Microsoft Political Audit

1. Executive Summary and Audit Scope

This comprehensive governance audit assesses the political, operational, and ideological footprint of Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) to determine the extent of its “Political Complicity” in the occupation of Palestine, the ongoing military campaigns in Gaza, and the broader maintenance of the Israeli state’s surveillance and security apparatus. Within the framework of political risk analysis, “complicity” is defined not merely as direct participation in hostilities, but as the provision of material support, dual-use technology, financial capital, or ideological cover that enables state and non-state actors to violate international humanitarian law (IHL) or maintain systems of apartheid.

The audit synthesizes financial disclosures, leaked internal documents, lobbying reports, and technical analyses to reconstruct Microsoft’s role within the “military-digital complex.” While public attention has largely focused on the “Project Nimbus” contract awarded to Google and Amazon, this report establishes that Microsoft remains a systemic and indispensable partner to the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD). Through its Azure cloud infrastructure, proprietary AI services, and deep integration with Israel’s military-academic complex, Microsoft provides the nervous system for modern, data-driven warfare and bureaucratic control over the Palestinian population.

Furthermore, the audit identifies a distinct ideological alignment at the highest levels of corporate governance. Board members and executives are deeply enmeshed in pro-Israel advocacy networks, influencing corporate policy to suppress internal dissent, lobby for legislative shielding of Israel, and enforce a disparity in content moderation that disadvantages Palestinian voices. This alignment exposes the corporation to significant legal liability, reputational degradation, and accusations of aiding and abetting atrocity crimes.

2. Governance and Ideological Alignment: The Boardroom Footprint

The operational conduct of Microsoft is a direct reflection of its governance structure. An examination of the Board of Directors and executive leadership reveals a pattern of political and financial entanglement with organizations dedicated to shielding the Israeli state from diplomatic and economic pressure. This “ideological footprint” manifests in the suppression of shareholder activism and the alignment of corporate resources with state-backed advocacy.

2.1. Board Member Affiliations and Political Capital

The composition of the Microsoft Board includes individuals whose private political activities and affiliations create a governance environment hostile to neutrality regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Reid Hoffman: The Architect of Anti-Progressive Funding

Reid Hoffman, a Microsoft board member and co-founder of LinkedIn, represents a significant vector of ideological influence. His political spending has been strategically directed toward defeating U.S. political candidates who advocate for conditioning aid to Israel or criticizing the occupation.

The audit finds that Hoffman is a primary financier of the “Mainstream Democrats PAC,” a group reportedly incubated by the Democratic Majority for Israel (DMFI).1 DMFI functions as a pro-Israel lobbying entity designed to counter progressive influence within the Democratic Party. In the 2022 election cycle alone, Hoffman’s associated PACs funneled millions into primaries to defeat candidates like Nina Turner, who had called for conditioning aid to Israel on human rights compliance.1

This activity is not merely personal; it reflects a worldview that actively seeks to marginalize political discourse critical of Israel. By funding the “United Democracy Project” (an AIPAC-affiliated Super PAC) and “Mainstream Democrats,” Hoffman leverages capital derived from his tech success to shape a US legislative environment favorable to unconditional military support for Israel.2 As a key voice on Microsoft’s Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee 3, Hoffman’s deep financial commitment to Zionist advocacy creates a conflict of interest when the committee is tasked with evaluating human rights risks in the region.

Penny Pritzker: Establishment Integration

Penny Pritzker, who chairs the Environmental, Social, and Public Policy Committee, maintains deep ties to the US-Israel political establishment. She was appointed to lead the US delegation to the Babi Yar memorial in Kyiv, underscoring her role in global Jewish advocacy.4 While such roles are diplomatic, her position as the gatekeeper for Microsoft’s social policy creates a structural barrier to any internal reassessment of the company’s complicity in Israeli human rights violations. The committee she chairs has consistently recommended voting against shareholder proposals that demand transparency on the use of Microsoft technology in conflict zones.3

