Amazon

1. Executive Dossier Summary

Company: Amazon.com, Inc.

Jurisdiction: United States (Seattle, WA) / Israel (Tel Aviv, Haifa)

Sector: Technology / Cloud Computing (AWS) / Retail / Logistics / Defense Contracting

Leadership: Andy Jassy (CEO), Jeff Bezos (Executive Chairman), Gen. (Ret.) Keith B. Alexander (Board Director)

Intelligence Conclusions:

The forensic intelligence assessment of Amazon.com, Inc. concludes that the corporation has transcended the status of a commercial vendor to become a Tier-1 Strategic Infrastructure Partner to the State of Israel and its defense establishment. This classification is not based on incidental retail activity or passive investment, but on the provision of “Sovereign Cloud” architecture that serves as the central nervous system for the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) modern operational doctrine. The company has effectively integrated its global infrastructure with the Israeli security state, creating a symbiotic relationship where the profitability of its cloud division is structurally linked to the digital sovereignty and military lethality of the occupation.

Concise Finding: Military and Digital Enablement

The investigation identifies Amazon Web Services (AWS) as the backbone of the IDF’s “Kill Chain.” Through the $1.2 billion “Project Nimbus” contract, Amazon hosts the “Sirius” air-gapped cloud and the “Infinite Store” of intelligence data that feeds AI targeting systems such as “Lavender” and “The Gospel.” Evidence confirms that during the 2023-2024 offensive in Gaza, the IDF’s internal computing systems collapsed under the weight of massive data flows, necessitating a “surge” to Amazon’s public cloud infrastructure to maintain operational lethality.1 Furthermore, Amazon creates a “Sovereignty Shield” for the Israeli state by contractually waiving its right to deny service to the military, regardless of human rights violations or adherence to internal Acceptable Use Policies (AUP).4 This effectively places the company in the position of a logistical arm of the military during active hostilities.

Concise Finding: Economic and Structural Entrenchment

Amazon exhibits deep structural entrenchment via a $7.2 billion Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) commitment through 2037.5 This investment is not merely financial; it creates a “Mutual Hostage” dynamic through the acquisition of Annapurna Labs. Amazon’s global competitive advantage in AI hardware (Trainium/Inferentia chips) is now dependent on an R&D team in Haifa comprised significantly of veterans from the IDF’s elite intelligence units, specifically Unit 81 and Unit 8200.2 This “Silicon Singularity” ensures that Amazon cannot divest from Israel without decapitating its own innovation pipeline, thereby aligning its corporate survival with the stability of the Israeli tech sector. Additionally, the retail division facilitates the “laundering” of settlement produce (dates, avocados) into global markets through supply chain obfuscation.5

Ideological and Public Positioning

The governance of Amazon demonstrates a severe ideological alignment with the Israeli security state. The Board of Directors includes Gen. (Ret.) Keith Alexander, former NSA Director, creating a direct nexus between US surveillance doctrine and Israeli defense needs.9 The corporation operates a “Winking Mechanism”—a clandestine protocol designed to tip off the Israeli government regarding foreign subpoenas—thereby actively colluding to evade international legal oversight.3 While the company actively migrated data to “save” Ukraine during the Russian invasion, it builds infrastructure to “empower” the bombardment of Gaza, failing the “Safe Harbor” test of geopolitical neutrality and revealing a discriminatory valuation of human rights based on geopolitical alignment.9

2. Corporate Overview & Evolution

Origins & Founders

Amazon.com, Inc. was founded in 1994 by Jeff Bezos as an online bookseller but rapidly evolved into the world’s dominant cloud computing and logistics provider. While the retail arm is the public face, the profit engine and strategic core is Amazon Web Services (AWS). The pivot to military integration began in earnest with the 2015 acquisition of Annapurna Labs, an Israeli microelectronics firm founded by Avigdor Willenz. This acquisition was not peripheral; it was central to solving Amazon’s virtualization challenges. The integration of Annapurna Labs marked the beginning of Amazon’s dependency on Israeli military-grade engineering, specifically sourcing talent from the IDF’s elite intelligence units (Unit 8200 and Unit 81) to design the silicon that powers AWS globally.²

The founding capital of Amazon was American, but its “innovation capital” has increasingly become Israeli. The acquisition of Annapurna Labs was a strategic decision to bypass the limitations of standard commercial chips (like those from Intel) and develop proprietary silicon that could handle the hyperscale demands of the cloud. The founders of Annapurna Labs, including Willenz, came from a background deeply embedded in the Israeli high-tech ecosystem, which functions in a revolving door with the defense establishment. This acquisition set the stage for a decade of deepening ties, where Amazon did not just buy a company, but integrated a culture of military-grade urgency and surveillance capability into its core engineering ethos.

Leadership & Ownership

The current leadership structure reflects a hardening of the “Security-State Nexus,” creating a corporate governance model that prioritizes defense contracting and intelligence cooperation over human rights due diligence.

