Meta Political Audit

1. Executive Summary: The Architecture of Digital Complicity

This report constitutes a forensic governance audit of Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ: META), executed to determine the corporation’s level of “Political Complicity” regarding the State of Israel, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and the ongoing military campaigns in Gaza. The objective is to move beyond superficial analyses of content moderation and investigate the deep structural, financial, and ideological, ligaments that bind one of the world’s most powerful technology corporations to a specific state actor and its military apparatus.

The audit synthesizes intelligence across four vectors: Governance Ideology, Lobbying & Trade, The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test (comparative geopolitical policy application), and Internal Corporate Policy. By analyzing board-level affiliations, venture capital flows, policy shifts, and whistleblower testimonies, this report establishes a “Complicity Ranking” for Meta Platforms.

Key Findings

The analysis indicates that Meta Platforms does not operate as a neutral digital intermediary. Instead, it functions as a Level 4: Integrated Strategic Partner within the Israeli technological and political ecosystem. This conclusion is supported by the following pillars of evidence:

1. Governance Interlock and Defense Integration: The Board of Directors is heavily influenced by the ideology of “Techno-Optimism” and “American Dynamism,” spearheaded by Marc Andreessen. Through his venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), key board members maintain direct financial interests in defense technology companies (such as Skydio) whose autonomous systems are currently operational in the Gaza theater.¹ This creates a fiduciary and ideological conflict where the board profits from the very kinetic warfare that the platform is tasked with moderating.
2. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Geopolitical Asymmetry: A forensic comparison of Meta’s policy responses to the war in Ukraine versus the war in Gaza reveals a systemic double standard. While Meta created policy exemptions to allow for “righteous violence” and political expression against Russian invaders ³, it has simultaneously tightened algorithmic chokeholds on Palestinian speech, reclassifying political terminology (e.g., “Zionist”) as hate speech proxies.⁵
3. Institutional Embedment: Meta is not merely a service provider in Israel but a structural pillar of the “Startup Nation” brand. Through deep integration with the Israel-America Chamber of Commerce’s AI Forum ⁷ and joint doctoral programs with Hebrew University ⁸, Meta actively legitimizes and develops the dual-use technological infrastructure of the Israeli state.
4. Operational Capture via Personnel: The employment of Jordana Cutler, a former senior advisor to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as the dedicated Policy Director for Israel and the Jewish Diaspora, represents a critical failure of corporate neutrality.⁹ Evidence suggests this role functions as a mechanism for the Israeli government to exert direct influence over content moderation protocols, a privilege not afforded to Palestinian stakeholders.

The following report details the mechanisms of this complicity, mapping the flow of capital, ideology, and policy that aligns Meta Platforms with the strategic objectives of the State of Israel.

2. Governance Ideology: The Board and Executive Architecture

The political footprint of a corporation is determined by the ideological composition of its highest governing body. An analysis of Meta’s Board of Directors and executive suite reveals a network of affiliations that link the company to Zionist advocacy, US-Israel geopolitical strategy, and the defense industrial base.

2.1 The Ideological Pivot: “American Dynamism” and the War Machine

The most significant finding in the governance audit is the presence of Marc Andreessen on the Meta Board of Directors. As a co-founder of the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Andreessen has become the primary architect of a worldview that conflates technological progress with military power—a philosophy he terms “Techno-Optimism.”

2.1.1 The Techno-Optimist Manifesto and Defense Capital

In his “Techno-Optimist Manifesto,” Andreessen articulates a worldview that rejects “stagnation” and embraces unbridled technological acceleration, including in the domains of defense and energy.¹⁰ While couched in the language of human advancement, this ideology serves as the intellectual superstructure for a16z’s “American Dynamism” fund, which invests heavily in “national interest” technologies.

