Anduril Industries

Key Findings

• Economic: Israeli defence-technology company ASIO reportedly signed an agreement to supply components for Anduril’s unmanned aircraft. February and June 2026 Calcalist reporting establishes a direct commercial relationship, although contract value, payments, component specifications and completed deliveries remain unverified.^{1, 2}
• Political: Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey publicly described himself as a “radical Zionist” in February 2025 and explicitly supported Israel’s continued existence as a Jewish state. This was personal political advocacy, not an official Anduril corporate statement.³
• Military: Anduril entered a strategic teaming agreement with Elbit Systems of America, a subsidiary of Israel-based Elbit Systems, to propose an artillery system for the US Army. Anduril’s planned contribution included Lattice software and military autonomy capabilities. The agreement does not establish Israeli procurement or deployment.^{4, 5}
• Not found: The four domain audits identified no verified Israeli government weapons contract, IDF deployment of Anduril equipment, Israeli state deployment of Lattice, or Anduril settlement operations. During an August 2025 controversy, Luckey was reported denying that Anduril had sold weapons to Israel.⁶

Target Profile

Key Facts:

• Anduril was founded in the United States in 2017 and develops defence technologies for American and allied military customers.^{7, 8}
• Its central software platform, Lattice, supports sensor integration, autonomous systems, battlefield information management and military command-and-control applications.^{9, 12}
• During 2026, the company pursued Israeli defence-sector relationships, prospective government sales, research and development opportunities, and possible local expansion.^{13, 14}
• No public evidence identified of an Israeli controlling shareholder, operating Israeli subsidiary, completed Israeli acquisition or verified Israeli government procurement contract.

Executive Summary

Anduril Industries is a privately held American defence-technology company specialising in autonomous systems, military software, surveillance platforms and weapons. Its products include unmanned aircraft, interceptors, cruise missiles and Lattice, a software platform connecting sensors and autonomous military assets. The company’s established defence business principally serves the United States and allied governments. Its Israeli nexus developed more visibly during 2026 through supplier arrangements, defence-industry partnerships, executive engagement and plans for local commercial expansion.^{8, 9, 13}

The strongest documented economic connection is a reported agreement with ASIO, an Israeli defence-technology supplier. Calcalist reported in February 2026 that ASIO had signed an agreement to provide components for Anduril unmanned aircraft, repeating the relationship in June. Subsequent reporting characterised Anduril as a significant ASIO customer and described the agreement as potentially worth millions of dollars. The public record establishes a reported existing commercial agreement, but independently accessible signed contractual documents, purchase orders, payment records and completed deliveries were not identified. A separate June 2026 agreement with Elbit Systems of America concerned a proposed artillery system for the US Army. It establishes formal collaboration with an Israeli-owned defence group without demonstrating procurement or deployment by Israel.^{1, 2, 15, 4}

The principal political connection concerns Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey. In a February 2025 Shawn Ryan Show interview, Luckey described himself as a “radical Zionist” and supported Israel’s continued existence as a Jewish state. During February 2026, Israeli reporting described his meetings with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli defence officials and defence-technology startups. These activities establish identifiable personal advocacy and engagement with Israeli state and defence-industry representatives. They do not independently establish an Anduril corporate position endorsing specific Israeli military operations, settlement expansion or Palestinian displacement.^{3, 16, 1}

The audits also establish important limitations. No verified Anduril weapons sales to the Israeli government, IDF operational deployments, Israeli military end-user certificates or Israeli state deployments of Lattice were identified. No documented Anduril operations in Israeli settlements or completed Israeli manufacturing facilities were established. Although founders associated with Anduril participated in financing Traysar, the evidence does not identify Anduril Industries as a corporate investor or establish corporate involvement in Traysar’s reported Gaza tunnel testing.^{11, 17, 6}

Under the final human-vetted Complicity Index V6.5 assessment, Anduril receives BRS 298, Tier D - Moderate Complicity. The score is driven principally by documented founder-level political advocacy and direct commercial engagement with an Israeli defence-technology supplier. Political scores 3.44 and Economic scores 1.99. Military and Digital both score 0.00 because the reviewed evidence did not establish qualifying Israeli military supply or digital deployment under those domains’ eligibility requirements. The assessment measures documented involvement within the specified methodology; it is not a judicial determination of unlawful conduct.