Andy Jassy (CEO):

As the former head of AWS, Andy Jassy was the primary architect of the Project Nimbus partnership. His tenure as CEO has been marked by a distinct shift toward defense integration. Jassy has publicly expressed unconditional support for Israel following October 7, 2023, labeling the attacks “shocking and painful,” while maintaining a conspicuous silence regarding the tens of thousands of Palestinian casualties resulting from the subsequent bombardment.12 More critically, Jassy has refused to engage with employee dissent regarding military contracts, presiding over the firing of organizers from the “No Tech For Apartheid” movement. His leadership signals that the alliance with the Israeli defense establishment is a non-negotiable strategic pillar of the company.9

Gen. (Ret.) Keith B. Alexander (Board of Directors):

The appointment of General Keith Alexander to the Board in September 2020 represents a critical inflection point. As the former Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Commander of US Cyber Command, Alexander is the personification of the US surveillance state. His tenure at the NSA coincided with deep cooperation with Israel’s Unit 8200 (notably on projects like Stuxnet). His presence on the Amazon Board provides the necessary security clearance and ideological “top cover” to pursue classified contracts like Project Nimbus. Alexander is a known keynote speaker for AIPAC and represents the fusion of US-Israel intelligence interests at the highest level of corporate governance.9 His influence ensures that Amazon’s strategic compass points toward deep integration with the military-industrial complex.

Dr. Andrew Ng (Board of Directors):

Appointed in April 2024, Dr. Ng’s expertise in Artificial Intelligence is critical for the oversight of machine learning tools that are deployed for military surveillance and targeting. As Project Nimbus includes the provision of advanced AI capabilities (such as facial recognition and predictive targeting), Ng’s role facilitates the technical governance of these lethal systems. His background in scaling AI systems aligns with the IDF’s doctrine of “algorithmic warfare,” ensuring that Amazon remains at the bleeding edge of these capabilities.9

Assessment:

The composition of Amazon’s leadership indicates a deliberate strategy to align with the defense establishment. The presence of General Alexander provides the necessary security clearance and ideological cover to pursue classified contracts like Project Nimbus. Leadership’s recurring engagement with Israeli venture funds and the absorption of Unit 81 teams (NeuroBlade) into Annapurna Labs indicates a sustained economic and technological dependency on the Israeli defense ecosystem.2 This is not a board that will be swayed by moral arguments; it is a board built to execute state-level security contracts.

Analytical Assessment:

Amazon’s corporate structure has evolved into a dual-use entity. While publicly a consumer retail brand, its operational core (AWS) functions as a private-sector extension of the state security apparatus. The acquisition strategy in Israel—buying core infrastructure capability rather than just consumer apps—demonstrates an intent to integrate the company’s “nervous system” with Israeli innovation, which is inextricably linked to the IDF. This is not incidental complicity; it is structural design. The company has effectively “nationalized” a portion of its infrastructure for the benefit of the Israeli state, creating a “Sovereign Cloud” that operates under Israeli jurisdiction but with American capital and technology.⁴

The implications of this structure are profound. Amazon is no longer a neutral platform provider. By designing custom silicon in Israel (Annapurna) to run on a cloud physically located in Israel (il-central-1) that is contractually dedicated to the Israeli Ministry of Defense (Nimbus), Amazon has created a closed loop of military capability. This loop is insulated from external pressure by the “Mutual Hostage” dynamic: Amazon needs the chips, and Israel needs the cloud. This interdependence makes Amazon a robust and resilient partner for the occupation, capable of weathering reputational storms that might force a less integrated company to divest.

3. Timeline of Relevant Events

The following timeline reconstructs the trajectory of Amazon’s integration into the Israeli military-industrial complex, highlighting the shift from commercial vendor to strategic partner. It reveals a pattern of deepening complicity, moving from economic investment to direct military enablement.

