Alteryx

Key Findings

• Economic: Israeli market access is documented through distributor self-descriptions by ONE Technologies/One BI and a reported Aqurate sub-distribution arrangement; the evidence does not identify customers, contracts, or settlement-related activity.^{1, 2, 3}
• Political: No public evidence identified of corporate Israel/Palestine statements, Israeli state partnerships, or conflict-related financing, lobbying, or logistics support.^{4, 5}
• Digital: Alteryx documentation places Auto Insights hosting in the United States, Australia, and Europe through Germany; no public evidence identified of Israeli hosting, a local data centre, Project Nimbus participation, or Israeli security deployment.^{6, 7}
• Not found: No public evidence identified of Israeli military, intelligence, law-enforcement, weapons, targeting, settlement-infrastructure, or surveillance relationship.^{4, 8, 9}

Target Profile

Key Facts:

• Alteryx was organized in California as SRC, LLC in 1997, renamed Alteryx, LLC in 2010, and converted to a Delaware corporation in 2011.¹⁰
• Alteryx’s disclosed office list includes locations in the United States, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, France, Czech Republic, India, Singapore, and Australia, but does not list an Israeli office; this is not conclusive evidence of no Israeli activity.¹⁶
• Its FY2023 subsidiary register did not list an Israel-incorporated subsidiary as of 31 December 2023.¹⁷

Executive Summary

Alteryx is an enterprise software company whose public materials describe analytics automation, data preparation, machine learning, AI, and related cloud-enabled services.^{10, 11} The documentary record establishes a limited commercial Israel nexus through distribution claims: ONE Technologies and One BI each describe themselves as holding exclusive Alteryx distribution rights in Israel, while a 7 August 2023 report stated that Aqurate would market Alteryx products as a One BI sub-distributor and service Trifacta customers in Israel.^{1, 2, 3} These are channel and market-access indicators, not evidence of identified end users or direct Alteryx contracts.

The audits do not establish an Alteryx-operated Israeli office, R&D centre, data centre, Israeli subsidiary, Israeli acquisition, Israeli state contract, settlement operation, or deployment with Israeli military, intelligence, police, or other security bodies.^{4, 6, 7, 16, 17} Alteryx’s available hosting documentation identifies Auto Insights hosting in the United States, Australia, and Europe through Germany, not Israel.⁶ The reviewed materials likewise do not identify Project Nimbus participation, Israeli-controlled cloud infrastructure, biometric or surveillance products, offensive cyber tools, or AI-enabled targeting applications for Israeli state actors.^{6, 7, 8}

The strongest documented vector is therefore economic and political-market proximity arising from Israel-focused distribution claims, coupled with unresolved visibility into end users and the continuing status of the reported Aqurate arrangement.^{1, 2, 3} This evidence does not support attributing the separate government-supply claims of ONE Harel, a division in the ONE Technologies group, to Alteryx: the cited ONE Harel material does not establish that Alteryx products were supplied to those government customers.¹⁸

The record is also substantially exculpatory. No public evidence identified of defence procurement, weapons-system supply, military logistics, settlement-infrastructure work, Israeli state-security deployments, or conflict-related corporate advocacy or financing.^{4, 5, 8, 9} Document-scoped scans found no Alteryx reference in specified UN, OHCHR, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch materials; those results do not prove absence from all records, parent entities, affiliates, or future updates.^{19, 20, 21, 22}

Under the fixed, human-vetted V6.5 assessment, Alteryx receives a BRS score of 307, placing it in Tier D (Moderate Complicity). The score reflects documented commercial distribution exposure and unresolved end-user visibility, while assigning zero scores to military and digital domains because the audits did not substantiate involvement in those areas.

Timeline of Relevant Events

Corporate Overview

Alteryx’s reported business is enterprise software rather than physical manufacturing, construction, or infrastructure provision. Its public materials characterize its offering as analytics, machine learning, AI, automation, and data-preparation software, distributed through direct and indirect channels including technology alliances, solution providers, strategic integrators, resellers, and cloud-service providers.^{10, 11, 23}

Following the March 2024 transaction, Alteryx remained the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Azurite Intermediate Holdings, Inc. Azurite Merger Sub, Inc. merged into Alteryx, while Azurite Software Intermediate Holdings, Inc. was identified as the holding company’s sole stockholder in the merger-completion filing.^{12, 13} Clearlake and Insight funds jointly acquired control, but the reviewed post-closing materials do not disclose their relative equity allocation, voting rights, or ultimate beneficial owners.^{13, 24}

