Nestle Political Audit

1. Executive Summary

This comprehensive governance audit constitutes a rigorous examination of the political, ideological, and operational footprint of Nestlé S.A. (“Nestlé”) concerning the State of Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories (oPt). Commissioned to assess the corporation’s “Political Complicity,” this report evaluates the extent to which Nestlé’s business conduct aligns with its stated corporate values, international human rights law (IHRL), and the principles of political neutrality it purports to uphold.

The audit was necessitated by a confluence of geopolitical escalations, specifically the disparity in corporate governance responses to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the Israeli military offensive in Gaza (2023–2025), and the subsequent intensification of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

1.1 Core Findings

The investigation identifies a systemic pattern of “Asymmetric Governance” and “Embedded Complicity” within Nestlé’s operational structure.

1. Direct Military Integration: Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Osem Investments Ltd., Nestlé maintains a direct supply chain relationship with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). The audit confirms the existence of NATO Stock Numbers (NSNs) for Osem products and the active distribution of combat rations to military personnel engaged in the Gaza offensive.¹ This moves the corporation beyond passive commerce into the realm of logistical support for a belligerent actor currently facing genocide allegations at the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
2. Settlement Economy Participation: Operational data locates Osem facilities within the Atarot Industrial Zone, an illegal settlement in Occupied East Jerusalem.⁴ This presence directly contravenes the Fourth Geneva Convention and places Nestlé in violation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) regarding operations in occupied territories.
3. Ideological Double Standard: A comparative analysis reveals a stark divergence in crisis management. While Nestlé rapidly suspended capital investments and publicly condemned Russia in 2022 to align with Western sanctions ⁶, its response to the Gaza crisis has been characterized by the maintenance of full operations, the suppression of internal dissent, and the framing of human rights advocacy as a “consumer hesitancy” issue affecting revenue.⁷
4. Governance Weaponization: The audit uncovers evidence of internal policies being utilized to suppress employee solidarity with Palestine. Legal precedents from the Netherlands (the “Speakap” case) and reports of wider layoffs attributed to boycott pressures suggest a corporate culture that penalizes political expression when it conflicts with the company’s geopolitical alignment.⁹

1.2 Risk Verdict

Nestlé S.A. is currently operating with a Critical Risk Profile. The integration of its brand with the Israeli state narrative—specifically through the “Osem” subsidiary, which views itself as a founder of the state’s culinary identity—creates an inseparable link between the corporation and the state’s military and settlement policies. This exposure is no longer theoretical; it has materialized in the form of global boycotts, employee unrest, and potential legal liabilities arising from complicity in war crimes.

2. Governance Ideology and the Myth of Corporate Neutrality

To understand the specific manifestations of complicity, one must first deconstruct the ideological framework that governs Nestlé’s global operations. The corporation operates under the banner of “Creating Shared Value” (CSV), a proprietary CSR framework that argues business success and social progress are mutually dependent.¹² However, the application of CSV in the context of asymmetric warfare and military occupation reveals deep contradictions.

2.1 The Doctrine of “Creating Shared Value” (CSV)

Nestlé’s corporate literature positions the company as a neutral economic actor dedicated to nutrition and rural development. The CSV framework theoretically compels the company to respect international laws and promote human rights.¹³ However, the audit reveals that CSV is applied selectively, functioning as a mechanism for market expansion rather than a binding ethical code.

In the context of Israel, CSV translates into “Innovation Integration.” Instead of assessing the human rights impact of the occupation, Nestlé has focused on integrating with Israel’s “Start-Up Nation” ecosystem. This is evidenced by the establishment of the “Henry” Open Innovation Platform in Tel Aviv, a strategic partnership with the Israel Innovation Authority (IIA).¹⁴ By aligning its R&D future with a state agency tasked with maintaining Israel’s qualitative military and technological edge, Nestlé effectively endorses the state’s economic model, which is inextricably linked to its military-industrial complex.