The implications for Meta’s neutrality in the Israel-Palestine context are profound:

• Direct Investment in Conflict Tech: a16z is a lead investor in Skydio, a US drone manufacturer. Intelligence reports and investigative journalism confirm that Skydio drones have been supplied to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and are actively used in surveillance and tactical operations in Gaza.²
• The Conflict of Interest: This creates a direct feedback loop. A Meta board member (Andreessen) has a financial stake in the success and proliferation of military hardware used in Gaza. Simultaneously, he sits on the board of the primary communication platform (Meta) used by civilians in Gaza to document the impact of that hardware. This structural conflict disincentivizes neutral content moderation, as the documentation of potential war crimes committed by portfolio-linked technologies (drones) poses a reputational risk to the investment.
• Other Portfolio Links: a16z also backs Anduril Industries and Shield AI, companies at the forefront of autonomous warfare and border surveillance.¹ These technologies align closely with Israel’s military doctrine of “software-defined warfare” and “smart borders,” creating a synergy between the board’s investment thesis and the operational realities of the Israeli occupation.

2.1.2 Political Financing and “Tech Zionism”

The audit also highlights the political financing activities of Andreessen and his partner Ben Horowitz.

• The Trump Pivot: Both Andreessen and Horowitz made significant donations to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign.¹⁴ This alignment suggests a preference for a US foreign policy that favors unconstrained support for Israel’s military actions and potential annexation of the West Bank, consistent with the Trump administration’s previous “Peace to Prosperity” plan.
• “Tech Zionism” and The Network State: Andreessen has publicly engaged with the concept of “Tech Zionism” and the “Network State,” an idea popularized by Balaji Srinivasan (an a16z network affiliate). This political theory advocates for the creation of new, sovereign corporate-states or digital enclaves.¹⁵ This ideology mirrors the Zionist project of state-building through technological and settlement expansion, suggesting a deep ideological resonance between Silicon Valley libertarians and the Israeli settler-colonial project.

2.2 The Deep State Liaison: Robert M. Kimmitt

Robert M. Kimmitt, Meta’s Lead Independent Director, brings a different but equally critical form of complicity to the board: deep institutional memory of US-Israel geopolitical management.

• Historical Precedent (Operation Opera): Kimmitt served as a senior legal advisor in the Reagan administration. Declassified documents reveal his direct involvement in managing the legal and diplomatic fallout of Israel’s 1981 bombing of the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq (Operation Opera).¹⁷
• Legal Expertise: His background involves navigating the Arms Export Control Act and determining whether Israeli military actions constitute a “substantial violation” of agreements to use US weapons only for “defensive purposes.”
• Current Relevance: Kimmitt’s presence provides Meta with high-level expertise in managing the friction between corporate operations and international law. His historical role in shielding the US-Israel relationship from legal consequences informs Meta’s current approach to “Safe Harbor” provisions, ensuring the company avoids legal liability for facilitating potential war crimes while maintaining its market position.

2.3 Executive Philanthropy and “Soft” Power

While corporate entities often claim distinct separation between personal philanthropy and professional duty, the audit finds a blurring of lines among Meta’s leadership.

2.3.1 Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan

While the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) focuses on broad scientific goals, the couple’s private family office has engaged in targeted philanthropy within the Jewish community that overlaps with Zionist advocacy.

• Strategic Donations: In 2021, the couple donated $1.3 million to 11 Jewish organizations. While some recipients were community-focused (schools, camps), the list included the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC).¹⁹ The JCRC is a primary lobbying body for pro-Israel advocacy in the United States, often coordinating opposition to BDS and promoting the “Brand Israel” narrative.
• Ideological Signaling: Reports indicate that Zuckerberg has been meeting with rabbis and scholars to “deepen his connection” to the community. While personal religious exploration is private, the financial support of political advocacy groups (JCRC) signals a willingness to invest in the institutional structures that defend Israeli policy.

2.3.2 Ben Horowitz and Shaare Zedek

Ben Horowitz, Andreessen’s partner and a key figure in the a16z ecosystem, has demonstrated direct philanthropic ties to Israeli state institutions.

• Shaare Zedek Medical Center: Horowitz ran a marathon to raise funds for the Shaare Zedek Medical Center in Jerusalem.²² While a medical institution, Shaare Zedek operates within the integrated Israeli hospital system, which treats IDF soldiers and is part of the national emergency infrastructure.
• Political Donations: Horowitz’s donations to the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC)—a group characterized by hawkish pro-Israel stances—further cement the ideological leaning of Meta’s key influencers.²³

2.4 The Executive Liaison: Jordana Cutler

Perhaps the most structurally compromised position within Meta is that of Jordana Cutler, the Public Policy Director for Israel and the Jewish Diaspora.

