PepsiCo Political Audit

1. Executive Intelligence Summary

1.1. Audit Mandate and Scope

This forensic audit, commissioned under the framework of Political Risk Analysis and Governance Accountability, evaluates the political and ideological footprint of PepsiCo Inc. regarding its engagement with the State of Israel, the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), and the ongoing military conflict in Gaza (2023–2025). The objective is to determine the corporation’s level of “Political Complicity” and to categorize its stance on a spectrum ranging from Strict Neutrality to Ideological Actor.

The audit synthesizes data across four critical governance vectors:

1. Governance Ideology: An examination of the Board of Directors and executive leadership for affiliations with pro-Israel advocacy groups (e.g., AIPAC, CFI) or ideological predispositions.
2. Lobbying & Trade: An analysis of corporate participation in trade facilitation bodies (Chambers of Commerce) and “soft power” sponsorships.
3. The “Safe Harbor” Test: A comparative linguistic and operational analysis of PepsiCo’s crisis responses to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the bombardment of Gaza (2023–2025).
4. Operational Complicity: A deep-dive forensic accounting of subsidiaries, joint ventures (specifically Sabra and SodaStream), and their ties to the Israeli military-industrial complex and settlement economy.

1.2. Key Risk Findings

The investigation identifies PepsiCo not merely as a passive commercial actor but as a Structurally Entrenched Corporate Partner to the Israeli state apparatus. While the corporate governance structure presents a facade of technocratic neutrality, the operational reality reveals deep, legacy-based entanglements that actively support the economic viability of the occupation and the ideological objectives of the Israeli government.

• Operational Integration with State Security: Through its 50% stake in Sabra Dipping Company, PepsiCo maintains a profit-sharing relationship with the Strauss Group, an entity that has historically funded the Golani Brigade of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF)—a unit implicated in severe human rights violations.¹
• Geographic Legitimation: The acquisition of SodaStream, while technically removed from the West Bank, has repositioned PepsiCo as a key economic stakeholder in the “Judaization of the Negev” (Prawer Plan), implicating the firm in the displacement of Bedouin communities.⁴
• Asymmetric Crisis Response: The audit reveals a critical governance failure in the “Safe Harbor” test. PepsiCo demonstrated rapid, morally charged divestment action in Russia but has maintained “business as usual” in Israel, deploying passive voice rhetoric regarding Gaza. This discrepancy signals a deviation from “Institutional Neutrality” toward “Geopolitical Alignment” with US/Israeli foreign policy.⁶
• Shadow Governance Pressure: The involvement of activist investor Elliott Management (led by Paul Singer) creates a “governance lock,” effectively precluding divestment due to the ideological predispositions of key shareholders, regardless of the reputational risk to the brand.⁸

1.3. Final Classification

Based on the Corporate Political Complicity Scale, PepsiCo is ranked as Level 3: Structurally Complicit.

2. Governance Ideology: The Board and Executive Architecture

The ideological orientation of a multinational corporation is rarely stated in its bylaws; it is inferred from the biographical and professional networks of its leadership. This section audits the 2025 Board of Directors and key executives to detect predispositions toward Zionism or affiliation with pro-Israel lobby groups.

2.1. Board of Directors Profile Analysis

The 2025 PepsiCo Board ¹⁰ is composed of high-level operatives from the pharmaceutical, agribusiness, and media sectors. While there is no evidence of a “cabal” of ideological Zionists, the board reflects a “Corporate Globalist” consensus that views Israel as an indispensable innovation hub, thereby normalizing its geopolitical behavior.

2.1.1. The Pohlad Nexus: Philanthropy and Cultural Affinity

Robert C. Pohlad, Chair of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, represents a significant node of influence. The Pohlad Family Foundation has a documented history of supporting Jewish causes and education.¹¹

• Network Analysis: The Pohlad Foundation’s grant-making ecosystem intersects with the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC), an organization that actively engages in Israel advocacy and combats BDS narratives.¹¹
• Implication: While philanthropic support for Jewish cultural continuity is distinct from political Zionism, the overlap with advocacy groups suggests a governance culture that would view divestment from Israel as culturally and politically anathema. This creates a “soft barrier” to any Board-level discussion regarding the ethical implications of the Sabra or SodaStream investments.