Date	Event	Significance	Source
2015 Jan 22	Acquisition of Annapurna Labs	Amazon acquires Haifa-based chipmaker for ~$370M. This begins the “Silicon Singularity,” embedding Unit 8200 alumni into Amazon’s core R&D for the Nitro System.	11
2019 Nov	Discriminatory Shipping Policy	Amazon offers free shipping to illegal West Bank settlements while charging Palestinians $24+, effectively recognizing settlements as “Israel” while penalizing the indigenous population.	16
2020 Sep 09	Gen. Keith Alexander Joins Board	Former NSA Director appointed to Amazon Board. Signals alignment with the US-Israel security/intelligence establishment prior to Nimbus bid.	10
2021 Apr	Project Nimbus Contract Signed	AWS and Google win $1.2B tender to provide “Sovereign Cloud” to Israel. Contract includes “No Boycott” and “No Service Denial” clauses, stripping Amazon of AUP enforcement rights.	19
2021 May	Employee Letter of Condemnation	During the bombardment of Gaza, Amazon employees release a letter condemning the Nimbus contract. Leadership ignores the dissent, prioritizing the contract.	21
2021 Oct	“Winking Mechanism” Exposed	Reports reveal Amazon agreed to a secret protocol to tip off Israel regarding foreign subpoenas via coded financial transactions, circumventing international legal norms.	3
2022	NeuroBlade Team Absorption	Amazon absorbs the engineering team of NeuroBlade (Unit 81 alumni) into Annapurna Labs, deepening the military-talent pipeline and reinforcing the R&D nexus.	14
2023 Aug 01	AWS Israel Region Launch	Official launch of il-central-1 region. Amazon announces $7.2 Billion FDI commitment through 2037, solidifying long-term economic support and infrastructure permanence.	6
2023 Oct 07	IDF Cloud “Surge”	Following the Hamas attack, the IDF’s internal systems crash. Workloads are “surged” to AWS public cloud to maintain the “Kill Chain” and operational tempo.	3
2023 Oct 10	Andy Jassy Statement	CEO Jassy issues statement supporting Israel (“shocking and painful”), pledging relief but ignoring Palestinian casualties, setting the ideological tone for the war.	12
2023 Nov	“Lavender” System Active	Reports confirm IDF use of AI targeting systems (Lavender/Gospel) hosted on cloud infrastructure to generate targets in Gaza at industrial scale.	2
2024 Mar	Shareholder Proposals Rejected	Amazon Board recommends voting against proposals requesting a report on customer due diligence regarding human rights violations (Nimbus), blocking oversight.	13
2024 Apr	No Tech For Apartheid Firings	Amazon fires organizers of the “No Tech For Apartheid” campaign (e.g., Ahmed Shahrour) for protesting the Nimbus contract, weaponizing HR policies.	25
2024 May	Shareholder Meeting Vote	Shareholders vote down the human rights due diligence proposal, validating the Board’s pro-contract stance and rejecting accountability.	26
2024 Aug	UN Special Rapporteur Report	UN report lists Amazon as a company implicated in the “Economy of Genocide” due to AI support and dual-use technology provision.	5

4. Domains of Complicity

Domain 1: Military & Intelligence Complicity (The Digital Kill Chain)

Goal:

To establish that Amazon Web Services (AWS) is not a passive host of data but an active, integral component of the IDF’s “Kill Chain,” providing the computational infrastructure necessary for AI-driven mass targeting and the “Sovereign Cloud” architecture that shields these operations from international oversight. This domain investigates the hypothesis that Amazon’s technology is the “engine” of the automated warfare systems used in Gaza.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The “Sovereign Cloud” and Project Nimbus Architecture:

The $1.2 billion Project Nimbus contract represents a fundamental shift in the IDF’s C4I (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence) doctrine. The “Military Audit” confirms that Amazon provides the “Sirius” cloud—an air-gapped, secure environment physically located in the il-central-1 region but disconnected from the public internet.2 This architecture was a specific requirement of the Israeli Ministry of Defense to ensure “data sovereignty.”

• Significance: This architecture allows the IDF to migrate classified operational data, which was previously siloed on-premise, to a hyperscale environment. This migration enables “Data Fusion,” where billions of intelligence data points (SIGINT from Unit 8200, VISINT from drones, OSINT from social media) are aggregated into a single “Infinite Store” hosted by AWS.¹
• Systemic Implication: Without the elastic scalability of AWS, the IDF would be unable to process the volume of data required for modern algorithmic warfare. The shift from on-premise servers to the cloud allows the IDF to run massive query loads that would choke traditional military data centers. The cloud is the engine; the military is the operator. Amazon provides the capability for mass surveillance and targeting that physically cannot exist on legacy hardware.

2. Hosting the “AI Kill Chain” (Lavender & The Gospel):

Investigative reports and technical analysis indicate that the IDF’s AI targeting systems—”Lavender” (human targeting) and “The Gospel” (structural targeting)—rely on cloud-native architectures.23

• Evidence: The “Digital Audit” notes that during the initial weeks of the 2023 assault on Gaza, the IDF’s internal systems collapsed due to the sheer load of data being generated. The military “surged” its computational requirements to the public cloud (AWS and Google) to maintain operational continuity.³
• Inference: This “surge” capacity means Amazon infrastructure was directly processing the data used to generate kill lists in real-time. The “Lavender” system, which identified 37,000 potential human targets with a pre-authorized “collateral damage” allowance, requires the massive object storage (Amazon S3) and GPU-based inference (Amazon EC2) that only a hyperscaler can provide.
• Reasoning: If Amazon provides the server that stores the drone feed, and the processor that runs the algorithm identifying the target, Amazon is materially participating in the targeting cycle. The “Gospel” system generates targets at a rate that human analysts cannot match; this speed is only possible due to the low-latency, high-throughput compute power of the AWS cloud.

3. Tactical Edge Support (Snowball Edge):

The availability of AWS Snowball Edge devices in the Tel Aviv region acts as a bridge between the cloud and the battlefield.4 These ruggedized, explosion-resistant compute nodes allow for “disconnected edge” operations.

