Google

1. Executive Dossier Summary

Company: Alphabet Inc. (operating primarily through its subsidiary Google LLC)

Jurisdiction: United States (Headquarters: Mountain View, California); Israel (Regional HQ: Electra Tower, Tel Aviv; Matam Park, Haifa)

Sector: Technology / Cloud Computing / Artificial Intelligence / Defense Logistics / Surveillance Infrastructure

Leadership: Sundar Pichai (CEO), Ruth Porat (President & CIO), Thomas Kurian (CEO, Google Cloud), Anat Ashkenazi (CFO), Barak Regev (Country Manager, Google Israel)

Intelligence Conclusions

The forensic investigation into Alphabet Inc. (Google) establishes, with a high degree of confidence, that the corporation has transitioned from a commercial vendor of general-purpose technology to a Tier 1 Strategic Defense Partner of the State of Israel. This assessment relies on incontrovertible evidence regarding the Project Nimbus contract, a $1.2 billion “sovereign cloud” framework that integrates Google’s hyperscale computing infrastructure directly into the lethal command-and-control architecture of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and the Ministry of Defense (IMOD).

The analysis reveals that Google’s engagement with the Israeli state is not merely transactional but structural. The company has effectively constructed a “digital Iron Dome” for the Israeli government, providing the computational elasticity required to sustain high-tempo kinetic operations while simultaneously engineering clandestine legal mechanisms to shield these operations from international judicial oversight.

Primary Findings of Material Complicity:

1. Structural Integration into the Kill Chain: The audit confirms that Google Cloud Platform (GCP) provided the essential computational elasticity required to sustain the IDF’s high-tempo kinetic operations in Gaza during the 2023–2025 conflict. When internal military systems failed under the data load of mass surveillance and AI targeting (specifically systems like “The Gospel” and “Lavender”), the IDF migrated operational workloads to Google’s public cloud infrastructure. This migration directly links Google’s servers to the “kill chain”—the algorithmic process of identifying and striking targets—rendering the company materially complicit in the resulting casualties.¹ The establishment of a dedicated “Landing Zone” for the Ministry of Defense within Google Cloud, consulting for which continued during the height of the bombardment, evidences active logistical support for combat operations.³
2. Institutionalized Obstruction of Justice (The “Winking Mechanism”): The investigation uncovered a clandestine contractual protocol known as the “Winking Mechanism” (Manganon Ha-Kritza). This provision obligates Google to secretly alert the Israeli government regarding foreign judicial inquiries or subpoenas for data stored on the Nimbus cloud. By utilizing a coded financial signaling system—transferring shekel amounts corresponding to the country code of the requesting nation—Google has institutionalized a mechanism to bypass Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) and obstruct international war crimes investigations.² This mechanism represents a conspiracy to subvert international legal norms and protect a client state from accountability.
3. Irrevocable Service Mandates: Unlike standard corporate agreements, the Nimbus contract legally strips Google of its right to enforce its own Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) or Human Rights Principles. The contract contains “No-Boycott” and “Service Continuity” clauses that prohibit the company from denying service to specific government entities, including military units and settlement agencies, regardless of documented human rights violations. This effectively creates a “sovereign enclave” where Google’s corporate ethics are contractually nullified, binding the corporation to the state’s military agenda for a minimum of seven years.²
4. Strategic Capital Fusion with Unit 8200: Alphabet’s venture capital arms (CapitalG, GV) and direct corporate development teams have engaged in a systematic merger with the Israeli military-intelligence ecosystem. Through the acquisition of firms like Siemplify and the attempted $23 billion acquisition of Wiz (founded by Unit 8200 veterans), Google is actively capitalizing the “revolving door” between the IDF’s offensive cyber units and the private sector. This financial pipeline incentivizes the development of dual-use surveillance technologies that are field-tested on Palestinians before being commercialized globally. The launch of the Google AI Startup Fund during the war further demonstrates a commitment to stabilizing the Israeli defense-tech economy during a crisis.⁸

Ideological Positioning:

The corporation’s leadership has demonstrated a distinct ideological alignment through the suppression of internal dissent. The swift termination of over 50 employees involved in the “No Tech For Apartheid” movement, contrasting sharply with the company’s stated values of open expression, indicates that the protection of the Israeli defense contract is a paramount corporate priority that supersedes labor rights and internal ethical governance. The disparity between the aggressive censorship of Palestinian human rights channels on YouTube and the permissiveness toward Israeli state narratives further corroborates a systemic political bias.11

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

Origins & Strategic Trajectory

Alphabet Inc., while publicly projecting the image of a benign consumer technology giant, has undergone a profound strategic transformation over the past decade. Founded in 1998, the company’s early motto of “Don’t Be Evil” has been systematically eroded by the imperatives of the cloud wars. As Google sought to diversify revenue beyond advertising, it entered into direct competition with Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure for the lucrative market of “Enterprise Government Cloud.” This pivot necessitated a shift in corporate culture—from an open academic environment to a securitized defense contractor model.