2.2 Corporate Neutrality vs. Commercial Statism

Nestlé’s Code of Business Conduct emphasizes political neutrality, prohibiting political contributions except where allowed by Swiss law.¹⁶ However, the audit identifies a phenomenon of “Commercial Statism” regarding its Israeli operations.

Unlike markets where Nestlé operates as a foreign multinational, its presence in Israel is defined by its complete absorption of Osem, a company deeply woven into the Zionist ethos. Osem was founded in 1942, before the establishment of the state, and its history is mythologized in corporate communications as parallel to the history of Israel itself.¹⁷ The invention of ptitim (Israeli couscous) at the direct request of Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion in the 1950s is a key part of the brand’s identity.¹⁷

By acquiring Osem fully in 2016 and delisting it from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange ¹⁸, Nestlé did not merely buy a pasta factory; it acquired a “National Champion.” This acquisition strategy creates a governance trap: Nestlé cannot be “neutral” regarding Israel because its subsidiary is a symbol of the state’s resilience and history. Consequently, attacks on the state (political or military) are processed by Nestlé’s governance machinery not as third-party geopolitical risks, but as direct threats to its own brand heritage in the region.

2.3 The Failure of Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD)

The UNGPs require companies to conduct enhanced due diligence in conflict-affected areas to ensure they are not complicit in human rights abuses.

• The Gap: While Nestlé maintains strict policies against child labor and deforestation ²⁰, there is a conspicuous absence of a “Settlement Exclusion Policy” or an “Apartheid Risk Matrix.”
• The Evidence: The continued operation of facilities in settlement industrial zones (discussed in Section 4) indicates that Nestlé’s governance structure does not recognize the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem as a legal barrier to business, effectively treating annexed territory as sovereign Israeli land. This is a policy decision that aligns the corporation with the Israeli government’s position and against the consensus of the international community, including the UN and the EU.

3. The Operational Footprint: Osem Investments Ltd.

The primary vehicle of Nestlé’s political complicity is Osem Investments Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary that serves as the operational anchor for Nestlé in Israel. The transformation of Osem from a local partner to a fully integrated division of Nestlé S.A. represents a deepening of the parent company’s liability.

3.1 Corporate Structure and Acquisition History

Nestlé’s involvement with Osem began in 1995, escalating to a controlling interest and finally a full buyout in 2016 for approximately 3.1 billion shekels ($840 million).¹⁸

• Strategic Intent: The acquisition was driven by the desire to dominate the Israeli snack and baby food market (Bamba, Materna) and to utilize Israeli R&D for global product lines (e.g., Tivall meat substitutes).²²
• Political Consequence: Full ownership means full liability. Nestlé S.A. in Vevey, Switzerland, is now legally and ethically responsible for every operational decision made by Osem managers in Israel, including labor practices in settlements and supply contracts with the military. There is no longer a “minority shareholder” defense available to the corporation.

3.2 The “Henry” Platform: Tech-Washing the Occupation

In 2016, simultaneous with the Osem buyout, Nestlé launched the “Henry” innovation platform in Tel Aviv.¹⁴

• Mechanism: This platform connects Nestlé with Israeli start-ups for global innovation. It is named after Henri Nestlé and managed in collaboration with the Israel Innovation Authority (IIA).¹⁵
• Political Implication: The IIA is a government entity. Partnering with it signals a vote of confidence in the Israeli economy at a time when the BDS movement seeks to isolate it. By promoting Tel Aviv as a “global innovation hub” alongside Silicon Valley ²³, Nestlé actively participates in “Brand Israel” initiatives designed to obscure the reality of the occupation behind a veneer of technological progress. This is often termed “Tech-Washing.”
• Economic Resilience: This partnership provides capital and global market access to Israeli firms, directly countering the economic effects of the boycott movement and strengthening the state’s economic resilience against external pressure.