• Operational Use: Military units in “denied environments” (like the Gaza Strip) can use Snowball devices to process surveillance data locally (e.g., from drones or biometrics at checkpoints) without an internet connection, later physically syncing the data to the AWS cloud. This extends the “digital iron dome” directly into the combat zone. The audit notes that Snowball devices are explicitly marketed for “tactical edge” scenarios, and their deployment in the small geographic area of Israel strongly suggests military application rather than civilian use (which would typically use standard fiber connections).

4. The “Sovereignty Shield” and “Winking Mechanism”:

Perhaps the most incriminating finding is the legal framework Amazon accepted. The contract contains a “No Boycott” clause, legally binding Amazon to provide service to the IDF even if the military commits documented war crimes.4 Furthermore, the “Winking Mechanism”—a clandestine protocol to notify the Israeli government of foreign subpoenas via coded financial transactions—demonstrates active collusion to defeat international legal discovery.3

• Analysis: Amazon has voluntarily surrendered its corporate sovereignty. By agreeing that it cannot deny service to the IDF, it has removed its own ability to enforce its “Acceptable Use Policy” regarding human rights. The “Winking Mechanism” (where a 1,000 NIS charge signals a US subpoena and a 3,900 NIS charge signals an EU subpoena) is a conspiracy to obstruct justice. It allows the Israeli state to preemptively intervene diplomatically or technically before Amazon hands over data to foreign courts investigating war crimes.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: Amazon claims it merely provides “general purpose” cloud computing for civilian ministries (Transport, Health) and has no visibility into specific military workloads.³¹
• Rebuttal: This is contradicted by the explicit inclusion of the Ministry of Defense in the Nimbus tender and the confirmed “surge” of military workloads during the war.³ The existence of the “Sirius” air-gapped cloud specifically for defense clients negates the “civilian only” defense. Furthermore, the “No Boycott” clause would be unnecessary for a purely civilian contract; it is a clause specifically designed to protect controversial military activities.
• Counter-Argument: Amazon is a neutral platform, like a phone company, and not responsible for how its tech is used.
• Rebuttal: The “Winking Mechanism” proves Amazon is not neutral; it is actively shielding one client (Israel) from the legal systems of other nations. Neutral utilities do not create secret codes to evade subpoenas. Additionally, providing “surge” capacity during an active invasion is an affirmative choice to support a belligerent, distinguishing it from passive utility provision.

Analytical Assessment:

Confidence: HIGH. The evidence of the “No Boycott” clause, the “Winking Mechanism,” and the “Surge” capacity usage is corroborated by multiple independent investigations (Guardian, +972) and leaked documents. Amazon is the indispensable architectural partner for the IDF’s data-driven warfare. The relationship is systemic, not transactional.

Intelligence Gaps:

• Specific bills of lading or deployment logs for AWS Snowball devices inside the Gaza Strip or at West Bank checkpoints.
• The exact volume of data (in petabytes) transferred between the IDF’s internal “red” network and the AWS “Sirius” cloud during the 2023 offensive.
• Direct correspondence between Gen. Keith Alexander and the Israeli MoD regarding the Nimbus contract negotiation.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Project Nimbus: The $1.2B contract vehicle.
• Sirius: The air-gapped military cloud tier.
• Lavender / The Gospel: AI systems hosted on the infrastructure.
• Unit 8200: The intelligence unit integrated with Amazon’s R&D.
• Gen. Keith Alexander: Board member facilitating the security nexus.

Domain 2: Economic & Structural Complicity (Silicon Sovereignty)

Goal:

To demonstrate that Amazon’s economic engagement goes beyond standard trade to include “Strategic FDI” (Foreign Direct Investment) that entrenches the Israeli economy and creates a “Mutual Hostage” dependency through hardware manufacturing and R&D. This domain explores how Amazon has embedded itself into the Israeli economy so deeply that divestment becomes structurally impossible.

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The $7.2 Billion Strategic Anchor:

In August 2023, Amazon committed to investing $7.2 billion (approx. ILS 26.6 billion) in Israel through 2037.5

• Significance: This is one of the largest single foreign investments in Israel’s history. It serves as an immense vote of confidence in the stability of the regime, signaling to global markets that the Israeli economy is a safe bet despite political volatility.
• Implication: This creates a “Capital Shield.” The sheer scale of the sunk costs (data centers, fiber optics, personnel) creates a massive disincentive for Amazon to divest. The company is now economically tethered to the state’s survival and prosperity for the next 15 years. This capital injection acts as a buffer against the economic impact of BDS campaigns, as Amazon has effectively pre-paid for its presence.

2. Annapurna Labs & The Unit 8200 Pipeline:

Amazon’s acquisition of Annapurna Labs in 2015 is the linchpin of its global hardware strategy. Annapurna designs the Nitro, Graviton, Trainium, and Inferentia chips—the custom silicon that gives AWS its global competitive advantage.2

• Talent Laundering: The “Economic Audit” reveals that Amazon actively recruits from the IDF’s elite technology units. The recent absorption of the NeuroBlade team (founded by Unit 81 alumni) into Annapurna Labs illustrates a direct pipeline from Military Intelligence to Amazon R&D.¹⁴ The founders, Elad Sity and Eliad Hillel, brought their team directly from the military-industrial sector into Amazon.
• Strategic Dependency: Amazon relies on this Haifa-based team for its global operations. If Amazon were to boycott Israel, the Israeli government could leverage the Annapurna workforce (who are often reservists) to disrupt Amazon’s global chip development. This “Mutual Hostage” dynamic ensures Amazon’s loyalty to the state is structural, not just elective. Amazon cannot build its next-generation AI cloud without the engineers in Haifa, and those engineers are loyal to the state.

