Netflix Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Scope and Objectives

This forensic audit was commissioned to evaluate the political and ideological footprint of Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) concerning its relationship with the State of Israel, the ongoing occupation of Palestinian territories, and the military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon (2023–2025). The objective is to determine the degree of “Political Complicity”—defined here as the extent to which corporate governance, capital allocation, lobbying activities, and content curation strategies materially or ideologically support the sovereign objectives of the State of Israel.

The audit utilizes the “Sovereign Fusion” methodology, a risk assessment framework that ranks multinational entities on a scale from 0.0 (Total Neutrality) to 10.0 (Sovereign Fusion), measuring the dissolution of boundaries between corporate strategy and state geopolitical interests. The analysis draws upon a comprehensive review of board composition, lobbying disclosures, internal corporate memorandums, comparative geopolitical responses (specifically the Ukraine-Russia vs. Gaza-Israel dichotomy), and content library forensics.

1.2. Strategic Assessment

The investigation concludes that Netflix Inc. exhibits a High Degree of Sovereign Fusion with the State of Israel, characterized by structural ideological alignment at the board level, direct executive participation in Israeli state diplomacy, and a discriminatory application of “Safe Harbor” policies that privilege Israeli state narratives while systematically purging Palestinian content under the guise of commercial licensing cycles.

Key findings include:

• Governance Ideology: The presence of Mathias Döpfner on the Board of Directors introduces a binding, non-negotiable Zionist mandate derived from Axel Springer SE’s corporate constitution, effectively precluding neutrality in board-level decision-making.¹
• The “Safe Harbor” Asymmetry: Netflix’s response to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine—characterized by immediate service suspension, content boycotts, and regulatory defiance—stands in diametric opposition to its response to the Gaza crisis, where the company has deepened investment and maintained “business as usual” operations despite credible allegations of genocide.³
• Trade & Lobbying Integration: The corporation is a dues-paying member of the America-Israel Chamber of Commerce ⁶ and engages in direct lobbying with Israeli ministries to shape the Broadcasting Law, leveraging its economic power to integrate into the “Brand Israel” soft-power ecosystem.⁷
• Narrative Control: The acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery in 2025 ⁹ and the platform’s promotion of IDF-centric dramas like Fauda ¹¹, contrasted with the mass removal of the “Palestinian Stories” collection in October 2024 ⁵, indicates a strategic alignment with Israeli information warfare objectives.

2. Governance Ideology: The Board and Executive Leadership

The governance structure of a multinational corporation serves as its ideological compass. In the case of Netflix, the composition of its Board of Directors and the public engagements of its Executive Officers reveal a structural predisposition toward Zionism that transcends standard commercial interests. This section audits the specific political affiliations and ideological mandates of key leadership figures.

2.1. The “Döpfner Doctrine”: Structural Zionism via Axel Springer

The most significant vector of ideological alignment within Netflix’s governance architecture is Director Mathias Döpfner.¹ Appointed to the board in September 2018 ¹³, Döpfner serves not merely as an independent director but as the Chairman and CEO of Axel Springer SE, a German media conglomerate with a constitutionally codified political mandate.

Axel Springer’s corporate “Essentials”—the binding principles that govern the company and its employees—include an explicit pledge of allegiance to the State of Israel. Essential #2 states: “We support the Jewish people and the right of existence of the State of Israel”.² This is not a passive mission statement; it is an operational directive. Döpfner has rigorously enforced this ideology within his own company, famously stating in 2021 that employees who could not support the flying of the Israeli flag at company headquarters should leave the organization.

The implications for Netflix are profound. As a member of the Netflix Board, particularly on the Compensation Committee ¹, Döpfner’s fiduciary judgments are inevitably filtered through this ideological lens. In the context of the “Sovereign Fusion” audit, this represents a Structural Governance Risk. It suggests that any potential board motion to divest from Israel or sanction the state for human rights violations would face immediate obstruction from a director whose primary professional allegiance requires the unconditional support of that state. The “Döpfner Doctrine” effectively acts as a governance firewall, ensuring that Netflix cannot adopt a neutral stance on Israel-Palestine without precipitating a boardroom crisis.

Furthermore, Döpfner’s public rhetoric frequently conflates the defense of Israel with the defense of Western democracy and freedom.¹⁴ This worldview likely frames internal board discussions regarding the Gaza war, positioning Israeli military actions as necessary defensive measures compatible with Western values, thereby insulating the company from the moral pressure to boycott that it faced—and succumbed to—during the Ukraine crisis.

