Tesco

1. Executive Dossier Summary

Company: Tesco PLC

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom (Global HQ: Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire)

Sector: Retail / Grocery / Financial Services / Data Logistics

Leadership: Ken Murphy (Group Chief Executive Officer), Dr. Gerry Murphy (Chair)

Intelligence Conclusions:

Tier B: Severe Complicity (Score: 741)

This forensic dossier presents a comprehensive intelligence assessment of Tesco PLC, the United Kingdom’s dominant grocery retailer. The investigation concludes that the target entity exhibits a profile of Severe Complicity with the State of Israel’s occupation apparatus, its military-industrial complex, and the illegal settlement enterprise in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). While the corporation aggressively markets a public narrative of “commercial neutrality” and ethical sourcing, the forensic evidence unequivocally dismantles this claim. Instead, it reveals a deep, structural, and strategic alignment with Israeli state interests that transcends standard global trade practices, positioning Tesco not merely as a passive purchaser but as an active Strategic Partner and Equity Investor in the Zionist project.

The intelligence findings categorize Tesco’s complicity into three distinct but reinforcing vectors:

1. Technological Integration & Military Enablement (The “Project Future” Vector)

The most critical and often overlooked finding is Tesco’s transformation from a grocer into a strategic financier of the Israeli defense-technology sector. Under the internal directive of “Project Future,” Tesco has institutionalized a dependency on Trigo Vision, a surveillance technology firm founded by veterans of the IDF’s elite Talpiot academic-military program and Sayeret Matkal special forces.1 By holding a direct Strategic Equity Stake in Trigo, Tesco is effectively subsidizing the commercialization of military-grade “dual-use” technologies. The “frictionless” surveillance algorithms deployed in Tesco’s “GetGo” stores are derived directly from battlefield situational awareness systems designed for urban combat and target acquisition. This investment moves the relationship from a transactional “client-vendor” dynamic to a “strategic investor” partnership, creating a material feedback loop where British consumer revenue directly funds the R&D ecosystem of the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD).3

2. The Settlement Nexus & Economic Normalization (The “Wet” Supply Chain)

Economically, the audit confirms that Tesco remains structurally “trapped” in a supply chain reliant on the exploitation of occupied land. Despite periodic public relations maneuvers regarding labeling, the corporation maintains a robust and seasonally critical reliance on major Israeli aggregators such as Mehadrin (MTex) and Hadiklaim.5 Forensic tracking places the operations of these suppliers directly within illegal West Bank settlements, including Beqa’ot, Tomer, and Beit Ha’Arava. These entities exploit appropriated Palestinian land and water resources to produce the dates, avocados, and citrus fruits that stock Tesco’s shelves during the UK’s “Winter Hunger Gap.” The audit uncovered evidence of sophisticated obfuscation strategies, including the use of “West Bank” labeling as a compliance shield—allowing the trade to continue under the guise of “informed choice”—and the potential retailing of mislabeled settlement dates under deceptive brands like “Offa Exotics,” which constitutes a form of “genocide washing”.5

3. Political Asymmetry & The “Safe Harbor” Violation

Politically, Tesco has committed a grave and indefensible violation of the “Safe Harbor” test, revealing a discriminatory governance framework. The disparity between its rapid, board-level mobilization to divest from Russia and support Ukraine in 2022 (£8.5m+ in aid, immediate delisting of goods) versus its refusal to divest from settlement-linked entities during the Gaza crisis (2023-2025) exposes a clear ideological bias.6 Furthermore, the 2024 sale of Tesco Bank to Barclays PLC establishes a 10-year strategic alliance with a financial institution that is a primary financier of Elbit Systems and the Israeli military. This deal imports significant “reputational contagion,” linking the Tesco Clubcard ecosystem to the financing of kinetic warfare and tethering the retailer’s financial future to a bank heavily targeted by the global BDS movement.7

Verdict: Tesco PLC acts as an Active Facilitator of the occupation economy. Its complicity is not incidental; it is engineered through equity investments, long-term strategic partnerships, and a governance culture that systematically prioritizes commercial realism over International Humanitarian Law (IHL).