Timeline of Relevant Events

Corporate Overview

Anduril Industries is an American defence-technology manufacturer founded in 2017. Its business combines hardware manufacturing with software-based autonomy, surveillance, sensing and military command-and-control capabilities. The company’s portfolio includes autonomous aircraft, underwater systems, interceptors, missiles and Lattice, which connects sensors and operational assets into integrated military systems.^{7, 9}

The company remains privately held. Andreessen Horowitz is an identified investor, and its investment information records a May 2026 Series H financing round of approximately $5 billion at a valuation of $61 billion. These figures describe company financing and valuation; they do not establish Israeli ownership or quantify Israel-related revenues.⁸

Anduril’s documented acquisition history includes American businesses such as Dive Technologies, acquired in February 2022, and other US technology manufacturers. The company also maintains international operations, including a UK business. No completed acquisition of an Israeli-domiciled company was established in the reviewed record.^{21, 22}

The Israeli relationships examined in this dossier have distinct legal and commercial characteristics.

First, ASIO is an Israeli defence-technology supplier reportedly contracted to provide components for Anduril unmanned aircraft. This is the principal directly attributable Israeli supplier relationship.^{1, 2}

Second, Elbit Systems of America is a US subsidiary of Israel-based Elbit Systems. Its June 2026 agreement with Anduril concerns collaboration on a proposed US Army artillery system. The relationship establishes cooperation with an Israeli-owned corporate group, but it does not establish common ownership between Anduril and Elbit or identify financial transfers to the Israeli parent.⁴

Third, Anduril explored establishing local Israeli operations. Reporting described prospective recruitment, research and development, government sales, industrial partnerships and possible acquisitions. September reporting identified Amikam Norkin as the intended local leader, subject to the absence of an official appointment announcement. No verified Israeli subsidiary registration, office address, operating laboratory, factory or completed acquisition was established.^{13, 19, 10}

Fourth, Traysar received financing from investors described as founders associated with Anduril. Traysar is a separately operated company headquartered in Austin, Texas, with an Israeli-US defence-technology identity described in contemporary reporting. Its financing announcement did not identify Anduril Industries as a corporate shareholder or disclose the investment amounts attributable to individual Anduril-associated participants.^{11, 20}

These relationships establish economic and institutional connections with Israel’s defence-technology ecosystem. They do not establish Israeli state control of Anduril, corporate ownership of Traysar or completed Israeli government procurement.

Domain Summaries

Military: Military

Mechanism of Involvement

Anduril manufactures expressly military systems, including autonomous weapons platforms, missiles, surveillance equipment and military command-and-control technology. Its September 2024 Barracuda-M announcement described a family of cruise missiles designed for precision-strike missions. In January 2026, Anduril announced a $23.9 million US Marine Corps contract for more than 600 Bolt-M precision-strike systems.^{23, 24}

These capabilities establish Anduril as a military contractor. The Military assessment, however, requires evidence connecting qualifying military activity to the defined Israel/Palestine target nexus.

The principal relevant military-industrial relationship is Anduril’s June 2026 strategic teaming agreement with Elbit Systems of America. The companies proposed the SIGMA Mobile Tactical Cannon for the US Army’s Self-Propelled Howitzer Modernization programme. Anduril’s planned contribution included Lattice software, battle management, autonomy and command-and-control interoperability.^{4, 5}

Elbit’s SIGMA artillery technology has an existing Israeli military connection. June 2026 reporting described SIGMA equipment in IDF service while discussing the proposed American programme. That connection does not establish that the IDF operates the Anduril-integrated configuration or that Anduril components have entered Israeli artillery systems.²⁵