Sandra Peterson: Defense and Security Intersections

Lead Independent Director Sandra Peterson brings a background that intersects with defense and security sectors. As Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee 3, she oversees the mechanisms that protect the board from external activist pressure. Her governance tenure has coincided with the rejection of proposals regarding the human rights impact of Microsoft’s defense contracts, effectively insulating the executive team from accountability regarding the company’s role in the Gaza conflict.5

2.2. Shareholder Activism and Corporate Suppression

The board’s ideological stance is most visible in its response to shareholder activism. In 2025, a coalition of investors holding over $80 million in shares filed a proposal demanding a report on the effectiveness of Microsoft’s human rights due diligence in conflict-affected areas, specifically citing the risk of complicity in genocide in Gaza.7

The board formally recommended a vote against this measure (Proposal 9), aligning its rationale with the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and JLens.9 These advocacy groups argued that the human rights proposal was a “BDS tactic” designed to “demonize Israel” rather than a legitimate inquiry into corporate risk. By adopting the rhetoric of external pro-Israel pressure groups, Microsoft’s governance apparatus effectively categorized human rights oversight as a hostile political act, thereby prioritizing ideological allegiance over fiduciary duty and risk management.11

2.3. Executive Leadership: The “Ethics” Shield

Executive leadership, led by CEO Satya Nadella and President Brad Smith, has employed a strategy of “plausible deniability” regarding the company’s military involvement.

• Direct Engagement: Reports confirm that CEO Satya Nadella personally met with the commander of Unit 8200 (Israel’s signals intelligence agency) in 2021 to discuss moving intelligence operations to the cloud.¹² This direct engagement contradicts later claims that executive leadership was unaware of the specific military applications of their technology.
• The “No Evidence” Defense: For months following the escalation of violence in October 2023, Microsoft maintained that there was “no evidence” its technologies were used to harm civilians.¹³ This defense collapsed only after investigative journalists leaked documents proving the widespread use of Azure for target generation and mass surveillance, forcing the company to issue a limited suspension of specific accounts in late 2025.¹⁵

3. Operational Complicity: The Military-Digital Complex

While Microsoft lost the highly publicized “Project Nimbus” tender, the audit reveals that its operational footprint within the Israeli military is vast, critical, and growing. The company provides the essential “digital nervous system” for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), facilitating data fusion, storage, and processing that underpins modern lethal operations.

3.1. Azure Cloud: The Backbone of Mass Surveillance

The most significant vector of operational complicity is the provision of Azure cloud infrastructure to elite military intelligence units. Leaked documents and internal testimonies confirm that Microsoft created a customized, segregated cloud environment for Unit 8200.¹²

Mechanism of Surveillance:

Unit 8200 utilizes Azure to host a mass surveillance system capable of intercepting and storing millions of phone calls daily from Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. The system’s internal mantra, “a million calls an hour,” reflects the industrial scale of this data ingestion.16 By July 2025, the volume of military data stored on Azure reportedly exceeded 11,500 terabytes.17

This infrastructure is not passive storage; it is an active component of the “kill chain.” The data stored on Azure is processed to identify patterns, track movements, and generate “target banks” for airstrikes.16 By providing the unlimited storage and computing power necessary to analyze an entire population’s communications, Microsoft arguably acts as a force multiplier for the occupation’s intelligence apparatus.

3.2. Integration with Lethal AI Systems

The audit finds that Microsoft’s AI services are integrated into the IDF’s broader lethal targeting architecture. While the proprietary targeting algorithms (“The Gospel,” “Lavender”) are developed by the military, they rely on the data lakes hosted and processed by Microsoft.¹⁸

• Translation and Transcription: Following October 7, 2023, the IDF’s consumption of Microsoft’s AI-enabled translation and transcription services spiked by nearly 200%.²⁰ These tools are essential for processing the massive intake of intercepted Arabic communications, converting raw audio into searchable text that can be fed into targeting algorithms.
• Targeting Support: The “Ofek” unit of the Israeli Air Force, responsible for managing target banks, utilizes Microsoft’s communications and messaging systems to coordinate lethal strikes.²¹

3.3. Specific Military Unit Engagements

Financial records and internal leaks detail specific engagements with IDF units that are directly involved in combat and occupation operations.

