INDEX / DIRECTORY / MANUFACTURING & DEFENSE / DEFENSE & AEROSPACE

Defense & Aerospace

22 companies assessed under the Complicity Index methodology · ranked by complicity score, from Elbit Systems (933/1000, Tier Extreme) down · 14 scored Tier A or B.

Every score is evidence-led and traceable: each dossier cites public sources across the four assessment domains - military, digital, economic and political. Higher scores indicate more documented material support. How scoring works →

  1. 1 Elbit Systems Israel 69 cited sources 933 A
  2. 2 Lockheed Martin 194 cited sources 868 A
  3. 3 Raytheon Technologies 52 cited sources 852 A
  4. 4 Boeing 42 cited sources 842 A
  5. 5 Leonardo 106 cited sources 836 A
  6. 6 Northrop Grumman 78 cited sources 796 B
  7. 7 General Dynamics 74 cited sources 751 B
  8. 8 BAE Systems 99 cited sources 740 B
  9. 9 Safran 101 cited sources 719 B
  10. 10 L3Harris Technologies 87 cited sources 694 B
  11. 11 Airbus 133 cited sources 657 B
  12. 12 General Electric 116 cited sources 632 B
  13. 13 Thales Group 82 cited sources 622 B
  14. 14 Rolls-Royce 110 cited sources 620 B
  15. 15 Dassault Aviation 91 cited sources 594 C
  16. 16 Kongsberg Gruppen 92 cited sources 581 C
  17. 17 SpaceX 140 cited sources 562 C
  18. 18 Saab AB 79 cited sources 306 D
  19. 19 Anduril Industries 69 cited sources 298 D
  20. 20 Rheinmetall 38 cited sources 283 D
  21. 21 General Atomics 71 cited sources 264 D
  22. 22 Helsing 75 cited sources 0 E

Lowest-scoring in this category

Least documented complicity of the 22 assessed - a lower score means less evidence was found, not that a company is endorsed.

  1. Helsing 75 cited sources 0 E
  2. General Atomics 71 cited sources 264 D
  3. Rheinmetall 38 cited sources 283 D

More in Manufacturing & Defense

Heavy Machinery2 Industrial & Conglomerates10