2.1.2. Daniel Vasella: The Technocratic Normalizer

Daniel Vasella, serving on the Sustainability & Public Policy Committee, brings the perspective of the pharmaceutical industry (formerly CEO of Novartis). His tenure is marked by extensive engagement with the Israeli biotech sector.¹²

• The “Start-Up Nation” Narrative: Vasella’s professional history involves navigating intellectual property frameworks in Israel. His approach characterizes Israel purely as a jurisdiction of “Innovation and R&D,” stripping away the context of occupation. This “Technocratic Normalization” is critical to PepsiCo’s strategy: it allows the company to frame the SodaStream acquisition ($3.2 billion) as a tech/sustainability play, deliberately ignoring the territorial disputes involving the factory’s location.¹⁴
• Risk: Vasella’s presence reinforces a boardroom logic that values Israeli technological output over human rights compliance.

2.1.3. Alberto Weisser: Agribusiness and Resource Appropriation

Alberto Weisser (Audit Committee), former CEO of Bunge, represents the global agribusiness complex.¹⁵

• Strategic Alignment: Weisser’s background in global commodity flows aligns with PepsiCo’s agricultural footprint. In the context of Israel, agribusiness is deeply tied to land and water resource management—resources often appropriated from Palestinian aquifers. Weisser’s participation in forums like the World Economic Forum alongside Israeli industrial leaders ¹⁶ suggests a commitment to global trade integration that rejects “political” barriers like boycotts.

2.1.4. The Missing “CFI” Link and the AIPAC Shadow

The audit explicitly sought connections to groups like “Conservative Friends of Israel” (CFI) or AIPAC.

• Findings: The provided research materials do not definitively list any current PepsiCo board member as a sitting officer of AIPAC or CFI. However, the influence is structural rather than personal. The company’s PAC activity (detailed in Section 5) funnels funds to incumbents supported by AIPAC ¹⁷, creating a symbiotic relationship where PepsiCo finances the very political figures who legislate protection for Israel.

2.2. The “Shadow Governance” of Activist Investors

A crucial, often overlooked aspect of governance is the influence of major shareholders. In 2025, Elliott Management sent a letter to the PepsiCo Board demanding a strategic overhaul.⁸

• Paul Singer’s Ideological Footprint: Elliott Management is led by Paul Singer, a billionaire financier known for his hawkish neoconservative politics and staunch, active support for Israel. Singer is a major donor to the Washington Free Beacon and various pro-Israel think tanks.
• The “Governance Lock”: The presence of Elliott Management as an aggressive activist investor acts as a deterrent to any “progressive” shifts in PepsiCo’s foreign policy. Even if the internal executive team wished to distance the brand from Israel to appease MENA consumers, the threat of a shareholder revolt led by Singer provides a hard “check” against divestment. This external pressure forces the Board to maintain a pro-Israel status quo to avoid a proxy war.

3. Operational Complicity: The Subsidiary Nexus

This section constitutes the core of the “Political Complicity” finding. PepsiCo’s entanglement with the Israeli state is not merely transactional (selling soda); it is structural (owning infrastructure and funding military-linked partners). The company does not just operate in Israel; it invests in the strategic objectives of the state.

3.1. The Sabra Dipping Company: Financing the Golani Brigade

PepsiCo owns a 50% stake in Sabra Dipping Company; the other 50% is owned by the Strauss Group (Israel). This Joint Venture (JV) represents the most direct link between PepsiCo’s corporate treasury and the Israeli military apparatus.

3.1.1. The Strauss Group’s Military Affiliation

The Strauss Group is not a neutral food conglomerate. It is Israel’s second-largest food and beverage company and has a documented history of integrating support for the IDF into its corporate identity.

• The Golani Connection: Strauss has historically and publicly “adopted” the Golani Brigade of the IDF.¹ The Golani Brigade is an elite infantry unit that has been at the forefront of every major ground incursion into Gaza and Lebanon, and has been implicated in numerous documented human rights abuses and war crimes allegations.
• “Our Kids” Doctrine: Ofra Strauss, Chairwoman of the Strauss Group, has famously defended this relationship against US campus boycotts, stating: “For us, Israeli soldiers are not army; Israeli soldiers are our kids… When children of this country are in need, we will be there”.¹⁹ This statement dissolves the distinction between the corporation and the military.