• A Political Appointee: Cutler is not a technocrat; she is a political operative. Her resume includes serving as Chief of Staff at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, D.C., and as a Campaign Advisor for the Likud Party (Netanyahu’s right-wing party) in the 2009 election.⁹
• Operational Interference: Cutler has explicitly described her mandate as “representing Israel to Facebook.” Investigative reports from The Intercept and Monde Diplomatique reveal that she utilizes Meta’s internal “content escalation channels” to flag pro-Palestinian content for removal.
  • Targeting Dissent: Specifically, Cutler has flagged posts by Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), invoking the “Dangerous Organizations and Individuals” (DOI) policy to suppress campus activism.⁹
  • The “Disputed” Territory Narrative: Former colleagues have alleged that Cutler lobbied internally to designate the West Bank as “disputed territory” rather than “occupied,” attempting to rewrite international legal definitions within Meta’s internal maps and policies.⁹
• Structural Bias: Meta does not employ a “Public Policy Director for Palestine.” The existence of a high-level role dedicated specifically to the “Jewish Diaspora” and Israel—staffed by a former state official—creates a structural imbalance where Israeli state interests have a direct, privileged channel to influence global content moderation, while Palestinian interests are relegated to general “Middle East” policy desks often staffed by individuals with less political capital.

3. Institutional Integration: Lobbying, Trade, and Legitimation

Meta is not merely a platform operating in Israel; it is a constituent member of the Israeli economy’s strategic depth. Through lobbying groups, academic partnerships, and R&D integration, Meta helps legitimize the “Startup Nation” brand while enhancing the state’s dual-use technological capabilities.

3.1 The Chamber of Commerce Nexus

Meta actively participates in trade associations that function as lobbying arms for US-Israel economic integration and anti-BDS activity.

3.1.1 Israel-America Chamber of Commerce (AmCham Israel)

Meta is a “Leading Member” of the AmCham Israel AI Forum, launched in July 2024.⁷

• The “B2G” Bridge: The stated goal of this forum is to serve as a “B2G” (Business-to-Government) bridge, fostering collaboration between US tech giants (Meta, Google, Amazon) and the Israeli government.
• Operational Complicity: By partnering with the Israeli government to develop its AI ecosystem, Meta is directly enhancing the state’s technological capacity. Given the inextricable link between Israel’s civilian tech sector and its military (the “dual-use” nature of Israeli tech), advancing “Israeli AI” inevitably advances Israeli military capabilities. The forum focuses on “developing advanced AI defense technologies” and “supporting the adoption of AI in the public sector” ²⁷, explicitly linking Meta to the state’s defense apparatus.

3.1.2 British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (BICC)

Evidence indicates “Facebook” (Meta) has been involved in BICC events, including business breakfasts and networking sessions.²⁸

• Soft Advocacy: The BICC openly describes its mission as “Soft Advocacy” on behalf of Israel, particularly since October 7th. By participating in and sponsoring BICC events, Meta lends its corporate credibility to an organization dedicated to defending Israeli policy in the UK and countering the BDS movement.

3.2 Academic and R&D Symbiosis: Whitewashing the Occupation

Meta uses its brand and resources to legitimize Israeli academic institutions, many of which are complicit in the occupation through military technology development and campus policy.

3.2.1 Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJI)

In 2022, Meta AI launched a joint PhD program with Hebrew University.⁸

• The Partnership: This is not a passive sponsorship; it is a deep integration. Meta assigns mentors to students, provides scholarships, and grants access to Meta’s computational infrastructure.
• The Complicity: Hebrew University is deeply embedded in the occupation infrastructure. Portions of its Mount Scopus campus are built on occupied Palestinian land (East Jerusalem). The university hosts the Havatzalot program, an elite IDF intelligence training corps. By partnering with HUJI, Meta normalizes these military ties and helps the university maintain its global standing despite calls for academic boycott.

3.2.2 Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

Meta has established research collaborations with the Technion, often cited as the technological engine of the Israeli military.

