Dolce & Gabbana DIGITAL

Enterprise Technology Stack & Vendor Relationships

• Dolce & Gabbana S.r.l. is identified in the company’s terms as an Italian company registered at Via Goldoni 10, 20129 Milan ¹.

• The group’s December 2024 Code of Ethics describes D&G S.r.l. and its subsidiaries as creating, producing, and directly distributing branded fashion, accessories, watches, jewellery, and beauty products ².

• A North American retail-infrastructure vacancy describes store and corporate network connectivity, firewalls, POS systems, backups, business-continuity routines, cloud/SaaS integration, and residual on-premises servers ³.

• The vacancy lists Microsoft 365 and Azure as example knowledge areas, but it does not establish either company as a contracted group-wide supplier ³.

• Temera identifies Dolce & Gabbana as a client of its Virtual Store suite, launched in November 2020, with virtual-boutique, video-call, catalogue, wishlist, and distributed order-management functions ⁴.

• Powerfront’s 2026 case study states that Dolce & Gabbana added Agentic AI to its existing INSIDE customer-engagement infrastructure and integrated it with order-management, inventory, and customer-profile systems ⁵.

• No public evidence identified of a verified relationship with an Israeli-origin enterprise-software, cybersecurity, or managed-technology vendor.

Surveillance, Biometrics & Retail Technology

• Dolce & Gabbana Beauty’s Photo Booth notice states that the service processes face images, contact details, and necessary technical data while expressly stating that it does not collect or process biometric data ⁶.

• The notice identifies AWS, Google Cloud, Booth Events, and Solodigitalis app systems as short-term storage systems for images and associated contact data, with automatic deletion after no more than 30 minutes ⁶.

• The notice does not disclose a cloud region, Israeli processing location, or Israeli legal-access pathway for Photo Booth data ⁶.

• Vogue reports that Ffface works with Dolce & Gabbana and other luxury brands on tailored interactive AI storefront products ⁷.

• Vogue’s discussion of Look AI analytics refers to possible use by “some” brands and does not identify Dolce & Gabbana as using facial recognition, gait analysis, behavioural analytics, or biometric identification ⁷.

• No public evidence identified of Dolce & Gabbana’s use of Israeli-origin facial-recognition, social-monitoring, predictive-policing, or workforce-surveillance technology.

Cloud Infrastructure, Data Residency & Sovereign Cloud Participation

• Dolce & Gabbana’s Middle East privacy notice states that profiling and marketing data are stored in the company’s CRM system on a server located in Italy ⁸.

• The notice states that, where consent applies, data may be transferred abroad using applicable safeguards and may be accessible to foreign governments under a lawful order in the recipient country ⁸.

• An earlier company privacy notice likewise identifies an Italy-based CRM server for marketing and profiling data, while stating that group subsidiaries worldwide may act as external processors and that transfers abroad may occur under applicable safeguards ⁹.

• The earlier notice lists identity and contact data, purchase information, tax-free or passport information, preferences, and purchase history among CRM-context data categories ⁹.

• The available notices do not identify Israel as a storage, routing, processing, or lawful-access jurisdiction ^{6, 8, 9}.

• No public evidence identified of Israeli data-centre infrastructure operated or leased by Dolce & Gabbana, Project Nimbus participation, or data-sovereignty services supplied to Israeli state or military bodies.

Defence, Intelligence & Security Sector Technology Relationships

• The corporate subsidiaries directory lists group entities across Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas, but does not name an Israeli entity, branch, or office ¹⁰.

• This directory-based result is limited to disclosed entities and does not exclude undisclosed contractors, distributors, franchisees, affiliates, or suppliers ¹⁰.

• The supplied document-scoped review found no Dolce & Gabbana mention in the cited UN Human Rights Council report on the economy of occupation and genocide ¹¹.

• The supplied review also found no Dolce & Gabbana mention in the identified OHCHR settlement-database updates ¹².

• No public evidence identified of technology contracts, digital-product provision, cloud services, cyber services, or other arrangements between Dolce & Gabbana and the Israeli Ministry of Defence, IDF, intelligence bodies, or other Israeli security agencies.

• No public evidence identified of offensive-cyber capabilities, exploit tools, or digital-weapons development, sale, licensing, maintenance, or deployment by Dolce & Gabbana.

AI, Algorithmic & Autonomous Systems

• Powerfront describes Dolce & Gabbana’s Agentic AI deployment as supporting product recommendations, order tracking, and customer-service interactions through integrations with commercial customer, inventory, and order systems ⁵.

• The cited case study describes retail and customer-service functions and does not identify an Israeli state, military, law-enforcement, or occupied-territory customer or deployment ⁵.

• Ffface’s reported relationship with Dolce & Gabbana concerns interactive AI storefront products rather than a disclosed security, state-sector, or surveillance deployment ⁷.

• No public evidence identified that Dolce & Gabbana has provided AI or machine-learning systems, computer vision, autonomous decision support, training data, or autonomous tracking systems to Israeli state, military, or security bodies.

Technology Ecosystem & R&D Footprint

• The company’s disclosed subsidiary directory identifies entities in numerous jurisdictions but does not list an Israeli R&D centre, engineering office, innovation lab, or corporate office ¹⁰.

• Dolce & Gabbana’s Code identifies founders Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana as continuing creative and strategic figures in group activities ².

• UK Companies House records Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana as active persons with significant control of Dolce & Gabbana UK Limited, each holding more than 25% but not more than 50% of shares ¹³.

• Associated Press reported that Stefano Gabbana’s resignation from oversight roles took effect on 1 January 2026, that Alfonso Dolce became chair later that month, and that Stefano Gabbana retained a creative role ¹⁴.

• No public evidence identified of Dolce & Gabbana-operated Israeli R&D facilities, accelerators, technology-company acquisitions, technology-fund investments, or material co-development arrangements with Israeli-domiciled entities or research institutions.

Civil Society Scrutiny & Regulatory History

• The supplied review found no Dolce & Gabbana mention in the specified editions of the cited UN, OHCHR, and civil-society-report corpus, a result limited to those documents and editions ^{11, 12}.

• Dolce & Gabbana’s boutique directory lists two boutiques in Tel Aviv and does not identify locations in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, or the Golan Heights ¹⁵.

• The directory does not describe technology provision, government customers, security-sector activity, or a settlement relationship ¹⁵.

• Ynetnews reported that Dolce & Gabbana Beauty cosmetics became officially available in Israel through Beauty & Co, part of the Schestowitz Group ¹⁶.

• That report concerns consumer-beauty importation and distribution rather than an enterprise-technology, cloud, security, military, or state contract ¹⁶.

• No public evidence identified of a boycott or divestment campaign specifically concerning Dolce & Gabbana technology provision to Israel or occupied territories, or of a regulatory, export-control, sanctions, or technology-sales proceeding involving such provision.