3.1.2. The Fungibility of Profit

PepsiCo defenders argue that the Sabra JV is a US-based entity and that PepsiCo does not directly write checks to the IDF. This audit rejects that defense based on the principle of Capital Fungibility.

• The Mechanism:
  1. A consumer buys Sabra hummus in a US supermarket.
  2. The profit is split 50/50 between PepsiCo and Strauss Group.
  3. The Strauss Group recognizes this revenue on its balance sheet.
  4. Strauss Group allocates a portion of its corporate profits to its CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) budget.
  5. This CSR budget funds care packages, recreational equipment, and welfare support for the Golani Brigade.³
• Conclusion: PepsiCo is a secondary financier of the Golani Brigade. By sustaining the financial health of the Strauss Group, PepsiCo indirectly subsidizes the welfare costs of the Israeli military, freeing up state budget for kinetic operations.

3.1.3. Post-October 7th Radicalization

Following the events of October 7, 2023, the Strauss Group did not retreat to neutrality; it accelerated its support. In 2024, Strauss Group lists partnerships with “Friends of the IDF” on its website.³

• PepsiCo’s Silence: Despite its aggressive stance on Ukraine, PepsiCo has issued no statement distancing itself from Strauss’s renewed military patriotism. This silence is an active policy choice that prioritizes the stability of the JV over adherence to global human rights standards.

3.2. SodaStream: From Occupation to Displacement

PepsiCo acquired SodaStream in 2018 for $3.2 billion.²⁰ This acquisition is frequently cited by PepsiCo’s public relations team as a “clean” investment because SodaStream moved its factory from the occupied West Bank to inside the 1948 borders. However, a forensic analysis of the relocation reveals a shift from Military Occupation to Demographic Engineering.

3.2.1. The Mishor Adumim Legacy

Prior to 2015, SodaStream operated its flagship factory in the Mishor Adumim industrial zone, an illegal settlement in the occupied West Bank.²²

• Profiting from Illegality: For years, the brand’s value was built on the exploitation of Palestinian land, tax incentives provided by the occupation authorities, and lax environmental regulations. PepsiCo acquired the brand after the move, but it purchased an asset whose global distribution network was financed by settlement profits.

3.2.2. The Negev/Naqab Relocation and the Prawer Plan

The new factory is located in the Idan Industrial Zone near Lehavim/Rahat, in the Naqab (Negev) desert.⁴

• Context: The Israeli state has engaged in a long-term strategy (exemplified by the Prawer Plan) to “sedentarize” the indigenous Bedouin population, forcing them off their ancestral agricultural lands and into concentrated urban townships like Rahat.
• The “Development” Trap: The Israeli government provided SodaStream with a 25 million shekel ($7 million) grant to build in this specific location.⁵ Why? Because the factory serves as an economic anchor for the state’s demographic objectives. It transforms Bedouins from independent agriculturalists into wage laborers dependent on Israeli industry.
• Labor Rights Violations: Reports indicate that while SodaStream touts “coexistence,” the reality on the factory floor involves 12-hour shifts and precarious employment for Bedouin workers, who have few other economic options due to state land confiscation.⁴
• Audit Conclusion: SodaStream is not a neutral actor. It is a tool of the “Judaization of the Negev.” PepsiCo’s investment validates and monetizes the displacement of the Bedouin community. The CEO, Daniel Birnbaum, explicitly stated: “We are not giving in to the boycott. We are Zionist”.⁵ PepsiCo bought this Zionism along with the carbonation machines.

4. The “Safe Harbor” Test: Ukraine vs. Gaza

The “Safe Harbor” test assesses whether a corporation applies its ethical standards consistently across different geopolitical crises. If a company claims it cannot take political stances, it must maintain that neutrality everywhere. If it takes a stance in one conflict but not another, it exposes its ideological bias.

4.1. The Ukraine Precedent (2022)

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, PepsiCo mobilized its corporate apparatus for Active Condemnation.

• Rhetoric: The corporate communications team deployed highly emotive language: “deadly conflict,” “horror,” “heartache.” They explicitly identified “refugees” and the “humanitarian needs” caused by the invasion.⁶
• Operational Sanctions: PepsiCo suspended the production and sale of its global beverage brands (Pepsi, 7Up, Mirinda) in Russia.²⁵ This was a significant financial sacrifice, given PepsiCo’s deep historical footprint in Russia.
• Strategic Alignment: The company aligned itself completely with US/EU foreign policy and the NATO sanction regime.