• Defense Tech Hub: The Technion is the birthplace of the D9 bulldozer (used for home demolitions in the West Bank and Gaza) and has deep ties to Elbit Systems and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems.
• Research Integration: Collaborations focus on machine learning and AI.³² While ostensibly civilian, this research strengthens the “human capital” of the Israeli defense sector. For example, Technion researchers funded by US defense grants (AFOSR) work on metamaterials with “clear promise in defense-related applications”.³⁴ Meta’s collaboration here acts as a force multiplier for this ecosystem.

3.2.3 Reichman University (formerly IDC Herzliya)

Meta executives, including legal counsel, appear as speakers at Reichman University.³⁵ Reichman is known for its School of Communications, which trains students in “Hasbara” (public diplomacy) to defend Israeli state narratives online. Meta’s engagement here signals a validation of the institution that trains the very actors who flood Meta’s platforms with state-aligned propaganda.

3.3 The Tel Aviv R&D Center: A Strategic Asset

Meta maintains a substantial R&D center in Tel Aviv (Sarona, relocating to Landmark Towers), employing roughly 1,000 people.³⁶

• Origins: The center was built on the acquisition of Onavo, a company founded by veterans of Unit 8200, Israel’s equivalent of the NSA.³⁷ Onavo was essentially a spyware company used by Facebook to monitor competitor usage (leading to antitrust scrutiny).
• Strategic Function: This center is not a satellite; it is a core hub for product development, including Facebook Lite and Safety Check. By anchoring core R&D in Tel Aviv, Meta makes itself dependent on the Israeli labor market, which is predominantly composed of IDF reservists. This creates a structural disincentive to alienate the Israeli workforce or government, as doing so could disrupt critical product lines.

4. The ‘Safe Harbor’ Test: Algorithmic Geopolitics

A critical measure of political complicity is the consistency of policy application across comparable geopolitical conflicts. The contrast between Meta’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Israeli bombardment of Gaza reveals a profound, systemic geopolitical bias.

Table 1: The ‘Safe Harbor’ Differential – Ukraine vs. Gaza

4.1 Ukraine: The Legitimation of Violent Resistance

Following Russia’s invasion, Meta explicitly politicized its moderation guidelines. Nick Clegg, President of Global Affairs, justified the allowance of violent speech against Russian soldiers by arguing that “ordinary Ukrainians” needed a space to express their “fury” and “resistance.” This established a precedent: Meta acknowledges that violent rhetoric is a legitimate form of political expression for occupied peoples.

4.2 Gaza: The Criminalization of Resistance

In the context of Gaza, this precedent was immediately abandoned.

• The “Zionist” Ban: In July 2024, amidst the Gaza war, Meta updated its hate speech policy to ban attacks on “Zionists” when used with “dehumanizing comparisons” (e.g., pigs, filth, vermin) or claims of “controlling the media”.⁶
  • The Complicity: While ostensibly combating antisemitism, this policy ignores the reality that Zionism is the state ideology of Israel. Palestinians criticizing the ideology that displaces them (e.g., “Zionist settlers are stealing land”) risk being flagged for hate speech. This effectively shields a political ideology from the robust critique typically afforded to other nationalist movements. Meta has essentially codified the conflation of anti-Zionism and antisemitism into its automated governance.
• Algorithmic Erasure: The BSR Human Rights Due Diligence report (commissioned by Meta itself) admitted that Meta’s algorithms disproportionately target Arabic content.⁴⁰ “False positives” for terrorism are rampant in Arabic, while genocidal incitement in Hebrew (e.g., “flatten Gaza,” “erase them”) circulates largely unchecked because Meta lacks sufficient Hebrew training data and classifiers.
• The “Terrorist” Bug: In a revealing “glitch,” Meta’s auto-translation feature briefly inserted the word “terrorist” into the bios of Palestinian Instagram users.⁴² Similarly, WhatsApp’s AI image generator produced images of children with guns when prompted with “Palestinian boy,” but not for “Israeli boy.” These “glitches” reveal the underlying bias in the training data sets, which skew towards associating Palestinians with violence.

5. Operational Complicity: The War Economy

Meta is not just a platform for speech; it is a marketplace. The audit found evidence that Meta actively profits from activities deemed illegal under international law and facilitates funding for military units.