The audited record does not identify an Alteryx Israel-incorporated subsidiary or company-operated Israeli office. The documented Israel connection is reseller-channel related: ONE Technologies and One BI make undated claims of exclusive Alteryx distribution rights in Israel, and Aqurate was reported in 2023 as a One BI sub-distributor.^{1, 2, 3} Alteryx’s licence terms contemplate reseller, partner, distributor, and OEM arrangements, but do not identify Israeli resellers, customers, implementation locations, contract values, or procurement identifiers.²³

Domain Summaries

Military: Military

Mechanism of Involvement

No public evidence identified of an Alteryx contract, tender award, framework agreement, memorandum, official defence-directory listing, or other documented relationship with the Israeli Ministry of Defense, Israel Defense Forces, Israel Police, Border Police, Israel Prison Service, intelligence bodies, or other Israeli security entities.^{4, 8, 9}

No public evidence identified that Alteryx manufactures, licenses, integrates, maintains, or supplies munitions, weapons systems, military platforms, targeting products, fire-control systems, ruggedised or tactical variants, or critical weapons sub-systems for Israeli forces.^{8, 9, 11} Its disclosed business is general analytics and automation software rather than construction equipment, military hardware, or physical infrastructure.^{10, 11}

No public evidence identified of services or equipment used in settlements, the separation barrier, checkpoints, demolitions, Israeli military installations, detention facilities, or construction activity in occupied Palestinian territory or the Golan Heights.^{4, 19, 20}

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

The strongest defence is the absence of substantiated military nexus evidence combined with Alteryx’s civilian commercial-software character.^{8, 9, 11} The company’s formation of Alteryx Public Sector, LLC for U.S. government and education markets does not evidence Israeli defence or security contracting.¹⁰

The audits cannot resolve non-public procurements, classified end users, secondary-market software use, reseller sales whose end users are not disclosed, or non-English tender records. Those limitations do not convert unverified possibilities into documented military involvement.^{4, 8}

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Digital: Digital

Mechanism of Involvement

Alteryx’s identified Israel-related digital nexus is commercial distribution, not documented digital-state infrastructure. ONE Technologies and One BI describe themselves as exclusive distributors in Israel, and Aqurate was reported as a One BI sub-distributor in 2023.^{1, 2, 3} The available evidence concerns data preparation, analytics distribution, and customer services rather than surveillance, policing, military, or intelligence technology.^{2, 3}

Alteryx states that its Alteryx One Platform, including Auto Insights, is hosted through Google Cloud Platform in the United States, Australia, and Europe through Germany.⁶ Its documentation allows customer-configured private file storage and private data processing in a customer’s own virtual private cloud; the audits do not establish which regions individual customers select.⁷ No public evidence identified that Alteryx operates or leases an Israeli data centre, uses an Israeli cloud region for Auto Insights hosting, processes customer data through Israeli-controlled infrastructure, or participates in Project Nimbus.^{6, 7}

No public evidence identified of Israeli military, intelligence, law-enforcement, or occupied-territory deployment; Israeli-origin biometric, predictive-policing, or surveillance tooling; offensive cyber capabilities; or AI provision for autonomous target generation, tracking, or surveillance-derived data processing for Israeli forces.^{4, 8}

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

The company’s strongest defence is that its documented product is civilian analytics and automation, with identified hosting locations outside Israel and no substantiated Israeli security deployment.^{6, 8, 11} Its AI documentation identifies Azure OpenAI and Google Gemini for functions such as Copilot and Auto Insights Playbooks, but does not identify Israeli state or security customers or Israeli processing locations.⁷

A distributor relationship alone does not identify an end user, deployment environment, or use case. The audits also cannot establish all private-VPC regions chosen by customers, all reseller customers, or non-public arrangements.^{1, 2, 3, 7}

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Economic: Economic

Mechanism of Involvement

The economic evidence consists of documented access to the Israeli market through distribution claims and partner coverage. One BI and ONE Technologies state that they hold exclusive distribution rights for Alteryx in Israel; Billigence, a UK-headquartered solution provider in Alteryx’s partner directory, lists Israel within its regional coverage.^{1, 2, 25} These sources do not identify customers, revenue, contract values, physical premises, or the nature of downstream use.