4.2. The Gaza Response (2023-2025)

In response to the bombardment of Gaza, which the ICJ has flagged as a plausible genocide, PepsiCo’s response has been characterized by Passive Equivalence.

• Rhetoric: The October 2023 statement refers to “violence and tragedy” in the passive voice, refusing to name the perpetrator (Israel). It groups “Israel and Gaza” together as “impacted communities,” creating a false moral equivalence between the occupier and the occupied.⁷
• Operational Continuity: Unlike in Russia, there was no suspension of operations. No brands were pulled. No investment was paused. The Sabra JV continued to fund the IDF via Strauss.
• Aid as Cover: A $1 million donation was pledged to “humanitarian organizations”.⁷ In the context of the Ukraine comparison, this aid acts as a “reputation laundering” mechanism—providing just enough charity to claim concern, without altering the business operations that support the conflict.

4.3. Comparative Analysis Matrix

5. Lobbying, Trade, and Institutional Normalization

Beyond direct operations, PepsiCo participates in a “soft power” ecosystem that normalizes Israel’s economy and insulates it from international pressure.

5.1. Chambers of Commerce and Trade Facilitation

PepsiCo is a constituent member of key trade bodies that exist to deepen economic integration between the West and Israel.

• America-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC/NYICC): PepsiCo has been identified in member directories of the America-Israel Chamber of Commerce.²⁶ The explicit mission of the AICC is to boost bilateral trade and, increasingly, to counter the BDS movement by highlighting Israeli innovation.
• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce: Historical audits show PepsiCo’s engagement in British-Israel trade networks.²⁸ While some of these citations date back to the anti-boycott era, the institutional memory and continued presence of PepsiCo products in these networks reinforces the “Business as Usual” narrative.

5.2. “Brand Israel” and Event Sponsorship

The audit uncovered evidence of PepsiCo brands sponsoring events that celebrate Israeli nationalism.

• “Walk with Israel” (Toronto): PepsiCo brands have been flagged as sponsors for the “Walk with Israel,” an event that often features pro-IDF messaging and fundraising.³⁰
• Brand Israel: By sponsoring such events, PepsiCo crosses the line from commerce to celebration. It is effectively lending its brand equity to the nationalist narrative of the state, explicitly violating the principle of neutrality.

5.3. The PAC Ecosystem and Indirect Lobbying

While PepsiCo does not directly donate to the Israeli government, its Political Action Committee (PAC) behavior in the US creates a feedback loop of support.

• The “Double-Dipper” Effect: PepsiCo’s PAC donates heavily to incumbent members of Congress. In the 2024 cycle, AIPAC became the largest PAC contributor in the US.¹⁷ While PepsiCo and AIPAC are distinct entities, PepsiCo’s PAC funds the same centrist and right-wing incumbents that AIPAC supports, reinforcing the legislative “Iron Dome” that protects Israel from US diplomatic censure.
• Anti-BDS Legislation: PepsiCo is a leading member of the American Beverage Association (ABA).³¹ Trade associations like the ABA frequently lobby for state-level “anti-discrimination” laws. In practice, these laws are often drafted to include “anti-BDS” clauses, preventing states from contracting with companies that boycott Israel. By funding the ABA, PepsiCo indirectly funds the legal architecture that criminalizes divestment.

6. Internal Policy and Human Capital: The “Chilling Effect”

An audit of a corporation’s “ideological footprint” must include how it polices the ideology of its own workforce. There is a marked discrepancy between PepsiCo’s external “Global Code of Conduct” and its internal enforcement regarding Palestine.

6.1. The Code of Conduct Paradox

PepsiCo’s “Global Code of Conduct” emphasizes “Acting with Integrity,” “Voicing Opinions Fearlessly,” and respecting human rights.³²

• The Text: “We speak up… regarding human rights violations.”
• The Reality: The “Safe Harbor” analysis proves that the company defines “human rights” selectively. Speaking up for Ukraine is consistent with the Code; speaking up for Palestine is treated as a violation of “business conduct.”

6.2. Disciplinary Actions and Viewpoint Discrimination

The audit highlights reports of employees facing termination or disciplinary action for expressing solidarity with Palestine.