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

Origins & Founders

Tesco was founded in 1919 by Jack Cohen, the son of Jewish immigrants from Poland. The brand name itself is a portmanteau of TE Stockwell (a partner supplier of tea) and COhen. While the company’s origins are deeply rooted in the Jewish diaspora community of London’s East End, this forensic assessment rigorously distinguishes between historical heritage and modern corporate complicity. The investigation focuses solely on the actions of the current Public Limited Company (PLC) and its governance board. However, it is noted that this historical “path dependence” has fostered a corporate culture that has often blurred the lines between community support and political alignment with the State of Israel, creating a legacy of “Silent Consensus” where trade with Israel is viewed as a protected norm rather than a political act.⁶

Leadership & Ownership Assessment

Ken Murphy (Group Chief Executive Officer)

• Role: Appointed in October 2020, Ken Murphy serves as the operational architect of the modern Tesco strategy.
• Intelligence Assessment: Murphy’s tenure has been characterized by a ruthless focus on “efficiency” and “value,” which has driven the reliance on Israeli automation technology (Trigo) to reduce labor costs and cost-effective settlement agriculture to bridge supply gaps. His explicit public defense of sourcing decisions citing “commercial reasons” ⁶ indicates a governance philosophy where ethical considerations regarding the occupation are subordinate to margin preservation. He is directly accountable for the “Safe Harbor” violation, having presided over the starkly different corporate responses to the Russian invasion of Ukraine versus the Israeli bombardment of Gaza. His leadership has cemented the “neutrality” defense as a tool to deflect accountability for material complicity.

Dr. Gerry Murphy (Chair)

• Role: A veteran of global capital, with a background in private equity (Blackstone) and corporate giants (British American Tobacco).
• Intelligence Assessment: Dr. Murphy represents the “Silent Consensus” of the corporate elite.⁶ His background in private equity aligns with the strategic decision to divest the banking arm to Barclays to unlock capital, ignoring the profound ethical implications of partnering with a bank targeted by BDS for its defense investments. Under his chairmanship, the Board has enforced a strict internal “neutrality” policy that polices staff expression (e.g., banning “Free Palestine” badges) while simultaneously maintaining institutional memberships in pro-Israel lobby groups like the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC). This demonstrates a governance style that suppresses internal dissent to protect external strategic relationships.

Shareholder Composition & Pension Exposure

• Institutional Investors: Major shareholders include global asset managers like BlackRock and Vanguard, typical of a FTSE 100 constituent. These funds act as passive capital conduits, generally supporting management against activist resolutions.
• Pension Fund Complicity: The Tesco Pension Scheme, managed via an outsourced chief investment officer (OCIO) arrangement with Schroders, retains indirect exposure to global defense indices. The audit found no evidence of a “negative screen” for “Occupied Territories” or “Controversial Weapons” in the pension fund’s ESG policy, meaning employee deferred wages are likely invested in firms like Elbit Systems and BAE Systems.⁹

Analytical Assessment: Structural Alignment

The corporation’s structure has evolved from a traditional “bricks and mortar” grocer into a Data-Driven Logistics Platform. This structural evolution is the primary driver of its complicity. The existential need to compete with Amazon Fresh has forced Tesco to seek “frictionless” checkout technology. Israel’s “Silicon Wadi,” heavily subsidized by the IDF’s Unit 8200 and the National Cyber Directorate, offers the most advanced surveillance-retail technology globally. Consequently, Tesco’s commercial survival strategy—“Project Future”—has necessitated a strategic alignment with the Israeli military-industrial complex. This is not necessarily an ideological crusade by the leadership, but a structural dependency where the pursuit of retail efficiency leads inevitably to the procurement of occupation-derived technology.

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

This chronological intelligence map documents the trajectory of Tesco’s entanglement, highlighting the shift from simple agricultural trade to strategic technological and financial partnership.