3.4. Administrative Control: The “Almunasseq” App

Beyond kinetic warfare, Microsoft enables the bureaucratic violence of the occupation through the “Almunasseq” (The Coordinator) application. Developed by the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), this app runs on Microsoft Azure.²⁵

• The Permit Regime: The app is the mandatory interface for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza to apply for permits to work, travel, or seek medical care.
• Data Extraction: To use the app, Palestinians must grant the Israeli military access to their phone’s camera, file storage, IP address, and geolocation.²⁵
• Coercive Control: By hosting this application, Microsoft facilitates a system of movement restrictions that human rights organizations identify as a central pillar of apartheid. The app effectively turns every user’s smartphone into a tracking device, feeding data back into the military’s surveillance ecosystem.

4. The R&D Nexus: Civil-Military Fusion and Dual-Use Technology

Microsoft’s footprint in Israel is distinguished by its deep integration into the state’s “civil-military fusion” ecosystem. The company’s R&D centers and academic partnerships function as a pipeline for military technology transfer.

4.1. The Technion Partnership

Microsoft Research maintains a robust partnership with the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, a primary engine of Israeli military R&D.²⁶

• Research Areas: Collaboration focuses on computer vision, AI, and cybersecurity.²⁷ These are “dual-use” technologies; advancements in computer vision for commercial avatars are directly applicable to automated target recognition for drones.
• Operational Utility: In 2018/2019, Technion students discovered security vulnerabilities in Microsoft’s Cortana assistant. Microsoft fixed these flaws based on student research, demonstrating a direct operational benefit from this relationship.²⁸ The Technion openly promotes its role in providing the “skills and education behind the creation and protection of the State of Israel,” explicitly linking its academic output to national defense.²⁶

4.2. Microsoft Israel R&D Center (Herzliya)

The Herzliya R&D center serves as a strategic node for global cybersecurity development, heavily staffed by veterans of IDF intelligence units like 8200 and 81.²²

• Revolving Door: The center recruits specifically from the military sector, ensuring that the mindset and methodologies of military intelligence are embedded in Microsoft’s commercial products.
• Acquisitions: Microsoft’s acquisition strategy targets Israeli startups founded by ex-military intelligence officers (e.g., Adallom, CyberX), effectively absorbing military-grade cyber-warfare capabilities into its corporate portfolio.²⁹

4.3. AnyVision (Oosto) and Biometric Control

While Microsoft eventually divested from the facial recognition firm AnyVision (now Oosto) in 2020, the case illustrates the company’s willingness to invest in occupation technologies until public backlash becomes untenable.

• The Technology: Microsoft’s venture fund M12 invested in AnyVision, which deployed facial recognition technology at Israeli military checkpoints in the West Bank to track Palestinians.³⁰
• Ethical Failure: The investment occurred despite Microsoft’s stated ethical principles on AI, highlighting a disconnect between corporate rhetoric and investment reality when profitable occupation technologies are involved.³¹

5. Information Dominance: Lobbying, Soft Power, and Censorship

Microsoft utilizes its immense financial and platform power to shape the narrative regarding Israel, shield the state from legislative pressure, and suppress opposing viewpoints.

5.1. Legislative Lobbying and “Anti-Boycott” Shielding

Microsoft’s lobbying disclosures reveal a proactive effort to shape US legislation in favor of Israel and against the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

• Israel Anti-Boycott Act: Microsoft reported lobbying on the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, a bill designed to criminalize participation in boycotts of Israel fostered by international organizations.³²
• Normalization Acts: The company has lobbied for the Israel Relations Normalization Act and the Abraham Accords, supporting diplomatic frameworks that normalize relations with Israel without addressing Palestinian rights.³⁴
• Trade Associations: Microsoft is a member of the US Chamber of Commerce and the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce.³⁶ These bodies are aggressive opponents of BDS and advocate for unhindered trade with Israeli settlement enterprises.

