INDEX / DIRECTORY / FOOD & BEVERAGE / FMCG & BRANDS

FMCG & Brands

17 companies assessed under the Complicity Index methodology · ranked by complicity score, from Nestle (819/1000, Tier Extreme) down · 3 scored Tier A or B.

Every score is evidence-led and traceable: each dossier cites public sources across the four assessment domains - military, digital, economic and political. Higher scores indicate more documented material support. How scoring works →

  1. 1 Nestle 73 cited sources 819 A
  2. 2 SodaStream Israel ↳ PepsiCo 74 cited sources 714 B
  3. 3 Danone 48 cited sources 678 B
  4. 4 Mars 109 cited sources 592 C
  5. 5 Unilever 112 cited sources 580 C
  6. 6 Coca-Cola 119 cited sources 578 C
  7. 7 Birds Eye 109 cited sources 572 C
  8. 8 PepsiCo 66 cited sources 561 C
  9. 9 Walkers ↳ PepsiCo 122 cited sources 561 C
  10. 10 Sabra Hummus 66 cited sources 556 C
  11. 11 Ferrero 123 cited sources 522 C
  12. 12 Heinz 45 cited sources 329 D
  13. 13 Kelloggs 139 cited sources 324 D
  14. 14 Cadbury 87 cited sources 309 D
  15. 15 Lotus Bakeries 66 cited sources 292 D
  16. 16 Lindt 66 cited sources 243 D
  17. 17 Warburtons 135 cited sources 0 E

Lowest-scoring in this category

Least documented complicity of the 17 assessed - a lower score means less evidence was found, not that a company is endorsed.

  1. Warburtons 135 cited sources 0 E
  2. Lindt 66 cited sources 243 D
  3. Lotus Bakeries 66 cited sources 292 D

More in Food & Beverage