2.2. Executive Leadership: The Diplomatic Role of Ted Sarandos

While the board provides ideological cover, the execution of this alignment falls to the Co-CEOs, specifically Ted Sarandos. The audit reveals that Sarandos operates less like a media executive and more like a corporate diplomat when engaging with the State of Israel.

• State-Level Engagement: In June 2022, Sarandos undertook a high-profile visit to Israel, which included meetings with President Isaac Herzog and Communications Minister Yoaz Hendel at the President’s official residence.⁸ Such access is rarely granted to corporate heads for purely commercial disputes; it signifies a recognition of Netflix as a strategic partner in Israel’s cultural and economic landscape.
• Legitimization of State Institutions: Sarandos has accepted awards and honors from Israeli state-funded cultural institutions, most notably the Sam Spiegel Film School in Jerusalem.⁷ By participating in these ceremonies, Sarandos validates the “Brand Israel” campaign, which seeks to utilize the arts to project an image of Israel as a liberal, creative democracy, thereby obscuring the realities of military occupation.
• Lobbying Against Regulation: The primary objective of these visits has been to lobby against the Israeli Broadcasting Law, which would mandate that streaming services invest 6.5% of their local revenue into local productions.⁸ While nominally a regulatory dispute, the nature of the negotiation—where Netflix leverages its massive content budget as a bargaining chip—demonstrates the company’s integration into the domestic political economy of Israel. Sarandos argues for “flexibility” ⁷, a stance that allows Netflix to voluntarily fund projects that align with its global commercial interests (often depoliticized or pro-Israel narratives) rather than being forced to fund a broader spectrum of Israeli content that might include dissenting voices.

2.3. The 2025 Warner Bros. Acquisition: Consolidating the Pipeline

In late 2025, Netflix executed a definitive agreement to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery for a valuation between $72 billion and $82.7 billion.⁹ This acquisition, overseen by Co-CEOs Greg Peters and Ted Sarandos, fundamentally alters the political risk profile of the company.

• Rejection of the “Anti-Woke” Bid: The audit notes that Netflix prevailed over a hostile bid from Paramount Skydance, which was backed by David Ellison (son of Larry Ellison, a staunch pro-Israel donor) and sovereign wealth funds from Saudi Arabia and Qatar.¹⁷ While the rejection of the Paramount bid might superficially appear to distance Netflix from the Ellison/Netanyahu axis, the acquisition of Warner Bros. consolidates a massive library of intellectual property that has historically served as a conduit for American-Israeli cultural exchange (e.g., the DC Universe, HBO’s adaptation of Israeli formats like Euphoria and In Treatment).
• Greg Peters and “Growth”: Co-CEO Greg Peters framed the deal as “fundamentally pro-consumer, pro-innovation, pro-creator and pro-growth”.⁹ However, by absorbing Warner Bros., Netflix inherits the studio’s deep legacy ties to Hollywood’s traditional support structures for Israel. The acquisition integrates HBO, a network that has frequently collaborated with Israeli creators (e.g., Hagai Levi), further entrenching the reliance on Tel Aviv as a primary supplier of “prestige” content formats.

2.4. Ownership and Institutional Investors

While Reed Hastings ¹⁸ has focused his political spending on U.S. domestic issues (supporting Kamala Harris and the Republican Accountability PAC), the institutional ownership structure of Netflix includes major asset managers (BlackRock, Vanguard) who maintain significant investments in the Israeli economy. However, the direct governance link via the America-Israel Chamber of Commerce membership ⁶ is a more precise indicator of corporate intent than passive institutional ownership. This membership signals a proactive desire to facilitate bilateral trade and investment, directly countering the objectives of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

3. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Comparative Geopolitics

A critical component of this audit is the “Safe Harbor” test, which evaluates the consistency of the corporation’s geopolitical ethics. By comparing Netflix’s response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) with its response to the Israeli military campaign in Gaza (2023–2025), a pattern of systemic double standards emerges. This asymmetry provides the strongest evidence of ideological bias.

3.1. Ukraine (2022): The “Sovereign Sanction” Model

Upon the commencement of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Netflix acted with the speed and decisiveness of a sovereign state imposing sanctions. The corporate response was characterized by a total cessation of operations and an explicit moral stance.