5.1 Profiting from Settlement Crimes

Investigations by Al Jazeera and watchdog groups have documented that Meta accepts and profits from advertisements promoting illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank.⁴³

• The Data: Over 100 ads were identified promoting real estate in settlements like Ariel and Ma’ale Adumim. These ads often target US and UK audiences, facilitating the sale of stolen land in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions.
• Discriminatory Housing: While Meta settled with the US DOJ over discriminatory housing ads in the US (stopping the use of “Special Ad Audiences” that exclude based on race) ⁴⁶, it continues to allow ads that effectively exclude Palestinians (who cannot buy land in Jewish-only settlements) to proliferate globally.
• Revenue from Hate: Meta has accepted ads from right-wing Israeli groups (e.g., Regavim) calling for the demolition of Palestinian schools and infrastructure. By monetizing this content, Meta becomes a financial beneficiary of the settler movement’s expansionist agenda.

5.2 Military Crowdfunding

Meta has platformed ads crowdfunding for military equipment for IDF units fighting in Gaza.⁴⁷

• Policy Violation: Meta’s own policies prohibit ads for weapons and ads that promote violence. Yet, ads soliciting funds for “tactical gear,” “drones,” “thermal imaging,” and “sniper tripods” for specific IDF battalions have appeared on Facebook and Instagram.
• The Loophole: These ads are often run by US-registered non-profits (501c3) or private individuals (e.g., singer Mayer Malik), circumventing direct military funding bans. Meta’s failure to systematically block these ads—despite taking down similar content in other contexts—suggests a “permissive negligence” regarding Israeli military funding.

6. Internal Policy: The Myth of Neutrality

Meta’s internal corporate culture is structured to suppress pro-Palestinian sentiment among its workforce under the guise of “neutrality” and “workplace safety,” while tacitly encouraging pro-Israel expression.

6.1 Disciplinary Actions and The “Ferras Hamad” Case

The firing of Ferras Hamad, a Palestinian-American engineer, serves as a stark case study of internal repression.⁴⁹

• The Incident: Hamad noticed an internal “SEV” (Site Event) where posts by prominent Palestinian photojournalist Motaz Azaiza were being systematically blocked. Hamad investigated the bug to fix it.
• The Retaliation: Meta fired him, claiming he violated user data privacy protocols by accessing the account data. Hamad’s lawsuit alleges this was a pretext to purge an employee who was highlighting algorithmic bias against Palestinians.
• Pattern of Bias: This incident is not isolated. CAIR filed a lawsuit on behalf of Mohammed Feras Majeed, another employee fired for discussing Gaza.⁵¹ The pattern suggests that investigating or discussing anti-Palestinian bias is treated as a “policy violation,” creating a chilling effect that deters engineers from correcting discriminatory algorithms.

6.2 The “Do Not Discuss” Policy

Meta has implemented strict internal guidelines restricting discussion of “political” topics on internal messaging boards (Workplace).⁵

• Uneven Enforcement: Employees report that discussions supporting Ukraine or Black Lives Matter were historically permitted or even encouraged as expressions of corporate values. However, discussions on Palestine are frequently flagged as “harassment,” “disruptive,” or “creating a hostile work environment.”
• Staff Dissent: Open letters signed by hundreds of Meta staff urging the CEO to address anti-Palestinian bias have been ignored. The dissolution of Meta’s Responsible AI teams further reduces the internal capacity to address these biases.

