Oracle

1. Executive Dossier Summary

Company: Oracle Corporation

Jurisdiction: United States (Headquarters: Austin, Texas); Israel (Subsidiary: Oracle Israel Ltd., Petah Tikva)

Sector: Enterprise Software, Cloud Infrastructure (IaaS/PaaS), Defense Technology, Artificial Intelligence

Leadership: Larry Ellison (Chairman & CTO), Safra Catz (CEO)

Intelligence Conclusions:

The forensic investigation into Oracle Corporation reveals a corporate entity that has transcended the traditional boundaries of a commercial technology vendor to become a constitutive element of the Israeli state’s security architecture. Unlike its peers in the “Big Tech” sphere—who often engage in transactional relationships with defense ministries—Oracle has established a posture of Systemic Strategic Integration. This is defined by the deliberate fusion of corporate infrastructure with the state’s mechanisms of violence, surveillance, and administrative control.

The intelligence assessment concludes that Oracle is materially complicit in three distinct, high-impact vectors:

1. Kinetic Enablement (The Kill Chain): Oracle has moved from the back office of military logistics to the tactical edge of the battlefield. Through its 2024 strategic alliance with Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, Oracle hosts the “Fire Weaver” sensor-to-shooter system on its cloud infrastructure. This integration utilizes Oracle’s “Roving Edge” ruggedized servers to process lethal targeting algorithms in real-time, effectively embedding the corporation into the IDF’s “kill web” and making its hardware a prerequisite for the speed and lethality of modern bombardment campaigns.¹
2. Sovereign Impunity (The Bunker Strategy): The construction of the “Jerusalem East” data center—a nuclear-hardened bunker located 50 meters underground—provides the Israeli government with “Continuity of Government” (COG) capabilities. By designing infrastructure specifically to withstand kinetic warfare and ensuring “data sovereignty” immune to international legal jurisdiction, Oracle actively insulates the occupation apparatus from external shocks, be they missiles or ICC subpoenas.¹
3. Bureaucratic Apartheid (The Digital Gatekeeper): Oracle provides the database engine for the “Rotem-Reut” system, the digital backbone of the Population and Immigration Authority. This system enforces the permit regime, restricting the movement of millions of Palestinians. Without Oracle’s proprietary database architecture, the granular control of the Palestinian population—checking permits, enforcing bans, and managing the registry—would be logistically impossible at its current scale.⁴

These operational realities are reinforced by a governance structure that is explicitly ideological. The leadership dyad of Larry Ellison and Safra Catz has aligned the corporation’s resources with the geopolitical objectives of the State of Israel, suppressing internal dissent and leveraging corporate assets to support the military effort in Gaza while simultaneously enforcing a “love it or leave it” policy for employees.⁶

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

Origins & Founders

Oracle Corporation was birthed in the shadow of the US intelligence community. Founded in 1977 as Software Development Laboratories (SDL), the company’s very name is derived from “Project Oracle,” a contract with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to build a relational database management system.⁷ This foundational DNA—serving the classified needs of state security agencies—has persisted and evolved. Unlike consumer-focused tech giants that later pivoted to defense, Oracle was architected from inception to manage the data of the security state. This historical context is crucial for understanding its current operations in Israel: the company views defense contracting not as a moral hazard, but as its original mandate.

Leadership & Ownership

The governance of Oracle is characterized by a high degree of centralization and an uncommonly explicit ideological commitment to Zionism.

• Larry Ellison (Co-founder, Chairman, CTO): Ellison’s involvement goes beyond corporate oversight. He is identified as the “largest private funder of the Israel Defense Forces” (IDF), having donated millions to the Friends of the IDF (FIDF) to support the welfare and infrastructure of Israeli soldiers.⁸ This personal financial commitment creates a direct nexus between the company’s controlling shareholder and the foreign military it serves. Ellison’s close personal relationship with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggests a blurred line between his personal geopolitical interests and Oracle’s corporate strategy.
• Safra Catz (CEO): An Israeli-American, Catz acts as the operational enforcer of the company’s alignment. Her leadership style is combative regarding “neutrality.” Following the October 7 attacks, she not only pledged corporate support but also issued an internal ultimatum: “If they don’t agree with our mission to support the State of Israel, then maybe we aren’t the right company for them”.⁶ This effectively politicized the employment of 160,000 staff, filtering the workforce for ideological compliance.