A second relationship concerns ASIO. Israeli reporting establishes a reported agreement for ASIO to supply components to Anduril’s unmanned aircraft programme. The direction of the identified supply relationship is from an Israeli company toward Anduril. No public evidence identified of completed ASIO-equipped Anduril aircraft, onward Israeli military deliveries or an Israeli operational end user.^{1, 15}

Israeli reporting also documented meetings and discussions involving Rafael, Smart Shooter, Kela, LiteVision and Israeli defence officials. These establish commercial engagement or prospective cooperation. They do not establish completed contracts supplying Anduril military equipment to Israeli forces.^{1, 2, 26}

The final V6.5 military assessment therefore contains no mechanically eligible governing frame. Military Impact, Magnitude and Proximity are each 0.00, producing a domain score of 0.00.

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

Anduril’s strongest documented defence is that its identifiable contracts and announced military collaborations do not establish weapons sales to Israel.

During an August 2025 controversy at National Taiwan University, Palmer Luckey was reported stating that Anduril had no weapons sales to Israel. This is an attributable public denial, although it predates the company’s reported Israeli commercial expansion during 2026 and is not independently audited proof of its complete sales history.⁶

The Elbit America SIGMA arrangement concerns a proposed US Army procurement programme. The reviewed record does not establish a completed programme award, Israeli procurement or deployment of the proposed integrated system.^{4, 5}

Similarly, the ASIO arrangement concerns components reportedly supplied to Anduril. Its existence does not establish that Anduril supplied weapons or targeting capabilities to the IDF.^{1, 15}

No public evidence identified of:

• An executed Israeli Ministry of Defense procurement contract or verified Anduril weapons delivery to the IDF.
• Israeli military end-user certificates or Israel-specific export licences naming Anduril.
• Completed transfers of Anduril missiles, armed aircraft, interceptors or artillery technology to Israeli forces.
• Anduril participation in Iron Dome, David’s Sling or Arrow procurement.
• Anduril equipment used in settlement construction, demolition, checkpoints or military infrastructure within occupied Palestinian territory.
• An Anduril-specific sanctions finding, export-control enforcement action or judicial determination concerning weapons supplied to Israel.

The absence of identified public records does not prove that undisclosed transactions cannot exist. It establishes that qualifying activity was not demonstrated by the reviewed evidence.

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Digital: Digital

Mechanism of Involvement

Anduril’s principal digital product is Lattice, a platform supporting autonomous military operations, sensor integration, detection, tracking, data exchange and command-and-control functions.

Anduril’s developer documentation describes software interfaces through which third-party systems can contribute sensor observations and video information. Its Mobile Sentry platform combines sensors, radar and AI-enabled monitoring for applications including military bases, borders and critical infrastructure.^{27, 28}

These capabilities are relevant to understanding the company’s potential technological applications. Their existence does not establish deployment within Israel or occupied Palestinian territory.

Anduril’s December 2024 partnership with Palantir linked Lattice’s tactical-edge capabilities with Palantir’s AI and data-management infrastructure. In June 2026, the US Army identified Anduril and Palantir as partners in its Next Generation Command and Control data architecture. The disclosed customer was the US Army.^{12, 29}

Anduril also announced a NATO Lattice programme in July 2026, supporting military data integration and interoperability. This is a documented multinational military technology relationship without an identified Israeli deployment.³⁰

The June 2026 Elbit America agreement represents a further technology partnership, but the disclosed project was a proposed American artillery system. The record does not establish that Lattice was delivered to an Israeli military or intelligence institution through this relationship.⁴

The reviewed audits identified no qualifying evidence of Anduril supplying digital surveillance, biometric identification, cloud hosting, AI platforms or offensive cyber capabilities to Israeli state institutions or settlement operators.

Accordingly, Digital Impact, Magnitude and Proximity are all 0.00, producing a final domain score of 0.00.

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

The strongest defence is the distinction between documented software capabilities and verified deployment for a specific Israeli customer.