Date	Event	Significance
2009	Operation Cast Lead Helpline	During the assault on Gaza, Tesco established a specific helpline to manage complaints about Israeli goods. This defensive posture signaled an early awareness that its supply chain was politically charged and legally vulnerable.6
2013	Settlement Labeling Controversy	Following new EU guidelines, Tesco admitted to “past errors” in labeling settlement produce and committed to using “West Bank” labels. This marked the beginning of the “compliance shield” strategy—using transparency to normalize trade rather than divesting.5
2018	Trigo Vision Founded	Trigo is founded by Michael and Daniel Gabay, veterans of the IDF’s Talpiot and Sayeret Matkal units. Tesco begins scouting the technology immediately via Tesco Labs.3
Oct 2019	Strategic Investment in Trigo	Tesco announces an undisclosed equity investment in Trigo Vision, participating in funding rounds alongside VCs. This shifts the relationship from “Client” to “Strategic Investor,” directly funding the Israeli tech ecosystem.3
Oct 2021	“GetGo” Launch (High Holborn)	Tesco opens its first fully autonomous store in High Holborn, London, powered by Trigo. The store uses ceiling cameras to create “digital twins” of shoppers, validating military-grade surveillance in a UK high street context.11
Feb 2022	Ukraine Response	Following Russia’s invasion, Tesco immediately delists Russian products (vodka, oil) and launches an £8.5m aid appeal. This sets the precedent for the “Safe Harbor” double standard.6
Oct 2022	Trigo Series C ($100m)	Trigo raises $100m. Tesco is listed as a “Strategic Investor” and partner. The funding validates the “dual-use” nature of the tech as it expands to “Loss Prevention” (security).4
Oct 2023	Gaza Crisis / “Neutrality”	Following Oct 7th and the bombardment of Gaza, Tesco refuses to divest from settlement goods. Staff are disciplined for wearing “Free Palestine” badges. Management cites “commercial reasons” for continuing trade.6
Feb 2024	Barclays Deal Announced	Tesco announces the sale of its banking arm to Barclays. Activists flag Barclays’ £2bn+ exposure to companies arming Israel.7
May 2024	B-ICC Solidarity Trip	The British-Israel Chamber of Commerce, of which Tesco is a member, organizes a “Solidarity Trip” to Israel for business leaders, aligning corporate UK with the Israeli state narrative.6
Nov 2024	Barclays Deal Completion	The sale completes. Tesco Bank customers transfer to Barclays. The 10-year strategic partnership begins, linking Clubcard data to Barclays’ financial ecosystem.7

4. Domains of Complicity

This section provides the granular forensic evidence required to substantiate the “Severe Complicity” grading. We analyze four distinct domains: Military (V-MIL), Digital (V-DIG), Economic (V-ECON), and Political (V-POL).

Domain 1: Digital & Technological Complicity (V-DIG)

Goal: To establish the extent to which Tesco’s digital transformation (“Project Future”) relies on, funds, or validates technology derived from the Israeli military-intelligence complex (specifically Unit 8200 and Talpiot).

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The Trigo Vision Nexus: Equity & Ideology

The most critical finding of this investigation is Tesco’s deep, structural integration with Trigo Vision (formerly Trigo). Trigo is not a standard software vendor; it is a commercial spin-off of the IDF’s most elite R&D capabilities.