3. Settlement Laundering via Retail Aggregators:

Amazon’s retail division (Whole Foods, Amazon Fresh) is deeply integrated into the supply chain of “Settlement Goods.” The audit identifies Hadiklaim (dates) and Galilee Export (avocados) as key suppliers.5

• Forensic Link: Hadiklaim markets Medjool dates grown in illegal Jordan Valley settlements (e.g., Tomer, Gilgal) under brands like “King Solomon” and “Jordan River,” which are sold on Amazon. Evidence shows that Hadiklaim engages in “commingling,” mixing settlement dates with those from sovereign Israel to obscure their origin.
• Complicity: By acting as the retailer and often the logistics provider (Fulfillment by Amazon – FBA), Amazon facilitates the economic viability of these illegal settlements. The lack of rigorous origin tracing allows these goods to be “laundered” as “Produce of Israel,” bypassing consumer boycotts and customs regulations. Amazon’s platform effectively erases the Green Line for global consumers.

4. Amazon Global Logistics (AGL) & Importer of Record:

For private label goods (Whole Foods “365”), Amazon acts as the Importer of Record (IOR).5 This creates direct legal liability. If Amazon imports settlement dates labeled as “Israel” to benefit from the US-Israel Free Trade Agreement, it is technically committing customs fraud, as settlement goods are not sovereign Israeli produce under US policy (though enforcement varies).

• Logistical Support: Amazon utilizes logistics partners like the Bar Group to deliver packages to illegal settlements. This normalizes the settlement enterprise by ensuring that a settler in Ariel receives the same service level as a resident of Tel Aviv, reinforcing the state’s narrative of annexation.

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: Amazon buys Annapurna Labs for the tech, not the politics. It’s just business; high-tech is global.
• Rebuttal: In Israel, high-tech is military tech. The “Dual-Use” nature of Unit 8200 alumni means that the same engineers designing Amazon’s chips are reservists designing the IDF’s cyber capabilities. The absorption of NeuroBlade (Unit 81) confirms the deliberate targeting of military human capital. Amazon is buying the output of the military education system.
• Counter-Argument: Retail sourcing is complex; Amazon can’t check every date.
• Rebuttal: Competitors like the UK Co-op have successfully implemented policies to exclude aggregators like Galilee Export. Amazon’s failure to do so is a choice, not a logistical impossibility. Amazon has the most sophisticated supply chain tracking in the world; if they wanted to filter settlement goods, they could.

Analytical Assessment:

Confidence: HIGH. The financial commitments are public record ($7.2B). The Annapurna acquisition is a matter of historical fact. The presence of Hadiklaim dates on Amazon is verifiable via simple search. The structural dependency on Israeli silicon is the most critical finding, as it cements the relationship beyond simple profit.

Intelligence Gaps:

• The specific contract terms between Annapurna Labs and the Israeli Ministry of Defense regarding “reserve duty” protections for key engineers.
• Internal Bills of Lading for Whole Foods “365” Medjool dates to trace specific packing houses to settlement locations.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Annapurna Labs: The strategic hardware hostage.
• NeuroBlade / Unit 81: The military-to-corporate pipeline.
• Hadiklaim / Galilee Export: The settlement aggregators.
• $7.2 Billion FDI: The economic anchor.

Domain 3: Political & Ideological Alignment (Governance & Normalization)

Goal:

To prove that Amazon’s complicity is driven by a governance structure that is ideologically aligned with the Zionist security state, manifested through board appointments, discriminatory policies, and the suppression of internal dissent. This domain analyzes the “Why” behind the “What.”

Evidence & Analysis:

1. The Board of Directors (The Security-State Nexus):

The presence of Gen. (Ret.) Keith Alexander on Amazon’s Board is the smoking gun of political alignment. As former NSA Director and a keynote speaker at AIPAC, Alexander personifies the “US-Israel Security Nexus”.9

• Impact: Alexander’s tenure (starting 2020) aligns perfectly with the preparation and bidding for the Project Nimbus contract (2021). His background in mass surveillance and cyber warfare provides the Board with the ethical “top cover” to approve contracts that facilitate the surveillance of Palestinians. He is not a neutral director; he is an ideological asset who views the US-Israel alliance as a pillar of global security, overriding human rights concerns.
• Jamie Gorelick: Another Board member with deep ties to the US Department of Defense (former General Counsel), reinforcing the board’s comfort with military contracting.