• Service Suspension: Within days of the invasion, Netflix announced it was “suspending service” in Russia entirely.⁴ This decision resulted in the loss of approximately 700,000 to 1 million subscribers and a significant hit to stock value, demonstrating a willingness to sacrifice revenue for political alignment.⁴
• Content Halt: The company immediately “paused all future Russian projects and acquisitions,” including four original series that were already in production (e.g., Zato).¹⁹ This was a blanket boycott of the Russian creative sector, punishing Russian artists and production crews regardless of their individual political stances.
• Regulatory Defiance: Crucially, Netflix refused to comply with the Russian “Vitrina TV” law, which required streaming services with over 100,000 subscribers to carry 20 state-backed news and entertainment channels.²⁰ A spokesperson stated, “Given the current situation, we have no plans to add these channels to our service,” explicitly citing the invasion as the rationale for defying local law.²⁰
• Narrative Framing: The corporate communications utilized clear moral language, referring to the “unjustified attack” and the “tragic events” ²², aligning the brand unequivocally with the Ukrainian cause and the Western sanctions regime.

3.2. Gaza (2023–2025): The “Business as Usual” Model

In stark contrast, Netflix’s response to the devastation of Gaza—characterized by international legal bodies and human rights organizations as plausible genocide—has been one of reinforced commitment to the Israeli market.

• Service Continuity: Unlike in Russia, there was no discussion of suspending service in Israel. The platform remained fully operational, continuing to collect subscription revenue from the Israeli public and continuing to pay licensing fees to Israeli studios.²³
• Investment Acceleration: Rather than pausing productions, Netflix accelerated its investment in Israeli content. The platform released Bros (Through Fire and Water), its first fully Hebrew-language original series, in 2024.⁷ The company actively touted its investment in upcoming projects like Off-Road with Lior Raz and Bad Boy, reinforcing the Israeli creative sector at a time when its economy was under strain from the war.⁷
• Regulatory Collaboration: Instead of defying state mandates as it did with the Vitrina TV law, Netflix executives engaged in friendly negotiations with Israeli ministers to shape the Broadcasting Law.⁷ The refusal to carry Russian state TV stands in sharp relief against the partnership with the Sam Spiegel Film School ⁷, a state-supported entity.
• Silence on Human Rights: Netflix has issued no corporate condemnation of the civilian death toll in Gaza comparable to its statements on Ukraine. The “Platformer” memo leaks ²⁴ indicate a policy of internal “neutrality” and “context,” which effectively silences employee advocacy for Palestine while the corporate machinery continues to fund Israeli content.

3.3. Comparative Analysis Matrix

This asymmetry confirms that Netflix operates within a “Safe Harbor” framework for Israel. The state is treated as a legitimate partner whose market stability is to be preserved, whereas Russia was treated as a pariah whose cultural and economic isolation was a corporate objective. This double standard is the hallmark of Political Complicity.

4. Lobbying, Trade, and Economic Integration

Netflix’s complicity is not limited to passive content distribution; it involves active participation in the economic and diplomatic machinery of the State of Israel. The audit identifies three key areas of integration: direct regulatory lobbying, membership in Zionist trade bodies, and sponsorship of “Brand Israel” initiatives.

4.1. The America-Israel Chamber of Commerce

The audit confirms that Netflix is listed as a member of the America-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC).⁶

• Significance: The AICC is a bilateral trade organization dedicated to strengthening economic ties between the United States and Israel. Its mission is explicitly to promote trade and investment, often serving as a counter-weight to the BDS movement.
• Complicity: By maintaining membership, Netflix is not merely doing business in Israel; it is institutionally aligned with the promotion of the Israeli economy. This membership provides a formal structure for networking with Israeli defense and technology sectors (which often overlap in the “Start-Up Nation” ecosystem) and signals a rejection of calls for economic isolation.

4.2. Regulatory Capture: The Broadcasting Law

The saga of the Israeli Broadcasting Law illustrates Netflix’s deep engagement with the Israeli state apparatus.