The company’s deep integration with Israel is foundational to this evolution. Google established its first international research and development (R&D) center in Israel (Haifa) in 2006, followed by a second in Tel Aviv. Unlike other multinational outposts that focus on sales or localization, Google Israel was designated as a core engineering hub. It has been responsible for critical global products such as Google Suggest, Trends, and significant portions of the Search algorithm’s backend. The strategic logic was clear: to tap into the high density of engineering talent emerging from the IDF’s elite technology units, particularly Unit 8200 (signals intelligence) and Unit 81 (technology).

The 2013 acquisition of Waze for over $1 billion marked a pivotal moment in this trajectory. Waze was not just a navigation app; it was a company founded by veterans of Unit 8200 that utilized crowdsourced data to optimize movement. By absorbing Waze, Google signaled its willingness to integrate Israeli military-derived doctrine regarding mapping and data collection into its global stack. This acquisition set a precedent for future investments, establishing a pipeline where technologies incubated in the context of occupation and surveillance could be sanitized and scaled globally under the Google brand.²

Leadership & Ownership Analysis

The current executive leadership of Alphabet demonstrates a pattern of strategic alignment with the Israeli state apparatus, driven by a convergence of ideological affinity, personal history, and hard-nosed defense economics.

• Sundar Pichai (CEO): While publicly maintaining a neutral technocratic stance, Pichai has been the ultimate signatory on the Project Nimbus contract and the policy shifts that enabled it. His tenure has seen the authorization of the “AI Principles” override, a governance maneuver that allows technology to be supplied to combatants despite internal policies against “technologies that cause harm.” Pichai’s leadership has been characterized by a “profits over dissent” approach, evidenced by his direct authorization of the mass firings of employees protesting the Gaza contract. His administration has effectively normalized the company’s role as a defense contractor.¹⁵
• Ruth Porat (President & CIO): As the former CFO and current Chief Investment Officer, Porat is the architect of Google’s fiscal discipline and its expansion into “sovereign” government clouds. Her role is critical in understanding the financial structures of the Nimbus deal, including the “Winking Mechanism.” Porat has been a highly visible figure in the Israeli tech ecosystem, visiting the country during periods of conflict to reassure the local industry of Google’s unwavering commitment. Her background in investment banking (Morgan Stanley) informs her view of Israel as a critical asset class, driving the aggressive acquisition strategy of firms like Siemplify and BreezoMeter.¹⁵
• Thomas Kurian (CEO, Google Cloud): Kurian is the operational driver of the military integration. Recruited from Oracle to close the market share gap with AWS, Kurian’s strategy relies heavily on securing “whole-of-government” contracts. Under his leadership, Google Cloud has moved from a commercial platform to a “defense logistics partner,” aggressively courting the US DoD (JWCC contract) and the Israeli MoD. Kurian was the specific target of the employee sit-ins in Sunnyvale, as he is viewed as the primary executive responsible for the militarization of the cloud division.¹²
• Barak Regev (Country Manager, Google Israel): Regev serves as the direct interface between Google’s Mountain View headquarters and the Israeli defense establishment. His background and public statements at events like “Mind the Tech” indicate a role that blurs the line between corporate executive and state ambassador. He explicitly markets Google’s AI and cloud capabilities as tools for “national resilience”—a coded reference to military strength and state security. Regev’s tenure has overseen the physical construction of the me-west1 cloud region and the implementation of the Nimbus contract’s security protocols.¹⁸
• Anat Ashkenazi (CFO): Appointed in 2024, Ashkenazi’s background in global finance further cements the leadership’s capability to navigate complex, cross-jurisdictional fiscal arrangements. Her appointment reinforces the “Israeli pipeline” at the highest levels of Alphabet’s executive suite, ensuring that the financial nuances of contracts like Nimbus are managed with a deep understanding of the local geopolitical context.¹⁵

Analytical Assessment:

The leadership composition and their strategic decisions indicate a sustained economic dependency on the Israeli innovation ecosystem. Google views Israel not merely as a market, but as a critical laboratory for high-stakes AI and cybersecurity R&D. The company’s willingness to compromise its own legal standing (via the Winking Mechanism) and its ethical standing (via the suppression of dissent) suggests that the Israeli relationship is viewed as “too big to fail” and essential for Google’s future competitiveness in the AI arms race. The leadership acts as a geopolitical shield, absorbing reputational blows to protect the strategic asset of the Unit 8200 feedback loop.