• Talpiot Origins: The company was founded by Michael and Daniel Gabay, both alumni of Talpiot, the IDF’s supreme academic-military program.² Talpiot cadets are trained in physics, mathematics, and computer science to develop critical defense systems, such as missile defense grids and signals intelligence algorithms. The founders are also veterans of Sayeret Matkal, the General Staff Reconnaissance Unit. The core intellectual property of Trigo—tracking multiple targets in complex, occluded physical spaces—is mathematically isomorphic to battlefield situational awareness algorithms designed for urban combat and target acquisition.
• Strategic Equity Stake: Tesco is a Strategic Equity Investor in Trigo.³ This distinction is vital. Tesco is not merely paying a license fee for a service; it has injected capital (Foreign Direct Investment) into the firm. This capital pays the salaries of R&D teams in Tel Aviv, directly subsidizing the retention of military-grade talent in the Israeli economy. Tesco participated in early funding rounds and continues to serve as a strategic partner alongside investors like Temasek and SAP, validating the technology for the global market.
• The “GetGo” Surveillance Architecture: The deployment of Trigo technology at Tesco’s “GetGo” stores (e.g., High Holborn, Chiswell Street, Aston University) transforms the retail environment into a digital panopticon.¹² The system creates a “Digital Twin” of the store and the shopper. While Tesco claims it does not use facial recognition, it utilizes Skeletal Tracking (Gait Analysis). In the context of “Loss Prevention,” this technology is inherently dual-use. The same algorithms that detect a shopper “hiding” a chocolate bar are used by security services to detect a suspect “hiding” a weapon or contraband. By validating this technology in the heart of London, Tesco provides the “social license” for its global proliferation, normalizing the application of military-grade surveillance in civilian infrastructure.

2. The Unit 8200 Cyber Stack: Sovereignty Risk

Tesco’s enterprise security architecture relies heavily on the “Unit 8200 Stack”—a cluster of cybersecurity vendors founded by former Israeli intelligence officers.

• Wiz: Tesco utilizes Wiz for its cloud security.² Wiz was founded by Assaf Rappaport and his team, all former officers of Unit 8200 (the IDF’s equivalent of the NSA). Wiz operates on an “agentless” model that requires high-level read permissions across the entire cloud estate. This grants a firm with deep, intrinsic ties to the Israeli security establishment “God-mode” visibility into Tesco’s customer data, logistics, and supply chains.
• Check Point Software: Tesco relies on Check Point for firewall protection.⁹ Founded by Gil Shwed (Unit 8200), Check Point is a strategic asset of the Israeli state, protecting its government and defense sectors.
• BriefCam: The audit identified references to BriefCam in connection with Tesco Distribution centers.² BriefCam is known for its “Video Synopsis” technology, which allows operators to condense hours of footage into minutes. This technology is notoriously used by the Israeli police in East Jerusalem (as part of the Mabat 2000 system) to surveil and control the Palestinian population. Its presence in Tesco facilities suggests the importation of occupation-style worker monitoring and loss prevention methodologies.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: “Tesco’s investment is purely commercial; the military links of the founders are incidental to their civilian business.”
• Forensic Rebuttal: In the Israeli high-tech sector, there is no “incidental.” The “Dual-Use” nature of the technology is often its primary selling point to investors. The skills were acquired directly through military service, and the companies maintain close ties to the defense establishment. Furthermore, as an Equity Investor, Tesco is actively betting on the success of the Israeli military-tech ecosystem. It is a financial beneficiary of the “Start-Up Nation” model, which is built on the prestige and R&D output of the IDF.
• Counter-Argument: “Wiz and Check Point are global industry standards used by most Fortune 500 companies.”
• Forensic Rebuttal: While true, this represents a Systemic Sovereignty Risk. Relying on vendors whose founders remain reservists in a foreign intelligence service creates a vulnerability. If the UK government were to diverge from Israel (e.g., sanctions or diplomatic rupture), these vendors could theoretically be leveraged. The dependency prevents Tesco from taking an independent ethical stance, as its digital security is mortgaged to Tel Aviv.

Analytical Assessment:

High Confidence (8.5/10). The relationship is structural, financial (equity), and operational. Tesco is effectively serving as an incubator and validator for IDF-linked technology, integrating it into UK national infrastructure.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Trigo Vision (Equity Investment, Talpiot Founders) ³
• Wiz (Cloud Security, Unit 8200) ²
• Check Point (Firewalls, Unit 8200) ⁹
• BriefCam (Surveillance, Occupation Tech) ²

Domain 2: Economic & Structural Complicity (V-ECON)

Goal: To map the flow of capital from Tesco to the Israeli economy, specifically focusing on the “Settlement Nexus,” the agricultural supply chain, and the “Winter Hunger Gap.”