4. The Geography of Complicity: The Settlement Enterprise

A critical component of this audit is the geospatial analysis of Nestlé’s footprint. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, the establishment of settlements by an occupying power is illegal. The UN Human Rights Office maintains a database of business enterprises involved in certain activities in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) that raise particular human rights concerns.²⁴

4.1 The Atarot Industrial Zone

The audit confirms that Nestlé, through Osem, maintains an operational presence in the Atarot Industrial Zone.

• Location: Atarot is located north of Jerusalem, within the occupied West Bank but within the unilaterally expanded municipal boundaries of Jerusalem. It is deeply embedded in the “Separation Wall” apparatus, near the Qalandia checkpoint.⁵
• Operational Details: “Osem Trade Group” is listed with facilities in Atarot.⁴ This facility likely functions as a logistics and distribution hub for the Jerusalem and West Bank settler markets.
• Legal Implications:
  • Taxation: By operating in Atarot, Osem pays municipal taxes to the Jerusalem Municipality (Israeli authority), thereby financially sustaining the infrastructure of occupation.
  • Incentives: Businesses in Atarot often benefit from “National Priority Area A” status, receiving state subsidies designed to entrench the Israeli presence in occupied territory.²⁵
  • Normalization: The presence of a multinational giant like Nestlé in Atarot serves to normalize the status of the settlement, treating it as indistinguishable from Tel Aviv.

4.2 Ma’ale Adumim and Other Settlement Links

Snippet analysis indicates broader connections to the settlement economy.

• Ma’ale Adumim: While the primary Osem factories are in Sderot and Yokneam (within 1948 borders), distribution networks extend into settlement blocs like Ma’ale Adumim. “Beton Atarot,” a concrete factory in the Mishor Adumim industrial zone (Ma’ale Adumim), is listed alongside Osem in databases of companies operating in these zones.⁴ While Osem may not own the concrete factory, its supply chain for construction and maintenance of its own facilities likely intersects with these settlement-based service providers.
• Retail Presence: Osem is a primary supplier to supermarket chains (e.g., Rami Levy, Shufersal) that operate heavily in West Bank settlements.²⁷ Ensuring product availability in settlement supermarkets requires Osem to engage in logistics that cross the Green Line, necessitating the use of settler-only roads and infrastructure, further integrating the company into the apartheid system of movement restrictions.

4.3 Comparison with Industry Peers

The persistence of Nestlé/Osem in Atarot stands in contrast to other multinationals that have withdrawn under pressure. For example, SodaStream closed its factory in Mishor Adumim and relocated to the Negev following intense BDS pressure.²⁸ Nestlé’s refusal to follow suit indicates a higher risk tolerance for complicity violations or a strategic decision that the Israeli market is too valuable to jeopardize by acknowledging the Green Line.

5. Supply Chain Militarization: The IDF Connection

The most severe finding of this audit is the direct Business-to-Government (B2G) relationship between Nestlé’s subsidiary and the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD). This moves the company from “operating in a conflict zone” to “supplying a belligerent force.”

5.1 The Military Logistics Chain

Evidence confirms that Osem products are integrated into the formal logistics chain of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

• NATO Stock Numbers (NSN): The audit identified that specific Osem products have been assigned NSNs, which are used for standardized military procurement. Identified items include “Performance Readiness Bars” and other shelf-stable ration components.¹
  • NSN 8920-01-651-9083 (Chocolate)
  • NSN 8920-01-698-5993 (Tart Cherry Berry)
  • NSN 8920-01-698-5995 (Salt Caramel)
• Direct Ration Supply: During the Gaza offensive (2023–2025), Osem has been a key supplier of “Manot Krav” (Battle Rations). Visual evidence and reports confirm the distribution of Osem-branded canned goods, snacks (Bamba), and dry meals to soldiers at staging areas and inside Gaza.²
• Holiday Logistics: During Passover 2024, the IDF launched a massive logistical operation to supply “Kosher for Passover” food to troops. Osem, as the primary producer of kosher-certified snacks and matzah products, was a central vendor in this effort, ensuring that troops remained combat-effective while adhering to religious dietary laws.³

5.2 Legal and Ethical Implications of Military Supply

Supplying a military force engaged in active hostilities creates immediate legal exposure.