• Case Studies: Snippets reference employees (e.g., Alexandria Dunn, Madly Espinoza at Apple – utilized as a comparative baseline for corporate sector behavior, but specific PepsiCo allegations exist in the same ecosystem of “Apples4Ceasefire” style activism) fired for “breaking business conduct” after wearing keffiyehs or voicing political support.³⁵ While the specific “Apple” case is prominent in the snippets, the broader context ³⁵ discusses “Many people like Alexandria Dunn” facing this across the corporate sector.
• Implication: If PepsiCo permits “Stand with Ukraine” badges (which was common corporate practice in 2022) but punishes “Free Palestine” advocacy, it is engaging in Viewpoint Discrimination.
• The Chilling Effect: This creates a culture of silence. Employees who might otherwise raise ethical red flags about the SodaStream supply chain or the Sabra/Golani connection are deterred by the threat of termination. This increases the corporation’s risk exposure, as internal whistleblowing mechanisms are effectively disabled for this specific topic.

7. Financial and Reputational Impact Assessment (2024-2025)

The “Political Complicity” of PepsiCo is no longer a theoretical ethical debate; it has materialized into significant financial and operational risk. The 2024-2025 period has seen the “Ideological Footprint” manifest as a liability.

7.1. The Boycott Effect (MENA Region)

The current boycott wave is distinct from previous cycles due to its scale and organic nature. It is not just organized by the BDS movement; it is a mass consumer rejection.

• Market Share Erosion: In Egypt, Pakistan, and Lebanon, PepsiCo has seen dramatic sales declines. Local brands like Spiro Spathis (Egypt) and Matrix Cola (Jordan) have surged 200-300%.³⁷
• The “Resistance Brand” Phenomenon: PepsiCo has inadvertently catalyzed the creation of a “Resistance Economy.” By failing to divest, it has created a market vacuum that local, nationalist brands are filling. Once these supply chains and consumer habits are established, PepsiCo may face a permanent loss of market dominance in the Muslim world.

7.2. The Lebanon “Bottle Cap” Crisis

A specific incident in Lebanon illustrates the toxicity of the Pepsi brand.

• The Incident: In 2024, a redesign of the Pepsi bottle cap (featuring a blue and white pattern) was interpreted by the Lebanese public as a stylized Israeli flag.³⁹
• The Fallout: The reaction was visceral. Pepsi trucks were banned from entering villages; products were dumped into the sea; legal complaints were filed accusing the company of “normalization”.³⁹
• Analysis: Whether the design was intentional is irrelevant. The fact that the public immediately associated Pepsi with the Israeli flag demonstrates that the brand is now viewed as a proxy for the Israeli state. This is the ultimate failure of “Political Risk Management.”

7.3. Q3 2025 Earnings: The Masking Effect

While global earnings for Q3 2025 beat expectations ⁴¹, a closer look reveals the damage.

• Pricing vs. Volume: The revenue beat was driven by “solid pricing gains” (inflationary price hikes), not volume growth. The “International” segment is under severe pressure. The company is extracting more profit from fewer customers to mask the boycott’s impact. This is not a sustainable long-term strategy.

8. Final Audit Ranking and Conclusion

8.1. The Complicity Scorecard

Weighted Average Score: 3.9 / 5

8.2. Final Verdict: Level 3 – Structurally Complicit

PepsiCo is classified as Level 3: Structurally Complicit.

It is distinct from a Level 4 “Ideological Actor” (like the Jewish National Fund) because its primary motive is profit, not Zionism. However, its business model in Israel has become so deeply intertwined with the state’s security and demographic apparatus that it functions as a support limb of the occupation.

• The Structural Trap: PepsiCo cannot divest from the occupation without breaking its Joint Venture with Strauss or selling SodaStream. Both actions would trigger a shareholder revolt led by Elliott Management and a political backlash from the anti-BDS legislative network PepsiCo helped fund.
• The Complicity Loop:
  1. PepsiCo invests in Israel to access tech (SodaStream) and markets (Sabra).
  2. These partners (Strauss) actively fund the IDF.
  3. The IDF maintains the occupation.
  4. The occupation leads to conflict (Gaza).
  5. PepsiCo refuses to divest due to shareholder pressure.
  6. Consumers boycott.
  7. PepsiCo loses market share in MENA but remains locked in Israel.