Assessment:

The leadership’s recurring engagement with Israeli venture funds and direct financing of the IDF indicates sustained economic dependency and ideological fusion. The decision to invest over $300 million in a hardened bunker in Jerusalem—an asset with a specific military utility—reflects a capital allocation strategy driven as much by Zionist state-building goals as by market demand.

Analytical Assessment:

Oracle’s corporate structure in Israel is designed for maximum friction-less integration with the defense establishment.

• The “Importer of Record” Strategy: By operating through its fully owned subsidiary, Oracle Israel Ltd., the company acts as the Importer of Record for dual-use hardware like the “Roving Edge” devices and Exadata machines.⁴ This keeps the supply chain internal and direct, shielding transactions from the scrutiny that might accompany third-party resellers.
• The “8200 Pipeline”: Oracle has systematically acquired Israeli startups founded by veterans of Unit 8200 (SIGINT), such as Ravello Systems ($500M) and Crosswise ($50M).¹¹ This serves a dual purpose: it injects massive capital into the military-industrial startup ecosystem, validating the “military service as career accelerant” model, and it integrates battle-tested cyber-warfare technologies (virtualization, surveillance tracking) into Oracle’s global commercial stack.

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

Date	Event	Significance
Late 1990s	BICC Membership	Oracle UK establishes long-term membership in the British-Israel Chamber of Commerce, facilitating trade normalization and opposing boycott initiatives.6
2001	ERP Tender Win	Oracle Israel wins a strategic tender (>NIS 100M) to implement the ERP system for the IMOD and IDF, establishing the logistical nervous system of the military.2
2006	Demantra Acquisition	Oracle acquires Israeli logistics firm Demantra for $41M, integrating advanced supply chain analytics used for dual-use military logistics.4
2011	Convergin Acquisition	Oracle buys Convergin, a company specializing in network signaling, strengthening its capabilities in telecommunications interception and management.4
2015	Kiryat Hamodi’in Contract	Oracle wins a 26-year tender to finance, build, and operate the IT infrastructure for the IDF’s new Intelligence Campus in the Negev, housing Unit 8200.6
Feb 2016	Ravello Systems Acquisition	Oracle acquires Ravello (founded by Unit 8200 vets) for $500M. The tech allows legacy military apps to move to the cloud without recoding, crucial for IDF modernization.11
Apr 2016	Crosswise Acquisition	Oracle buys Crosswise for $50M. The tech tracks users across devices (phone to laptop), a core capability for both advertising and surveillance.12
May 2021	Project Nimbus Litigation	After losing the primary Nimbus tender, Oracle sues the Israeli government, aggressively fighting for the right to host the military’s cloud data.15
Oct 13, 2021	Jerusalem Bunker Launch	Oracle inaugurates “Jerusalem East,” a nuclear-hardened underground data center (50m deep), providing “Sovereign Cloud” and continuity of government.16
2021	Project Menta Launch	Oracle partners with the Israeli Air Force on “Project Menta,” a classified data engineering initiative likely related to operational sortie data.18
Mar 2, 2022	Russia Operations Suspended	Oracle suspends all operations in Russia following the Ukraine invasion, establishing a “Safe Harbor” precedent it would later violate in Gaza.19
Oct 2023	“Stands with Israel” Policy	CEO Safra Catz declares “Oracle Stands with Israel,” pledging double investment and donating to IDF support structures immediately post-Oct 7.10
Jan 2024	Unit 81 Partnership	Oracle deepens collaboration with the IDF’s Unit 81 (Covert Tech), accelerating procurement for special operations and rapid prototyping.18
Sep 2024	Rafael “Fire Weaver” Deal	Oracle announces strategic partnership with Rafael to host the “Fire Weaver” sensor-to-shooter system on OCI, directly integrating into the kill chain.20
Apr 2024	Palantir Alliance	Strategic partnership to certify Palantir’s AI platforms on OCI, creating a unified “defense stack” for the Israeli military.22

4. Domains of Complicity

Domain 1: Military & Intelligence Complicity (V-MIL)

Goal:

To forensically establish the extent to which Oracle Corporation’s technology, services, and infrastructure are integrated into the kinetic operations, logistical sustainment, and intelligence gathering of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

Evidence & Analysis (Comprehensive and Deep):

The investigation identifies Oracle as a “Tier 1 Kinetic Partner.” This assessment rests on three pillars of evidence:

1. Direct Kinetic Integration (The Kill Chain):
   The most significant finding is the 2024 partnership with Rafael Advanced Defense Systems to host the “Fire Weaver” system on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI).20 Fire Weaver is a “sensor-to-shooter” system that utilizes AI to analyze inputs from battlefield sensors (drones, satellites, ground units) and instantaneously assign the most relevant weapon to a target.
   • The “Roving Edge” Enabler: Crucially, this system runs on Oracle Roving Edge Infrastructure (REI). These are ruggedized, portable server nodes (weighing <35lbs, 56 cores) deployed to the tactical edge (e.g., inside command vehicles or forward bases).²¹
   • Implication: In modern warfare, latency is lethal. Relying on a data center in Tel Aviv to process targeting data from Gaza introduces dangerous delays. By placing Oracle hardware physically on the battlefield, Oracle solves the latency problem for the IDF. This means Oracle servers are calculating the algorithms that decide when and where to strike. The corporation is providing the computational substrate for lethal force.
2. Logistical Backbone (ERP Monopoly):
   While less visible than missiles, the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is the backbone of any army. Since winning the tender in 2001, Oracle has maintained the IMOD and IDF’s logistical nervous system.13 This system manages the supply chain for the Israeli Air Force (IAF), tracking spare parts for F-35s and F-16s, aviation fuel, and munitions inventory.
   • Systemic Reliance: The IDF’s ability to mobilize reserves (managed via Oracle HR modules) and sustain a bombardment campaign (managed via Oracle Supply Chain modules) is predicated on the uptime of Oracle software. This constitutes “Vendor Lock-in,” where the military cannot function efficiently without the vendor’s active support.
3. Intelligence Infrastructure (Unit 8200 & Unit 81):
   Oracle’s involvement in the “Kiryat Hamodi’in” project—a 26-year contract to build and operate the IT infrastructure for the new intelligence campus in the Negev—cements its role as the landlord of Israel’s surveillance state.6 Furthermore, the specific partnership with Unit 81 (the IDF’s elite technology unit) to “accelerate procurement” facilitates the rapid acquisition of specialized components for covert operations.18 This is not generic IT; it is the streamlining of the R&D cycle for military intelligence.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: “Oracle provides dual-use technology; they cannot control how the military uses it.”
• Rebuttal: This defense collapses under the weight of the “Fire Weaver” evidence. The partnership with Rafael was explicitly to host a weapon system. The “Roving Edge” devices are ruggedized specifically for battlefield use. This is not a generic database sale; it is the customized engineering of a kill chain solution.
• Argument: “Oracle lost the Nimbus tender, so its role is secondary to Google and Amazon.”
• Rebuttal: Oracle’s “Shadow Cloud” strategy allows it to capture the most sensitive and classified workloads (like Project Menta and Unit 81 operations) that the defense establishment prefers to keep out of the public cloud. The “Jerusalem East” bunker was purpose-built for this “sovereign” niche, likely hosting data too sensitive for Nimbus.³

Analytical Assessment: HIGH CONFIDENCE.

Oracle is deeply embedded in the IDF’s operational cycle. It provides the logistics to mobilize, the intelligence infrastructure to surveil, and the edge computing to target.

Intelligence Gaps:

• The exact number of Oracle Roving Edge nodes currently deployed in the Gaza and Lebanon theaters.
• Specific operational details of “Project Menta” regarding its integration with IAF strike planning software.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Rafael Advanced Defense Systems: Strategic Partner (Fire Weaver).
• Unit 8200: Technology Source (Ravello) & Infrastructure Client (Kiryat Hamodi’in).
• Israeli Air Force: Client (ERP, Project Menta).
• Unit 81: Procurement Partner.

Domain 2: Digital & Surveillance Complicity (V-DIG)

Goal:

To analyze Oracle’s role in the digital infrastructure of the occupation, focusing on population control systems and the “Sovereign Cloud” strategy.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The Architecture of Apartheid (Rotem-Reut):
   Oracle provides the database engine (Oracle Database Enterprise Edition with Real Application Clusters) for the Population and Immigration Authority’s (PIBA) “Rotem” and “Reut” systems.5
   • Mechanism: “Rotem” is the population registry; “Reut” is the border control interface. Together, they form the digital filter used at checkpoints (e.g., Qalandia, Allenby Bridge). Every Palestinian movement permit, every “security ban,” and every biometric ID check is a query against an Oracle database.
   • Systemic Implication: Oracle is the digital gatekeeper of the occupation. Its technology allows the permit regime to scale to industrial levels, processing tens of thousands of laborers daily. Without the high-concurrency capabilities of Oracle’s database, the physical bureaucracy of the occupation would face logistical collapse. Oracle is the “sole supplier” for these licenses, indicating total dependency.⁵
2. The Jerusalem Bunker (Sovereign Impunity):
   The “Jerusalem East” data center is a unique asset. Built 50 meters underground and hardened against missile, chemical, and nuclear threats, it is a “digital bunker”.3
   • Strategic Intent: This facility is designed for “Continuity of Government” (COG). It ensures that the Israeli state’s data remains operational even if surface infrastructure is destroyed in a total war scenario. By marketing this as a “Sovereign Cloud” immune to foreign laws, Oracle aids Israel in shielding occupation data (e.g., land registries, settlement plans) from international legal mechanisms like the ICC.
3. Surveillance Integration (Mabat 2000):
   Oracle databases underpin the “Mabat 2000” surveillance network in Jerusalem’s Old City.23 This panopticon system utilizes thousands of CCTV cameras and facial recognition to track Palestinian movement. Oracle’s backend infrastructure is essential for storing the massive volume of video and metadata generated by this dragnet.
4. Data Fusion (BlueKai & Crosswise):
   The acquisition of Crosswise (founded by Unit 8200 alumni) brought “cross-device tracking” technology into Oracle’s Data Cloud.12 This tech links a user’s disparate digital footprints (phone, laptop, tablet). In the hands of a state actor, this commercial technology becomes a powerful surveillance tool for de-anonymizing targets and mapping social networks, a practice central to the IDF’s “Blue Wolf” and “Wolf Pack” initiatives.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: “Oracle just sells the database; they don’t administer the checkpoint policy.”
• Rebuttal: Oracle provides maintenance and support for these specific systems. They profit directly from the licensing of the “Rotem” system. By continuing to service the infrastructure of a discriminatory permit regime that international bodies have labeled as apartheid, they are knowingly facilitating the crime.

Analytical Assessment: HIGH CONFIDENCE.

Oracle functions as the Systemic Operational Partner for the digital occupation. Its technology is the “nervous system” of the permit regime and the “memory” of the surveillance state.

Intelligence Gaps:

• The extent of data sharing between Oracle’s commercial “Identity Graph” (BlueKai) and Israeli intelligence databases.
• The specific Oracle modules used in the “Wolf Pack” database backend.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Population and Immigration Authority (PIBA): Key Client (Rotem System).
• Mabat 2000: Surveillance Project (Jerusalem).
• Bynet Data Communications: Local Partner (Bunker construction).

Domain 3: Economic & Structural Complicity (V-ECON)

Goal:

To analyze Oracle’s economic footprint, focusing on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), support for the settlement enterprise, and the “tech-washing” of military R&D.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. Settlement Enterprise Support (The Erasure of the Green Line):
   Oracle infrastructure hosts the systems used by the Civil Administration (ICA) to monitor “illegal construction” in Area C of the West Bank.24
   • Mechanism: This system aggregates data from aerial imagery and field inspectors to identify Palestinian structures built without (nearly impossible to obtain) permits. This data is the precursor to demolition orders.
   • Complicity: Oracle is providing the technical tools for forced displacement. Additionally, Oracle provides municipal IT services to illegal settlements like Ariel and Ma’ale Adumim, treating them as standard customers and helping to normalize their administrative status.²
2. Strategic FDI and the “8200 Pipeline”:
   Oracle has invested over $1 billion in the Israeli economy through acquisitions and infrastructure.25
   • Ravello Systems ($500M): Acquired from Unit 8200 veterans. The tech allows “lift and shift” of legacy apps to the cloud—critical for the IDF’s digital transformation.¹¹
   • Crosswise ($50M): Acquired from Unit 8200 veterans. Surveillance/Tracking tech.¹²
   • Systemic Effect: These acquisitions create a “virtuous cycle” for the military-industrial complex. Young Israelis serve in Unit 8200, develop dual-use tech, found startups, and get bought by Oracle. This “exit” culture incentivizes the militarization of the tech sector and provides the capital that sustains it.
3. Importer of Record:
   Oracle Israel Ltd. acts as the Importer of Record for sensitive hardware.4 This legal status allows Oracle to bypass intermediaries and ship dual-use technology (like high-performance computing clusters) directly to Israeli data centers, maintaining a secure and friction-less supply chain for the defense establishment.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: “Providing municipal software to settlements is just utility provision.”
• Rebuttal: Under the UN Guiding Principles, businesses must avoid causing or contributing to adverse human rights impacts. Servicing illegal settlements directly aids their maintenance and economic viability, contributing to the violation of international law (Fourth Geneva Convention).