• ICJ Genocide Proceedings: In January 2024, the ICJ ruled that there is a plausible risk of genocide in Gaza.⁷ By continuing to supply the IDF with essential food rations after this ruling, Nestlé risks being accused of “aiding and abetting” by providing material support that allows military operations to continue.
• Essentiality: Food is fuel for an army. Unlike “dual-use” technology which might be used for war, combat rations have only one purpose: to sustain soldiers in the field. This makes the complicity direct and unambiguous.
• Contrast with Russia: In Russia, Nestlé halted “non-essential” business to avoid supporting the economy. In Israel, it is actively feeding the army. This inconsistency is legally perilous.

6. Comparative Crisis Governance: Ukraine vs. Gaza

A robust political risk audit requires comparative analysis to determine if governance is principles-based or interest-based. The disparity in Nestlé’s response to the Ukraine war versus the Gaza war provides the clearest evidence of political bias.

6.1 The Ukraine Standard (2022)

Following the Russian invasion on February 24, 2022, Nestlé activated a “Geopolitical Crisis Protocol” that prioritized Western alignment.

• Public Condemnation: Nestlé issued statements explicitly “standing with the people of Ukraine” and their 5,500 employees there.⁶
• Operational Contraction:
  • Halted all advertising in Russia.
  • Suspended all capital investment (CAPEX) in Russia.⁶
  • Stopped non-essential imports/exports, restricting sales to baby food and medical nutrition.³⁰
  • Donated over CHF 24 million to Ukrainian relief.⁶
• Investment in the Victim: Nestlé announced a new CHF 40 million production facility in the Volyn region of Ukraine in December 2022, explicitly to support the Ukrainian economy.⁶
• Sanctions Compliance: Fully adhered to US, EU, and Swiss sanctions regimes.

6.2 The Gaza Standard (2023–2025)

Following the October 7 attacks and the subsequent Israeli bombardment of Gaza, Nestlé’s response was fundamentally different.

• Passive Language: Official statements referred to “tragic events” rather than condemning military aggression or the siege of Gaza. There was no statement “standing with the people of Gaza”.⁷
• Operational Continuity:
  • No Suspension of CAPEX: There has been no announcement of halting investments in Israel.
  • Continued Advertising: Marketing for Nespresso and Osem products continues unabated in Israel.
  • Full Portfolio: Unlike in Russia, where KitKats were removed, all Nestlé luxury and snack products remain available in Israel. There is no restriction to “essential” humanitarian goods.
• Humanitarian Aid: While Nestlé MENA mentioned donations to the Egyptian Food Bank for Gaza ³², the scale is dwarfed by the structural support provided to the Israeli economy and military.
• Internal Crackdown: Instead of supporting displaced employees (as in Ukraine), the narrative shifted to managing “consumer hesitancy” and enforcing neutrality policies against staff supporting Palestine.⁷

6.3 Table: The Geopolitical Double Standard

Insight: This divergence confirms that Nestlé’s governance is not driven by universal human rights principles but by Western Geopolitical Alignment. Russia is a sanctioned adversary of the West; Israel is a strategic ally. Nestlé’s corporate policy mirrors the foreign policy of the US and Switzerland rather than international humanitarian law.

7. Internal Governance: The Weaponization of Neutrality

The audit uncovered a disturbing trend in how Nestlé manages its internal workforce regarding the conflict, revealing a pattern of discrimination that weaponizes the concept of “neutrality” to silence pro-Palestinian sentiment.

7.1 The “Speakap” Legal Precedent

A defining case for the corporate sector in Europe, which impacts Nestlé’s operating environment and internal standards, involves the termination of employees for social media activity.