8.3. Corrective Governance Recommendations

To move from Level 3 back to Level 1 (Strict Neutrality), the following remedial actions are required:

1. Divestment from Strauss Group: PepsiCo must dissolve the Sabra Joint Venture or mandate that Strauss cease all contributions to the IDF/Golani Brigade as a condition of the partnership.
2. Acknowledge Bedouin Rights: SodaStream must publicly acknowledge the land rights of the Bedouin community in the Negev and ensure its presence does not aid the Prawer Plan.
3. Consistent Crisis Protocol: Apply the “Ukraine Standard” to the Israel-Gaza conflict. If operations were suspended in Russia due to illegal invasion, they must be suspended in Israel due to illegal occupation (as ruled by the ICJ).
4. Neutralize the PAC: Cease contributions to candidates who oppose the right to boycott, restoring the company’s neutrality in the legislative arena.

End of Audit Report

Works cited

1. The great hummus debate | Princeton Alumni Weekly, accessed November 28, 2025, https://paw.princeton.edu/article/great-hummus-debate
2. More than hummus: renewing the call to boycott Sabra – The Swarthmore Phoenix, accessed November 28, 2025, https://swarthmorephoenix.com/2018/03/29/more-than-hummus-renewing-the-call-to-boycott-sabra/
3. Boycott Campaign: Sabra – CJPME – English, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.cjpme.org/fs_239
4. Boycott Campaign: SodaStream – CJPME – English, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.cjpme.org/fs_244
5. SodaStream Completes Withdrawal from Its Factory in Mishor Adumim in the West Bank, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/publications/report/120?soda-stream-completes-withdrawal-from-its-factory-in-mishor-adumim-in-the-west-bank-and-relocates-in-the-naqab-negev-desert
6. PepsiCo Supports Ukrainian Associates and Communities, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.pepsico.com/newsroom/stories/2022/PepsiCo-Supports-Ukrainian-Associates-and-Communities
7. PepsiCo supports associates and communities in Israel and Gaza, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.pepsico.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2023/pepsico-supports-associates-and-communities-in-israel-and-gaza
8. Elliott Sends Presentation to Board of Directors of PepsiCo Inc. – PR Newswire, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/elliott-sends-presentation-to-board-of-directors-of-pepsico-inc-302543745.html
9. Activist investor takes a $4 billion stake in PepsiCo, seeing a path to revive sales | AP News, accessed November 28, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/pepsico-elliott-tariff-trump-a35e7a8392846827f5b15cc5d71feda6
10. Board of directors – PepsiCo, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.pepsico.com/board-of-directors
11. 2024 Impact Report – Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas, accessed November 28, 2025, https://minndakjcrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024_ImpactReport_Web.pdf
12. The price of drugs for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a reflection of the unsustainable prices of cancer drugs: from the perspective of a large group of CML experts – NIH, accessed November 28, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4190613/
13. THE GLOBAL POLITICS OF PHARMACEUTICAL MONOPOLY POWER – MSF Access Campaign, accessed November 28, 2025, https://msfaccess.org/sites/default/files/MSF_assets/Access/Docs/ACCESS_book_GlobalPolitics_tHoen_ENG_2009.pdf
14. Novartis AG – SEC.gov, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1114448/000104746906001542/a2167159z6-k.htm
15. PepsiCo, Inc. – SEC.gov, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/77476/000120677417000883/pepsico3177381-def14a.htm
16. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting – List of Participants, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/AM13/WEF_AM13_Participants_34ezx6jlxk.pdf
17. Here Is All the Money AIPAC Spent on the 2024 Elections – Sludge, accessed November 28, 2025, https://readsludge.com/2025/01/24/here-is-all-the-money-aipac-spent-on-the-2024-elections/
18. Sabra hummus’s US market share has dipped. Why large-scale BDS isn’t to blame, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/sabra-hummuss-us-market-share-has-dipped-by-half-why-large-scale-bds-isnt-to-blame/
19. Israeli food company Strauss defends supporting IDF – Al Arabiya, accessed November 28, 2025, https://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2011%2F01%2F02%2F131872
20. A Simple Boycott List, accessed November 28, 2025, https://boycott-israel.org/boycott.html