Lattice’s ability to integrate sensors, video and autonomous systems does not establish that Israeli institutions operate it. Likewise, general military AI partnerships and US Army programmes cannot be attributed to Israel without a documented customer or deployment connection.^{12, 27, 29}

No public evidence identified of:

• Israeli Ministry of Defense, IDF or intelligence-agency procurement of Lattice.
• Deployment of Anduril biometric identification or facial-recognition systems in occupied Palestinian territory.
• Integration of named Israeli biometric products into Anduril’s operating systems.
• Participation by Anduril in Israel’s Project Nimbus government cloud programme.
• Anduril-controlled data centres or sovereign cloud infrastructure in Israel.
• Storage, routing or processing of Anduril-controlled Lattice data through Israeli-controlled infrastructure.
• Israeli or Palestinian civilian surveillance datasets used to train Anduril models.
• Israeli state use of Anduril offensive cyber capabilities.
• A verified Anduril-specific finding by the reviewed UN or specialist NGO sources concerning digital surveillance in Israeli settlements.

The audits’ negative findings reflect accessible material reviewed through 21 October 2026. They do not constitute exhaustive verification of unpublished contracts, classified deployments or every historical database edition.

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Economic: Economic

Mechanism of Involvement

The economic domain contains the clearest documented direct commercial relationship connecting Anduril to an Israeli company.

On 20 February 2026, Calcalist reported that Israeli defence-technology company ASIO had signed an agreement to supply components for Anduril’s advanced unmanned aircraft. The same reporting described ASIO’s involvement in arranging meetings between Palmer Luckey and Israeli defence startups, alongside the Israeli Ministry of Defense’s Directorate of Defense Research and Development.¹

On 21 June 2026, Calcalist again identified ASIO among companies with which Anduril had entered agreements, describing the intended supply of drone components. July reporting characterised Anduril as a significant ASIO customer and estimated the agreement’s value in the millions of dollars.^{2, 15}

The evidence therefore supports a reported existing contractual relationship between Anduril and an Israeli defence-technology supplier.

Its precise commercial performance remains unresolved. The reviewed record did not independently establish the contract price, signed agreement text, component specifications, individual purchase orders, completed deliveries, payment amounts or manufacturing origin of particular components.

The economic significance is consequently the documented commercial engagement benefiting an Israeli supplier through an agreed business relationship, without a verified monetary benefit or completed production transfer.

A second relationship is the June 2026 strategic teaming agreement with Elbit Systems of America. Elbit America belongs to Israel-based Elbit Systems and proposed combining its artillery capabilities with Anduril’s Lattice software and autonomy expertise for a US Army programme. Reporting identified manufacturing activity in South Carolina.⁴

This establishes cooperation with an Israeli-owned defence-industrial group. However, no public evidence identified of completed programme payments, royalties to the Israeli parent, realised Israeli economic benefit or production deliveries attributable to the agreement.

Anduril’s broader Israeli market-entry activities reinforce the commercial context. During June 2026, Globes and Calcalist reported plans involving local recruitment, research and development, prospective Israeli government sales, industrial partnerships, possible acquisitions and potential manufacturing operations.^{13, 19}

These activities demonstrate active market development. They do not establish completed capital expenditure, Israeli payroll, operating facilities, tax payments or recognised Israeli sales revenue.

Traysar and founder-associated investment

On 16 June 2026, Traysar announced a $25 million seed financing led by Silent Ventures, with participation from institutional investors and unnamed founders associated with Anduril and Erebor. Traysar develops autonomous engineering systems for subterranean military operations.¹¹

Contemporary reporting described Traysar as an Israeli-US defence-technology company and identified several Anduril founders as possible individual investors. The reviewed evidence did not verify which named founders participated or quantify their contributions.²⁰

Military.com reporting reproduced by Traysar described prototype testing in a Gaza tunnel, attributed to Traysar co-founder Asher Katz. This is evidence concerning Traysar’s activities. It does not demonstrate that Anduril Industries operated equipment in Gaza or that Anduril-associated investment capital financed the testing.¹⁷

The $25 million financing total belongs to Traysar’s entire funding round. It cannot be attributed to Anduril Industries or to Anduril-associated investors collectively.