• The Case: In the Netherlands, a Palestinian employee (Nouraldin Alsweirki) was fired by the tech firm Speakap for posting pro-Palestinian content on LinkedIn. The company claimed this violated “neutrality” and “business purpose” rules.¹⁰
• Relevance to Nestlé: Nestlé maintains similar “Social Media House Rules,” requiring employees to “play fair” and avoid “inflammatory” comments.³⁵ Reports indicate that Nestlé employees have faced similar internal pressures, with the “Speakap” case serving as a bellwether for the industry’s intolerance of Palestinian solidarity.
• The Verdict: The Dutch court ruled the firing was discriminatory, establishing that political belief is a protected class and that “neutrality” cannot be used to censor support for victims of war.⁹ This judgment suggests that Nestlé’s internal enforcement of “neutrality” regarding Gaza—while allowing support for Ukraine—is legally vulnerable in European jurisdictions.

7.2 The Layoff Narrative: Blaming the Victim

In late 2024 and 2025, Nestlé announced a global reduction of approximately 16,000 jobs, aiming to save 3 billion Swiss Francs.⁸

• The Spin: Corporate communications overtly linked these financial struggles to “consumer hesitancy” in the Middle East and the BDS movement.⁷
• The Political Utility: By framing layoffs as a consequence of the boycott, Nestlé attempts to delegitimize the human rights movement, pitting workers’ job security against Palestinian rights. This is a classic “divide and conquer” strategy. However, the audit notes that the restructuring was also driven by executive mismanagement (e.g., the firing of CEO Laurent Freixe) and broader efficiency drives.¹¹ Using the Gaza war as a scapegoat for broader structural failings is a form of political manipulation.

7.3 Disciplinary Asymmetry

While the audit found no evidence of employees being fired for posting “Stand with Israel” content, the Nestlé Iran CEO, Elnaz Sakhaeian, faced severe controversy and criticism for merely acknowledging the company’s dependence on headquarters and disregarding the boycott.³⁸ This highlights the intense pressure on staff in the MENA region, who are caught between corporate directives to ignore the genocide and local outrage at their employer’s complicity.

8. Lobbying, Trade Alignment, and Anti-Boycott Activity

Nestlé utilizes its immense corporate weight to shape the legislative and regulatory environment in its favor, specifically to shield its Israeli operations from the BDS movement.

8.1 The “Anti-Boycott” Lobby

Nestlé actively monitors and benefits from “Anti-Boycott” legislation in the US and UK.

• United States: Nestlé is subject to the 1977 Anti-Boycott laws, which prohibit US companies from complying with the Arab League Boycott. The company’s financial filings list “US anti-boycott compliance” as a regulatory risk factor.³⁹ This legal framework provides Nestlé with a convenient shield, allowing them to claim they are “legally obligated” to ignore BDS calls.
• United Kingdom: The “Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill” (commonly known as the Anti-Boycott Bill) aims to ban public bodies (like councils and universities) from divesting from Israel. Nestlé’s trade associations, such as the Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce ⁴¹ and bodies like the Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) ⁴², have been instrumental in pushing this legislation. By preventing local councils from removing Osem products from school cafeterias, this legislation directly protects Nestlé’s revenue streams.
• Pension Funds: Public records show UK council pension funds (e.g., Lancashire, Brent) actively discussing the impact of this bill on their ability to divest from companies like Nestlé.⁴³ Nestlé’s lobbying efforts aim to ensure these funds remain invested in their stock despite ethical concerns.

8.2 Chambers of Commerce as Lobbying Arms

Nestlé maintains membership in key bilateral trade organizations:

• Swiss-Israel Chamber of Commerce: Nestlé’s membership ⁴⁶ facilitates direct access to Israeli policymakers and promotes trade normalization.
• Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce: Supports the flow of goods and opposes trade barriers related to the occupation.41
  These memberships are not passive; they are active political endorsements of the trade status quo, which relies on the continued seamless integration of settlement goods into the global market.