Works cited

1. The American Dynamism 50: AI Edition | Andreessen Horowitz, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://a16z.com/american-dynamism-50-ai/
2. Drones tested in Gaza are now monitoring American cities – Harici, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://harici.com.tr/en/drones-tested-in-gaza-are-now-monitoring-american-cities/
3. Meta Meets the Reality of War | TechPolicy.Press, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.techpolicy.press/meta-meets-the-reality-of-war/
4. Meta doesn’t allow violent speech — except when it does – Coda Story, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.codastory.com/newsletters/meta-rules-violence-ukraine-iran/
5. Meta Extends Ban on the Term ‘Zionist’ | Novara Media, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://novaramedia.com/2024/07/09/meta-extends-ban-on-the-term-zionist/
6. Meta moderating ‘Zionist’ as a slur probably won’t change anything …, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://forward.com/culture/631203/meta-facebook-instagram-zionist-moderation/
7. Amcham Israel Launches AI Forum to Promote AI Ecosystem and Serve as the B2G bridge, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.amcham.co.il/2024/533-amcham-israel-launches-ai-forum-to-promote-ecosystem-and-serve-as-b2g-bridge
8. Hebrew University and Meta AI Launch Joint AI Ph.D. Program, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.afhu.org/2022/10/26/hebrew-university-and-meta-ai-launch-joint-ai-ph-d-program/
9. Representing Israel on Meta, by Sam Biddle (Le Monde …, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://mondediplo.com/2024/12/09meta
10. Time for Techno-Optimism: My Long Read Q&A with Venture Capitalist Marc Andreessen (Friday Flashback), accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.aei.org/articles/time-for-techno-optimism-my-long-read-qa-with-venture-capitalist-marc-andreessen-friday-flashback/
11. The Techno-Optimist Manifesto – Andreessen Horowitz, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://a16z.com/the-techno-optimist-manifesto/
12. AI-powered drones used in Gaza now surveil US cities: Report – The Cradle, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://thecradle.co/articles/ai-powered-drones-used-in-gaza-now-surveil-us-cities-report
13. The Future of Drone Warfare | Andreessen Horowitz, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://a16z.com/podcast/the-future-of-drone-warfare/
14. Trump secures donations from two Silicon Valley venture capital billionaires | Fox Business, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/trump-secures-donations-two-silicon-valley-venture-capital-billionaires
15. Tech Moguls Want to Build a Crypto Paradise on a Native American Reservation, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/06/tech-crypto-native-american-musk-balaji-network-state/
16. Trump’s Gaza Fantasy and the Network State: The Tech-Fueled Future of Privatized Sovereignty | TechPolicy.Press, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.techpolicy.press/trumps-gaza-fantasy-and-the-network-state-the-tech-fueled-future-of-privatized-sovereignty/
17. Robert M. Kimmitt, NSC Staff to Richard V. Allen, “Israeli Strike – Legal Aspects,” 11 June 1981, Secret, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/21297-34-1981-06-11pages-batch-5-28
18. Robert M. Kimmitt, NSC Staff to Richard V. Allen, “Israeli Strike – OCR of the Document | National Security Archive, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/media/21297/ocr
19. Mark Zuckerberg, Priscilla Chan Donating $1.3 Million To Jewish Organizations, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://baltimorejewishlife.com/news/news-detail.php?SECTION_ID=1&ARTICLE_ID=148119
20. Mark Zuckerberg, Priscilla Chan Donating $1.3 Million To Jewish Organizations – i24NEWS, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/economy/finance/1632147436-report-mark-zuckerberg-priscilla-chan-donating-1-3-million-to-jewish-organizations
21. Your Daily Phil: Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan donate $1.3 million to Jewish groups, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://ejewishphilanthropy.com/your-daily-phil-mark-zuckerberg-and-priscilla-chan-donate-1-3-million-to-jewish-groups/
22. Meet our Marathon Runner – Benjamin Horowitz – Shaare Zedek, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://shaarezedek.org.uk/meet-our-marathon-runner-benjamin-horowitz/
23. Vice President – JD Vance – OHIO, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://oh.onair.cc/jd-vance-vice-president/
24. Billionaire Jeff Yass linked to $16m in donations to anti-Muslim and pro-Israel groups, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/24/jeff-yass-anti-muslim-pro-israel-donations
25. Facebook hires longtime Netanyahu adviser – Mondoweiss, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://mondoweiss.net/2016/06/facebook-longtime-netanyahu/
26. Meta’s Israel policy chief sought to censor pro-Palestinian Instagram posts – Anadolu Ajansı, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/metas-israel-policy-chief-sought-to-censor-pro-palestinian-instagram-posts/3369787