Uncompleted Israeli acquisition activity

Globes reported in June 2026 that Palmer Luckey had considered acquiring Kela Technologies. The report stated that Kela’s founders rejected the approach and intended to remain independent. Accordingly, a completed Kela acquisition is disconfirmed by the contemporary reporting.¹⁸

Calcalist also reported Anduril’s interest in LiteVision, an Israeli electro-optical technology company. Separate reporting identified approximately $8 million in initial financing involving 8VC and other investors, without identifying Anduril as an investor. The Israel Innovation Authority separately identifies LiteVision-EO as an Israeli technology company.^{2, 31, 32}

No completed Anduril acquisition, direct equity investment or supply contract involving LiteVision was established.

Economic score rationale

The final examiner-adjudicated assessment assigns:

• Impact 2.90: The reported ASIO agreement establishes direct commercial engagement benefiting an Israeli defence-technology supplier. The score reflects that substantive relationship while recognising the limited verified downstream effect.
• Magnitude 4.80: A reported component agreement, additional industrial collaboration and wider market-development activity establish a meaningful commercial relationship. The magnitude remains bounded by unverified payments, deliveries, contract values and realised Israeli economic contribution.
• Proximity 8.00: The ASIO relationship is reported as a direct supplier agreement with Anduril itself, creating high contractual proximity. This directness supports the score without requiring the unverified assertion that components were delivered or deployed.

The resulting Economic score is 1.99.

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

Anduril can reasonably argue that the available evidence does not quantify actual economic transfers to Israel.

The ASIO arrangement is documented through reporting of an existing agreement, but independently accessible contractual and fulfilment records were not identified. July estimates of a multimillion-dollar agreement should not be presented as verified payments or realised revenue.^{1, 15}

The Elbit America programme concerns a US subsidiary’s proposed American procurement opportunity. Israeli parent ownership does not independently demonstrate that programme proceeds have reached Israel.⁴

The Traysar investments were attributed to unnamed founders associated with Anduril. No verified corporate ownership by Anduril Industries or named individual contribution amount was established.^{11, 20}

The Kela transaction was reportedly rejected, while LiteVision interest did not produce a verified Anduril investment or acquisition.^{18, 31}

No public evidence identified of:

• Completed Israeli Ministry of Defense procurement or recognised Israeli customer revenue.
• Verified capital expenditure on an Israeli Anduril factory, office or laboratory.
• A completed Israeli operating subsidiary acquisition.
• Israeli corporation-tax payments, payroll liabilities or verified employee numbers.
• Direct Anduril corporate investment in Traysar.
• Quantified transfers from Anduril-associated investors into Israeli operations.
• Profits or royalties remitted to Israel through the Elbit America arrangement.
• Israeli sovereign-bond holdings or financing of settlement infrastructure.
• Settlement-origin sourcing, settlement-derived revenue or business operations within an identified Israeli settlement.

These findings limit the attributable economic effect and prevent the broader Israeli commercial ecosystem from being treated as automatically owned, funded or controlled by Anduril.

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Political: Political

Mechanism of Involvement

The principal political finding is Palmer Luckey’s directly attributable public advocacy concerning Israel.

In a Shawn Ryan Show interview publicised in February 2025, Luckey described himself as a “radical Zionist” and expressly supported Israel’s continued existence as a Jewish state. He explained his position through references to Jewish historical experience and security.³

This constitutes explicit personal ideological advocacy by an Anduril founder. Its significance within Political derives from the speaker’s direct connection to the target company and the stated political position.

The statement must nevertheless be interpreted precisely. Supporting Israel’s continued existence as a Jewish state does not independently establish support for settlement expansion, particular Gaza military operations, forced displacement or violations of international humanitarian law. The reviewed audits did not identify verified Luckey statements expressly endorsing those specific activities.

The record also does not establish that Luckey’s interview represented an official statement issued by Anduril Industries.