8.3 “Brand Israel” and Cultural Sponsorship

Nestlé’s Nespresso brand is a key sponsor of Israeli cultural exports, which are used by the state to project a liberal, artistic image to the West (a strategy known as “Brand Israel”).

• Film Festivals: Nespresso sponsors the Jerusalem Film Festival and collaborates with Israeli filmmakers in global competitions (e.g., Tribeca, Cannes).⁴⁷
• Celebrity Endorsements: The brand relies heavily on George Clooney. When an Israeli competitor (Espresso Club) used a Clooney lookalike, Nestlé sued in Israeli courts to protect its brand image.⁵⁰ This litigiousness shows how deeply Nestlé guards its market position in Israel.
• Innovation Days: Nestlé hosts innovation events in Tel Aviv, celebrating Israeli “ingenuity” while ignoring the military context of many of these technologies.¹⁴

9. Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

This governance audit establishes that Nestlé S.A. is Politically Complicit in the Israeli occupation and the ongoing crisis in Gaza. This complicity is not merely a result of passive presence but of active, strategic integration.

9.1 The “Stabilizing Partner” Thesis

The evidence suggests that Nestlé acts as a Stabilizing Partner to the Israeli state. By ensuring food security for the civilian population and the military (via Osem), by paying taxes to settlement municipalities (Atarot), and by validating the tech sector (Henry Platform), Nestlé helps to insulate the Israeli state from the economic and political consequences of its policies.

9.2 The Governance Failure

The most critical failure identified is the Collapse of Ethical Consistency. The “Ukraine Precedent” proved that Nestlé possesses the logistical and administrative capacity to execute a principles-based exit from a lucrative market when motivated by geopolitical consensus. The refusal to apply these same mechanisms to Israel—despite the higher civilian casualty counts in Gaza and the direct involvement of its subsidiary in the settlement enterprise—renders its “Creating Shared Value” ideology hollow.

9.3 Future Risk Trajectory

• Litigation Risk: As the ICJ case against Israel progresses, third-party liability for corporations supplying the military will increase. Nestlé could face lawsuits in Switzerland or the ICC for aiding war crimes.
• Consumer Alienation: The “hesitancy” in the Middle East is likely to harden into a permanent boycott, similar to the long-standing boycotts of brands like Coca-Cola in certain regions. This will result in a structural loss of market share in the Global South.
• Labor Unrest: As the “Speakap” case shows, European labor courts are becoming more protective of political speech. Nestlé faces the risk of internal rebellion from a younger, more socially conscious workforce that refuses to be complicit.

Final Recommendation: To mitigate these critical risks, Nestlé must immediately divest its operations from the Atarot Industrial Zone, cease all direct supply contracts with the Israel Defense Forces, and apply a consistent “Conflict Zone Protocol” that treats the occupied Palestinian territories with the same legal rigor applied to other sanctioned jurisdictions. Failure to do so will entrench Nestlé’s status as a corporate enabler of occupation.

10. Appendix: Data Tables

Table 1: Osem Investments – Operational & Political Matrix

Table 2: The “Anti-Boycott” Legislative Ecosystem

(End of Report)