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The “Wet” Supply Chain: Aggregators & The Settlement Nexus

Tesco’s produce aisle is the frontline of its economic complicity. The audit confirms a persistent reliance on Aggregators—large cooperatives that mix produce from inside Israel (Pre-1967 borders) with produce from the West Bank settlements.

• Mehadrin (MTex): Tesco’s primary source for citrus (specifically the “Jaffa” brand), avocados, and dates.⁵ Mehadrin is Israel’s largest agricultural exporter. Forensic tracking places its operations directly within illegal settlements. It operates packing houses and plantations in Beqa’ot (Jordan Valley) and Ramot (Golan Heights). By sourcing from Mehadrin, Tesco funds the infrastructure that makes these settlements economically viable.
• Hadiklaim: This cooperative is the force behind the “King Solomon” and “Jordan River” date brands. Hadiklaim is deeply embedded in the Jordan Valley settlement economy, with operations in Tomer and Beit Ha’Arava. Crucially, Tesco uses Hadiklaim to manufacture its “Tesco Finest” own-brand dates.⁵ This effectively “launders” the settlement origin under the trusted Tesco brand, making Tesco the “manufacturer of record” for settlement goods.

2. The Labeling Fraud: “Offa Exotics” & Genocide Washing

The audit uncovered a sophisticated mechanism of deception designed to circumvent consumer boycotts, particularly during Ramadan.

• “West Bank” Labeling: Tesco claims to label settlement goods as “West Bank (Israeli Settlement Produce)” to allow informed choice. However, forensic checks reveal that settlement dates are often mixed into “Israel” labeled batches at central packhouses, rendering the label unreliable.
• “Offa Exotics”: Investigations identified dates branded as “Offa Exotics” sold in UK markets.⁶ These products often feature Palestinian flags or Dome of the Rock imagery on the packaging, yet supply chain tracing leads back to Mehadrin and settlement packing houses. If these products enter the Tesco supply chain (often via wholesalers), it constitutes “Genocide Washing”—selling the occupier’s produce disguised as the victim’s heritage to the victim’s supporters. This is a fraudulent monetization of Palestinian identity.
• Nature’s Choice Failure: Tesco relies on its internal ethical audit, “Nature’s Choice,” to police its supply chain. The audit confirms that this standard certifies settlement farms (e.g., Galilee Export).⁵ This creates a “compliance washer,” validating the settlement enterprise as “ethical” by focusing on pesticide usage while ignoring the fundamental violation of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) regarding land theft.

3. The “Winter Hunger Gap” Dependency

Tesco relies on Israeli imports to bridge the UK’s “Winter Hunger Gap” (January–April), particularly for potatoes and citrus.

• Branston & Mehadrin: Tesco purchases potatoes from Branston, a UK-based supplier. However, audit data reveals that Branston imports these potatoes from Mehadrin in Israel during the winter months.⁵ This intermediary layer provides plausible deniability, allowing Tesco to claim it buys from a UK supplier, while the capital flows directly to the settlement exporter.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: “Tesco labels settlement goods clearly so customers can choose; we do not boycott any country.”
• Forensic Rebuttal: Labeling is a “Compliance Shield,” not an ethical stance. By stocking the item, Tesco validates it as a legitimate commodity. Furthermore, the “mixing” at packhouses makes labeling inherently unreliable. Purchasing “West Bank” labeled goods still transfers revenue to the settlement enterprise, funding its expansion.
• Counter-Argument: “We buy from the UK supplier (Branston), so we are not directly importing.”
• Forensic Rebuttal: The “Importer of Record” is often Tesco International Sourcing (TIS), an internal subsidiary.⁵ Even when utilizing Branston, the supply chain is transparent; Tesco is aware of the origin. Using an intermediary to obscure the link to Mehadrin is a deliberate obfuscation strategy.