Israeli governmental and defence-sector engagement

Calcalist reported in February 2026 that Luckey visited Israel and met Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, senior defence officials and representatives of Israeli defence-technology companies.¹⁶

Separate reporting described meetings with approximately ten Israeli startups facilitated by the Ministry of Defense’s research and development directorate and ASIO. Named participants included companies developing military and dual-use technologies.¹

June 2026 reporting subsequently described Anduril CEO Brian Schimpf’s planned engagement with Israeli government and defence-industry representatives, including contacts involving Elbit Systems, Rafael and the defence research establishment.^{14, 26}

These interactions establish reported engagement with Israeli state and defence-industry institutions. They do not independently establish agreements on Israeli government policy or a corporate commitment to support particular military operations.

In September 2026, Globes reported that retired Israeli Air Force commander Amikam Norkin had been selected to manage Anduril’s Israeli operations, including prospective Ministry of Defense and IDF relationships. The publication expressly stated that the appointment had not been officially announced.¹⁰

Consequently, the reported selection is evidence of intended institutional positioning, while verified commencement of employment and the precise contractual terms remain unresolved.

Political lobbying and financing

Anduril participates in registered US federal lobbying. The US House lobbying registry identifies the company under registrant number 44934. Aggregated disclosure records describe lobbying involving defence, appropriations, intelligence, homeland security, foreign relations and technology.^{33, 34}

The reviewed research identified approximately $2.83 million in reported lobbying activity during 2025 and $1.37 million across available 2026 filings. These figures concern general US federal lobbying activity and cannot be attributed to Israel-specific objectives without additional evidence.³⁴

Anduril also maintains a federally registered political action committee, FEC committee C00763623. The audited reporting period covering January 2025 to July 2026 recorded approximately $218,668 in receipts, $184,770 in disbursements and $178,500 in contributions to other committees. These records establish US electoral-financing activity without proving support for any particular Israel-Palestine policy.³⁵

An August 2026 Guardian investigation also described substantial personal Republican fundraising and political contributions by Palmer Luckey. The reported activity concerns US domestic politics and does not independently establish donations to Israeli military-support or settlement organisations.³⁶

The reviewed audits identified no verified company-specific lobbying expenditure for Israeli military assistance, anti-BDS legislation, settlement expansion or restrictions on Palestinian advocacy.

Public corporate positioning

Anduril publicly communicates about military technology and allied defence requirements. Its website and military announcements describe its role in developing autonomous systems, command-and-control platforms and defence equipment.⁹

No public evidence identified of an official Anduril statement specifically addressing Palestinian civilian casualties, the legality of Israel’s occupation, settlement expansion or Gaza humanitarian conditions.

The absence of an identified public statement is an evidentiary finding about the reviewed record. It does not independently establish institutional approval of particular Israeli policies.

Political score rationale

The final examiner-adjudicated assessment assigns:

• Impact 6.50: Luckey’s explicit and directly attributable ideological advocacy constitutes a high-impact political statement within the framework’s target lens. It is evidence of personal political legitimation of Israel’s continued existence as a Jewish state, without establishing an official corporate endorsement of particular Israeli government actions.
• Magnitude 3.70: The governing evidence is one identified founder interview. Additional reported institutional contacts provide context, but the record does not establish a sustained corporate advocacy campaign, large-scale Israel-specific political financing or official policy programme.
• Proximity 9.00: The governing political expression came directly from Anduril’s co-founder rather than from an unrelated intermediary. Its attribution to Luckey is therefore very high, while remaining distinct from official corporate speech.

The resulting Political score is 3.44, the highest of the four assessed domains.

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

Anduril’s strongest defence is that Palmer Luckey’s personal political beliefs cannot automatically be attributed to the company as a formal institutional position.

The February 2025 statement was made during an external interview. No audited evidence establishes an Anduril board resolution, official corporate policy or company-wide political programme adopting the precise statement.³

The substance of the statement also has clear limits. Support for Israel’s existence as a Jewish state does not, by itself, prove support for occupation, settlement expansion, attacks on civilians or particular government decisions.