27. The Israel-America Chamber of Commerce – OUR MEMBERS, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://amcham.co.il/news-newsletters/78-our-members
28. 70th-Anniversary-Past Events – Israelbondsintl, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://israelbondsintl.com/70th-anniversary-past-events/
29. From London to Manchester and Leeds – a journey of business opportunities – Israel Economic Mission to UK, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://itrade.gov.il/uk/2025/02/19/from-london-to-manchester-and-leeds-a-journey-of-business-opportunities/
30. Meta Partners With Jerusalem’s Hebrew University to Develop Artificial Intelligence, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.algemeiner.com/2022/10/26/meta-partners-with-jerusalems-hebrew-university-to-develop-artificial-intelligence/
31. Hebrew University and Meta AI Launch Joint AI PhD Program to Drive Cutting-Edge Research | Campaign, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://campaign.huji.ac.il/news/hebrew-university-and-meta-ai-launch-joint-ai-phd-program-drive-cutting-edge-research
32. 18Hubs in the Startup Nation. Research Partnership with Technion… | by Havas X Envision | Medium, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://medium.com/@18Havas/18hubs-in-the-startup-nation-8c45b8e3afbc
33. Workshop on Applied Machine Learning Management, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://wamlm-kdd.github.io/wamlm/organizers.html
34. AFRL-AFOSR-UK-TR-2022-0098 Advances in Metamaterials – DTIC, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1178737.pdf
35. Industry Speakers | Reichman University, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.runi.ac.il/en/schools/law/fame-program-2025/industry-speakers
36. Meta’s Israeli development center moving to new Tel Aviv headquarters | Ctech, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/8iv0k9ces
37. Meta Careers – Jobs In Meta – DevJobs, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://devjobs.co.il/company-details/facebook
38. Meta’s Broken Promises: Systemic Censorship of Palestine Content on Instagram and Facebook – Human Rights Watch, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/12/21/metas-broken-promises/systemic-censorship-palestine-content-instagram-and
39. Meta’s clampdown on Palestine speech is far from ‘unintentional’ – +972 Magazine, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.972mag.com/meta-arabic-palestine-censorship/
40. Human Rights Due Diligence of Meta’s Impacts in Israel and Palestine in May 2021 Insights and Recommendations – BSR, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Meta_Human_Rights_Israel_Palestine_English.pdf
41. Human Rights Due Diligence of Meta’s Impacts in Israel and Palestine in May 2021 | Blog, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.bsr.org/en/blog/human-rights-due-diligence-of-meta-impacts-in-israel-and-palestine-may-2021
42. He was fired after addressing Meta’s anti-Palestine bias – YouTube, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_b5GV82Fpo
43. Investigation finds Meta profiting from ads promoting Israeli settlements in West Bank, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.arabnews.com/node/2595916/amp
44. Does Meta support Israel? Ethics and Profits Explored – Brussels Morning, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://brusselsmorning.com/does-meta-support-israel-ethics-and-profits-explored/76426/
45. Facebook hosts Israeli ads promoting illegal activity – Queen Mary University of London, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.qmul.ac.uk/law/news/2025/items/facebook-hosts-israeli-ads-promoting-illegal-activity.html
46. Justice Department Secures Groundbreaking Settlement Agreement with Meta Platforms, Formerly Known as Facebook, to Resolve Allegations of Discriminatory Advertising, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-secures-groundbreaking-settlement-agreement-meta-platforms-formerly-known
47. I/OPT: Meta allows Ads crowdfunding Israeli military gear, report says, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/iopt-meta-allows-ads-crowdfunding-israeli-military-gear-report-says/
48. Israel-Gaza War: Meta Running Ads Funding Israeli Strikes in Gaza | GRAVITAS – YouTube, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhPSAdi5Lug
49. Palestinian-American engineer accuses Meta of firing him over Gaza content – The Guardian, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/05/palestinian-american-meta-engineer-lawsuit
50. USA: Meta faces lawsuit after “unlawful” dismissal of Palestinian-American software engineer – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/usa-meta-faces-lawsuit-after-unlawful-dismissal-of-palestinian-american-software-engineer/
51. CAIR Sues Meta for Firing of Muslim Employee Over Pro-Palestine, Anti-Genocide Advocacy | CAIR California, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://ca.cair.com/press-release/cair-sues-meta-for-firing-of-muslim-employee-over-pro-palestine-anti-genocide-advocacy/
52. Tech Worker Testimonies on Palestinian Advocacy and Workplace Suppression – 7amleh, accessed on December 12, 2025, https://7amleh.org/storage/Advocacy%20Reports/Delete%20the%20issue-11.11.pdf