Analytical Assessment: HIGH CONFIDENCE.

Oracle is deeply entrenched in the economy of the occupation. It creates the software that manages settlement expansion and provides the capital that fuels the military-tech ecosystem.

Intelligence Gaps:

• A comprehensive list of all settlement municipalities currently running Oracle ERP.
• Details on tax optimization structures used to repatriate IP from Israeli acquisitions.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Civil Administration (ICA): Client (Demolition monitoring).
• Ariel / Ma’ale Adumim: Settlement Clients.
• Ravello / Crosswise: Acquired Entities.

Domain 4: Political & Ideological Complicity (V-POL)

Goal:

To evaluate the ideological alignment of Oracle’s leadership and its corporate governance regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict, specifically contrasting its actions with its “Safe Harbor” precedents.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. Ideological Governance (Ellison & Catz):
   The leadership dyad of Larry Ellison and Safra Catz acts not as neutral corporate stewards, but as ideological partisans.
   • Ellison: As the “largest private funder of the IDF” via FIDF, Ellison’s personal financial funnel to the military creates a direct conflict of interest.⁸ His vision of a “pro-Israel information empire” (evidenced by the TikTok bid) suggests a strategy of using corporate assets for narrative control.⁶
   • Catz: Her “Love it or leave it” ultimatum to employees post-October 7 (“If you don’t agree with our mission to support the State of Israel, then maybe we aren’t the right company for you”) is a suppression of free speech and labor rights.¹⁰ It filters the workforce for Zionist alignment.
2. The “Safe Harbor” Failure (Discriminatory Policy):
   A forensic comparison of Oracle’s geopolitical responses reveals a discriminatory double standard:
   • Ukraine (2022): Oracle suspended all operations in Russia immediately, citing the “unlawful attack” and aligning with international law.¹⁹
   • Gaza (2023-2025): Despite ICJ rulings on plausible genocide, Oracle deepened its investment, donating to IDF support structures and offering “sovereign” continuity.
   • Conclusion: Oracle uses “ethics” only when it aligns with US/Israeli foreign policy. It is not a principled actor; it is a state-aligned actor.
3. Suppression of Humanitarian Dissent:
   Internal whistleblowers report that “Oracle for Palestine” was suppressed, and employees were gaslit by HR (referred to mental health services for raising ethical concerns).26 Crucially, Oracle removed Palestinian humanitarian charities (UNRWA, MAP) from its employee matching program while maintaining support for Israeli military charities, actively weaponizing its philanthropy.27

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Argument: “Executives can support whoever they want privately.”
• Rebuttal: When Safra Catz makes support for Israel a condition of “fitting in” at the company, and when Larry Ellison’s donations are touted at galas, these are public, corporate acts. They signal to the Israeli state that Oracle is a reliable ideological partner, which likely aids in securing sensitive contracts like the Bunker.

Analytical Assessment: HIGH CONFIDENCE.

Oracle represents a case of Ideological Fusion. The corporation is weaponized as an extension of the leadership’s Zionist commitments.

Intelligence Gaps:

• Direct records of lobbying communications between Oracle executives and the Israeli PMO regarding the TikTok acquisition bid.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• FIDF: Recipient of Ellison’s funding.
• “Oracle for Palestine”: Suppressed employee group.
• British-Israel Chamber of Commerce: Lobbying vehicle.

5. BDS-1000 Classification

Results Summary:

• Final Score: 834
• Tier: Tier A (Extreme Complicity)
• Justification Summary: Oracle Corporation functions as a Tier 1 Strategic Enabler of the Israeli defense and occupation apparatus. The company has crossed the threshold from commercial vendor to kinetic partner through the hosting of the “Fire Weaver” weapon system. Its construction of the Jerusalem Bunker ensures the regime’s “Continuity of Government,” while its ideological governance actively suppresses dissent and finances the military. Oracle is not merely complicit; it is an integrated component of the “kill chain” and the apartheid bureaucracy.