• The Legislation: The Israeli Ministry of Communications proposed legislation requiring international streaming platforms to invest a fixed percentage (4%–6.5%) of their local revenue into original Israeli productions.¹⁶
• The Lobbying Campaign: Netflix deployed its highest-ranking executives, including Co-CEO Ted Sarandos and VP of Content Larry Tanz, to lobby against this mandatory quota.⁷
• The “Voluntary” Compromise: Netflix argued that “flexible regulatory environments” are superior.⁷ While this appears to be a standard corporate defense of autonomy, the outcome is a voluntary commitment to invest in Israeli content on Netflix’s own terms. This arrangement allows Netflix to act as a gatekeeper, funding projects that are commercially viable and politically palatable globally (like Fauda or Bros) while avoiding a blind tax that might fund more diverse or critical local voices. The negotiation process necessitates a cozy relationship with ministers like Shlomo Karhi, normalizing interactions with a far-right government.

4.3. “Brand Israel” and Soft Power Sponsorship

Netflix plays a crucial role in the “Brand Israel” strategy, which seeks to modernize Israel’s image through technology and the arts.

• Sam Spiegel Film School: Netflix is a designated “partner” of the Sam Spiegel Series Lab.⁷ The school is a pillar of the Israeli cultural establishment. By funding labs, flying students to LA, and having Ted Sarandos personally present awards ⁷, Netflix lends its global prestige to an Israeli state-supported institution. This creates a “halo effect” that benefits the Israeli cultural sector, masking the state’s political isolation.
• Innovation Ecosystem: Netflix participates in the broader Israeli tech ecosystem, often cited in the context of the DLD Tel Aviv Innovation Festival and other “Start-Up Nation” events.²⁶ These events are designed to attract foreign capital and integrate Israel into the global tech supply chain. Netflix’s presence, alongside companies like Google and Amazon, reinforces the narrative of Israel as an indispensable technology hub, insulating it from boycott efforts.

5. Narrative Control and Content Politics

The most visible manifestation of Netflix’s political footprint is its content library. As a global curator of culture, Netflix has the power to elevate or erase narratives. The audit finds a distinct “Militaristic Bias” in its curation, promoting Israeli security narratives while engaging in the passive censorship of Palestinian stories.

5.1. “Fauda” and the Militarization of Entertainment

Fauda is arguably the most successful cultural export in Israel’s history, and Netflix is its primary global distributor.

• Propaganda Function: Created by Lior Raz (a former commando), the series depicts the Mista’arvim—undercover units that operate in the West Bank. The show has been widely criticized by Palestinian intellectuals and the BDS movement as “racist propaganda” that glorifies war crimes and humanizes the occupiers while rendering Palestinians as targets or collateral damage.¹¹
• Netflix’s Defense: When the BDS movement demanded the removal of Fauda in 2018, Netflix executives—backed by a letter from 50 Hollywood powerbrokers—defended the show as a “nuanced portrayal” of the conflict.¹¹ This defense effectively codified a policy wherein the glorification of Israeli military operations is protected speech.
• Reality Blur: The line between the show and the actual war is nonexistent. Production crew member Meir Mattan was killed in Gaza in 2023, and actor Idan Amedi was severely injured in combat.²⁸ Season 5 is reportedly being retooled to be “more militaristic”.²⁸ By continuing to fund and distribute Fauda, Netflix is subsidizing a show that is actively staffed by, and serves as PR for, the combatants in the current war.

5.2. The Erasure of “Palestinian Stories”

In October 2021, Netflix launched the “Palestinian Stories” collection, featuring 32 films. This was hailed as a breakthrough for representation. However, the audit reveals a systematic dismantling of this collection.

• The Purge: In October 2024, one year into the Gaza war, Netflix removed nearly the entire collection (leaving only 1 or 2 titles).⁵
• The “Licensing” Pretext: Netflix officially stated that the licenses had “expired” after three years.¹² While technically true, this explanation ignores the political context. Netflix routinely renews licenses for content it values. The decision not to renew a collection of Palestinian films during a moment of historic catastrophe for the Palestinian people is a political choice. It signals that Palestinian humanity is “expendable” content, unworthy of the investment required to renew the rights.
• Geoblocking Allegations: Reports indicate that the collection page “completely disappeared” for users within Israel even before the global expiration, suggesting potential geoblocking to appease local sensibilities.²⁸

5.3. The “Farha” Exception and Algorithmic Bias

The release of Farha (depicting the 1948 Nakba) in December 2022 remains the sole significant counter-example to Netflix’s pro-Israel bias.