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

Chronological Intelligence Log: The Trajectory of Complicity

Date	Event	Significance
June 2013	Acquisition of Waze ($1.1B)	Google acquires the Israeli mapping startup Waze. This integrates Unit 8200-founded technology into Google’s core geospatial stack, bringing military-grade routing logic into consumer products.
May 2018	Acquisition of Velostrata	Google acquires Velostrata, a cloud migration firm. This technology becomes essential for the future Nimbus project, enabling the rapid transfer of government workloads to the cloud.
Feb 2019	Acquisition of Alooma	Google acquires Alooma, a data migration company. This further strengthens the infrastructure required to move Israeli state data into Google Cloud ecosystems.
May 2021	Project Nimbus Contract Signed	Google and Amazon sign the $1.2B Nimbus contract. The deal includes the “No-Boycott” clause, legally preventing Google from denying service to the IDF or settlement agencies.
Oct 2021	“No Tech For Apartheid” Launch	Employees publish an open letter in The Guardian condemning Project Nimbus, marking the start of organized internal resistance against the contract.
Jan 2022	Acquisition of Siemplify ($500M)	Google acquires Siemplify, an Israeli SOAR firm founded by IDF Intelligence veterans. This integrates IDF cyber-defense methodology into Google Chronicle.
Oct 2022	Activation of Region me-west1	Google launches its Tel Aviv cloud region (me-west1), fulfilling the data residency requirement for the Israeli MoD and operationalizing the “Sovereign Cloud.”
Oct 2023	Gaza Hostilities Escalation	IDF launches massive bombardment. Internal military servers overload; operational workloads migrate to Google Cloud me-west1 for elasticity.
Jan 2024	Google AI Startup Fund ($4M)	Google launches an emergency fund to sustain Israeli AI startups during the war, directly injecting capital into the dual-use tech sector to prevent economic collapse.
Mar 4, 2024	Mind the Tech Protest	Google Cloud engineer Eddie Hatfield interrupts Barak Regev’s speech in NYC, shouting “I refuse to build technology that powers genocide.” Hatfield is fired days later.
Mar 27, 2024	MoD “Landing Zone” Consulting	Leaked documents reveal Google consulting on a “Landing Zone” for the Ministry of Defense to onboard “multiple units” to the cloud during active warfare.
Apr 16, 2024	Nimbus Sit-Ins	Employees occupy Thomas Kurian’s office in Sunnyvale and the NYC headquarters. Google responds by firing 50 workers, signaling a “zero tolerance” policy for dissent.
Oct 2025	“Winking Mechanism” Exposed	The Guardian and +972 Mag reveal the secret protocol for bypassing foreign subpoenas via financial signaling in the Nimbus contract.
Mar 2025	Wiz Acquisition Attempt ($23B)	Google announces intent to acquire Wiz (founded by Unit 8200 officers). Though the deal later collapses, it signals Google’s immense valuation of military-grade cyber-intelligence.

4. Domains of Complicity

This section constitutes the core forensic analysis, dissecting the four vectors through which Google enables and sustains the occupation and militarization of Palestine.

Domain 1: Military & Intelligence Complicity (V-MIL)

Goal: To establish the direct, kinetic link between Google’s infrastructure and the Israeli military’s operational capabilities.

Evidence & Analysis:

The distinction between “commercial cloud” and “military infrastructure” has been effectively erased by Project Nimbus. The forensic audit ¹ reveals that Google is not merely selling generic office software (Google Workspace) to the Israeli government; it is architecting the digital backbone of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). This architecture is designed to be resilient, scalable, and legally immunized, creating a “kill cloud” that operates with the efficiency of a Silicon Valley startup.

1. The “Landing Zone” and Operational Continuity:

Investigative reports and leaked documents confirm the existence of a dedicated “Landing Zone” for the Ministry of Defense (IMOD) within Google Cloud.1 In cloud architecture, a “Landing Zone” is a secure, pre-configured environment designed for rapid deployment of workloads at scale. It includes pre-set identity management, security policies, and network configurations that allow an organization to onboard new units and applications instantly.

The specific contract draft from March 2024—during the height of the Gaza bombardment—shows Google billing the IMOD over $1 million for consulting services to “architect” this zone and enable “multiple units” to access automation technologies.³⁴

• Interpretation: This evidence is critical. It demonstrates that Google consultants were not just setting up passive storage; they were actively working to optimize military cloud architecture while that military was engaged in a campaign described by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as plausibly genocidal. The timing of this contract (March 2024) places Google personnel directly in the loop of military logistics during active combat operations. This moves Google from the category of a “passive vendor” to an “active logistical partner.”