5.2. “Brand Israel” Sponsorship

Microsoft actively funds “Brand Israel” initiatives, which seek to whitewash the occupation through cultural and technological diplomacy.

• “Israel Day on Fifth” (NYC): Microsoft is listed as a corporate sponsor of the “Celebrate Israel” parade in New York City.³⁸ This event acts as a nationalist rally for the Israeli government, often featuring right-wing politicians and erasing Palestinian existence from the public square.
• J-Biz Expo: Microsoft has served as a “Gold Sponsor” for the J-Biz Expo, a trade event connecting US businesses with the Orthodox Jewish Chamber of Commerce, facilitating economic ties that often extend to settlement industries.³⁸

5.3. LinkedIn and Algorithmic Censorship

As the owner of LinkedIn, Microsoft controls a critical node of professional discourse. The audit finds persistent evidence of “shadowbanning” and systemic bias against Palestinian content.

• The 7amleh Report: A technical analysis by the digital rights group 7amleh found that LinkedIn’s algorithms disproportionately flag and suppress pro-Palestinian content. Users report sudden drops in engagement when using terms like “genocide,” “apartheid,” or “Gaza”.³⁹
• Policy Bias: Internal whistleblowers have described a culture of “anti-Palestinian racism” within moderation teams, where defending Palestinian rights is viewed as a “career ender”.⁴⁰
• The “Zionist” Debate: Meta and other platforms (often setting industry standards followed by LinkedIn) have considered policies treating “Zionist” as a protected category. This effectively categorizes political criticism of a state ideology as hate speech, enabling the mass removal of Palestinian political analysis.⁴¹

6. Internal Governance: Labor Relations and Dissent

The company’s handling of internal dissent regarding its Israel ties reveals a rigid enforcement of ideological conformity, often at the expense of labor rights.

6.1. The “No Azure for Apartheid” Campaign

A coalition of Microsoft employees, organizing as “No Azure for Apartheid” (NAA), has publicly demanded the termination of contracts with the IDF.³¹ Their demands include:

1. Divestment: Terminate all Azure contracts with the Israeli military.
2. Disclosure: Publicly list all ties to the Israeli state and defense sector.
3. Protection: Safeguard employees’ right to free speech regarding Palestine.

6.2. Retaliatory Measures and Surveillance

Microsoft’s response to this organizing has been punitive and securitized.

• Firings: In 2024 and 2025, Microsoft terminated multiple employees for organizing vigils and disrupting executive events to protest the Gaza war.⁴⁴
• Surveillance: Allegations have surfaced that Microsoft requested FBI monitoring of employee protests, effectively treating internal labor organizing as a national security threat.⁴⁴
• Double Standards: Employees report that internal message boards allow pro-Israel sentiment (e.g., “Israel will forever be”) while flagging Palestinian slogans (e.g., “From the river to the sea”) as harassment or hate speech, creating a discriminatory workplace environment.⁴⁸

7. Comparative Geopolitics: The Russia vs. Israel Double Standard

A key indicator of political complicity is the inconsistency in applying ethical standards across different geopolitical contexts. The audit identifies a stark contrast between Microsoft’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Israeli bombardment of Gaza.

This disparity suggests that Microsoft’s “ethical” stance is not principled but rather aligned with US foreign policy interests. The company acts as a geopolitical instrument of the West, withdrawing from adversaries (Russia) while buttressing allies (Israel) regardless of the human rights violations committed by either actor.

8. Risk Assessment and Legal Implications

8.1. International Legal Liability

Microsoft’s provision of infrastructure for mass surveillance and lethal targeting exposes the company to significant legal risks under evolving international law.