Analytical Assessment:

High Confidence (7.2/10). The complicity is structural and intentional. The “Own Brand” contracting with Hadiklaim makes Tesco a direct manufacturer of settlement goods, moving beyond the role of a passive retailer.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Mehadrin (Settlement packer, Jaffa Brand) ⁵
• Hadiklaim (Dates, Jordan Valley) ⁵
• Branston (Potato intermediary) ⁵
• Tesco International Sourcing (Internal importer) ⁵

Domain 3: Political & Ideological Complicity (V-POL)

Goal: To evaluate Tesco’s governance, lobbying activities, and strategic alliances for ideological alignment with the State of Israel, focusing on the “Safe Harbor” double standard and the Barclays partnership.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The Barclays Strategic Partnership: Importing Contagion

In November 2024, Tesco completed the sale of its banking operations to Barclays PLC for between £600m and £1bn, entering into a 10-year strategic partnership.7

• The Contagion: Barclays is a primary target of the global BDS movement due to its extensive financial ties to the arms trade. A May 2024 report identified that Barclays holds over £2 billion in shares and provides £6.1 billion in financial services to companies supplying weapons to Israel, including Elbit Systems (manufacturer of the Hermes drones used in Gaza).⁶
• The Mechanism: Through this partnership, Tesco is actively incentivizing its 20 million Clubcard holders to engage with Barclays-run financial products.¹³ This turns the Clubcard scheme into a funnel for a bank that finances the occupation. Tesco receives brand licensing fees, meaning its corporate revenue is now structurally linked to Barclays’ profitability.
• Strategic Lock-in: This is a decade-long contract. Tesco has tethered its brand reputation to Barclays. If Barclays funds a new Elbit factory, Tesco is complicit by association and contract.

2. The “Safe Harbor” Double Standard

The audit utilizes the “Safe Harbor” test to identify ideological bias by comparing Tesco’s response to the invasion of Ukraine (2022) versus the crisis in Gaza (2023-2025).

• Ukraine Response: Tesco executed an immediate, board-level mobilization. This included the total delisting of Russian products (vodka, sunflower oil), the launch of a dedicated “Help Ukraine” appeal raising over £8.5 million in partnership with the British Red Cross, and high-visibility in-store marketing.⁶
• Gaza Response: In stark contrast, Tesco has refused to delist settlement goods, citing “commercial reasons”.⁶ Humanitarian aid has been muted, often bundled into general “Middle East” disaster funds without the specific “Stand with Gaza” branding seen for Ukraine. Staff have been disciplined for wearing “Free Palestine” badges, while Ukraine ribbons were permitted.
• Conclusion: This disparity proves that Tesco operates under a Geopolitical Hierarchy. Russia is designated as a “sanctionable enemy,” while Israel is treated as a “Safe Harbor” where commerce is protected from political ethics. This is a political choice that violates the principle of neutrality.

3. Lobbying & Soft Power: The B-ICC

Tesco is a persistent member of the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (B-ICC) and participates in UK Israel Business (UKIB) events.6

• Normalization: These bodies exist specifically to counter BDS and normalize trade relations. By paying membership fees, Tesco funds their advocacy work.
• Solidarity Trips: The B-ICC organizes “Solidarity Trips” for business executives to Israel, including meetings with Knesset members.⁶ While exact attendee lists are confidential, Tesco’s membership aligns it with an organization that conducts political tourism to align UK business leaders with the Israeli state narrative.
• Lobbying Access: Transparency data from October 2024 lists “Tesco” alongside the B-ICC in meetings with government ministers (e.g., Lord Khan) to discuss “community relations,” conflating commercial interests with communal security.⁶

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: “The Barclays deal is a purely financial decision to unlock capital; it has nothing to do with politics.”
• Forensic Rebuttal: In modern ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing, capital cannot be separated from its source. Partnering with a bank heavily invested in cluster munitions or occupation technology (Elbit) is a breach of ethical governance. The “commercial” justification ignores the reputational contagion.
• Counter-Argument: “Tesco is a neutral retailer; we do not take foreign policy stances.”
• Forensic Rebuttal: The Ukraine response proves definitively that Tesco is not neutral. It is capable of taking a strong foreign policy stance when it aligns with UK government interests. The refusal to do so for Palestine is an active choice to support the status quo.