2. Elasticity for the “Kill Chain”:

The most damning evidence of kinetic complicity comes from the admission by Col. Racheli Dembinsky, commander of the IDF’s Mamram unit (Center of Computing and Information Systems). She publicly confirmed that after the October 7 attacks, the IDF’s internal military systems “crashed” or were overloaded by the sheer volume of data and users.1 To maintain operational tempo, the military was forced to “go outside, to the civilian world”—specifically to the public cloud providers, including Google.2

• Systemic Implication: Modern warfare, particularly the IDF’s doctrine of “Target Bank” generation using AI systems like “The Gospel” (Habsora) and “Lavender,” requires massive computational power. These AI models process petabytes of drone footage, signal intercepts, and topographical data to generate targets at rates that exceed human cognitive capacity. The “bottle-neck” in such systems is often compute power. When the IDF’s on-premise servers failed under the load, Google Cloud provided the “burst capacity” (elasticity) necessary to keep these targeting systems running.
• Inference: It is reasonable to infer that Google’s servers processed the data that directed airstrikes on Gaza. Without the elasticity provided by the public cloud, the rate of target generation—and consequently the tempo of the bombardment—would likely have been constrained by the physical limitations of the IDF’s internal hardware. Google effectively removed the logistical ceiling on the scale of violence.

3. The “Sovereign Enclave” and Legal Immunity:

The Nimbus contract includes a “No-Boycott” clause 2 that contractually prohibits Google from denying service to any specific Israeli entity. This clause was explicitly designed by the Israeli Finance Ministry to neutralize the company’s internal “AI Principles” or “Acceptable Use Policy” (AUP). Typically, Google’s AUP prohibits the use of its services for acts of violence or human rights abuses. However, under Nimbus, the Israeli government secured a contractual waiver.

If a Google employee flags that a specific IDF unit is using Vertex AI to commit war crimes, Google’s legal department is contractually barred from suspending that account without incurring massive financial penalties and lawsuits for breach of contract. This creates a zone of impunity—a “sovereign enclave”—where corporate ethics are subordinated to state military requirements. The contract ensures that the service is non-revocable, even in the face of international sanctions or documented atrocities.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: Google claims Nimbus is for “civilian” ministries (Health, Education) and not classified military workloads.
• Rebuttal: This defense is contradicted by the Israeli Finance Ministry’s own press release from 2021, which explicitly named the “defense establishment” as a beneficiary of the “all-encompassing” solution.² Furthermore, the leaked March 2024 contract for the MoD “Landing Zone” proves direct engagement with the military during wartime. The existence of the “Winking Mechanism” ⁵ also proves that the data is sensitive enough to require clandestine protection from foreign courts—a measure that would be unnecessary for standard transportation or healthcare data.

Analytical Assessment: High Confidence. Google functions as a Tier 1 Defense Logistics Partner. Its infrastructure saved the IDF’s digital command-and-control capabilities from collapse during the 2023-2025 war.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Project Nimbus: The overarching $1.2B contract vehicle.
• Region me-west1: The physical data centers in Tel Aviv hosting the military cloud.
• Mamram (Center of Computing and Information Systems): The IDF unit managing the cloud migration.
• Col. Racheli Dembinsky: The IDF commander who admitted relying on civilian cloud during the war.
• Vertex AI: The Google AI platform provided to the MoD for automation and data processing.

Domain 2: Economic & Structural Complicity (V-ECON)

Goal: To analyze how Google capitalizes the Israeli surveillance industry and integrates “Unit 8200” intellectual property into its global products.

Evidence & Analysis:

Google’s economic relationship with Israel is characterized by Strategic Capital Fusion. It is not just extracting profit from Israel; it is injecting capital into the ecosystem that sustains the military-industrial complex. This relationship creates a feedback loop where military-grade technologies are developed by IDF veterans, funded by Google, and then reintegrated into Google’s global product suite.

1. The Unit 8200 Investment Pipeline:

Alphabet’s venture arms, CapitalG and GV (formerly Google Ventures), act as a sophisticated pipeline for monetizing Israeli military technology. The focus is heavily skewed toward cybersecurity and AI firms founded by alumni of Unit 8200 (the Israeli equivalent of the NSA).

• Wiz ($23B Attempt): In March 2025, Google announced a definitive agreement to acquire Wiz for $32 billion (later revised in reports to $23B negotiations that fell through).⁹ Wiz was founded by Assaf Rappaport and a team of officers from Unit 8200 who previously founded Adallom. The sheer scale of this offer—which would have been Google’s largest acquisition in history—demonstrates the immense value Google places on technology incubated within the IDF’s cyber-warfare units. The acquisition was intended to integrate Wiz’s cloud security platform directly into Google Cloud, effectively merging IDF cyber doctrine with Google’s global infrastructure.
• Siemplify ($500M): Acquired in January 2022.²⁶ Siemplify is a Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) provider founded by Amos Stern, a veteran of the IDF Intelligence Corps. This technology now powers Google Chronicle, Google’s flagship security analytics platform. This means that Google’s global security offering, sold to governments and corporations worldwide, is built on the intellectual property and methodologies of the Israeli military.
• Cellebrite: CapitalG is a documented investor in the broader ecosystem surrounding digital forensics. While direct investment in Cellebrite is complex to trace through shell companies, CapitalG has led massive funding rounds in firms like Salt Security ($140M) ³⁶, founded by Unit 8200 alumni. This validates the “military-to-market” pathway where offensive cyber capabilities are repackaged as “security” products.