Domain Scoring Summary

The BDS-1000 model requires a separate evaluation of the target’s complicity across four domains: Military (V-MIL), Digital (V-DIG), Economic (V-ECON), and Political (V-POL). Each domain’s score is a function of its measured Impact (I), Magnitude (M), and Proximity (P).

BDS-1000 Scoring Matrix – Oracle Corporation

Domain	I	M	P	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	6.8	8.5	9.0	6.8
Economic (V-ECON)	7.3	8.5	9.0	7.3
Digital (V-DIG)	8.8	9.5	9.5	8.8
Political (V-POL)	8.6	9.0	8.8	8.6

V- {domain} Calculation

$$V_{domain} = I \times \min(M/7,1) \times \min(P/7,1)$$

• Impact (I): 0-10 scale based on the specific domain rubric (e.g., Lethality, Surveillance).
• Magnitude (M): Measures scale (revenue, volume, duration).
• Proximity (P): Measures directness (contract vs. supply chain).

Detailed Calculations:

• V-MIL: $6.8 \times 1 \times 1 = 6.8$ (Capped M/P at 1). Impact driven by Fire Weaver and Roving Edge.
• V-ECON: $7.3 \times 1 \times 1 = 7.3$. Impact driven by Settlement support and $1B+ FDI.
• V-DIG: $8.8 \times 1 \times 1 = 8.8$. Impact driven by “Sovereign Cloud” and Rotem-Reut system.
• V-POL: $8.6 \times 1 \times 1 = 8.6$. Impact driven by Catz/Ellison ideology and “Safe Harbor” failure.

Final Composite

Using the OR-dominant formula with a side boost:

Let:

$$V_{MAX} = \max(6.8, 8.8, 7.3, 8.6) = 8.8$$

$$Sum_{OTHERS} = (6.8 + 8.8 + 7.3 + 8.6) – 8.8 = 22.7$$

BRS Score Formula

$$BRS_Score = ((V_{MAX} + (Sum_{OTHERS} \times 0.2)) \div 16) \times 1000$$

Then:

$$BRS_Score = ((8.8 + (22.7 \times 0.2)) \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS_Score = ((8.8 + 4.54) \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS_Score = (13.34 \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS_Score = 0.83375 \times 1000 \\ BRS_Score = 833.75$$

(Result is scaled 0–1000.)

Grade Classification:

Based on the score of 834, the company falls within:

• Tier A (800–1000): Extreme Complicity
• Tier B (600–799): Severe Complicity
• Tier C (400–599): High Complicity
• Tier D (200–399): Moderate Complicity
• Tier E (0–199): Minimal/No Complicity

Tier: Tier A

6. Recommended Action(s):

1. Institutional Divestment & Exclusion (ESG Trigger):

Given the Tier A classification and the direct integration into lethal systems (Fire Weaver), Oracle Corporation should be placed on immediate exclusion lists for all ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) funds, sovereign wealth funds, and university endowments. The “dual-use” defense is nullified by the existence of the “Roving Edge” tactical deployments. Investors must be informed that Oracle capital is effectively “sunk” into the physical security of the Israeli state (Jerusalem Bunker), representing a high geopolitical fiduciary risk.

2. Strategic Public Exposure (The “Kill Web” Narrative):

Advocacy groups should focus public attention specifically on the Rafael-Oracle partnership. The narrative must shift from generic “cloud computing” to “algorithmic warfare.” Highlighting that Oracle servers are processing the logic for lethal strikes in Gaza creates a tangible link to war crimes that is easier for the public to understand than back-office ERP systems. Campaigns should target Oracle’s annual “CloudWorld” events with evidence of this kinetic complicity, demanding an end to the “Fire Weaver” and “Project Menta” contracts.

3. Legal Accountability (Universal Jurisdiction):

Legal bodies and NGOs should investigate whether Oracle executives, specifically the Israeli-based leadership and the US-based CEO Safra Catz, face liability under universal jurisdiction for aiding and abetting war crimes. The provision of the “Rotem” system (facilitating apartheid) and the “Fire Weaver” system (facilitating potential indiscriminate targeting) provides substantial grounds for legal complaints in European jurisdictions.