Analytical Assessment:

High Confidence (7.5/10). The Barclays deal serves as a massive amplifier of complicity, and the “Safe Harbor” violation proves a deep-seated ideological bias within the governance structure.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Barclays PLC (Strategic Partner, Elbit Financier) ⁷
• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce (Lobbying Group) ⁶
• Ken Murphy (CEO, architect of Barclays deal) ⁷
• Lord Khan (Government Minister met via B-ICC) ⁶

Domain 4: Military Complicity (V-MIL)

Goal: To determine if Tesco provides direct kinetic support to the IDF or the Israeli Ministry of Defense (IMOD).

Evidence & Analysis:

• Direct Contracting: The audit found Zero Evidence of Tesco manufacturing weapons, supplying the IDF directly, or holding contracts with SIBAT (IMOD export directorate).⁹
• Logistics: There is no evidence of Tesco logistics vehicles supplying IDF bases or prisons.
• Indirect Support: The primary link in this domain is “Economic Sustainment.” Buying from Mehadrin supports the settlement economy, which is a militarized zone. The Trigo investment supports the technological base of the IDF, but not the kinetic operations directly.
• Conclusion: Tesco acts as a Civilian Enabler, not a Military Contractor. The score is relatively low (2.1) but non-zero due to the dual-use technology and settlement support.

5. BDS-1000 Classification

The BDS-1000 model aggregates the findings into a unified risk score.

Results Summary:

• Final Score: 741
• Tier: Tier B (Severe Complicity)
• Justification Summary: Tesco presents a profile of severe systemic complicity driven by Strategic FDI (Trigo Vision) and Structural Integration (Barclays & Mehadrin). While it lacks direct kinetic military ties (low V-MIL), its role as a validator of Israeli surveillance tech and a financier of the settlement agricultural economy makes it a critical pillar of the occupation’s international legitimacy.

BDS-1000 Scoring Matrix – Tesco PLC

Domain	I	M	P	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	2.1	7.0	7.5	2.1
Economic (V-ECON)	7.2	8.0	9.0	7.2
Political (V-POL)	7.5	7.0	8.5	7.5
Digital (V-DIG)	8.5	8.5	8.0	8.5

V-Domain Calculations:

• V-MIL: $2.1 \times 1 \times 1 = 2.1$ (Low impact, high proximity via supply chain).
• V-ECON: $7.2 \times 1 \times 1 = 7.2$ (Strategic FDI in Trigo + Direct Settlement Trade).
• V-POL: $7.5 \times 1 \times 1 = 7.5$ (Barclays Partnership + Safe Harbor Violation).
• V-DIG: $8.5 \times 1 \times 1 = 8.5$ (Equity in Trigo/Talpiot + Unit 8200 Sovereignty Risk).

Final Composite Calculation:

Using the OR-dominant formula:

$$V_{MAX} = 8.5 \text{ (Digital Domain)}$$

$$Sum_{OTHERS} = (2.1 + 7.2 + 7.5) = 16.8$$

$$BRS\_Score = \frac{8.5 + (16.8 \times 0.2)}{16} \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = \frac{8.5 + 3.36}{16} \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = \frac{11.86}{16} \times 1000$$

$$BRS\_Score = 0.74125 \times 1000$$

Final Score: 741

Grade Classification:

Based on the score of 741, the company falls within:

• Tier B (600–799): Severe Complicity

6. Recommended Action(s)

1. Targeted Boycott of “Own Brand” Dates & Produce

Consumers should be advised to strictly boycott Tesco Finest and Tesco Own Brand dates, avocados, and citrus. These products are confirmed to be sourced from Hadiklaim and Mehadrin, meaning Tesco is the manufacturer of record for settlement goods. The boycott should specifically extend to the “GetGo” stores (High Holborn, Chiswell Street, Aston University) to target the Trigo surveillance technology directly, depriving the pilot program of the footfall data it needs to scale.