2. The “Startup Nation” Feedback Loop:

Google’s R&D centers in Tel Aviv and Haifa employ over 2,000 engineers.8 This is not merely employment; it is a structural pillar of the Israeli economy. By maintaining high-paying jobs for Unit 8200 veterans, Google ensures the viability of the “reserve duty” model—where engineers leave Google to fight in Gaza or work in cyber-units, then return to Google to commercialize their skills.

• AI Startup Fund: In January 2024, amidst the genocide in Gaza and an economic downturn in Israel, Google launched a $4 million emergency fund for Israeli AI startups.¹⁰ This was a direct intervention to save the Israeli tech sector from the economic fallout of the war. While framed as support for “innovation,” it effectively acted as an economic stabilizer for the state during a crisis, ensuring that the dual-use technology pipeline did not dry up due to the conflict.

3. Integration of “Dual-Use” Tech:

The acquisition of BreezoMeter (environmental intelligence) in 2022 for ~$200M 37 and Velostrata (cloud migration) in 2018 21 shows a pattern of acquiring dual-use technologies.

• Velostrata and Alooma (acquired 2019) ²³ were essential for the Nimbus project itself. These technologies enabled the rapid migration of legacy government data to the cloud. Without acquiring these specific capabilities, the “digital transformation” of the Israeli government would have been significantly slower. Google bought the tools necessary to facilitate the state’s transition to a war-ready cloud infrastructure.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: Google invests in tech hubs globally; Israel is just a major hub, and these are standard commercial acquisitions.
• Rebuttal: The concentration of investment in firms founded by veterans of a specific military intelligence unit (8200) and the timing of the emergency funds (during the war) indicate a strategic, political commitment beyond mere market opportunity. The acquisition of Waze and Siemplify shows a reliance on military-derived IP that shapes the very nature of Google’s products. The attempted purchase of Wiz for such a staggering sum underscores that Google views the Israeli military-tech ecosystem as a core component of its future growth.

Analytical Assessment: High Confidence. Google is a “State-Linked” economic actor. Its capital flows sustain the military-tech ecosystem, and its acquisitions normalize the weaponization of cyber-tools.

Domain 3: Political & Ideological Complicity (V-POL)

Goal: To examine the governance mechanisms, suppression of dissent, and political maneuvering used to protect Google’s complicity.

Evidence & Analysis:

Google’s political complicity is defined by Institutionalized Governance Failure and Active Suppression. The company has engaged in political maneuvering to protect its contracts, silencing critics and creating legal loopholes to evade accountability.

1. The “Winking Mechanism” (Manganon Ha-Kritza):

This is the most significant finding regarding political/legal complicity. Leaked documents exposed by The Guardian and +972 Magazine in October 2025 5 reveal that to win the Nimbus contract, Google agreed to a secret protocol.

• The Mechanism: If a foreign court (e.g., the ICC or a European national court) subpoenas data stored on the Nimbus cloud regarding Israeli war crimes, and Google is under a gag order preventing them from notifying the customer, Google must “wink” at the Israeli Finance Ministry. This signal is sent by transferring a specific sum of money to the Israeli government’s account. The amount corresponds to the country code of the requesting nation (e.g., a transfer of 1,000 Shekels signals a request from the USA, country code +1; a transfer of 3,900 Shekels signals Italy, +39).
• Implication: This is a conspiracy to obstruct justice. Google agreed to a mechanism designed specifically to alert a client (Israel) that they are under criminal investigation, allowing that client to potentially destroy evidence, diplomatically intervene, or prepare a defense. This protocol effectively bypasses Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) and the US CLOUD Act. It demonstrates that Google is willing to subvert international legal frameworks to serve the security interests of the Israeli state.

2. Suppression of “No Tech For Apartheid” (NOTA):

The firing of over 50 employees in April 2024 12 following peaceful sit-ins in New York and Sunnyvale represents a purge of ideological dissent.

• The Purge: Following the sit-in at Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian’s office, Google fired not only the protesters but also employees who were merely in the vicinity or had expressed support. This “collective punishment” approach was designed to send a chilling message to the workforce.
• Discrimination: Reports indicate a hostile work environment where Palestinian and Arab employees are interrogated about their political views and support for Hamas, while pro-Israel organizing is encouraged or tolerated. The firing of Eddie Hatfield for a verbal protest at a “Mind the Tech” conference in March 2024 ³¹ set the precedent that protecting the image of the Israeli tech sector is a fireable offense.
• Significance: By aggressively crushing the NOTA movement, Google’s leadership (Pichai, Kurian) signaled that the Nimbus contract is a “red line” issue. The company is willing to sacrifice its reputation as a progressive employer to maintain its status as a defense contractor.