• Aiding and Abetting: Legal advocacy groups have notified Microsoft that its support for Unit 8200 may constitute “aiding and abetting” war crimes and crimes against humanity. By providing the cloud storage necessary to generate targets for a military campaign deemed “plausibly genocidal” by the ICJ, Microsoft executives could theoretically face liability.²⁴
• GDPR and Data Privacy: The complaint filed by the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) argues that Microsoft’s processing of Palestinian data on Azure violates EU data protection laws (GDPR), as the company is facilitating the unlawful surveillance of a protected population.⁵³

8.2. Reputational and Financial Materiality

• Investor Flight: The filing of shareholder resolutions by institutional investors signals that the market views Microsoft’s complicity as a material financial risk. The “BDS risk” is no longer theoretical but is being priced in by socially responsible investment funds.⁷
• Brand Toxicity: As the “No Azure for Apartheid” campaign grows and aligns with the broader “No Tech for Apartheid” movement (targeting Google/Amazon), Microsoft risks alienating the next generation of tech talent, who increasingly prioritize ethical alignment in employment choices.³¹

9. Conclusion: The “High Complicity” Determination

Based on the evidence gathered, this audit assigns Microsoft Corporation a High Political Complicity rating.

The company is not a neutral service provider. It is an active participant in the infrastructure of the Israeli occupation. Through the Azure cloud, it hosts the mass surveillance data of millions of Palestinians. Through AI services, it accelerates the translation and processing of intelligence used for lethal targeting. Through governance, it channels financial resources to pro-Israel political advocacy and suppresses internal dissent. Through lobbying, it seeks to shield the Israeli state from accountability mechanisms like BDS.

Microsoft has effectively integrated itself into the Israeli military-industrial complex. While it publicly lost the Project Nimbus contract, its private, sector-specific engagements with Unit 8200 and the IMOD ensure that it remains a critical pillar of Israel’s digital military superiority. The company’s recent, limited suspension of specific accounts appears to be a containment strategy rather than a genuine ethical pivot, enacted only after investigative journalism made “business as usual” untenable.

Key Entities of Concern:

• Corporate: Microsoft Israel R&D Center, M12 Venture Fund.
• Government/Military: IMOD, Unit 8200, Unit 9900, COGAT.
• Governance: Reid Hoffman (Board), Sandra Peterson (Board), Penny Pritzker (Board).
• Advocacy Partners: ADL, JLens, US Chamber of Commerce, British-Israel Chamber of Commerce.