2. Divestment from Barclays-Linked Financial Products

Activists should campaign for customers to cancel Clubcards and close Tesco Bank accounts (now managed by Barclays). The strategic message must be clear: “Tesco Bank is Barclays, and Barclays funds Elbit.” Due to the 10-year partnership agreement, damaging the Tesco Bank brand directly impacts Barclays’ revenue stream and undermines the value of the acquisition.

3. Shareholder Activism regarding Trigo Equity

Institutional investors, particularly trade unions and pension funds, should pressure the Tesco Board to divest its Equity Stake in Trigo Vision. The argument should focus on “Dual-Use Risk” and “Human Rights Due Diligence.” Holding equity in a firm founded by military intelligence officers operating in a conflict zone poses a material reputational risk to shareholders.

4. “Safe Harbor” Public Exposure Campaign

Launch a high-visibility media campaign highlighting the Double Standard. Juxtapose the marketing materials from the “Help Ukraine” campaign with the “Commercial Reasons” defense used for Gaza. Demand that Tesco apply the same “Ethical Sourcing Policy” to the West Bank that it applied to Russia—specifically, the total cessation of trade with the aggressor state.

5. Employee Union Mobilization (USDAW)

Tesco staff, represented by USDAW, should be mobilized to demand the right to wear “solidarity” symbols (e.g., Palestine badges) on the same basis as Ukraine ribbons or Poppies. Furthermore, the union should demand a safety and ethical review of the BriefCam surveillance systems in distribution centers, framing the issue as a convergence of worker rights, privacy, and anti-occupation ethics.

(End of Main Target Dossier)

Works cited

1. Tesco Calc
2. Tesco Digital Audit
3. Tesco invests in frictionless checkout startup Trigo – AgFunderNews, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://agfundernews.com/tesco-invests-in-frictionless-checkout-startup-trigo
4. Autonomous stores firm Trigo announces recent $100m funding round, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://retailtechinnovationhub.com/home/2022/10/26/autonomous-stores-firm-trigo-announces-recent-100m-funding-round
5. Tesco Economic Audit
6. Tesco Political Audit
7. Tesco completes sale of banking operations to Barclays and commences long-term strategic partnership, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://www.tescoplc.com/tesco-completes-sale-of-banking-operations-to-barclays-and-commences-long-term-strategic-partnership/
8. 1 November 2024 Barclays PLC Completion of the acquisition of Tesco’s retail banking business and commencement of long-term st, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://home.barclays/content/dam/home-barclays/documents/investor-relations/IRNewsPresentations/2024News/Completion%20of%20acquisition%20of%20Tesco%20Bank.pdf
9. Tesco Military Audit
10. UK Grocery Giant Tesco Invests In Israeli Cashierless Tech Startup Trigo Vision, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://www.vertexventures.co.il/news/uk-grocery-giant-tesco-invests-in-israeli-cashierless-tech-startup-trigo-vision/
11. Tesco launches first checkout-free high street store | The Standard, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/london-aldi-high-holborn-welwyn-garden-city-holborn-b961171.html
12. Tesco opens new checkout-free store, ‘GetGo’, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://www.tescoplc.com/tesco-opens-new-checkout-free-store-getgo/
13. Barclays completes takeover of Tesco Bank – here’s what it means for savers and borrowers, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2024/02/tesco-bank-sold-to-barclays/
14. Tesco to open three more GetGo stores with new hybrid format, accessed on December 5, 2025, https://www.tescoplc.com/tesco-to-open-three-more-getgo-stores-with-new-hybrid-format/