2. The “Safe Harbor” Double Standard (Ukraine vs. Gaza):

Amazon’s response to geopolitical crises reveals a blatant hierarchy of human value, failing the “Safe Harbor” test of neutrality.

• Ukraine: Amazon executed “Operation Snowball,” moving 10 petabytes of Ukrainian government data out of the country to save it from Russian attacks. They instituted a “no-fly zone” for Russian products and explicitly stated “We Stand With Ukraine”.⁹ They treated the preservation of the Ukrainian state as a moral imperative.
• Gaza: Conversely, Amazon built data centers in Israel to “sanction-proof” the government’s data. Instead of rescuing Palestinian data (land records, university archives) from destruction, they provided the infrastructure to empower the bombardment. This inversion—saving the victim in Ukraine vs. arming the strong party in Gaza—demonstrates that Amazon’s “human rights principles” are subservient to US foreign policy interests. The company effectively chose to be the “digital ark” for Ukraine and the “digital sword” for Israel.

3. Suppression of Dissent (No Tech For Apartheid):

Amazon has actively weaponized its HR policies to silence opposition to Project Nimbus.

• Evidence: The firing of Ahmed Shahrour and other organizers of the “No Tech For Apartheid” campaign demonstrates a zero-tolerance policy for pro-Palestinian advocacy.⁹
• Pattern: While affinity groups for other causes (LGBTQ+, Black Lives Matter) are celebrated and allowed to organize, Palestinian advocacy is framed as “workplace disruption” or “harassment.” Amazon utilizes a discriminatory application of its External Communications Policy to purge dissenters, creating a culture of fear. This internal suppression ensures that the Board’s pro-Israel strategy faces no internal friction.

4. Settlement Normalization & Logistics:

The “Political Audit” highlights the 2019/2020 controversy where Amazon offered free shipping to illegal settlements while charging Palestinians in the same territory.4

• Significance: Although the policy was technically adjusted after threats of lawsuits, the underlying infrastructure relies on recognizing settlements as “Israel.” By utilizing logistics partners like the Bar Group, Amazon normalizes the settlement enterprise, treating Ariel and Ma’ale Adumim as seamless extensions of Tel Aviv, thereby eroding the Green Line in the digital economy. This is a form of “Economic Annexation.”

Counter-Arguments & Assessment:

• Counter-Argument: The Board is diverse; Keith Alexander is just one voice.
• Rebuttal: In matters of defense contracting and cyber-security, the former NSA Director carries outsized weight. His presence signals to the Pentagon and the MoD that Amazon is a “trusted partner” for classified work. He chairs the Security Committee, giving him direct oversight of these issues.
• Counter-Argument: Firing employees for protesting is standard corporate discipline; it’s about disruption, not speech.
• Rebuttal: The asymmetry is the key. Amazon allows and encourages political expression regarding Ukraine, LGBTQ+ rights, and climate change. The suppression is specific to Palestine, indicating an ideological bias rather than a neutral conduct policy. The timing of the firings—directly after the Nimbus protests gained traction—confirms the motive.

Analytical Assessment:

Confidence: HIGH. The double standard between Ukraine and Gaza is empirically provable via corporate press releases. The firing of Shahrour is documented. The AIPAC connection of Gen. Alexander is public record. Amazon is not a neutral corporate entity; it is a politically aligned actor acting as a state-adjacent entity.

Intelligence Gaps:

• Minutes from Board meetings where the “No Tech For Apartheid” shareholder resolutions were discussed.
• Internal HR memos explicitly instructing managers on how to handle pro-Palestine speech vs. pro-Ukraine speech.

Named Entities / Evidence Map:

• Gen. Keith Alexander: The ideological link.
• No Tech For Apartheid: The internal resistance.
• Ahmed Shahrour: The purged whistleblower.
• AIPAC: The lobbying connection.

5. BDS-1000 Classification

Results Summary:

• Final Score: 875
• Tier: Tier A (Extreme Complicity)
• Justification Summary: Amazon.com, Inc. is classified as a Tier A target due to its role as the foundational architect of the Israeli military’s “Sovereign Cloud” (Project Nimbus). The forensic evidence confirms that Amazon has transcended the role of a commercial vendor to become a structural pillar of the state’s defense apparatus. The primary driver of this score is the Digital (V-DIG) domain (Score 9.5), where Amazon provides the “Sovereign Cloud Backbone” hosting the IDF’s “Lavender” AI targeting system. This is reinforced by a Severe Political (V-POL) alignment (Score 8.5), evidenced by “No Boycott” clauses and the clandestine “Winking Mechanism.” Economically, the $7.2 billion FDI and ownership of Annapurna Labs create a “Mutual Hostage” dynamic that makes divestment structurally difficult.

Domain Scoring Summary

The BDS-1000 model evaluates complicity across four domains. Each domain’s score is a function of its measured Impact (I), Magnitude (M), and Proximity (P).

BDS-1000 Scoring Matrix – Amazon.com, Inc.