Works cited

1. The Israel Lobby’s New Campaign Playbook – Jewish Currents, accessed December 9, 2025, https://jewishcurrents.org/the-israel-lobbys-new-campaign-playbook
2. INVESTIGATION: The Super PACs Trying To Take Down Working Class Candidates For Congress – Perfect Union, accessed December 9, 2025, https://perfectunion.us/investigation-super-pacs-working-class-candidates-2022/
3. Microsoft Corporation Overview Board Of Directors, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/investor/corporate-governance/board-of-directors
4. JUF News | U.S. Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker leads delegation to Ukraine, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.juf.org/news/world.aspx?id=440623
5. Sandi Peterson – Wikipedia, accessed December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandi_Peterson
6. Biden megadonor faces calls to be ousted from Microsoft board over political activism, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/biden-megadonor-microsoft-board-political-activism
7. Unprecedented investor action demands Microsoft answer for reported involvement in Gaza genocide | American Friends Service Committee, accessed December 9, 2025, https://afsc.org/newsroom/unprecedented-investor-action-demands-microsoft-answer-reported-involvement-gaza-genocide
8. Unprecedented Investor Action Demands Microsoft Answer for Reported Involvement in Gaza Genocide – SEC.gov, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000121465925010874/j724252px14a6g.htm
9. ADL and JLens Recommend AGAINST BDS-Aligned Shareholder Proposal at Microsoft Annual Meeting – Business Wire, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20251112112895/en/ADL-and-JLens-Recommend-AGAINST-BDS-Aligned-Shareholder-Proposal-at-Microsoft-Annual-Meeting
10. The case to vote AGAINST Proposal 9 (“Report on Human Rights Due Diligence”) on Microsoft’s 2025 Proxy Statement – JLens, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.jlensnetwork.org/the-case-to-vote-against-proposal-9-report-on-human-rights-due-diligence-on-microsofts-2025-proxy-statement/
11. Notice of Exempt Solicitation – SEC.gov, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2016320/000092189525002903/px14a6g14098msft_11062025.htm
12. ‘A million calls an hour’: Israel relying on Microsoft cloud for expansive surveillance of Palestinians – The Guardian, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/06/microsoft-israeli-military-palestinian-phone-calls-cloud
13. Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of some services after review over mass surveillance of Palestinians – CBS News, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/microsoft-blocks-israel-services-mass-surveillance-palestinians/
14. Microsoft statement on the issues relating to technology services in Israel and Gaza, accessed December 9, 2025, https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/05/15/statement-technology-israel-gaza/
15. Update on ongoing Microsoft review – Microsoft On the Issues, accessed December 9, 2025, https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2025/09/25/update-on-ongoing-microsoft-review/
16. Microsoft blocks Israel’s use of its technology in mass surveillance of Palestinians – The Guardian, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/25/microsoft-blocks-israels-use-of-its-technology-in-mass-surveillance-of-palestinians
17. Microsoft must come clean on its role in Israel’s war on Gaza – Access Now, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.accessnow.org/press-release/microsoft-must-come-clean-on-its-role-in-israels-war-on-gaza/
18. AI-assisted targeting in the Gaza Strip – Wikipedia, accessed December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI-assisted_targeting_in_the_Gaza_Strip
19. Microsoft reduces Israel’s access to AI products over Gaza mass surveillance | AP News, accessed December 9, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/microsoft-israel-military-gaza-hamas-artificial-intelligence-3f4bf8036e7e02f385b258bd353af1fd
20. Microsoft denies claim its AI tech was used by IDF during war to target Gazans, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/microsoft-denies-claim-its-ai-tech-was-used-by-idf-during-war-to-target-gazans/
21. Revealed: Microsoft deepened ties with Israeli military to provide tech support during Gaza war | Israel | The Guardian, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/23/israeli-military-gaza-war-microsoft
22. Leaked documents expose deep ties between Israeli army and Microsoft – +972 Magazine, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.972mag.com/microsoft-azure-openai-israeli-army-cloud/
23. FINAL BNC Microsoft Company Complicity Profile- UPDATED 2/26/2025 – BDS Movement, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.bdsmovement.net/sites/default/files/2025-03/Microsoft%20Company%20Complicity%20Profile-%20UPDATED%202_26_2025.pdf
24. Microsoft Faces Reckoning for Assisting Israel’s Genocide in Gaza | Truthout, accessed December 9, 2025, https://truthout.org/articles/microsoft-faces-reckoning-for-assisting-israels-genocide-in-gaza/
25. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Microsoft – Who Profits, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/7371
26. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology – Wikipedia, accessed December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technion_%E2%80%93_Israel_Institute_of_Technology
27. Computer Vision Group – Microsoft Research, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/group/vision/
