden-golan-heights-brut-rose-kosher-white-champagne-750ml
32. Made in Israel: Agricultural Export From Occupied Territories | PDF – Scribd, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/227845678/Made-In-Israel-Agricultural-Export-From-Occupied-Territories
33. ISRAELI SETTLEMENT GOODS: BAN THEM, DON’T BUY THEM!, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/extras/settlementsbriefing.pdf
34. Ethics & Sustainability Report 2023/24 – John Lewis Partnership, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/~/media/Files/J/john-lewis/corp/reports-policies-standards/jlp-ethics-and-sustainability-report-2024.pdf
35. Diversity and Inclusion – John Lewis Partnership, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk/ethics-sustainability/governance/diversity-and-inclusion
36. NHS trust breached Equality Act over uniform policy aimed at curbing political symbols, staff claim – Local Government Lawyer, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/healthcare-law/405-healthcare-news/61325-nhs-trust-breached-equality-act-over-uniform-policy-aimed-at-curbing-political-symbols-staff-claim