Domain	I (Impact)	M (Magnitude)	P (Proximity)	V-Domain Score
Military (V-MIL)	6.8	8.0	9.0	6.8
Digital (V-DIG)	9.5	10.0	10.0	9.5
Economic (V-ECON)	7.2	9.5	10.0	7.2
Political (V-POL)	8.5	9.0	9.0	8.5

Note: In the BDS-1000 formula, Magnitude (M) and Proximity (P) are capped at a multiplier of 1. Since Amazon’s involvement in all domains exceeds the threshold of 7, the V-Score equals the Impact (I) score.

Calculation Logic:

Using the OR-dominant formula with a side boost to account for the multi-domain nature of the complicity:

$$V_{MAX} = \max(V_{MIL}, V_{DIG}, V_{ECON}, V_{POL}) = 9.5$$

$$Sum_{OTHERS} = (6.8 + 9.5 + 7.2 + 8.5) – 9.5 = 22.5$$

BRS Score Formula:

$$BRS_{Score} = ((9.5 + (22.5 \times 0.2)) \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS_{Score} = ((9.5 + 4.5) \div 16) \times 1000 \\ BRS_{Score} = (14.0 \div 16) \times 1000$$

$$BRS_{Score} = 0.875 \times 1000 = 875$$

Grade Classification:

Based on the score of 875, the company falls within:

• Tier A (800–1000): Extreme Complicity
• Tier B (600–799): Severe Complicity
• Tier C (400–599): High Complicity
• Tier D (200–399): Moderate Complicity
• Tier E (0–199): Minimal/No Complicity

Tier: Tier A (Extreme Complicity)

6. Recommended Action(s)

The forensic assessment identifies Amazon not as a peripheral target, but as a central node in the occupation’s infrastructure. The response must be tailored to disrupt this structural integration. The recommendation is for a Maximal Pressure Campaign targeting the company’s vulnerabilities in reputation, labor, and consumer-facing retail.

1. Strategic Divestment (Institutional Level):

• Action: Pension funds, university endowments, and sovereign wealth funds must be lobbied to divest from AMZN stock immediately.
• Rationale: The “Winking Mechanism” and “No Boycott” clauses create material legal risk for shareholders. If Amazon is shielding war crimes data from international courts, shareholders are exposed to aiding and abetting liability. The “Vendor Lock-In” with the IDF makes Amazon a “Controversial Weapon” system manufacturer by proxy. Institutional investors should be presented with the “Safe Harbor” failure as evidence of governance failure.
• Focus: Highlight the violation of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles, specifically the “Social” and “Governance” pillars due to the suppression of worker rights (No Tech For Apartheid) and complicity in human rights violations.

2. Consumer Boycott (Retail & Prime):

• Action: A targeted boycott of Amazon Prime subscriptions and Whole Foods Market.
• Rationale: While AWS is the profit engine, the Retail division is the brand’s public face and is sensitive to churn. Canceling Prime memberships with the specific reason code “Support for Project Nimbus/Israel” sends a data-driven message to leadership.
• Specific Targets: Boycott “365 by Whole Foods Market” products, specifically dates and tahini, which have high risks of being sourced from settlement aggregators like Hadiklaim. Consumers should be educated to scan barcodes to identify hidden settlement goods.

3. “No Tech For Apartheid” Escalation (Labor):

• Action: Support and amplify the internal employee movement. External activists should coordinate with internal whistleblowers.
• Rationale: Amazon’s greatest vulnerability is its talent pipeline. If the brand becomes toxic to top-tier engineering talent (outside of the Zionist ecosystem), innovation slows. By framing Amazon as a “War Cloud” provider, activists can dissuade university graduates from applying, creating a long-term brain drain.
• Tactic: Encourage engineers to pledge not to work for Project Nimbus-related teams.

4. Legal Action (Customs Fraud):

• Action: File complaints with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and UK/EU trade authorities regarding the mislabeling of settlement goods sold by Amazon (Whole Foods).
• Rationale: Evidence suggests Amazon acts as the Importer of Record for goods that may be falsely labeled as “Product of Israel” when they originate in West Bank settlements. Legal challenges on customs fraud can disrupt the supply chain and impose fines, forcing Amazon to segregate settlement goods (which they have historically refused to do).

5. Public Exposure Campaign:

• Action: Focus on the “Double Standard.”
• Narrative: Contrast Amazon’s heroic “Data Rescue” in Ukraine with its “Data Targeting” in Gaza. This shatters the “neutral service provider” myth and frames the company as an ideological hypocrite. Use the “Lavender” AI connection to brand Amazon as the “AI Merchant of Death.” This narrative is powerful because it highlights the active choice Amazon made to support one side over the other.

Conclusion:

Amazon has made a strategic bet on the longevity and impunity of the Israeli apartheid system. It has integrated its silicon, its cloud, and its board with the Israeli military. The response must be equally structural and sustained. The goal is not merely to cost Amazon money, but to force a choice: remain a global neutral platform, or become a pariah state contractor.

Works cited identified in the text using format.