28. Security Vulnerability in the Cortana-Alexa Partnership Demonstrates Lock Screen Bypass, accessed December 9, 2025, https://austechnion.com/2019/09/03/security-vulnerability-in-the-cortana-alexa-partnership-demonstrates-lock-screen-bypass/
29. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems – Wikipedia, accessed December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafael_Advanced_Defense_Systems
30. Respecting human rights, when the products your company sells can be misused: illustrative examples, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.wearehumanlevel.com/content-hub/respecting-human-rights-when-the-products-your-company-sells-can-be-misused-illustrative-examples
31. A Marriage Made in Hell: An Introduction to Microsoft’s Complicity in Apartheid and Genocide, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.notechforapartheid.com/press/a-marriage-made-in-hell-an-introduction-to-microsoft-s-complicity-in-apartheid-and-genocide
32. Selected docket entries for case 19−1378 – – Foundation for Middle East Peace, accessed December 9, 2025, https://fmep.org/wp-content/uploads/190416-brief-CCRPL.pdf
33. The Gun Industry and the New Anti-Boycott Laws, accessed December 9, 2025, https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4124&context=flr
34. Senate Committee Print 117-29 – BUSINESS MEETINGS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE DURING THE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS First Session January 3, 2021 to January 3, 2022 Second Session January 3, 2022 to January 3, 2023 117th Congress (2021-2022) – Congress.gov, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/committee-print/117th-congress/senate-committee-print/52685
35. JDCA’s Endorsed Candidates, accessed December 9, 2025, https://jewishdems.org/endorsements/
36. Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/stores/israel-britain-chamber-of-commerce/
37. U.S.-Israel Business Council | U.S. Chamber of Commerce, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.uschamber.com/program/international-affairs/middle-east-central-asia-and-turkey-affairs/us-israel-business-council
38. OJ Chamber – Orthodox Jewish Chamber of Commerce, accessed December 9, 2025, https://oldlive.ojchamber.com/
39. New Report by 7amleh Exposes Biased Content Moderation Practices on LinkedIn During the Genocide in Gaza, accessed December 9, 2025, https://7amleh.org/post/digital-rights-under-threat-en
40. Digital Rights Under Threat: The Impact of LinkedIn’s Biased Moderation Amid Genocide – 7amleh, accessed December 9, 2025, https://7amleh.org/storage/posts/pdf/639875b1-6f57-40b0-b365-6e1011bb48fa.pdf
41. How Meta censors Palestinian voices – Access Now, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.accessnow.org/publication/how-meta-censors-palestinian-voices/
42. Meta is revisiting its hate speech policy on Zionism — here’s why it’s (still) a bad idea – Access Now, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.accessnow.org/meta-hate-speech-policy-on-zionism-is-still-a-bad-idea/
43. Microsoft: End Complicity in Apartheid and Genocide – Action Network, accessed December 9, 2025, https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/microsoft-end-complicity-in-apartheid-and-genocide
44. USA: Microsoft fires worker who interrupted CEO speech protesting against the company supplying technology to the Israeli military during war on Gaza – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/usa-microsoft-fires-worker-who-interrupted-ceo-speech-protesting-against-the-company-supplying-technology-to-the-israeli-military-during-war-on-gaza/
45. USA: Four Microsoft employees fired following protests over the company’s ties to Israel’s operations in Gaza – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/usa-four-microsoft-employees-fired-following-protests-over-the-companys-ties-to-israels-operations-in-gaza/
46. Microsoft fires employees who organized vigil for Palestinians killed in Gaza – KING 5 News, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/microsoft-fires-employees-vigil-palestinians-killed-gaza/281-18a5877e-22d5-471f-83a5-52b008684c39
47. Microsoft revokes Israeli military access to technology used to surveil Palestinians, accessed December 9, 2025, https://afsc.org/newsroom/microsoft-revokes-israeli-military-access-technology-used-surveil-palestinians
48. Microsoft workers fired over Gaza vigil say company ‘crumbled under pressure’ | US news, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/02/microsoft-workers-fired-gaza-vigil
49. Microsoft Russian subsidiary files for bankruptcy following Putin criticism, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.nationaltechnology.co.uk/Microsoft_Russia_Subsidiary_Files_For_Bankruptcy.php
50. Microsoft suspends new sales in Russia – Microsoft On the Issues, accessed December 9, 2025, https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2022/03/04/microsoft-suspends-russia-sales-ukraine-conflict/
51. Israeli innovations take center stage as Microsoft charges into the AI agent era – Ynet News, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/tech-and-digital/article/hyucm3jxzl
52. Microsoft’s Aiding of Israel’s Genocide Against Palestinians Exposes Company and its Leadership to Legal Liability | Center for Constitutional Rights, accessed December 9, 2025, https://ccrjustice.org/home/press-center/press-releases/microsoft-s-aiding-israel-s-genocide-against-palestinians-exposes
53. Irish authorities asked to investigate Microsoft over alleged unlawful data processing by IDF, accessed December 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/dec/04/irish-authorities-asked-to-investigate-microsoft-over-alleged-unlawful-data-processing-by-idf