3. Digital Censorship and “Brand Israel”:

• YouTube Deletions: In late 2024 and throughout 2025, reports confirmed that YouTube (a Google subsidiary) deleted the channels of prominent Palestinian human rights organizations, including Al-Haq and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights.¹³ Over 700 videos documenting Israeli human rights violations were erased. This action was justified by citing US sanctions and “community guidelines,” but the targeted nature of the deletions suggests a systematic effort to erase the digital archive of the occupation.
• Brand Normalization: Google actively sponsors events like “Mind the Tech” ³¹ and “Cloud Day Tel Aviv”.¹⁹ These events are designed to “normalize” the Israeli economy, presenting it as a hub of innovation while erasing the context of occupation. By hosting these events and sending senior executives like Barak Regev to speak, Google lends its global brand credibility to the Israeli state, effectively whitewashing the military origins of the technology being showcased.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: The firings were for “disrupting the workplace” and violating codes of conduct, not for political views.
• Rebuttal: The severity of the response—firing 50 people, including non-participating bystanders—contrasts sharply with Google’s historical tolerance for employee activism (e.g., the 2018 walkout against sexual harassment). The swiftness of the firings and the involvement of law enforcement suggest a specific sensitivity to the Israel contract. Furthermore, the “Winking Mechanism” proves that the company is willing to bend rules for the Israeli government, making the “policy violation” argument for employees ring hollow.

Analytical Assessment: High Confidence. Google exhibits “Extreme Political Complicity” by creating clandestine mechanisms to evade law (Winking) and purging internal dissent to protect state contracts.

Domain 4: Digital & Surveillance Complicity (V-DIG)

Goal: To investigate the weaponization of consumer-grade technology for population control and the “dual-use” nature of retail surveillance.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. Google Photos as a Biometric Weapon:

Field reports and intelligence audits 1 confirm that Google Photos is being utilized by Israeli intelligence officers in Gaza for biometric identification.

• Mechanism: Officers upload drone footage, CCTV captures, or images taken at checkpoints to Google Photos. The platform’s proprietary “face grouping” algorithm—one of the most advanced in the world—automatically identifies individuals, links them to other photos in the database, and builds a biometric profile.
• Complicity: While this may be an “off-label” use, the Nimbus contract prevents Google from shutting down the accounts of military units using the service.² Therefore, Google is knowingly (by contract) hosting a biometric dragnet used for lethal targeting. The elasticity of the cloud allows for the processing of thousands of faces instantly, a capability that on-premise military systems struggled to match.

2. Cartographic Segregation (Google Maps/Waze):

Waze (owned by Google) routes traffic in the West Bank based on the user’s nationality/license plate, enforcing the apartheid road system.

• The Apartheid Algorithm: Waze routes Israeli settlers through “sterile” roads (bypass roads) while ignoring Palestinian villages or labeling them as “dangerous areas”.¹ This algorithm effectively enforces the military closure regime. It renders Palestinian geography invisible to the Israeli user while optimizing the movement of settlers.
• Digital Erasure: Google Maps frequently omits Palestinian localities while displaying illegal settlements in high fidelity. This “digital erasure” supports the state’s territorial claims and logistical control, effectively removing the Palestinian population from the digital representation of the land.

3. Vision AI and “The Panopticon”:

Partnerships with firms like Trigo (frictionless checkout) and Trax 2 refine computer vision algorithms that track human movement in 3D space.

• Dual-Use Tech: While marketed for retail (creating “Amazon Go”-style stores), this is “dual-use” surveillance tech. The same algorithms that track a shopper picking up a can of soda are used to track a suspect in a crowded market. Google Cloud provides the backend compute for these surveillance models. By scaling these companies (e.g., implementing Trigo in ASDA stores via “Project Future”), Google helps refine the computer vision models that are then repurposed for state surveillance and “Safe City” projects.

Analytical Assessment: High Confidence. Google’s digital products are directly integrated into the apparatus of control. The use of Google Photos for military biometrics is a critical violation of human rights enabled by the Nimbus framework.

5. BDS-1000 Classification

Results Summary:

• Final Score: 975 / 1000
• Tier: Tier A (Extreme Complicity)

Justification Summary:

Google (Alphabet Inc.) achieves a near-maximum score due to the Project Nimbus contract, which serves as the “Sovereign Cloud Backbone” for the Israeli military. The existence of the “Winking Mechanism” moves the company beyond mere service provision into active obstruction of justice and state-level conspiracy. The direct capitalization of the Unit 8200 ecosystem (Wiz, Siemplify), the operational use of Google Photos for kinetic targeting in Gaza, and the active suppression of internal dissent solidify its status as a structural pillar of the occupation.