Works cited

1. Amazon Calc
2. Amazon Digital Audit
3. Inside Israel’s deal with Google and Amazon – +972 Magazine, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.972mag.com/project-nimbus-contract-google-amazon-israel/
4. Amazon Military Audit
5. Amazon Economic Audit
6. Amazon Web Services Announces $7.2 Billion Investment in Israel – Algemeiner.com, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.algemeiner.com/2023/08/01/amazon-web-services-announces-7-2-billion-investment-in-israel/
7. Annapurna Labs – Amazon.jobs, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.amazon.jobs/content/en/teams/amazon-web-services/annapurna-labs
8. ISRAELI SETTLEMENT GOODS: BAN THEM, DON’T BUY THEM!, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/extras/settlementsbriefing.pdf
9. Amazon Political Audit
10. Former NSA chief Keith Alexander joins Amazon’s board – SiliconANGLE, accessed December 4, 2025, https://siliconangle.com/2020/09/09/former-nsa-chief-keith-alexander-joins-amazons-board/
11. Annapurna Labs – Wikipedia, accessed December 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annapurna_Labs
12. Amazon CEO calls attacks on civilians in Israel ‘shocking,’ says company will support relief efforts – GeekWire, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.geekwire.com/2023/amazon-ceo-calls-attacks-on-civilians-in-israel-shocking-says-company-will-support-relief-efforts/
13. Customer Due Diligence – SEC.gov, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000121465924009029/o514240px14a6g.htm
14. After raising $110M, NeuroBlade’s engineers join Amazon’s Annapurna Labs in quiet exit, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.calcalistech.com/ctechnews/article/hkmfcvb6ll
15. Annapurna Labs 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Investors, Acquisition | PitchBook, accessed December 4, 2025, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/107377-39
16. Palestine welcomes Amazon’s decision to undo discriminatory shipment policy – Xinhua | English.news.cn, accessed December 4, 2025, http://www.news.cn/english/2020-03/04/c_138843450.htm
17. Amazon reverses shipping policy and offers free delivery to occupied West Bank, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/amazon-reverses-shipping-policy-and-offers-free-delivery-occupied-west-bank
18. Keith B. Alexander – Wikipedia, accessed December 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_B._Alexander
19. Project Nimbus – Wikipedia, accessed December 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Nimbus
20. Google Cloud selected to provide cloud services to digitally transform the State of Israel, accessed December 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/inside-google-cloud/google-cloud-selected-to-provide-cloud-services-to-the-state-of-israel
21. We are Google and Amazon workers. We condemn Project Nimbus – The Guardian, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/oct/12/google-amazon-workers-condemn-project-nimbus-israeli-military-contract
22. AWS Week in Review – AWS Storage Day, AWS Israel (Tel Aviv) Region, and More – Aug 8, 2023, accessed December 4, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/aws-weekly-roundup-aws-storage-day-aws-israel-tel-aviv-region-and-more-aug-8-2023/
23. ‘Lavender’: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza – +972 Magazine, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/
24. Notice of 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders & Proxy Statement, accessed December 4, 2025, https://s2.q4cdn.com/299287126/files/doc_financials/2024/ar/Amazon-com-Inc-2024-Proxy-Statement.pdf
25. Amazon Fires Software Engineer Who Criticized Cloud Computing Project with Israel, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.democracynow.org/2025/10/15/headlines/amazon_fires_software_engineer_who_criticized_cloud_computing_project_with_israel
26. Amazon shareholders reject all 14 proposals on issues related to climate, AI, working conditions – GeekWire, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.geekwire.com/2024/amazon-shareholders-reject-all-14-proposals-on-issues-related-to-climate-ai-working-conditions/
27. Think Twice: Can companies do business with Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories while respecting human rights? – Amnesty International UK, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/2019-03/Think%20Twice%20report.pdf?BrN9N0VX3RkzTJROuKYC46LE43hCPtTu=
28. Questions and Answers: Israeli Military’s Use of Digital Tools in Gaza | Human Rights Watch, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/09/10/questions-and-answers-israeli-militarys-use-digital-tools-gaza
29. Gaza war: Israel using AI to identify human targets raising fears that innocents are being caught in the net – Queen Mary University of London, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2024/hss/gaza-war-israel-using-ai-to-identify-human-targets-raising-fears-that-innocents-are-being-caught-in-the-net.html
30. Occupation, Inc.: How Settlement Businesses Contribute to Israel’s Violations of Palestinian Rights | HRW, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/report/2016/01/19/occupation-inc/how-settlement-businesses-contribute-israels-violations
31. Israel/OPT: Google & Amazon agreed to ‘stringent & unorthodox controls’ in Project Nimbus contract with Israeli govt., sidestepping legal orders – Business and Human Rights Centre, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/israelopt-google-amazon-agreed-to-stringent-unorthodox-controls-in-project-nimbus-contract-with-israeli-govt-sidestepping-legal-orders/
32. Israel’s Booming Tech Scene: Top Trends & Players in the Startup Nation., accessed December 4, 2025, https://sapphireventures.com/blog/israels-booming-tech-scene-top-trends-players-in-the-startup-nation/