The reported Aqurate arrangement described marketing Alteryx products and serving Trifacta customers in Israel.³ Alteryx’s licence agreement contemplates authorized resellers, partners, distributors, and OEMs, with sales, payment, and delivery arrangements separately established between resellers and customers.²³ The reviewed evidence does not establish whether Alteryx software reached Israeli public-sector, defence, settlement-municipal, or private customers through an intermediary.²⁵

No public evidence identified of Israeli-owned subsidiaries, Israeli R&D centres, Israeli real estate, logistics facilities, data centres, sovereign-bond holdings, Israel-focused fund holdings, physical-goods sourcing, or settlement-origin products.^{10, 16, 17, 25} The company’s disclosed office list does not include Israel, but that omission is not conclusive evidence of no Israeli activity.¹⁶

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

The strongest defence is that the record supports only market-channel indicators, not an identified Israeli operating footprint or harmful commercial activity.^{1, 2, 3} No public evidence identified of sales to settlement municipalities, occupied-territory customers, Israeli defence bodies, or critical-infrastructure operators.^{4, 25}

The relevant distributor descriptions are not equivalent to corporate confirmation, procurement records, or end-user disclosure. The available record also lacks Israel-specific revenue, workforce, tax-registration, market-position, profit-repatriation, or economic-contribution figures.^{16, 25} The absence of evidence is not proof that every downstream sale or customer is absent.

Named Entities and Evidence Map

Political: Political

Mechanism of Involvement

No public evidence identified of an Alteryx corporate statement on Israel/Palestine, Gaza, settlements, or related human-rights issues; conflict-period free services, credits, logistics aid, or reservist policies; Israeli state partnerships; or Israel/Palestine-related lobbying, financing, political donations, or public advocacy by Alteryx or reviewed current leaders.^{5, 26}

The political relevance of the documented distribution relationship is indirect. ONE Harel, a division within ONE Technologies, describes itself as a supplier to Israeli government offices and national companies, but its material does not establish that Alteryx products were supplied to those entities.¹⁸ No public evidence identified that ONE Technologies, One BI, or Aqurate marketed Alteryx for military, security, settlement-municipality, surveillance, targeting, or border-security use.^{1, 2, 3}

No public evidence identified of Alteryx operations, intermediary premises, product sales, service contracts, or named customers in Israeli settlements, East Jerusalem, the West Bank, Gaza, or the Golan Heights.^{4, 20} The reviewed September 2025 OHCHR update did not mention Alteryx, a document-scoped result rather than proof of absence from every record or future update.²⁰

Counter-Arguments and Evidence Limits

The strongest defence is that neither distributor status nor affiliation with a broader technology group establishes state contracting, settlement activity, or political conduct by Alteryx.^{1, 2, 18} The record contains no identified government procurement award, state-customer deployment, corporate political statement, or conflict-related financing.^{4, 5, 26}

The review does not establish all indirect reseller transactions or whether a parent, sponsor, affiliate, or principal may appear under another name in external databases. The supplied scans are expressly document-scoped and cannot support transitive attribution or a conclusion beyond their stated scope.^{19, 20, 21, 22}

Named Entities and Evidence Map

BDS-1000 Score

Method: V6.5.

• V_MAX: 3.50 Avg_OTHERS: 0.92
• BRS Score: 307 Tier: D (Moderate Complicity)

V_MAX is driven by Economic: documented Israel-focused distribution and partner coverage establish commercial-market exposure, while end users, contract values, and use contexts remain unresolved.^{1, 2, 3, 25} Political captures the associated political-risk proximity and unresolved downstream visibility, but is lower because no direct Israeli-state, settlement, advocacy, or financing nexus was substantiated.^{4, 5, 18, 26}

The V6.5 method is scale-free, evidence-only, and human-vetted. Scores reflect the verified record rather than inference from sector, ownership, nationality, reseller adjacency, or unverified allegations.

Methodology Note

• This dossier relies only on the four supplied domain audits and their cited source record; it does not add allegations, assumptions, or external research.
• Impact (I) assesses the documented activity type, Magnitude (M) its evidenced scale, and Proximity (P) its directness to the relevant Israel/Palestine nexus.
• The method is scale-free: a company’s size, visibility, technology category, or investor identity does not itself establish complicity.
• Divested, exited, or superseded operations are mitigated rather than treated as current conduct; ownership and governance claims are limited to the transaction and current-disclosure record.
• Entity attribution is direct: a distributor, parent, sponsor, affiliate, or group division is not treated as Alteryx conduct without evidence connecting Alteryx products or services to the claimed activity.
• Settlement operation, if substantiated, may be assessed in both Economic and Political; no such Alteryx operation was documented here. “No public evidence identified” is used where the audit checks found no supporting record.