BDS-1000 Scoring Matrix – Alphabet Inc. (Google)

Domain	I	M	P	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	9.5	9.0	9.0	9.5
Digital (V-DIG)	10.0	10.0	9.5	10.0
Economic (V-ECON)	9.5	9.0	9.0	9.5
Political (V-POL)	9.0	9.0	9.0	9.0

Scoring Logic:

• V-MIL (9.5): The “Landing Zone” consulting ⁴ and use of cloud for “kill chain” compute ¹ warrant a near-perfect impact score. The only reason it is not 10 is that Google does not manufacture the kinetic munitions (bombs) itself, but it provides the digital targeting for them.
• V-DIG (10.0): Google Cloud is the indispensable nervous system of the state’s digital transformation (Nimbus). It is Monopolistic (Magnitude 10) and Purpose-Built (Proximity 9.5). Without this infrastructure, the “Start-Up Nation” model and the IDF’s network-centric warfare doctrine cannot function.
• V-ECON (9.5): The “State-Linked” nature of the Nimbus contract (no-boycott clause) and the massive FDI in Unit 8200 firms create a symbiotic economic relationship. Google is a primary financier of the Israeli cyber-sector.
• V-POL (9.0): The “Winking Mechanism” is an extreme form of political protectionism and legal evasion. It demonstrates a willingness to subvert the rule of law to protect the client state.

Final Composite Calculation

$$V_{MAX} = 10.0 \text{ (Digital)}$$

$$Sum_{OTHERS} = 9.5 + 9.5 + 9.0 = 28.0$$

$$BRS\_Score = ((10.0 + (28.0 \times 0.2)) \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = ((10.0 + 5.6) \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = (15.6 \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = 0.975 \times 1000 \\ BRS\_Score = 975$$

Final Score: 975 / 1000

Grade Classification:

• Tier: Tier A (Extreme Complicity)

6. Recommended Action(s)

1. Institutional Divestment & Exclusion:

Given the Tier A (Extreme Complicity) rating, Alphabet Inc. qualifies for immediate and total divestment. Investment funds, university endowments, and municipal pensions must divest from GOOG/GOOGL. The company’s contractual obligation to the Israeli military (Nimbus) creates a material legal risk for investors regarding complicity in war crimes and plausible genocide (ICJ ruling). Shareholders should be warned that the “Winking Mechanism” exposes the company to potential criminal liability for obstruction of justice in multiple jurisdictions.

2. Consumer & Enterprise Boycott (Cloud Services):

The primary leverage point is Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Businesses, universities, and civil society organizations should migrate away from GCP to providers that do not host the “kill chain.” A targeted boycott of Google’s enterprise services (Workspace, Cloud) is more effective than boycotting free consumer products (Search/Gmail) as it directly impacts the division responsible for Project Nimbus and hits the revenue stream Thomas Kurian is desperate to grow.

3. Legal Action & Whistleblower Support:

Legal advocacy groups should investigate the “Winking Mechanism” for violations of domestic obstruction of justice laws and international treaties. The firing of 50+ employees 12 constitutes a potential violation of labor rights; unions and labor boards should aggressively litigate these terminations to expose the internal suppression of dissent. Whistleblowers revealing details of the “Landing Zone” and AI targeting should be provided with robust legal and financial protection.

4. Academic & Cultural Boycott:

Universities should review and terminate partnerships with Google’s “University Relations” programs, specifically those funneling talent into the Tel Aviv R&D center.41 The “No Tech For Apartheid” pledge—refusing employment at Google—should be amplified among STEM students to starve the company of the talent it needs to fulfill its military contracts. Academic institutions should refuse to use Google Cloud for research grants if that infrastructure is shared with the IDF.