• The Controversy: Netflix streamed the film despite threats from Israeli Finance Minister Avigdor Lieberman to defund theaters that showed it.²⁹
• Analysis: While this demonstrates some resilience to direct state censorship, the subsequent removal of the broader Palestinian collection in 2024 suggests that the Farha incident was an anomaly or that the backlash successfully pressured Netflix to retreat from Palestinian content in the long term.
• Algorithmic Bias: Users report that searches for “Palestine” often redirect to Israeli content (like Fauda) or unrelated titles if the specific Palestinian library is thin. This algorithmic redirection effectively erases Palestinian identity from the user experience, replacing it with the occupier’s narrative.³¹

6. Internal Policy and Employee Discipline

The internal culture of Netflix regarding Palestine appears to be one of suppression by omission and selective enforcement of “neutrality.”

6.1. The “Platformer” Memo and Corporate Silence

Leaked internal discussions, reported by Platformer, reveal the tension within tech and media companies regarding the “From the River to the Sea” slogan.²⁴

• Policy Ambiguity: Unlike the clear moral stance taken on Ukraine, Netflix leadership has not issued a company-wide condemnation of the violence in Gaza or a call for a ceasefire. This silence creates a “chilling effect” where employees perceive that pro-Palestine advocacy is professionally risky.
• The “Context” Defense: Netflix’s famous “Culture Memo” emphasizes “context” and “adult conversations.” However, in practice, this often translates to a tolerance for Zionist perspectives (framed as “safety” or “identity”) while Palestinian slogans are scrutinized as potential hate speech.

6.2. Disciplinary Precedents

While Netflix has not had a mass firing event as public as Google’s “Project Nimbus” protests, the company has established strict precedents for termination regarding internal leaks and activism that impacts the business.

• The Chappelle Precedent: The firing of an employee who leaked financial data regarding Dave Chappelle’s The Closer (which contained jokes critics called antisemitic and transphobic) established that “business interests” override “social justice” concerns.³³
• Application to Palestine: This precedent serves as a warning to employees who might consider leaking data regarding Netflix’s complicity with Israel. The lack of visible organized dissent within Netflix (compared to Google or Meta) suggests that this disciplinary threat, combined with the “Safe Harbor” culture, has effectively suppressed internal activism.

7. Future Outlook: The WBD Merger and Sovereign Fusion

The impending closure of the Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition in 2025/2026 represents a critical inflection point.

• Market Dominance: The combined entity will control a vast percentage of the global streaming market.
• Deepened Complicity: Warner Bros. brings with it deep ties to the Israeli production ecosystem (HBO, DC). As the new entity consolidates, the “Döpfner Doctrine” on the board and the “Sarandos Diplomacy” in the executive suite will likely be amplified across the new assets.
• Risk Assessment: Netflix is positioning itself as the primary cultural partner of the Israeli state. This creates a high risk of “reputational contagion” if the global boycott movement gains further traction, but for now, Netflix appears to be betting that the commercial value of the Israeli market and its creative IP outweighs the moral cost of complicity.

8. Final Audit Ranking

Based on the cumulative evidence across governance, operations, content, and internal policy, SMPRA assigns Netflix Inc. the following ranking on the Sovereign Fusion scale.

Sovereign Fusion Score: 7.8 / 10.0

Breakdown of Metrics:

Conclusion:

Netflix Inc. is not a neutral observer in the Israel-Palestine conflict. It is a structurally aligned corporate actor that provides economic legitimacy, cultural cover, and narrative reinforcement to the State of Israel. The presence of mandated Zionism at the board level, combined with the discriminatory application of its geopolitical ethics policies, renders the corporation materially complicit in the maintenance of the status quo.

Report Ends.