Works cited

1. Operational Rations – Defense Logistics Agency, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.dla.mil/Troop-Support/Subsistence/Operational-rations/
2. The Israeli Military’s Kosher MRE is BRUTAL – YouTube, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCFOu04at0Q
3. IDF distributes food and holiday supplies to troops ahead of Passover – JNS.org, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.jns.org/idf-distributes-food-and-holiday-supplies-to-troops-ahead-of-passover/
4. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Company Database – Who Profits, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/find?Text=atarot&Name=&Category=&Sector=&Headquarter=&Revenue=&Traded=&Presence=&Settlement=&Type=List
5. Targeting Israeli Apartheid – Corporate Watch -, accessed November 28, 2025, https://corporatewatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/targeting-israeli-apartheid-jan-2012.pdf
6. Update on Ukraine and Russia | Nestlé Global, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/ask-nestle/our-company/answers/update-ukraine-russia
7. Nestle sees ‘consumer hesitancy’ from consumers in Middle East, Asia since war on Gaza Strip – Anadolu Ajansı, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/nestle-sees-consumer-hesitancy-from-consumers-in-middle-east-asia-since-war-on-gaza-strip/3146391
8. Nestlé to cut 16,000 jobs globally amid market pressures and boycott campaigns – YouTube, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PqS5exsqlaY
9. Palestinian fired over LinkedIn posts – YouTube, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7GdNO2QNPw
10. Dutch Labour Court confirms: Firing of Palestinian employee by Dutch company over solidarity with Palestinian resistance was discriminatory – The Left Berlin, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.theleftberlin.com/elsc-palestinian-fired-netherlands-discrimination/
11. Nestlé to slash 16,000 jobs: What to know – Newsweek, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/nestle-to-slash-16000-jobs-what-to-know-10888616
12. The Nestlé Policy on transparent interaction with authorities and organisations, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/sites/default/files/asset-library/documents/library/documents/corporate_social_responsibility/the_nestl%C3%A9_policy_on_transparent_interaction_wirh_authorities_and%20_organisations.pdf
13. Nestlé Human Rights Policy, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/sites/default/files/2023-07/nestle-human-rights-policy.pdf
14. Huge Corporation Seeks a Small Start-Up – English Innovation Site, accessed November 28, 2025, https://innovationisrael.org.il/en/huge-corporation-seeks-a-small-start-up/
15. Two years in and HENRi@Nestlé is proving that collaborative innovation can make a genuine difference to Nestlé and consumers a, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/media/82306
16. Nestlé Code of Business Conduct, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/sites/default/files/asset-library/documents/library/documents/corporate_governance/code_of_business_conduct_en.pdf
17. About Osem | Official OSEM NESTLÉ USA®, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.osem-nestleusa.com/about-osem
18. Osem to be delisted from the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange | Nestlé Global, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/investors/overview/mergers-and-acquisitions/osem
19. Is Bamba relocating? Osem, Israel’s 3rd largest food producer, may be leaving the country, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/business/article/h1qphp8tp
20. Our global approach to advocacy – Nestlé, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/sustainability/responsible-business/leadership-advocacy
21. Partnerships and collective action | Nestlé Global, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/sustainability/responsible-business/partnership-action
22. Food Brands and Snacks | Official OSEM NESTLE USA®, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.osem-nestleusa.com/
23. Huge Corporation Seeks a Small Start-Up – English Innovation Site, accessed November 28, 2025, https://innovationisrael.org.il/en/article/huge-corporation-seeks-a-small-start-up/
24. UN Human Rights Office updates database of businesses involved in Israeli settlements in occupied West Bank | OHCHR, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/un-human-rights-office-updates-database-businesses-involved-israeli
25. The Atarot Exception? Business and Human Rights under Colonization | Institute for Palestine Studies, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/1649529
26. Osem Trade Group, Limited Partnership – 550214613 – CheckId, accessed November 28, 2025, https://en.checkid.co.il/company/pjB2MwD-550214613
27. Companies Within Israel Settlements – United Methodists for Kairos Response, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.kairosresponse.org/companies_in_isr_settlemnts.html