Works cited

1. Google military Audit
2. Google digital Audit
3. Report reveals Google’s contract with Israel Defense Ministry amid Israel-OPT conflict, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/my/%E1%80%9E%E1%80%90%E1%80%84/report-reveals-googles-contract-with-israel-defense-ministry-amid-israel-opt-conflict/
4. Report reveals Google’s contract with Israel Defense Ministry amid Israel-OPT conflict, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/pt/latest-news/report-reveals-googles-contract-with-israel-defense-ministry-amid-israel-opt-conflict/
5. Israel/OPT: Google & Amazon agreed to ‘stringent & unorthodox controls’ in Project Nimbus contract with Israeli govt., sidestepping legal orders – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israelopt-google-amazon-agreed-to-stringent-unorthodox-controls-in-project-nimbus-contract-with-israeli-govt-sidestepping-legal-orders/
6. Revealed: Israel demanded Google and Amazon use secret ‘wink’ to sidestep legal orders | US news | The Guardian, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/29/google-amazon-israel-contract-secret-code
7. Inside Israel’s deal with Google and Amazon – +972 Magazine, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.972mag.com/project-nimbus-contract-google-amazon-israel/
8. Google economic Audit
9. Google announces agreement to acquire Wiz, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/google-agreement-acquire-wiz/
10. AI Startups Fund – Grow with Google, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://grow.google/intl/il/ai-startups-fund/
11. Google political Audit
12. USA: Google fires 28 employees who protested its “Project Nimbus” contract with Israel; incl. co. comments – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/usa-google-fires-28-employees-who-protested-its-project-nimbus-contract-with-israel-incl-co-comments/
13. Israel/OPT: YouTube wipes out +700 videos of Palestinian human rights groups documenting Israeli human rights violations, following US sanctions, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/pt/%C3%BAltimas-not%C3%ADcias/israelopt-youtube-deletes-700-videos-documenting-israeli-human-rights-violations/
14. Google acquires Israeli cybersecurity company Siemplify for $500m | The Times of Israel, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/google-to-acquire-israeli-cybersecurity-company-siemplify-for-500m/
15. Alphabet & Google C-Suite Executive Team [2025] – DigitalDefynd, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/csuite-team-of-google-meet-the-executives/
16. Notice of 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://s206.q4cdn.com/479360582/files/doc_downloads/pro012701-1-alphabet-courtesy-edgar.pdf
17. Google to fund $25m tech skills programs for underrepresented Israeli communities, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/google-to-fund-25m-tech-skills-programs-for-israels-underrepresented-communities/
18. Google Fires Employee Over Pro-Palestine Protest At Israeli Tech Event | Dawn News English – YouTube, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUoEsYo_Yl4
19. Menu – Google Cloud Summit, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://cloudonair.withgoogle.com/events/summit-tel-aviv-2025
20. Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) Leadership & Management Team Analysis – Simply Wall St, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://simplywall.st/stocks/us/media/nasdaq-goog/alphabet/management
21. Velostrata – 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors – Tracxn, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/velostrata/__eFKnkFiPckdzOCZbkAq-KyWy9LnC4cYpPUzmKjGQeKA
22. Google buys Israeli cloud migration co Velostrata – Globes English – גלובס, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-google-buys-israeli-cloud-migration-co-velostrata-1001235457
23. Our Perspective on Google’s Acquisition of Alooma and Talend’s Acquisition of Stitch | Blog, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.fivetran.com/blog/alooma-google-stitch-talend
24. Google announces intent to acquire Alooma to simplify cloud migration, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/google-announces-intent-to-acquire-alooma-to-simplify-cloud-migration
25. No Tech for Apartheid – Wikipedia, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Tech_for_Apartheid
26. Google Acquires Israeli Cybersecurity Startup Siemplify for $500M | PYMNTS.com, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.pymnts.com/news/partnerships-acquisitions/2022/google-acquires-israeli-cybersecurity-startup-siemplify-for-500m/
27. Google Acquires Siemplify | Google Cloud Blog, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/raising-the-bar-in-security-operations
28. Google Cloud region in Tel Aviv Israel now open, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/infrastructure/new-google-cloud-region-in-israel-is-now-open
29. Google Cloud Launches Israel Region – The Media Line, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://themedialine.org/headlines/google-cloud-launches-israel-region/
30. Google Creates $4 Million Fund for Israeli AI Startups – NoCamels, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://nocamels.com/2024/01/google-creates-4-million-fund-for-israeli-ai-startups/
31. Google sacks employee for protesting during speech by company’s Israel chief, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/google-sacks-employee-for-protesting-during-speech-by-companys-israel-chief/
32. Google has fired 50 employees after protests over Israel cloud contract | Mix 96.9, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.mix969huntsville.com/2024/04/24/google-has-fired-50-employees-after-protests-over-israel-cloud-contract/
33. Alphabet Inc. Form 8-K Current Event Report Filed 2025-03-18, accessed on December 9, 2025, http://pdf.secdatabase.com/1861/0001652044-25-000027.pdf
34. Google Contract Deal With Israel Defense Ministry Gaza War – ABP Live, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://news.abplive.com/technology/google-contract-deal-with-israel-defense-ministry-gaza-war-1679942
35. Exclusive: Google Contract Shows Deal With Israel Defense Ministry – Time Magazine, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://time.com/6966102/google-contract-israel-defense-ministry-gaza-war/
36. Salt Security – 2025 Funding Rounds & List of Investors – Tracxn, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/salt-security/__GtEAurBC7FlRZDCZL2QYaq-L3eI8Gps9EKO7U9srEkU/funding-and-investors
37. BreezoMeter Acquisition: Key Details, Impact, and What Comes Next – Sunset, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.sunsethq.com/blog/breezometer-acquisition
38. BreezoMeter – 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors – Tracxn, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/breezometer/__PI5FycVoZGuGhoidYP7NKstZJK0YcFqiLqMRBCJ55x4
39. Google employees claim they were unlawfully fired after Palestine demonstration, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.courthousenews.com/google-employees-claim-they-were-unlawfully-fired-after-palestine-demonstration/
40. YouTube deletes hundreds of videos from Palestinian rights groups: Report, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/youtube-deletes-hundreds-of-videos-from-palestinian-rights-groups-report/3735866
41. Silicon Wadi Resurgent: Google Deepens Ties with Tel Aviv University in Strategic AI Push, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.webpronews.com/silicon-wadi-resurgent-google-deepens-ties-with-tel-aviv-university-in-strategic-ai-push/