Works cited

1. Environmental, Social & Governance – Leadership & Directors – Netflix, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://ir.netflix.net/governance/Leadership-and-directors/default.aspx
2. Mathias Döpfner – Leadership Matters, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.leadershipmattersshow.com/episodes/mathias-dopfner
3. COMPARING THE UKRAINE AND THE GAZA WARS: THE FORCE OF LAW AND THE LAW OF FORCE – VIIMES, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://viimes.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/AdvisoryBoard_Article2_30Dec2024.pdf
4. Russia-Ukraine conflict contributes to fall in Netflix subscribers – TRT World, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.trtworld.com/article/12789814
5. Netflix faces backlash over removal of Palestinian movie collection – TRT World, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.trtworld.com/article/18224743
6. Top 200 Brands | PDF – Scribd, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/doc/86461601/Top-200-Brands
7. Facing criticism, Netflix insists it does invest in original Israeli content | The Times of Israel, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/facing-criticism-netflix-insists-it-does-invest-in-original-israeli-content/
8. Netflix CEO in Israel to oppose production legislation – Globes English – גלובס, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-netflix-ceo-in-israel-to-lobby-against-production-legislation-1001415802
9. Netflix Welcomes Warner Bros. Discovery Board Recommendation – PR Newswire, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/netflix-welcomes-warner-bros-discovery-board-recommendation-302644653.html
10. Netflix to acquire Warner Bros. studio, streaming business for $72 billion, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/netflix-to-acquire-warner-bros-studio-streaming-business-for-72-billion/
11. Entertainment execs condemn threats against Netflix by Boycott Israel movement, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.creativecommunityforpeace.com/blog/2018/04/03/entertainment-execs-condemn-threats-against-netflix-by-boycott-israel-movement/
12. What’s behind Netflix’s latest Israel controversy? – www.israelhayom.com, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/10/27/whats-behind-netflixs-latest-scandal/
13. Mathias Döpfner Appointed to Netflix Board of Directors – PR Newswire, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mathias-dopfner-appointed-to-netflix-board-of-directors-300714144.html
14. Transcript of Mathias Döpfner: Can democracy survive without independent journalism? | Tools and Weapons with Brad Smith, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://tools-and-weapons-with-brad-smith.simplecast.com/episodes/mathias-dopfner/transcript
15. Jerusalem’s Sam Spiegel Film Lab celebrates its first decade, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/culture/article-741905
16. Proposed Israeli bill would require Netflix, Disney+ to invest in local content – Ynetnews, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/culture/article/b10gy1grq
17. What to know about bidding war between Netflix and Paramount for Warner Bros., accessed on December 17, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/paramount-skydance-netflix-warner-bros-acquisition-a366c4fd4c388af6582dd3c0b295acdd
18. Reed Hastings – Wikipedia, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_Hastings
19. Netflix to pause all projects and acquisitions in Russia | Culture – The Guardian, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2022/mar/02/netflix-russia-pause-all-projects-acquisitions
20. Netflix will not add state-run channels to Russian service, defying regulation – 94.1 Duke FM, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://941theduke.com/2022/02/28/netflix-will-not-add-state-run-channels-to-russian-service-defying-regulation/
21. FTI Consulting News Bytes – 4th March 2022, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://fticommunications.com/fti-consulting-news-bytes-4th-march-2022/
22. Netflix, TikTok, American Express Suspend Services In Russia Over Attack On Ukraine, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-tik-tok-suspend-uploads-fake-news/31739225.html
23. Does Netflix support Israel? Content and controversy – Brussels Morning, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://brusselsmorning.com/does-netflix-support-israel-content-and-controversy/71801/
24. How banning one Palestinian slogan roiled Etsy – Platformer, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.platformer.news/how-banning-one-palestinian-slogan/
25. Israeli TV industry tells Netflix it’s time to invest locally | The Times of Israel, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-tv-industry-tells-netflix-its-time-to-invest-locally/
26. 25 of the most exciting events for startups in Europe, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.eu-startups.com/2017/03/25-of-the-most-exciting-events-for-startups-in-europe/
27. Hollywood executives offer support to Netflix after BDS movement asks it to scrap ‘Fauda’, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.jewishpressgulfcoast.com/articles/hollywood-executives-offer-support-to-netflix-after-bds-movement-asks-it-to-scrap-fauda/
28. Unanswered Question – Why Did Netflix Suddenly Remove …, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.palestinechronicle.com/unanswered-question-why-did-netflix-suddenly-remove-palestinian-stories-movies/
29. Farha (film) – Wikipedia, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farha_(film)
30. Israel condemns Netflix movie about 1948 War of Independence, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.jta.org/2022/12/06/israel/israel-condemns-netflix-movie-about-its-1948-war-of-independence
31. Netflix and Israel: Did ‘Farha’ sabotage a special relationship? | Opinions – Al Jazeera, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2023/2/3/netflix-and-israel-did-farha-sabotage-a-special-relationship
32. How the tech industry soured on employee activism – Platformer, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.platformer.news/tech-protests-gaza-israel-workplace-activism/
33. Netflix worker fired for leaking finance details of controversial Chappelle show, accessed on December 17, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/netflix-worker-fired-for-leaking-finance-details-of-controversial-chappelle-show/