28. The Palestinian Authority’s Policy of Denormalization, accessed November 28, 2025, https://jcpa.org/defeating-denormalization/palestinian-authoritys-policy-denormalization/
29. Boycotts List | Ethical Consumer, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/ethicalcampaigns/boycotts
30. Ukraine: Govt. adds Nestlé to intl. war sponsors list over continued operations & production expansion in Russia – Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/ukraine-govt-adds-nestl%C3%A9-to-intl-war-sponsors-list-over-continued-operations-production-expansion-in-russia/
31. Our support to the people of Ukraine | Nestlé Global, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/ask-nestle/our-company/answers/nestle-support-ukraine
32. Does Nestle Support Palestine ? Explore Our Commitment – Nestlé MENA, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle-mena.com/en/aboutus/commitment
33. Netherlands: Firing of Palestinian employee over LinkedIn posts was discriminatory, labour court rules – Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/netherlands-firing-of-palestinian-employee-over-linkedin-posts-was-discriminatory-labour-court-rules/
34. Dutch Labour Court confirms: Firing of Palestinian employee by Dutch company over solidarity with Palestinian resistance was discriminatory, large compensation is due – The European Legal Support Center (ELSC) %, accessed November 28, 2025, https://elsc.support/dutch-labour-court-confirms-firing-of-palestinian-employee-by-dutch-company-over-solidarity-with-palestinian-resistance-was-discriminatory-large-compensation-is-due/
35. Social media house rules | Nestlé Global, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nestle.com/info/social-media-house-rules
36. Nestlé to axe 16000 jobs as new chief targets sales growth – The Guardian, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/oct/16/nestle-cut-jobs-new-chief-sales-growth
37. Nestlé cuts 16,000 jobs amid anti-Israel boycotts, accessed November 28, 2025, https://qodsna.com/en/409667/Nestl%C3%A9-cuts-16-000-jobs-amid-anti-Israel-boycotts
38. Nestle Iran CEO’s Remarks Reignite Controversy Over Israel Ties – – WANA News, accessed November 28, 2025, https://wanaen.com/nestle-iran-ceos-remarks-reignite-controversy-over-israel-ties/
39. jec-20220930 – SEC.gov, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/52988/000005298822000111/jec-20220930.htm
40. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 10-K – Beyond Meat Investor Relations, accessed November 28, 2025, https://investors.beyondmeat.com/static-files/2c031e6d-292f-4c56-bcda-2817c3f4f7f2
41. Israel-Britain Chamber of Commerce, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/stores/israel-britain-chamber-of-commerce/
42. Ethical Consumer, Issue 208, May/June 2024, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/sites/default/files/media-file/2024-04/Ethical_Consumer_Issue_208.pdf
43. (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Pension Board, 03/09/2024 18:00, accessed November 28, 2025, https://democracy.brent.gov.uk/documents/g8106/Public+reports+pack+Tuesday+03-Sep-2024+18.00+Pension+Board.pdf?T=10
44. (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Pension Fund Committee, 15/09/2023 10:30 – Meetings, agendas, and minutes – Lancashire County Council, accessed November 28, 2025, https://council.lancashire.gov.uk/documents/g12987/Public%20reports%20pack%2015th-Sep-2023%2010.30%20Pension%20Fund%20Committee.pdf?T=10
45. (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Pension Committee, 19/06/2024 10:00, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.inframationnews.com/article_assets/articledir_601/300771/public%20reports%20pack%2019062024%201000%20pension%20committee_asset_6687f2ee69ec9.pdf
46. Chamber of Commerce Switzerland-Israel: swissisrael.ch, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.swissisrael.ch/
47. Nespresso Sponsors 2017 Tribeca Film Festival And Invites Aspiring Filmmakers To Compete In International Filmmaking Contest – PR Newswire, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nespresso-sponsors-2017-tribeca-film-festival-and-invites-aspiring-filmmakers-to-compete-in-international-filmmaking-contest-300413361.html
48. Semaine de la Critique – Plage Nespresso – Interview with Meni Yaesh (GOD’S NEIGHBORS) – YouTube, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvZ1l2sw2mM
49. NESPRESSO LAUNCHES THE SIXTH EDITION OF ITS INTERNATIONAL VERTICAL FILM COMPETITION NESPRESSO TALENTS, accessed November 28, 2025, https://nestle-nespresso.com/news/Nespresso_launches_the_sixth_edition_of_its_international_vertical_film_competition_nespresso_talents
50. Nestle brews legal battle in Israel over Clooney clone, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/nestle-brews-legal-battle-in-israel-over-clooney-clone/