Reported meetings with Netanyahu and defence officials establish political and institutional access, but do not demonstrate agreement with every policy of those officials or participation in decisions about military operations.¹⁶

Similarly, federal lobbying and PAC expenditure concern a range of American political and defence issues. The reviewed filings do not establish that the identified expenditure funded Israel-specific lobbying or anti-Palestinian legislation.^{33, 35}

The company’s response to August 2026 protests outside its Seattle-area offices also focused on respect for freedom of speech and support for military personnel. The reporting did not establish a formal Palestine-specific boycott dispute or retaliatory employee disciplinary action.³⁷

No public evidence identified of:

• An official Anduril statement endorsing Israeli settlement expansion or forced Palestinian displacement.
• Verified founder or executive endorsement of particular Israeli military operations in Gaza.
• Corporate donations to the IDF, Friends of the Israel Defense Forces, JNF/KKL or settlement-promotion organisations.
• Identified Anduril lobbying specifically for anti-BDS laws or settlement policy.
• Executive leadership positions in named Israeli state political-advocacy organisations.
• Anduril retaliation against employees for Palestine-related expression.
• Verified settlement-related political sponsorship.
• A company-specific judicial or regulatory finding concerning political activity in occupied Palestinian territory.

These limitations are material to the distinction between personal founder advocacy, business engagement and formal corporate political action.

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Complicity Index Score

Method: Complicity Index V6.5, final human-vetted and examiner-adjudicated assessment.

• V_MAX: 3.44 Avg_OTHERS: 0.66
• BRS Score: 298 Tier: D (Moderate Complicity)

Political establishes the governing maximum score through Palmer Luckey’s documented personal political advocacy. Economic contributes through the reported ASIO supplier agreement, while Military and Digital remain zero because no qualifying Israeli military supply or digital deployment was established.

The result follows a scale-free, evidence-only, human-vetted method. It assesses the character, magnitude and proximity of documented involvement rather than company size, general military capability or unverified allegations.

The V6.5 domain calculation is:

V = I × min(M/7, 1) × min(P/7, 1)

The final Complicity Index calculation is:

BRS = ((V_MAX + 0.2 × Avg_OTHERS) / 12) × 1000

Using the final adjudicated domain scores produces BRS 298, within the Tier D band of 200–399.

Methodology Note

• Evidence-only assessment: This dossier synthesises the four Anduril domain audits completed on 21 October 2026: Military, Digital, Economic and Political. Every positive attribution derives from the documented audit record. Reported allegations, contemplated transactions and unverified assertions are distinguished from completed, confirmed conduct. The final V6.5 values are fixed examiner-adjudicated results.

• Scale-free scoring: Impact (I) measures the type and significance of the qualifying activity; Magnitude (M) measures its established scale; and Proximity (P) measures directness to the company and the defined Israel/Palestine nexus. Large corporate revenues, substantial military capabilities or company valuation do not automatically produce high scores.

• Temporal treatment: Evidence is evaluated according to its documented timing and continuity. Divested, terminated or exited operations must be discounted or mitigated where supported by evidence. Prospective acquisitions, proposed contracts and intended facilities cannot be treated as completed transactions. The 2026 Anduril relationships are assessed according to their recorded status through 21 October 2026.

• Entity attribution: Corporate acts, subsidiary activities, founder statements, personal investments and independently operated companies are separately attributed. A parent company’s nationality, a partner’s operations or an individual’s association does not establish transitive corporate responsibility. Traysar’s reported Gaza testing therefore remains attributable to Traysar without verified Anduril corporate involvement.

• Settlement and domain allocation: Verified settlement operations may qualify separately under Economic and Political where the economic activity and political nexus satisfy the applicable rules. Such dual-domain treatment requires independent evidence and is not inferred from general Israeli commercial activity. No qualifying Anduril settlement operation was established.

• Negative findings and uncertainty: The phrase “No public evidence identified” is used where the audits found no accessible evidence establishing a specific claim. It does not assert universal nonexistence. Unverified component deliveries, individual investments, prospective facilities, official appointments and completed Israeli government contracts are retained as unresolved where appropriate. The final assessment preserves exculpatory findings and excludes claims that do not satisfy the evidentiary threshold.