4. Employee Mobilization & Whistleblower Support:

Despite the suppression of “Oracle for Palestine,” external support should be provided to internal whistleblowers to leak further details on “Project Menta” and the “Wolf Pack” backend. The “Safe Harbor” discrepancy (Russia vs. Israel) is a potent wedge issue to rally internal dissent, exposing the hypocrisy of the leadership’s governance and potentially triggering a broader labor revolt similar to “No Tech for Apartheid.”

Works cited

1. Oracle digital Audit
2. Oracle military Audit
3. Oracle goes underground for Israel data centre – Developing Telecoms, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://developingtelecoms.com/telecom-technology/data-centres-networks/12105-oracle-goes-underground-for-israel-data-centre.html
4. Oracle economic Audit
5. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Oracle – Who Profits, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/7396?oracle
6. Oracle political Audit
7. Oracle Corporation – Wikipedia, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Corporation
8. Record $53.8 million raised for IDF soldiers at Beverly Hills gala | The Times of Israel, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/record-53-8-million-raised-for-idf-soldiers-at-beverly-hills-gala/
9. Record $53.8 million raised for Israeli soldiers at Beverly Hills gala, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.jta.org/2017/11/05/united-states/record-53-8-million-raised-for-idf-soldiers-at-beverly-hills-gala
10. During war visit, Oracle CEO affirms commitment to open second data center in Israel, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/during-war-visit-oracle-ceo-affirms-commitment-to-open-second-data-center-in-israel/
11. Ravello Systems – 2025 Company Profile, Team, Funding & Competitors – Tracxn, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://tracxn.com/d/companies/ravello-systems/__28GdFs-09U24h5T79nYahSEYEc8Y472s60c1UA6rkKY
12. Oracle has acquired Israeli Big Data startup Crosswise for $50m – SiliconANGLE, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://siliconangle.com/2016/04/17/oracle-has-acquired-israeli-big-data-startup-crosswise-for-50m/
13. Worksheet – Who Profits, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/excel
14. Oracle opens cloud data centre 50m underground in Israel – The Register, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/14/oracle_israel_data_centre/
15. Oracle appeals to court to cancel results of Nimbus cloud tender | Ctech, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3912183,00.html
16. Oracle inaugurates regional cloud center in Jerusalem, plans to open 2nd site, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/oracle-inaugurates-regional-cloud-center-in-jerusalem-plans-to-open-2nd-site/
17. First underground data center in Israel built to ‘withstand missiles and car bombs’ – JNS.org, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.jns.org/first-underground-data-center-in-israel-built-to-withstand-missiles-and-car-bombs/
18. Oracle Company Complicity Profile – BDS Movement, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.bdsmovement.net/sites/default/files/2025-03/Oracle_Company_Complicity_Profile.pdf
19. Tech companies cut ties with Russia over Ukraine invasion – Courthouse News Service, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.courthousenews.com/tech-companies-cut-ties-with-russia-over-ukraine-invasion/
20. Rafael partners with Oracle to boost global defence systems – IT Brief Australia, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://itbrief.com.au/story/rafael-partners-with-oracle-to-boost-global-defence-systems
21. Oracle and RAFAEL to Provide Cloud-Based AI Solutions for Defense Missions, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.oracle.com/news/announcement/ocw24-oracle-and-rafael-to-provide-cloud-based-ai-solutions-for-defense-missions-2024-09-10/
22. Oracle and Palantir Join Forces to Deliver Mission Critical AI Solutions to Governments and Businesses, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.oracle.com/news/announcement/oracle-and-palantir-join-forces-to-deliver-mission-critical-ai-solutions-to-governments-and-businesses-2024-04-04/
23. The Private Actors Behind the Economy of Occupation and Genocide – Al-Haq, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/download/2025/11/25/dbio-novemebr-2025-1764074548.pdf
24. The Israeli Occupation Industry – Matrix IT – Who Profits, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.whoprofits.org/companies/company/4009
25. With $1.2 Billion in Investments from Cloud Giants, Israel Is the Cloud Nation – IOD – The Content Engineers, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://iamondemand.com/blog/israel-is-the-cloud-nation/
26. Oracle execs: Love Israel or maybe this isn’t the job for you | Responsible Statecraft, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://responsiblestatecraft.org/oracle-tiktok-israel-2674151514/
27. Oracle allegedly suppresses Pro-Palestinian voices & cuts charity support amid TikTok takeover bid – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed on December 9, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/oracle-allegedly-suppresses-pro-palestinian-voices-cuts-charity-support-amid-tiktok-takeover-bid/