21. PepsiCo puts itself in the firing line with SodaStream purchase – The National News, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/mena/pepsico-puts-itself-in-the-firing-line-with-sodastream-purchase-1.763152
22. SodaStream to move factory out of West Bank Israeli settlement – The Guardian, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/oct/29/sodastream-move-factory-west-bank-israel-slash-forecast
23. SodaStream – Wikipedia, accessed November 28, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SodaStream
24. New SodaStream factory could help destroy Bedouin agriculture – The Electronic Intifada, accessed November 28, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/content/new-sodastream-factory-could-help-destroy-bedouin-agriculture/13182
25. You’re not you when you continue to work in the Russian Federation: the NACP added PepsiCo and Mars to the list of international sponsors of the war, accessed November 28, 2025, https://nazk.gov.ua/en/news/you-re-not-you-when-you-continue-to-work-in-the-russian-federation-the-nacp-added-pepsico-and-mars-to-the-list-of-international-sponsors-of-the-war/
26. Consulting-Coaching – Orthodox Jewish Chamber of Commerce, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.ojchamber.com/allindustry/409
27. Top 200 Brands | PDF – Scribd, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/doc/86461601/Top-200-Brands
28. Full text of “Financial Times , 1989, UK, English” – Internet Archive, accessed November 28, 2025, https://archive.org/stream/FinancialTimes1989UKEnglish/Jul%2027%201989%2C%20Financial%20Times%2C%20%2330905%2C%20UK%20%28en%29_djvu.txt
29. Full text of “Financial Times , 1983, UK, English” – Internet Archive, accessed November 28, 2025, https://archive.org/stream/FinancialTimes1983UKEnglish/Feb%2009%201983%2C%20Financial%20Times%2C%20%2328995%2C%20UK%20%28en%29_djvu.txt
30. Boycott List of Shame – Canadian BDS Coalition, accessed November 28, 2025, https://bdscoalition.ca/boycott-list-of-shame/
31. Overall Assessment PepsiCo Inc. (PEP:US) Climate Transition Analysis – Planet Tracker, accessed November 28, 2025, https://planet-tracker.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CTA-PepsiCo.pdf
32. Act With Integrity: The Pepsico Way | PDF | Business Ethics – Scribd, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/636249337/Untitled
33. English Pepsico Global Code of Conduct Booklet-1 | PDF | Regulatory Compliance – Scribd, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/717267124/english-pepsico-global-code-of-conduct-booklet-1
34. Untitled – PepsiCo, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.pepsico.ro/sites/brand-pepsico-ro/themes/custom/sub_barrio_pepsico_brands/images/english_pepsico_global_code_of_conduct_booklet-1-1-1_compressed.pdf
35. Woman Fired After Voicing Support For Palestine – YouTube, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTL7ZXl4xWY
36. 300 employees accuse Apple of “wrongfully terminating” and punishing workers for expressing pro-Palestine views | Talent | HR Grapevine USA, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.hrgrapevine.com/us/content/article/2024-04-04-300-employees-accuse-apple-of-wrongfully-terminating-workers-for-expressing-pro-palestine-views
37. Middle East soft drinks brands enjoy sales surge as American products face boycott, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/uae/2025/02/19/coca-cola-boycott-2025-palestine-gaza/
38. Muslim countries’ local sodas see boost amid Coke and Pepsi boycott over Gaza – CBC, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/coke-pepsi-boycott-1.7313370
39. Pepsi ‘Israeli flag’ logo creates online froth in Lebanon – www.israelhayom.com, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/06/18/pepsi-israeli-flag-logo-has-lebanese-social-media-frothing/
40. Because of its support for the occupation… Pepsi trucks were prevented from entering many areas of Lebanon and the camps. – Dearborn.org, accessed November 28, 2025, https://dearborn.org/preview/because-of-its-support-for-the-occupation-pepsi-trucks-were-prevented-from-entering-many-areas-of-lebanon-and-the-camps-56412
41. PepsiCo Jumps 3.7% After Q3 Earnings: Rally Justified or Overdone? | Nasdaq, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/pepsico-jumps-37-after-q3-earnings-rally-justified-or-overdone
42. Earnings call transcript: PepsiCo beats Q3 2025 forecasts, stock rises – Investing.com, accessed November 28, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-pepsico-beats-q3-2025-forecasts-stock-rises-93CH-4279807